Evolution of percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty in the treatment of patients with aortic stenosis.

Symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with a dismal prognosis with conservative management only; the mortality rate is >50% at two years with medical treatment alone. In 1986, Cribier first introduced the percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) concept in patients with acquired severe AS. The initial enthusiasm surrounding this technique, touted as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in older patients with AS, waned with subsequent large registries, which showed failure of the procedure to alter the natural history of calcific AS and its associated procedural morbidity. For many years BAV has been used as palliative treatment for short-term symptom relief in elderly, non-surgical patients. The timely surge in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) rejuvenated and resurrected the dormant field of BAV. By its use to predilate the stenosed valve for easier delivery of the prosthesis, valvuloplasty now plays an integral role in the majority of TAVR procedures. BAV is successfully used as a bridge to SAVR and TAVR with better outcomes and is used as a standalone treatment for symptom relief in high-risk patients and for temporary stabilization of hemodynamically unstable patients. BAV can be used as a selection tool to determine if the patient will benefit from valve replacement if they have other comorbidities, such as severe pulmonary hypertension, severe lung disease, very poor ejection fraction, or frailty.

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and bivalirudin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is currently the standard of care for patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), as well those patients with "stable" angina who have failed medical therapy in whom PCI is an acceptable alternative to surgical revascularization. The aim of adjunctive antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy during PCI is to alleviate the risks associated with platelet activation and aggregation, iatrogenic plaque rupture, and thrombus formation during. The aim of this review is to summarize the evidence that has emerged from the randomized studies comparing a strategy combining heparin and a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) with that of bivalirudin in patients undergoing elective and urgent PCI.

Saphenous vein graft interventions: strategies and devices to minimize distal embolization.

Percutaneous coronary intervention of degenerated saphenous vein grafts remains relatively high risk when compared to native vessel interventions, despite advances in pharmacotherapy and embolic protection. This article discusses the phenomenon of distal embolization that seems to plague saphenous vein graft interventions, reviews device-based strategies for embolic protection, and offers a perspective on the utility of percutaneous saphenous vein graft intervention in both elective and acute settings.

Percutaneous revascularization in women with coronary artery disease: we've come so far, yet have so far to go.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) has traditionally been thought of as a disease that predominantly affects men. Women, however, are more likely than men to die from a myocardial infarction (MI). In this article, the data on access to cardiovascular care, treatment of stable and unstable coronary disease, and outcomes in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) will be reviewed. Despite increased awareness of heart disease in women, and improved outcomes after PCI, women with MI have more mortality and delays to treatment than men. Women with CAD have symptoms that differ from men with CAD. Improved understanding of the symptoms of CAD in women by patients and health care providers may improve treatment and outcomes in women with CAD.

Intravascular ultrasound guidance in drug-eluting stent deployment.

The role of routine intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the bare metal stent era remains controversial. The potential to reduce revascularization was reported without impacting non-fatal myocardial infarction and death. Drug-eluting stents (DES) have realized improved clinical results in patients undergoing PCI but are not free of restenosis and are limited by thrombosis, particularly in more complex lesion types. Stent under-expansion, malposition, and incomplete lesion coverage have been identified as the key mechanisms of DES failure. The identification of these features on IVUS and their subsequent treatment may lead to improved clinical outcomes. Though a clinical benefit is intuitive, results from randomized trials are still needed to justify routine IVUS guided DES implantation. The Authors provide a review of the currently available evidence pertaining to the potential clinical benefit of IVUS guidance in DES implantation.

How to approach drug-eluting stent restenosis.

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been a major advance in percutaneous coronary intervention reducing restenosis and repeat revascularization. The application of DES to the treatment of complex lesion and patient subsets has resulted in significant rates of DES restenosis or failure. Though predominantly focal, substantial rates of non-focal DES restenosis are being observed. Non-focal disease most likely represents a resistant process that will remain a therapeutic challenge. An understanding of the causative mechanical and biological factors is essential for the prevention and treatment of DES restenosis. Robust data relating to the treatment efficacy for this problem is lacking. At present, repeat DES or vascular brachytherapy appear to the best available options. Evidence from randomized controlled trials and large registries is required to establish a formal treatment approach. We provide guidelines based on current available evidence.

