RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In Africa, the delivery of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) at public healthcare clinics is challenged by understaffing, overcrowding, and HIV-associated stigma, often resulting in low PrEP uptake and continuation among clients. Giving clients the option to refill PrEP at nearby private pharmacies, which are often more convenient and have shorter wait times, may address these challenges and improve PrEP continuation. METHODS: This mixed methods study used an explanatory sequential design. At two public clinics in Kiambu County, Kenya, clients ≥ 18 years initiating PrEP were given the option to refill PrEP at the clinic where they initiated for free or at one of three nearby private pharmacies for 300 Kenyan Shillings (~ $3 US Dollars). The providers at these pharmacies (pharmacists and pharmaceutical technologists) were trained in PrEP service delivery using a prescribing checklist and provider-assisted HIV self-testing, both with remote clinician oversight. Clients were followed up to seven months, with scheduled refill visits at one, four, and seven months. The primary outcomes were selection of pharmacy-based PrEP refills and PrEP continuation. Following pilot completion, 15 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with clients who refilled PrEP were completed. We used descriptive statistics and thematic analysis to assess study outcomes. RESULTS: From November 2020 to November 2021, 125 PrEP clients were screened and 106 enrolled. The majority (59%, 63/106) of clients were women and the median age was 31 years (IQR 26-38 years). Over 292 client-months of follow-up, 41 clients (39%) refilled PrEP; only three (3%) at a participating pharmacy. All clients who completed IDIs refilled PrEP at clinics. The reasons why clients did not refill PrEP at pharmacies included: a preference for clinic-delivered PrEP services (i.e., pre-existing relationships, access to other services), concerns about pharmacy-delivered PrEP services (i.e., mistrust, lower quality care, costs), and lack of knowledge of this refill location. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that clients who initiate PrEP at public clinics in Kenya may have already overcome barriers to clinic-delivered PrEP services and prefer PrEP access there. To reach new populations that could benefit from PrEP, a stand-alone model of pharmacy-delivered PrEP services may be needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04558554 [registered: June 5, 2020].
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Farmacias , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición , Humanos , Kenia , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Masculino , Femenino , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición/métodos , Adulto , Farmacias/estadística & datos numéricos , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
As countries scale up pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention, diverse PrEP delivery models are needed to expand access to populations at HIV risk that are unwilling or unable to access clinic-based PrEP care. To identify factors that may influence implementation of retail pharmacy-based PrEP delivery in Kenya, we conducted in-depth interviews with 40 pharmacy clients, 16 pharmacy providers, 16 PrEP clients, and 10 PrEP providers from two provinces. Most participants expressed strong support for expanding PrEP to retail pharmacies, though conditioned their acceptance on assurances that care would be private, respectful, safe, and affordable. Participant-reported determinants of feasibility centered primarily on ensuring that the intervention is compatible with retail pharmacy operations (e.g., staffing levels, documentation requirements). Future research is needed to develop and test tailored packages of implementation strategies that are most effective at integrating PrEP delivery into routine pharmacy practice in Kenya and other high HIV prevalence settings.
