Oxygenation Instability Assessed by Oxygen Saturation Histograms during Supine vs Prone Position in Very Low Birthweight Infants Receiving Noninvasive Respiratory Support.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of prone vs supine position on the oxygenation instability among very low birth weight (VLBW) infants receiving noninvasive respiratory support, as assessed by the average oxygen saturation (SpO2) histograms. STUDY DESIGN: Sixty-nine histograms from 23 VLBW infants were studied prospectively. Each infant was studied during 3 consecutive 3-hour periods of alternating positions; 12 infants started the study while prone and 11 infants started supine, by random order. Histogram classification system was used to quantify oxygenation stability and time spent in different SpO2 ranges. RESULTS: The fraction of inspired oxygen values were similar in both positions. Unstable histograms were more common in supine vs prone position (20/34 [59%] vs 10/35 [29%]; P = .02, respectively). Analyzing oxygenation stability as per position change revealed that a change from prone to supine increased oxygenation instability, and supine to prone decreased instability (P = .02). In the supine vs prone position, percent of time spent in SpO2 ≤80% and <90% was higher (5.0 ± 4.2 vs 2.4 ± 3.4 [P < .001] and 24.1 ± 13.7 vs 13.2 ± 10.0 [P < .001], respectively), and percent of time in SpO2 >94% was lower (39.7 ± 26.0 vs 52.4 ± 23.4 [P = .04]). CONCLUSIONS: Prone positioning decreased oxygenation instability and resulted in higher oxygenation among VLBW premature infants on noninvasive respiratory support. SpO2 histograms allow easy bedside assessment of oxygenation instability, and quantification of the time spent at different SpO2 ranges.

Compliance and satisfaction with BRCA surveillance in specialized clinics versus community follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To assess adherence to medical follow-up protocols among BRCA1/2 carriers and compare outcomes between dedicated carrier clinics and community healthcare settings. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted by distributing an anonymous questionnaire within the 'Good BRCA Genes - Support and Information Group for BRCA Carriers' association. The questionnaire assessed adherence to recommended surveillance and satisfaction with various aspects of the follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 682 BRCA carriers surveyed, 68.5% reported fully adhering to recommended medical follow-up. Those not fully adhering cited bureaucracy challenges, scheduling difficulties, timing uncertainties, and difficulty remembering examination dates. Less than 50% were satisfied with appointment availability, scheduling, contact persons, and general practitioners' knowledge of BRCA carrier risks and follow-up. The 417 women monitored in dedicated breast clinics reported notably higher optimal adherence to recommended surveillance (78.3 vs. 53.6%, P < 0.0001). In addition, they noted greater satisfaction with appointment availability (63.7 vs. 25.0%, P < 0.0001), appointment scheduling process (58.1 vs. 24.7%, P < 0.0001), availability of breast surgeons/gynecology specialists (67.4 vs. 50.8%, P < 0.0001), and availability of a contact person for consultations between appointments (53.5 vs. 20.8%, P < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Our findings highlight the advantages of surveillance in dedicated BRCA1/2 clinics, including closer monitoring and increased satisfaction. Given the limited availability of such clinics and the growing number of BRCA1/2 carriers, the opening of additional dedicated clinics and the consideration of alternative surveillance-enhancing solutions, such as training healthcare professionals, using digital tools, and employing artificial intelligence, are essential.