Chlamydia trachomatis: time for screening?

Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection is the leading cause of bacterial sexually transmitted disease in industrialised countries, particularly among young people. The consequences of chlamydial infection may involve urethritis, cervicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, tubal factor infertility, epididymitis and prostatitis. In addition, chlamydial infection increases the risk of acquisition of human immunodeficiency virus and has been associated with cervical cancer. Although screening programmes exist in a number of countries, the continuously increasing prevalence of chlamydial infections demonstrates the necessity for health authorities to establish effective screening policies, and the importance of defining a comprehensive European screening policy is emerging.

SESy-Europe: a multi-language database dedicated to cancer screening monitoring.

Cancer is the second cause of death in developed countries. Many efforts to educate the public to more tumor free life-style and screening practice have been therefore adopted. Considering the high costs of diagnostic procedures and educational programs a cancer prevention/screening practice monitoring system is required to reduce costs, to assist health making policy decisions, and to tailor more targeted interventions whenever indicated. We, therefore, realized a computerized data-base able to assist medical personnel in health intervention monitoring and making policy at community level with a focus on the European region. An international medical board provided the translation of medical-related contents in English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Rumanian, Spanish and Turkish. The electronic system recognizes and finds relationships between screening events or secondary prevention tests and various causes of medical examinations (symptoms, diseases, professions, presence and type of health insurance, sex, age, medical history, family history, educational level, knowledge about cancer screening and prevention, patient location, type of community, region of provenance, etc). Due to its multi-language standardized characteristics its application may bridge European countries in cancer screening monitoring policy.

Adenosine triphosphate production by peripheral blood CD4⁺T cells in clinically stable renal transplant recipients.

Previous studies have shown that intracellular adenosine triphosphate (iATP) in activated CD4 T cells in vitro may identify patients at risk of infection or rejection post-transplantation. In this study, we evaluated whether this test could identify the level of risk in 656 renal transplant recipients (RTRs) with good and stable graft function. Therefore, 1095 blood samples from RTRs and 200 from healthy blood donors (normal controls [NCs]) were collected in 2 years and analyzed using the Cylex(®) ImmuKnow™ assay (Cylex, Inc., Columbia, MD, USA). The classification of T cell responses into strong, moderate, and low revealed significant differences between patients and NCs in low and strong responses (P < .001 and P = .021, respectively). The majority of patient samples exhibited moderate immune response (72.2%) in comparison with NC (75%). One hundred twenty-eight patients had fluctuated T cell responses between the three response zones. All patients were clinically stable for at least 1 month after the test. T cell response was increased after time post-transplantation (P < .001) and was found higher in protocols using azathioprine versus other immunosuppression (P < .001) and cyclosporine instead of tacrolimus (P = .012). According to the results of this study, we are not able to support this assay as an immune monitoring test post-transplantation in clinically stable RTRs. In contrast, measuring of iATP in CD4 T cells is a valuable tool for estimating T cell activation capacity. Because T cell activation is mainly affected by immunosuppression, this test may give information regarding the strength of different immunosuppressive protocols or the strength of immunosuppression as it is associated with longer follow-up periods.

Tumour marker prescriptions for cancer screening in the Hellenic primary care.

Tumour markers are neither sensitive nor specific enough for cancer screening. Despite established guidelines, tumour marker 'screening myth' may be alive among physicians, but no study has analysed the phenomenon. This study aims to investigate tumour marker recommendation for screening purposes in primary care setting. A total of 209 Hellenic physicians were surveyed for screening activities by a multiple-choice questionnaire. Data were abstracted for the following tumour marker recommendations: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA); cancer antigens 19.9, 125 and 15.3; alpha-fetoprotein and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-HCG). A high rate of physicians advocate that tumour markers in cancer screening (range from 24% for beta-HCG to 46% for CEA). This phenomenon is not related to age, sex, type and level of physicians' specialization. In conclusion, many physicians recommend tumour markers for screening purposes. This may be harmful, since their prescriptions unnecessarily burden health economics, and further evaluation of false-positive findings might be associated with increased costs and risk from additional diagnostic/therapeutic interventions.