Optimal timing of delivery in small for gestational age fetuses near term: a national cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to study the competing risks of antepartum versus intrapartum/neonatal death in small for gestational age (SGA) and non-SGA fetuses. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a national cohort study using all singletons delivered between 36 and 42(6/7) weeks without hypertension, preeclampsia, diabetes, congenital anomalies, or noncephalic presentation from the Netherlands Perinatal Registry (1999-2007). The resultant cohort was divided in three groups based on birth weight by gestational age (SGA < P5 group, 61,021 deliveries; SGA P5-10 group, 58,902 deliveries; non-SGA group 1,168,523 deliveries). We compared the mortality risk of delivery with expectant management. RESULTS: Delivery was associated with more mortality than expectant management for 1 week from 39 weeks onward in the non-SGA group (relative risk [RR], 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.50). For the SGA < P5, expectant management for 1 more week was associated with more mortality from 38 weeks onward although this only reached statistical significance from 40 weeks onward (RR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.80-3.36). CONCLUSION: At 36 and 37 weeks, delivery is associated with a higher risk of mortality in SGA < P5 fetuses than expectant management. Delivery of SGA < P5 fetuses at 38 and 39 weeks is associated with the best perinatal outcome whereas for non-SGA fetuses this is at 39 to 40 weeks.

Impact of introduction of mid-trimester scan on pregnancy outcome of open spina bifida in The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of introduction of the mid-trimester scan on pregnancy outcome in cases of open spina bifida in two regions of The Netherlands. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 190 cases of open spina bifida diagnosed pre- or postnatally, with an estimated date of delivery between 2003 and 2011. RESULTS: With implementation of the mid-trimester scan the percentage of cases of open spina bifida detected before the 24(th) week of pregnancy increased from 43% to 88%. The rise in prenatal detection rate was associated with a significant increase in the number of terminated pregnancies and a decrease in the rate of perinatal loss; the percentage of children born alive did not change significantly. In the subgroup that underwent a scan between 18 and 24 weeks of pregnancy, cranial signs were present in 94.4% of cases. CONCLUSION: Introduction of the mid-trimester scan has led to an increase in early identification of pregnancies complicated by open spina bifida. Pregnancies previously destined to end in perinatal loss are now terminated whilst pregnancies with a relatively good prognosis are frequently continued; the number of children with open spina bifida who are born alive has not changed significantly. Our study confirms that prenatal diagnosis is usually triggered by visualization of a lemon-shaped skull or a banana-shaped cerebellum.

Relationship of isolated single umbilical artery to fetal growth, aneuploidy and perinatal mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To review the available literature on outcome of pregnancy when an isolated single umbilical artery (iSUA) is diagnosed at the time of the mid-trimester anomaly scan. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (1948-2012), EMBASE (1980-2012) and the Cochrane Library (until 2012) for relevant citations reporting on outcome of pregnancy with iSUA seen on ultrasound. Data were extracted by two reviewers. Where appropriate, we pooled odds ratios (ORs) for the dichotomous outcome measures: small for gestational age (SGA), perinatal mortality and aneuploidy. For birth weight we determined the mean difference with 95% CI. RESULTS: We identified three cohort studies and four case-control studies reporting on 928 pregnancies with iSUA. There was significant heterogeneity between cohort and case-control studies. Compared to fetuses with a three-vessel cord, fetuses with an iSUA were more likely to be SGA (OR 1.6 (95% CI, 0.97-2.6); n = 489) or suffer perinatal mortality (OR 2.0 (95% CI, 0.9-4.2); n = 686), although for neither of the outcomes was statistical significance reached. The difference in mean birth weight was 51 g (95% CI, -154.7 to 52.6 g): n = 407), but again this difference was not statistically significant. We found no evidence that fetuses with iSUA have an increased risk for aneuploidy. CONCLUSION: In view of the non-significant association between iSUA and fetal growth and perinatal mortality, and in view of the heterogeneity in studies on aneuploidy, we feel that large-scale, prospective cohort studies are needed to reach definitive conclusions on the appropriate work-up in iSUA pregnancies. At present, targeted growth assessment after diagnosis of iSUA should not be routine practice.