RESUMEN: Ya que varios países están ampliando sus programas de profilaxis previa a la exposición al VIH (PrEP, por sus siglas en inglés), se necesitan modelos diversos para ampliar el acceso a poblaciones que no están dispuestos a acceder, o que no pueden acceder, a los servicios de PrEP que se ofrecen en las instalaciones de salud. Para identificar los factores que pueden influir en la prestación de servicios de PrEP a través de farmacias privadas, realizamos entrevistas en profundidad con 40 clientes de farmacia, 16 proveedores de servicios de farmacia, 16 usuarios de PrEP, y 10 proveedores de PrEP. La mayoría de los participantes manifestó su firme apoyo a la propuesta de expandir la provisión de PrEP a las farmacias privadas, aunque condicionó su aceptación a la garantía de que la atención sea privada, respetuosa, segura, y asequible. Según los participantes, los factores determinantes de la viabilidad de ofrecer PrEP en las farmacias privadas se centran en asegurar de que la intervención sea compatible con las operaciones de las farmacias privadas (p. ej., el número de personal, los requisitos de documentación). Se necesitan investigaciones adicionales para desarrollar y evaluar diferentes paquetes de estrategias de implementación para descubrir cuáles son los más eficaces para integrar los servicios de PrEP en la prestación rutinaria de servicios de farmacia tanto en Kenia como en otros lugares de alta prevalencia del VIH.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH , Infecciones por VIH , Farmacias , Farmacia , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Factibilidad , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Humanos , KeniaRESUMEN
HIV self-testing (HIVST) has the potential to reduce barriers associated with clinic-based preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) delivery. We conducted a substudy nested in a prospective, pilot implementation study evaluating patient-centered differentiated care services. Clients chose either a blood-based or oral fluid HIVST kit at the first refill visit. Data were abstracted from program files and surveys were administered to clients. We purposively sampled a subset of PrEP clients and their providers to participate in in-depth interviews. We surveyed (n = 285). A majority (269/285, 94%) reported HIV risk. Blood-based HIVST was perceived as easy to use (76/140, 54%), and (41/140, 29%) perceived it to be more accurate. Oral fluid-based HIVST was perceived to be easy to use (95/107, 89%), but almost all (106/107, 99%) perceived it as less accurate. HIVST improved privacy, reduced workload, and saved time. HIVST demonstrates the potential to streamline facility-based PrEP care in busy African public health facilities.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición , Autoevaluación , Humanos , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Kenia/epidemiología , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición/métodos , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Prueba de VIH/métodos , Prueba de VIH/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Pública/métodos , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Anti-VIH/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In 2020, healthcare providers were expected to provide care to individuals with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), putting them at risk of acquiring COVID-19. The possibility of acquiring poorly understood infectious diseases while providing care may have an impact on the mental health of providers. We conducted a study to explore the effects of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare providers. METHODS: Between April and August 2021, we conducted in-depth interviews with 60 healthcare providers in the infectious disease unit (IDU) and other units of the hospital (non-IDU). The healthcare providers completed an online self-administered survey form with demographic data (age, sex, average income, and known contact with a COVID-19 patient). We used semi-structured interview guides to understand the healthcare providers' lived experiences of stress, anxiety, depression, and their associated factors. We transcribed the interviews verbatim and coded and analyzed the transcripts to derive thematic concepts related to mental health experiences. RESULTS: The healthcare providers had a median age of 37 years [IQR 20.0-58.0], and 56.7% were female, 30.0% nurses, 18.3% medical doctors, and 11.7% laboratory technologists. The healthcare providers reported increased stress during the pandemic, attributed to the high demand for patient care, changes in social life, and fear of COVID-19 infection. They also reported experiences of anxiety and depression as a result of limited knowledge at the beginning of the pandemic and the perception that "COVID-19 resulted in death". Testing positive for COVID-19, high exposure to COVID-19 risks, and the death of patients and colleagues reportedly affected the healthcare providers' mental health. Additionally, the healthcare providers reported mental health support through debriefing meetings, peer-to-peer support, and psychological counseling, with privacy and confidentiality concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare providers faced mental health issues such as stress and anxiety while taking care of COVID-19 patients. An effective mental health response requires institutional practices that address context-specific challenges such as privacy and confidentiality.