Safety of intracoronary gamma-radiation on uninjured reference segments during the first 6 months after treatment of in-stent restenosis: a serial intravascular ultrasound study.

BACKGROUND: The effects of endovascular irradiation on uninjured reference segments during the treatment of in-stent restenosis are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the Washington Radiation for In-Stent restenosis Trial (WRIST), patients with in-stent restenosis were first treated with conventional catheter-based techniques and then randomized (blinded) to receive either gamma-irradiation ((192)Ir) or a placebo (dummy seeds). We identified all patients in whom the active (n=19) or dummy seeds (n=19) extended >10 mm proximal and distal to the in-stent restenosis lesion. Serial (postirradiation and follow-up) external elastic membrane (EEM), lumen, and plaque and media (EEM-lumen) areas were measured (using intravascular ultrasound) every 1 mm over 5-mm-long reference segments that were 6 to 10 mm proximal and distal to the in-stent restenosis lesion. During follow-up, a similar small increase occurred in the plaque and media area in the proximal and distal reference segments in both (192)Ir and placebo patients. However, in the (192)Ir patients, an increase in both proximal and distal EEM area occurred; as a result, no change in lumen area occurred. Conversely, in the placebo patients, the proximal reference EEM area decreased, and no change occurred in the distal reference EEM area; this contributed to a decrease in lumen area. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of a deleterious effect of gamma-irradiation on angiographically normal uninjured reference segments in the first 6 months after the treatment of in-stent restenosis.

Serial intravascular ultrasound assessment of the efficacy of intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy for preventing recurrence in very long, diffuse, in-stent restenosis lesions.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of coronary gamma-irradiation in preventing recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR) is well established. However, brachytherapy may be less effective in very long, diffuse ISR lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to study patients with long, diffuse ISR lesions (length, 36 to 80 mm) who were enrolled in (1) Long WRIST (Washington Radiation In-Stent Restenosis Trial), a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intracoronary gamma-irradiation (15 Gy at 2 mm from the source) and (2) high-dose (HD) Long WRIST, a registry that used a dose prescription of 18 Gy at 2 mm from the source. IVUS was performed using automated pullback (0.5 mm/s). Stent, lumen, and intimal hyperplasia were measured at 2-mm intervals. Complete postintervention and follow-up IVUS imaging was available in 30 irradiated and 34 placebo patients from Long WRIST and in 25 patients from HD Long WRIST. Stent length was longer in HD Long WRIST than in placebo or treated patients in Long WRIST (P=0.0064 and P=0.0125, respectively). Otherwise, baseline measurements were similar. At follow-up, the minimum lumen area was largest in the HD Long WRIST patients (4.0+/-1.4 mm(2)); areas were 2.9+/-1.0 mm(2) in irradiated patients in Long WRIST and 1.9+/-1.1 mm(2) in placebo patients in Long WRIST (P<0.005 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: - Serial IVUS analysis shows that gamma-irradiation reduces recurrent in-stent neointimal hyperplasia in long, diffuse ISR lesions; however, it is even more effective when given at a higher dose.

Treatment of in-stent restenosis with excimer laser coronary angioplasty versus rotational atherectomy: comparative mechanisms and results.

