Socioeconomic Status is Globally a Prognostic Factor for Overall Survival of Multiple Myeloma Patients: Synthesis of Studies and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic status (SES) is reflecting differences in sociodemographic factors affecting cancer survivorship. Deprived, low SES populations have a higher prevalence of multiple myeloma and worst survival, a condition which widens over time. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of 16 studies (registries and cohorts) reporting myeloma patients' survival data according to SES. Ten studies reported Hazzard Ratio (H.R.) (95 % CI), and 16 studies reported p values. We combined the H.R. from 10 studies, and by using the Mosteller-Bush formula, we performed a synthesis of p values according to the area of the globe. RESULTS: Combination of H.R. from 10 studies including 85198 myeloma patients weighted to sample size of each study and adopting the hypothesis of random effect returned a combined H.R.: 1,26 (1,13-1,31) in favor of high SES patients.USA: Synthesis of p values coming from 6 studies (n=89807 pts) by using the Mosteller and Bush formula extracted a p-value of <0.0001 favoring high SES patients.Oceania: Synthesis of p values in two cohorts from Australia and New Zealand (n= 10196 pts) returned a p-value of 0,022 favoring high SES patients.Europe: The synthesis of p values from the U.K. and Greece studies (n=18533 pts) returned a p-value of <0,0001 favoring high SES patients.Asia: Synthesis of 2 studies from Asia (n=915 pts) returned a p-value of <0,0001 favoring high SES patients. CONCLUSIONS: Across the globe and widening over decades, the socioeconomic status remains a gap for equality in myeloma care.

Socioeconomic Status Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Overall Survival in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: Real-World Data From a Cohort of 223 Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Socioeconomic status (SES) has been shown to be a prognostic factor for overall survival in a variety of hematologic malignancies, especially for patients who require continuous care such as those with multiple myeloma (MM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from 223 patients with symptomatic MM diagnosed and treated in our department from January 2005 to December 2019. The modified Kuppuswamy scale, slightly modified, was used for the SES assessment. The Kaplan-Meier estimator of survival and Cox regression analysis were used. RESULTS: In our cohort of 223 patients with MM, low SES was an independent poor prognostic factor for overall survival (OS), in addition to higher International Staging System stage and high-risk cytogenetics (hazard ratio for low SES on Cox regression analysis, 2.092; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-3.2; log-rank P = .000). Patients with low SES had inferior survival compared with the whole patient cohort (median OS: low SES, 28 months; 95% CI, 18-37.9; high SES, 68 months; 95% CI, 55.6-80.4; log-rank P = .000). The low SES effect on OS was more evident for the elderly patients who were not transplant eligible and in those with a diagnosis of MM International Staging System stage I. The effect of low SES on OS was attenuated by time, and ethnic origin had no effect on OS. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study have shown that low SES is an independent poor prognostic factor for survival of patients with MM.

Risk factors for cardiovascular disease mortality in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: A nationwide, registry-based cohort study.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) emerges as a major cause of death in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), but predictors of fatal CVD and the effect of MDS-specific treatments on CVD mortality remain largely unknown. In an analysis involving 831 patients with MDS with known causes of death, we noted an independent association of lower risk MDS, age >70 years, pre-existing CVD, and treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents with a higher risk of death from CVD. If externally validated, these simple risk factors could increase clinicians' awareness toward CVD complications and guide early introduction of intensive monitoring and preventive interventions in MDS patients.