Analysis of partial volume correction on quantification and regional heterogeneity in cardiac PET.

BACKGROUND: The partial volume correction (PVC) of cardiac PET datasets using anatomical side information during reconstruction is appealing but not straightforward. Other techniques, which do not make use of additional anatomical information, could be equally effective in improving the reconstructed myocardial activity. METHODS: Resolution modeling in combination with different noise suppressing priors was evaluated as a means to perform PVC. Anatomical priors based on a high-resolution CT are compared to non-anatomical, edge-preserving priors (relative difference and total variation prior). The study is conducted on ex vivo datasets from ovine hearts. A simulation study additionally clarifies the relationship between prior effectiveness and myocardial wall thickness. RESULTS: Simple resolution modeling during data reconstruction resulted in over- and underestimation of activity, which hampers the absolute left ventricular quantification when compared to the ground truth. Both the edge-preserving and the anatomy-based PVC techniques improve the absolute quantification, with comparable results (Student t-test, P = .17). The relative tracer distribution was preserved with any reconstruction technique (repeated ANOVA, P = .98). CONCLUSIONS: The use of edge-preserving priors emerged as optimal choice for quantification of tracer uptake in the left ventricular wall of the available datasets. Anatomical priors visually outperformed edge-preserving priors when the thinnest structures were of interest.

Partial volume and motion correction in cardiac PET: First results from an in vs ex vivo comparison using animal datasets.

BACKGROUND: In a previous study on ex vivo, static cardiac datasets, we investigated the benefits of performing partial volume correction (PVC) in cardiac 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose(FDG) PET datasets. In the present study, we extend the analysis to in vivo cardiac datasets, with the aim of defining which reconstruction technique maximizes quantitative accuracy and, ultimately, makes PET a better diagnostic tool for cardiac pathologies. METHODS: In vivo sheep datasets were acquired and reconstructed with/without motion correction and using several reconstruction algorithms (with/without resolution modeling, with/without non-anatomical priors). Corresponding ex vivo scans of the excised sheep hearts were performed on a small-animal PET scanner (Siemens Focus 220, microPET) to provide high-resolution reference data unaffected by respiratory and cardiac motion. A comparison between the in vivo cardiac reconstructions and the corresponding ex vivo ground truth was performed. RESULTS: The use of an edge-preserving prior (Total Variation (TV) prior in this work) in combination with motion correction reduces the bias in absolute quantification when compared to the standard clinical reconstructions (- 0.83 vs - 3.74 SUV units), when the end-systolic gate is considered. At end-diastole, motion correction improves absolute quantification but the PVC with priors does not improve the similarity to the ground truth more than a regular iterative reconstruction with motion correction and without priors. Relative quantification was not influenced much by the chosen reconstruction algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: The relative ranking of the algorithms suggests superiority of the PVC reconstructions with dual gating in terms of overall absolute quantification and noise properties. A well-tuned edge-preserving prior, such as TV, enhances the noise properties of the resulting images of the heart. The end-systolic gate yields the most accurate quantification of cardiac datasets.

Voxel-based comparison of state-of-the-art reconstruction algorithms for 18F-FDG PET brain imaging using simulated and clinical data.

UNLABELLED: The resolution of a PET scanner (2.5-4.5mm for brain imaging) is similar to the thickness of the cortex in the (human) brain (2.5mm on average), hampering accurate activity distribution reconstruction. Many techniques to compensate for the limited resolution during or post-reconstruction have been proposed in the past and have been shown to improve the quantitative accuracy. In this study, state-of-the-art reconstruction techniques are compared on a voxel-basis for quantification accuracy and group analysis using both simulated and measured data of healthy volunteers and patients with epilepsy. METHODS: Maximum a posteriori (MAP) reconstructions using either a segmentation-based or a segmentation-less anatomical prior were compared to maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) reconstruction with resolution recovery. As anatomical information, a spatially aligned 3D T1-weighted magnetic resonance image was used. Firstly, the algorithms were compared using normal brain images to detect systematic bias with respect to the true activity distribution, as well as systematic differences between two methods. Secondly, it was verified whether the algorithms yielded similar results in a group comparison study. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between the reconstructed and the true activity, with the largest errors when using (post-smoothed) MLEM. Only 5-10% underestimation in cortical gray matter voxel activity was found for both MAP reconstructions. Higher errors were observed at GM edges. MAP with the segmentation-based prior also resulted in a significant bias in the subcortical regions due to segmentation inaccuracies, while MAP with the anatomical prior which does not need segmentation did not. Significant differences in reconstructed activity were also found between the algorithms at similar locations (mainly in gray matter edge voxels and in cerebrospinal fluid voxels) in the simulated as well as in the clinical data sets. Nevertheless, when comparing two groups, very similar regions of significant hypometabolism were detected by all algorithms. CONCLUSION: Including anatomical a priori information during reconstruction in combination with resolution modeling yielded accurate gray matter activity estimates, and a significant improvement in quantification accuracy was found when compared to post-smoothed MLEM reconstruction with resolution modeling. AsymBowsher provided the most accurate subcortical GM activity estimates. It is also reassuring that the differences found between the algorithms did not hamper the detection of hypometabolic regions in the gray matter when performing a voxel-based group comparison. Nevertheless, the size of the detected clusters differed. More elaborated and application-specific studies are required to decide which algorithm is best for a group analysis.

Single and multipinhole collimator design evaluation method for small animal SPECT.

High-resolution functional imaging of small animals is often obtained by single pinhole SPECT with circular orbit acquisition. Multipinhole SPECT adds information due to its improved sampling, and can improve the trade-off between resolution and sensitivity. To evaluate different pinhole collimator designs an efficient method is needed that quantifies the reconstruction image quality. In this paper, we propose a fast, approximate method that examines the quality of individual voxels of a postsmoothed maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) reconstruction by studying their linearized local impulse response (LLIR) and (co)variance for a predefined target resolution. For validation, the contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) in some voxels of a homogeneous sphere and of a realistic rat brain software phantom were calculated for many single and multipinhole designs. A good agreement was observed between the CNRs obtained with the approximate method and those obtained with postsmoothed MLEM reconstructions of simulated noisy projections. This good agreement was quantified by a least squares fit through these results, which yielded a line with slope 1.02 (1.00 expected) and a y-intercept close to zero (0 expected). 95.4% of the validation points lie within three standard deviations from that line. Using the approximate method, the influence on the CNR of varying a parameter in realistic single and multipinhole designs was examined. The investigated parameters were the aperture diameter, the distance between the apertures and the axis-of-rotation, the focal distance, the acceptance angle, the position of the apertures, the focusing distance, and the number of pinholes. The results can generally be explained by the change in sensitivity, the amount of postsmoothing, and the amount of overlap in the projections. The method was applied to multipinhole designs with apertures focusing at a single point, but is also applicable to other designs.