RESUMEN
Background: The contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing), one of the Multipurpose Prevention Technologies (MPT) products, is effective in preventing unintended pregnancies and may contribute to reducing the frequency of Bacterial Vaginosis (BV), which is a risk factor for HIV acquisition, transmission, and shedding among women. NuvaRing may cause irregular menstruation, including menstrual suppression, which may influence women's decision on product choice, use, and acceptability. In this prospective cohort study, we assessed women's experiences with menstruation suppression following continued NuvaRing use. Methods: A total of 18 in-depth interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide among purposively selected women with BV in Thika, Kenya, aged 18-40 years, who used NuvaRing continuously. All women received counseling on possibility of menstrual suppression following continuous NuvaRing use. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed. Results: Participants who expected and were aware that menstrual suppression was a possible side effect of Nuvaring accepted its benefits, and expressed acceptance and desire to continue using NuvaRing. Participants who had not anticipated menstrual suppression expressed anxiety and fear, with some expressing desire to continue using NuvaRing but worried about unintended negative consequences. The ability to perform daily activities uninterrupted, reduced expenses on sanitary supplies, enhanced sexual pleasure and relationships, and absence of menstrual pain were benefits of menstrual suppression. Although all participants received counseling on menstrual suppression, some expressed anxiety over the possibility of unintended pregnancy. As a result, they frequented medical facilities for health check-ups and pregnancy tests, and some used combined oral contraceptives to induce menses. Conclusion: Understanding perceptions regarding menstrual suppression is crucial in offering targeted and comprehensive counseling to improve women's understanding of menstruation suppression to influence acceptance and use of NuvaRing. Additionally, improved male involvement in reproductive health concerns and women's autonomy in discussing reproductive health issues with partners is essential.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention is highly effective, but uptake remains low in Africa, especially among young women who are a priority population for HIV prevention services. HIV self-testing (HIVST) has been proven to increase HIV testing in diverse populations but has been underutilized to support linkage to HIV prevention services. Most young women who initiate PrEP in Africa do so through informal peer referral. We wanted to test a model of formalized peer referral enhanced with HIVST delivery among young Kenyan women. METHODS: The Peer PrEP Trial is a two-arm hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster-randomized controlled trial being conducted in central Kenya. Eligible participants (i.e., peer providers, n = 80) are women (≥ 16-24 years) refilling or initiating PrEP at public healthcare clinics who can identify at least four peers who could benefit from PrEP and not enrolled in another HIV study. Peer providers will be 1:1 randomized to (1) formal peer PrEP referral + HIVST delivery, where they will be encouraged to refer four peers (i.e., peer clients, ≥ 16-24 years) using educational materials and HIVST kits (two per peer client), or (2) informal peer PrEP referral, where they are encouraged to refer four peer clients using informal word-of-mouth referral. In both arms, peer providers will deliver a standard PrEP referral card with information on nearby public clinics delivering PrEP services. Peer providers will complete surveys at baseline and 3 months; peer clients will complete surveys at 3 months. Our primary outcome is PrEP initiation among peer clients, as reported by peer providers at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include PrEP continuation (any refilling), HIV testing (past 3 months), sexual behaviors (past month), and PrEP adherence (past month) among peer clients, as reported by both peer providers and clients at 3 months. Implementation outcomes will include participants' perceived acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the intervention as well assessments of the intervention's fidelity and cost. DISCUSSION: Evidence from this trial will help us understand how HIVST could support health systems by facilitating linkage to PrEP services among young women who could benefit in Kenya and similar settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04982250. Registered on July 29, 2021.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Autoevaluación , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Prueba de VIH , Kenia , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Derivación y ConsultaRESUMEN
Background: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective for HIV prevention, but uptake remains low, especially among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in Kenya. A model in which trained AGYW using PrEP deliver HIV self-tests to their close friends and refer them to PrEP may help increase PrEP uptake in this population. To understand AGYW's potential willingness to engage in such a model, we conducted a qualitative formative study in Kenya. Method: We conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews (IDIs) with AGYW (16 to 24 years) in Kiambu County who were determined at risk of HIV acquisition. We purposively recruited "PrEP-naïve" (no prior PrEP use) and "PrEP-experienced" AGYW who used PrEP for at least 1 month within the previous year. We solicited perspectives on initiating/engaging in conversations about HIV risk and PrEP, distributing/receiving HIV self-test kits, and referring/following through on a referral to clinic-based HIV services. We analyzed verbatim transcripts