BACKGROUND: Atheroablation yields improved clinical results for balloon angioplasty (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, PTCA) in the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis (ISR). METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the mechanisms and clinical results of excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) versus rotational atherectomy (RA), both followed by adjunct PTCA; 119 patients (158 ISR lesions) were treated with ELCA+PTCA and 130 patients (161 ISR lesions) were treated with RA+PTCA. Quantitative coronary angiographic and planar intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measurements were performed routinely. In addition, volumetric IVUS analysis to compare the mechanisms of lumen enlargement was performed in 28 patients with 30 lesions (16 ELCA+PTCA, 14 RA+PTCA). There were no significant between-group differences in preintervention or final postintervention quantitative coronary angiographic or planar IVUS measurements of luminal dimensions. Angiographic success and major in-hospital complications with the 2 techniques were also similar. Volumetric IVUS analysis showed significantly greater reduction in intimal hyperplasia volume after RA than after ELCA (43+/-14 versus 19+/-10 mm(3), P<0.001) because of a significantly higher ablation efficiency (90+/-10% versus 76+/-12%, P = 0.004). However, both interventional strategies had similar long-term clinical outcome; 1-year target lesion revascularization rate was 26% with ELCA+PTCA versus 28% with RA+PTCA (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Despite certain differences in the mechanisms of lumen enlargement, both ELCA+PTCA and RA+PTCA can be used to treat diffuse ISR with similar clinical results.

Intracoronary beta-radiation therapy inhibits recurrence of in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy reduces recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR). This study, BETA WRIST (Washington Radiation for In-Stent restenosis Trial) was designed to examine the efficacy and safety of the beta-emitter 90-yttrium for the prevention of recurrent ISR. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 50 consecutive patients with ISR in native coronaries underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, laser angioplasty, rotational atherectomy, and/or stent implantation. Afterward, a segmented balloon catheter was positioned and automatically loaded with a 90-yttrium, 0.014-inch source wire that was 29 mm in length to deliver a dose of 20.6 Gy at 1.0 mm from the balloon surface. In 17 patients, manual stepping of the radiation catheter was necessary for lesions >25 mm in length. The radiation was delivered successfully to all patients, with a mean dwell time of 3.0+/-0.4 minutes. Fractionation of the dose due to ischemia was required in 11 patients. At 6 months, the binary angiographic restenosis rate was 22%, the target lesion revascularization rate was 26%, and the target vessel revascularization rate was 34%; all rates were significantly lower than those of the placebo group of gamma-WRIST. CONCLUSIONS: beta-Radiation with a 90-yttrium source used as adjunct therapy for patients with ISR results in a lower-than-expected rate of angiographic and clinical restenosis.

Prolonged antiplatelet therapy to prevent late thrombosis after intracoronary gamma-radiation in patients with in-stent restenosis: Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trial plus 6 months of clopidogrel (WRIST PLUS).

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary gamma-radiation reduces recurrent in-stent restenosis. Late thrombosis (>30 days after radiation therapy) is identified as a serious complication. The Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trial (WRIST) PLUS, which involved 6 months of treatment with clopidogrel and aspirin, was designed to examine the efficacy and safety of prolonged antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of late thrombosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 120 consecutive patients with diffuse in-stent restenosis in native coronary arteries and vein grafts with lesions <80 mm underwent percutaneous coronary transluminal angioplasty, laser ablation, and/or rotational atherectomy. Additional stents were placed in 34 patients (28.3%). After the intervention, a closed-end lumen catheter was introduced into the artery, a ribbon with different trains of radioactive (192)Ir seeds was positioned to cover the treated site, and a dose of 14 Gy to 2 mm was prescribed. Patients were discharged with clopidogrel and aspirin for 6 months and followed angiographically and clinically. All patients but one tolerated the clopidogrel. The late occlusion and thrombosis rates were compared with the gamma-radiation-treated (n=125) and the placebo patients (n=126) from the WRIST and LONG WRIST studies (which involved only 1 month of antiplatelet therapy). At 6 months, the group receiving prolonged antiplatelet therapy had total occlusion and late thrombosis rates of 5.8% and 2.5%, respectively; these rates were lower than those in the active gamma-radiation group and similar to those in the placebo historical control group. CONCLUSIONS: Six months of clopidogrel and aspirin and a reduction in re-stenting for patients with in-stent restenosis treated with gamma-radiation is well tolerated and associated with a reduction in the late thrombosis rate compared with a similar cohort treated with only 1 month of clopidogrel and aspirin.

