A rare cause of stroke: fail-implanted venous port catheter system - a case report.

BACKGROUND: We present the case of a 75-year-old female with acute embolic cerebral infarction caused by a fail-implanted venous port catheter system in the left subclavian artery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 75-year-old woman presented to our emergency room after acute onset of a right-sided hemiparesis and dysarthria. Within 2 days after admission, she developed a left-sided hemiparesis, ataxia with concordant gait disturbance and incoordination of the left upper limb. DWI-MRI showed acute multiple infarcts in both cerebral and cerebellar hemispheres. Laboratory examination, 24-h Holter electrocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography provided no pathological findings. Further examination revealed an arterially fail-implanted port catheter, placed in the left subclavian artery with its tip overlying the ascending aorta, as the source of cerebral embolism. CONCLUSION: This is the first case report of thromboembolic, cerebral infarction due to a misplaced venous port catheter in the subclavian artery, emphasizing the imperative need for a thorough diagnostic workup, when embolism is suspected but cannot be proven at first glance.

Neuromuscular sonography detects changes in muscle echotexture and nerve diameter in ICU patients within 24 h.

PURPOSE: During an ICU stay, changes in muscles and nerves occur that is accessible via neuromuscular sonography. METHODS: 17 patients recruited from the neurological and neurosurgical ICU (six women; 66 ± 3 years) and 7 healthy controls (three women, 75 ± 3 years) were included. Muscle sonography (rectus abdominis, biceps, rectus femoris and tibialis anterior muscles) using gray-scale values (GSVs), and nerve ultrasound (peroneal, tibial and sural nerves) analyzing the cross-sectional area (CSA) were performed on days 1 (t1), 3 (t2), 5 (t3), 8 (t4), and 16 (t5) after admission. RESULTS: Time course analysis revealed that GSVs were significantly higher within the patient group for all of the investigated muscles (rectus abdominis: F = 7.536; p = 0.011; biceps: F = 14.761; p = 0.001; rectus femoris: F = 9.455; p = 0.005; tibialis anterior: F = 7.282; p = 0.012). The higher GSVs were already visible at t1 or, at the latest, at t2 (tibialis anterior muscles). CSA was enlarged in all of the investigated nerves in the patient group (peroneal nerve: F = 7.129; p = 0.014; tibial nerve: F = 28.976, p < 0.001; sural nerve: F = 13.051; p = 0.001). The changes were visible very early (tibial nerve: t1; peroneal nerve: t2). The CSA of the motor nerves showed an association with the ventilation time and days within the ICU (t1 through t4; p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: We detected very early changes in the muscles and nerves of ICU-patients. Nerve CSA might be a useful parameter to identify patients who are at risk for difficult weaning. Therefore our observations might be severity signs of neuromuscular suffering for the most severe patients.

Excellent interrater agreement for the differentiation of fasciculations and artefacts - a dynamic myosonography study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to confirm the diagnostic performance of dynamic myosonography with regard to its reliability to correctly identify fasciculations and to distinguish them from artefacts. Furthermore, interrater agreement regarding the identification of different muscle movements was investigated. METHODS: A total of 11 observers analysed 25 muscle ultrasound videos acquired using a standardized protocol. The video files illustrated fasciculations and artefacts (voluntary probe movements, voluntary contractions or swallowing and pulsating vessels) in different muscle groups. RESULTS: Fasciculations could be distinguished from artefacts with a sensitivity of 90.9% and specificity of 98.5%. Interrater agreement regarding the presence or absence of fasciculations showed an overall median of 100% (interquartile range, IQR: 96-100%). In every investigated muscle group, the median of the interpreter agreement was found to be 100% (correct ratings of all observers: submental muscles: 43 of 44; biceps muscles: 22 of 22; forearm flexors: 31 of 33; rectus abdominis muscles: 33 of 33; quadriceps muscles: 19 of 22; tibialis anterior muscles: 51 of 55; undefinable muscles: 65 of 66). CONCLUSION: Dynamic myosonography is an extremely reliable tool with excellent interrater agreement to correctly identify fasciculations and to distinguish them from artefacts. SIGNIFICANCE: Myosonography should be further incorporated in clinical routine diagnostic work-up.