using rapid qualitative analysis and a combination of inductive and deductive approaches, with the latter informed by the Integrated Behavior Model (IBM). Results: From August to December 2020, we conducted 30 IDIs: 15 with PrEP-experienced and 15 with PrEP-naïve AGYW. Participants' median age was 20 [interquartile range (IQR): 20-22]. Overall, most participants anticipated that they would be willing to engage in this model. PrEP-experienced AGYW emphasized the salience of their concerns about friends' HIV risk behaviors, with several noting that they are already in the habit of discussing PrEP with friends. Many additionally expressed positive attitudes toward the proposed target behaviors, perceived these to be normative among AGYW, and expressed confidence in their ability to carry out the behaviors with proper support. Although few participants had HIVST experience, nearly all anticipated they would be able to use an HIV self-test kit correctly if provided instruction. Conclusion: The Kenyan AGYW who participated in this study generally anticipated that they would be willing to engage in a formal peer PrEP referral model enhanced with peer-delivered HIV self-tests. Future research is needed to pilot test this model to determine its acceptability, feasibility, and effect on HIVST and PrEP uptake within this population.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH , Infecciones por VIH , Adolescente , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Kenia , Autoevaluación , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Derivación y ConsultaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Partners of persons living with HIV (PLHIV) are at a high risk of HIV acquisition, particularly if PLHIV are newly diagnosed or not virally suppressed. A focused partner HIV testing strategy could stimulate efficient identification of persons for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) or antiretroviral therapy (ART) programs. METHODS: We sequentially implemented 2 partner testing strategies at 2 Kenyan HIV clinics: (1) an invitation for clinic-based testing and (2) HIV self-testing (HIVST) kits distribution to index PLHIV. For each testing strategy, we enrolled approximately 150 consecutive index PLHIV with partners of unknown HIV status, not on ART, <6 months on ART, or who had detectable viral load. We compared partner engagement, testing uptake, and linkage for ART or PrEP between the 2 testing strategies. RESULTS: Of 313 index PLHIV enrolled (160 in invitation, 153 in HIVST), the median age was 32 years (interquartile range 26-40) and 76% were women. Overall, 73% of participants (229) discussed HIV testing with their partners: 76% (121) in the invitation strategy vs 71% (108) in the HIVST strategy [adjusted odds ratio (adjOR): 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31 to 0.97]. Overall, 52% (79) partners in the HIVST strategy tested vs 38% (60) in the invitation strategy (adjOR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.78). Among partners engaged, 73% in the HIVST strategy vs 50% in the invitation tested (adjOR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.46 to 4.96); 25% (35/139) tested positive for HIV. Eighty-nine percentage (31/35) who tested positive initiated treatment, but only 21% (20/93) who tested negative initiated PrEP. CONCLUSIONS: HIVST kit distribution to PLHIV with partners of unknown HIV status effectively increased partner testing. Only one-fifth of partners who tested negative initiated PrEP-thus innovations to link to prevention services are urgently needed.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Autoevaluación , Adulto , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Prueba de VIH , Humanos , Kenia , Masculino , Parejas SexualesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Post-abortion clinics located in regions with high HIV burden may ideal locations to integrate counselling and delivery of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), aligning with normative goals for integrated delivery of HIV and reproductive health care. The objective of this study was to gauge the degree to which Kenyan women seeking care for a pregnancy loss, including induced abortion, are at risk for HIV and whether women would welcome an introduction to PrEP prior to discharge from post-abortion care. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study from August 2019 to February 2020 with women ages 15 to 30 recruited sequentially as they were accessing post-abortion care at public and private facilities in Thika and Kisumu, Kenya. Data collection was through a cross-sectional survey and laboratory testing for common sexually transmitted infections (N = 200), and in-depth interviews (N = 30). Descriptive statistics summarize PrEP knowledge and referrals and a multivariable log-link binomial model estimated correlates of receiving a referral for PrEP. Qualitative data were analysed using inductive and deductive approaches. RESULTS: Among 200 HIV-negative women (median age 21.0, interquartile range 19.0 to 22.0), the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis was 18.2% and Neisseria gonorrhoeae was 2.0%. Half of the women scored ≥5 on a validated tool that would correspond to an expected HIV incidence of 9.5% per year. Approximately half (55.8%) of women were familiar with PrEP prior to the study and 33.3% received a referral from study staff to a clinic offering PrEP. In qualitative interviews, women expressed interest in accessing PrEP from the gynaecology ward that provided post-abortion care but they preferred alternative locations for PrEP refills. CONCLUSIONS: Kenyan women accessing post-abortion care have substantial HIV risk and were favourable about the idea of receiving support to initiate PrEP as part of care offered during post-abortion care. These settings can be integrated into national PrEP programmes as locations providing PrEP referrals and initiation.