Comparative efficacy of gamma-irradiation for treatment of in-stent restenosis in saphenous vein graft versus native coronary artery in-stent restenosis: An intravascular ultrasound study.

BACKGROUND: We used serial volumetric (post-irradiation and follow-up) intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to compare the effectiveness of gamma-irradiation ((192)Ir) in saphenous vein graft (SVG) versus native coronary artery in-stent restenosis (ISR). METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 47 patients with native coronary artery ISR from WRIST (Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trial) and 31 patients with SVG ISR (12 from the WRIST and 19 from SVGWRIST). After irradiation and at 6-month follow-up, stent, lumen, and intimal hyperplasia (IH, stent minus lumen) areas were measured every 1 mm. ISR length was similar in the 2 groups (29+/-12 versus 29+/-14 mm, P=0.9). Post-intervention measurements of stent (280+/-154 versus 324+/-270 mm(3), P=0.4), lumen (184+/-91 versus 214+/-172 mm(3), P=0.3), and IH (96+/-77 versus 109+/-119 mm(3), P=0.5) volumes were similar in the 2 groups. The post-intervention minimum lumen cross sectional areas tended to be smaller in native artery ISR lesions (4.7+/-1.7 versus 5.4+/-1.6 mm(2), P=0.11). During follow-up, there was a slight increase in IH volume (9+/-38 mm(3)) in native artery ISR lesions and a slight decrease in IH volume in SVG ISR lesions (-9+/-32 mm(3), P=0.0463). There was also a slight decrease in minimum lumen area in the native artery ISR lesions versus a slight increase in minimum lumen area in the SVG ISR lesions (-0.8+/-1.7 versus 0.2+/-1.1, P=0.0087). As a result, the follow-up minimum lumen area in native artery lesions was smaller than in SVG ISR lesions (4.1+/-2.1 mm(2) versus 5.6+/-2.2 mm(2), P=0.0067). CONCLUSION: gamma-Irradiation with (192)Ir brachytherapy appears to be as effective in SVGs as it is in native artery ISR lesions.

Inhibition of restenosis with beta-emitting radiotherapy: Report of the Proliferation Reduction with Vascular Energy Trial (PREVENT).

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary gamma- and beta-radiation have reduced restenosis in animal models. In the clinical setting, the effectiveness of beta-emitters has not been studied in a broad spectrum of patients, particularly those receiving stents. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective, randomized, sham-controlled study of intracoronary radiotherapy with the beta-emitting (32)P source wire, using a centering catheter and automated source delivery unit, was conducted. A total of 105 patients with de novo (70%) or restenotic (30%) lesions who were treated by stenting (61%) or balloon angioplasty (39%) received 0 (control), 16, 20, or 24 Gy to a depth of 1 mm in the artery wall. Angiography at 6 months showed a target site late loss index of 11+/-36% in radiotherapy patients versus 55+/-30% in controls (P:<0.0001). A low late loss index was seen in stented and balloon-treated patients and was similar across the 16, 20, and 24 Gy radiotherapy groups. Restenosis (>/=50%) rates were significantly lower in radiotherapy patients at the target site (8% versus 39%; P:=0.012) and at target site plus adjacent segments (22% versus 50%; P:=0.018). Target lesion revascularization was needed in 5 radiotherapy patients (6%) and 6 controls (24%; P:<0.05). Stenosis adjacent to the target site and late thrombotic events reduced the overall clinical benefit of radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: beta-radiotherapy with a centered (32)P source is safe and highly effective in inhibiting restenosis at the target site after stent or balloon angioplasty. However, minimizing edge narrowing and late thrombotic events must be accomplished to maximize the clinical benefit of this modality.

