Microarray Analysis Confirms ImmunoCAP-Fluorescence Enzyme Immunoassay Results on Specific IgE in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis and Suspected Birch Pollen-Related Food Allergy.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies demonstrated that birch pollen-related foods can cause late eczematous responses in birch pollen-sensitized patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). However, suitable markers to predict birch pollen-related food allergy in patients with AD are still lacking. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the correlation of the results from ImmunoCAP® fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (FEIA) singleplex and ImmunoCAP® immuno solid-phase allergen chip (ISAC) multiplex system in AD patients and investigated the diagnostic validity of allergen microarray analysis, measuring specific IgE (sIgE) with ImmunoCAP® ISAC to predict birch pollen-related food allergy in patients with AD. METHODS: A total of 19 children and adults with AD, existing IgE-mediated birch pollen sensitization, and suspected birch pollen-related food allergy underwent a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) in the clinical routine. Total and sIgE levels to birch pollen, Bet v 1, Bet v 2, and birch pollen-related foods (apple, carrot, celery, and hazelnut) were determined prior to the DBPCFC by ImmunoCAP®-FEIA. Additionally, allergen microarray ImmunoCAP® ISAC analysis was performed. Data were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Twelve out of 19 patients (63% responders) experienced an allergic reaction upon DBPCFC. Overall, 7 patients (37%) developed a significant deterioration of AD with a median increase of 12.4 points in the scoring of atopic dermatitis (SCORAD) index (range 10.0-15.7). Oral allergy syndrome was the predominant immediate-type symptom (n = 11/12 responders). There were no differences in sensitization frequencies regarding allergens of the pathogenesis-related protein family 10 between responders and non-responders. In all patients, correlation of IgE levels determined with ImmunoCAP® ISAC and ImmunoCAP®-FEIA, respectively, was significant with high correlation coefficients regarding birch pollen allergen extract, rBet v 1, and rBet v 2 (rs > 0.8, p < 0.001) and lower but also significant correlation coefficients regarding food allergens (rs < 0.8, p < 0.05-<0.001). CONCLUSION: ImmunoCAP® ISAC microarray allows displaying a differentiated sensitization profile in birch pollen-sensitized patients with AD. However, IgE-mediated sensitization against birch pollen-related allergens revealed by the allergen multiplex system does not predict late eczematous reactions upon DBPCFC with birch pollen-related foods.

Effects of structured patient education in adults with atopic dermatitis: Multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic relapsing skin disease prevalent in 1% to 3% of adults in Western industrialized countries. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the effectiveness of educational training in an outpatient setting on coping with the disease, quality of life, symptoms, and severity in adults with AD. METHODS: In this German prospective, randomized controlled multicenter study, adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD were educated by referring to a comprehensive 12-hour training manual consented by a multiprofessional study group from different centers (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Neurodermitisschulung für Erwachsene [ARNE]). Patients were randomly allocated to the intervention or waiting control groups. Study visits were performed at baseline and after 1 year (1 year of follow-up). Primary outcomes were defined as a decrease in (1) "catastrophizing cognitions" with respect to itching (Juckreiz-Kognitions-Fragebogen questionnaire), (2) "social anxiety" (Marburger Hautfragebogen questionnaire), (3) subjective burden by symptoms of the disease (Skindex-29 questionnaire), and (4) improvement of disease signs and symptoms assessed by using the SCORAD index at 1 year of follow-up. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: At 1 year of follow-up, patients from the intervention group (n = 168) showed a significantly better improvement compared with the waiting group (n = 147) in the following defined primary study outcomes: coping behavior with respect to itching (P < .001), quality of life assessed by using the Skindex-29 questionnaire (P < .001), and the SCORAD index (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first randomized, controlled multicenter study on patient education in adult AD. The ARNE training program shows significant beneficial effects on a variety of psychosocial parameters, as well as AD severity.

[Food Allergy and Intolerance : Distinction, Definitions and Delimitation]. / Nahrungsmittelallergien und andere -unverträglichkeiten : Bedeutung, Begriffe und Begrenzung.

Immunologically mediated hypersensitivity to foods is defined as food allergy, mainly due to immunglobulins of class E (IgE) triggering immediate reactions (type I hypersensitivity) with possible involvement of mucosa, skin, airways, intestinal tract, and the vascular system. Primary food allergy is based on (early) IgE sensitization against animal (e. g., cow's milk, hen's eggs) or plant proteins (e. g. peanut, hazelnut or wheat). In the case of secondary food allergies, IgE against pollen proteins (e. g., birch) reacts to structurally related food proteins (with cross-reactions to stone and pit fruits). Non-immunological food intolerance reactions are mostly based on carbohydrate malassimilation (e. g., lactose intolerance, fructose malabsorption) and are rarely due to pseudo-allergies (e. g., flavors, dyes, preservatives) primarily in patients with chronic urticaria. Common intestinal symptoms are mainly due to functional disorders (e. g., irritable bowel disease), rarely because of inflammatory intestinal diseases (e. g., celiac disease). Histamine intolerance, gluten hypersensitivity, and so-called food type III hypersensitivities are controversial diagnoses. The aforementioned disease entities/models are of variable importance for the affected individuals, the public health system, and society in general.

Non-celiac gluten/wheat sensitivity (NCGS)-a currently undefined disorder without validated diagnostic criteria and of unknown prevalence: Position statement of the task force on food allergy of the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI).

Within the last decade, non-celiac gluten/wheat sensitivity (NCGS) has been increasingly discussed not only in the media but also among medical specialties. The existence and the possible triggers of NCGS are controversial. Three international expert meetings which proposed recommendations for NCGS were not independently organized and only partially transparent regarding potential conflicts of interest of the participants. The present position statement reflects the following aspects about NCGS from an allergist's and nutritionist's point of view: (A) Validated diagnostic criteria and/or reliable biomarkers are still required. Currently, this condition is frequently self-diagnosed, of unknown prevalence and non-validated etiology. (B) Gluten has not been reliably identified as an elicitor of NCGS because of high nocebo and placebo effects. Double-blind, placebo-controlled provocation tests are of limited value for the diagnosis of NCGS and should be performed in a modified manner (changed relation of placebo and active substance). (C) Several confounders hamper the assessment of subjective symptoms during gluten-reduced or gluten-free diets. Depending on the selection of food items, e.g., an increased vegetable intake with soluble fibers, diets may induce physiological digestive effects and can modify gastrointestinal transit times independent from the avoidance of gluten. (D) A gluten-free diet is mandatory in celiac disease based on scientific evidence. However, a medically unjustified avoidance of gluten may bear potential disadvantages and risks. (E) Due to a lack of diagnostic criteria, a thorough differential diagnostic work-up is recommended when NCGS is suspected. This includes a careful patient history together with a food-intake and symptom diary, if necessary an allergy diagnostic workup and a reliable exclusion of celiac disease. We recommend such a structured procedure since a medically proven diagnosis is required before considering the avoidance of gluten.