Effect of intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy on in-stent restenosis: An intravascular ultrasound analysis from the gamma-1 study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to use serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound to evaluate the effect of gamma-radiation on recurrent in-stent restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: After successful reintervention, patients were randomized to receive either (192)Ir or placebo. Intravascular ultrasound studies with motorized pullback (0.5 mm/s) were performed immediately after irradiation and at 8-month follow-up in 70 patients. Paired volumetric analysis of the stented segment and of 5-mm proximal and distal reference segments was performed; this included measurements of the external elastic membrane, lumen, plaque and media (external elastic membrane minus lumen), stent, and intimal hyperplasia (stent minus lumen). Baseline proximal reference, stent, and distal reference measurements were similar in both groups. The changes in proximal and distal reference measurements of the external elastic membrane, plaque and media, and lumen areas were similar in both groups. However, the decrease in stented segment lumen volume was less in the (192)Ir patients than the placebo patients (-25+/-34 mm(3) versus -48+/-42 mm(3); P:=0.0225), and the increase in the volume of intimal hyperplasia in the stented segment was less in the (192)Ir patients than in the placebo patients (28+/-37 mm(3) versus 50+/-40 mm(3); P:=0.0352). When averaged over the length of the stented segment (32+/-13 mm versus 33+/-14 mm; P:=0.9), the increase in mean area of intimal hyperplasia was 0.8+/-1.0 mm(2) in the (192)Ir group and 1.6+/-1.2 mm(2) in the control group (P:=0.0065). Late stent-vessel wall malapposition was noted in one placebo patient and no (192)Ir patients. CONCLUSIONS: gamma-Radiation therapy can effectively prevent recurrent in-stent restenosis by inhibiting neointimal formation within the stent. At the stent edge, there were no significant differences between (192)Ir and placebo patients.

Intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy after angioplasty inhibits recurrence in patients with in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of in-stent restenosis presents a critical limitation of intracoronary stent implantation. Ionizing radiation has been shown to decrease neointimal formation within stents in animal models and in initial clinical trials. We studied the effects of intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy versus placebo on the clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients with in-stent restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred thirty patients with in-stent restenosis underwent successful coronary intervention and were then blindly randomized to receive either intracoronary gamma-radiation with (192)Ir (15 Gy) or placebo. Four independent core laboratories blinded to the treatment protocol analyzed the angiographic and intravascular ultrasound end points of restenosis. Procedural success and in-hospital and 30-day complications were similar among the groups. At 6 months, patients assigned to radiation therapy required less target lesion revascularization and target vessel revascularization (9 [13.8%] and 17 [26.2%], respectively) compared with patients assigned to placebo (41 [63.1%, P=0.0001] and 44 [67.7%, P=0.0001], respectively). Binary angiographic restenosis was lower in the irradiated group (19% versus 58% for placebo, P=0.001). Freedom from major cardiac events was lower in the radiation group (29.2% versus 67.7% for placebo, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary gamma-radiation used as adjunct therapy for patients with in-stent restenosis significantly reduces both angiographic and clinical restenosis.

Vascular repair after balloon overstretch injury in porcine model effects of intracoronary radiation.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of IR on thrombus formation and dissection repair following overstretch balloon injury in porcine coronary arteries. BACKGROUND: Exposure of blood to the injured arterial wall after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) induces thrombus formation and inflammation in the dissection plane. Neointima formation is related to smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation and migration into the preformed thrombus. Intracoronary radiation (IR) with doses of 10 to 25 Gy using either beta or gamma emitters can prevent neointima accumulation by reducing SMC proliferation. However, there are some indications that IR may delay the process of dissection repair after PTCA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of IR on thrombus formation and dissection repair after overstretch balloon injury in porcine coronary arteries. METHODS: Forty porcine coronaries were injured by balloon overstretch followed by either 0 or 18 Gy of 90Y prescribed to 1.2 mm from the balloon center. The animals were euthanized 14 days after treatment, and intimal area (IA) and IA corrected for medial fracture length (IA/FL) were quantified by digital image analysis. Dissections were quantified by tracing the length, thickness and area behind the dissection flap. The rate of dissections was calculated for each group. Thrombi were identified and designated as intraluminal thrombus or thrombus within dissection planes (mural thrombus), and area measurements were obtained. RESULTS: The irradiated group showed a significant reduction of IA/FL (0.55 +/- 0.29 vs. 0.05 +/- 0.09; p < 0.001). No difference was observed in the rate of dissection between control and irradiated arteries (77% vs. 88%, respectively). The control group showed a smaller dissection area (0.19 +/- 0.28 mm2 vs. 0.32 +/- 0.29 mm2; p < 0.05) with smaller mural thrombi (0.03 +/-0.01 mm2 vs. 0.29 +/- 0.30 mm2; p < 0.001). A strong correlation between dissection area and neointima area was observed only in the control group (R2 = 0.474; p < 0.003; alpha0.05 = 0.862). A positive correlation between mural thrombus and dissection area was observed only in the irradiated group (R2 = 0.889; p < 0.001; alpha0.05 = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the dissection area may be a useful parameter by which to quantify the extent of injury and repair after IR and may indicate an incomplete healing process after IR at this time point.

Late total occlusion after intracoronary brachytherapy for patients with in-stent restenosis.

OBJECTIVES: The study sought to determine the incidence and predictors of late total occlusion (LTO, >30 days) in-patients with in-stent restenosis who were treated with intracoronary radiation. BACKGROUND: Intracoronary radiation both with beta and gamma emitters has been shown to reduce recurrent in-stent restenosis. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 473 patients who presented with in-stent restenosis and who were enrolled in various radiation protocols, whether randomized to placebo versus radiation or entered into registries. There were 165 placebo and 308 radiated patients, including both gamma and beta emitters. Maximum dose to the vessel wall was 30 to 55 Gy. Following radiation, all patients received antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and either ticlopidine or clopidogrel for one month. All patients completed at least six months of angiographic follow-up. RESULTS: The LTO was documented in 28 patients (9.1%) from the irradiated group versus 2 placebo patients (1.2%), p < 0.0001. The LTO rates were similar across studies and emitters. In the irradiated group, LTO presented as acute myocardial infarction in 12 patients (43%), unstable angina in 14 (50%), and asymptotic in 2 (7%). Mean time to LTO was 5.4 +/- 3.2 months in the irradiated group versus 4.5 +/- 2.1 in placebo patients (p = NS). The overall rate of restenting for the entire study group at the time of radiation was 48.6%. Importantly, new stents were placed in 82% of the irradiated and in 100% of the placebo patients who presented with LTO. Multivariate analysis determined that new stenting was the main predictor of LTO. CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary radiation for patients with in-stent restenosis is associated with a high rate of LTO. Restenting may contribute late thrombosis. Prolonged antiplatelet therapy (up to six months) should be considered for these patients.

Procedural results and intermediate clinical outcomes after multiple saphenous vein graft stenting.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the early and mid-term (18-month) clinical events in a consecutive series of patients undergoing a nonstaged multiple saphenous vein grafting (SVG) intervention with stents as compared with a single SVG stent procedure. BACKGROUND: Saphenous vein graft angioplasty has been limited by high rates of distal embolization, myocardial infarction, restenosis and late mortality. It is unknown whether stenting of multiple, different SVGs at the same setting is associated with higher risk. METHODS: We evaluated in-hospital and mid-term clinical outcomes (death, Q wave myocardial infarction [MI] and repeat revascularization rates up to 18 months) in 70 consecutive patients treated with coronary stents in 2 (93% of patients) or 3 SVGs, as compared with 649 patients undergoing stenting of a single SVG between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 1997. RESULTS: Overall procedural success was obtained in 97% of patients with 2 or 3 SVGs and 97% of patients with a single SVG (p = 0.94). Procedural complications were also similar (2.8% for multiple SVGs vs. 2.7% for a single SVG, p = 0.94). There was a higher prevalence of periprocedural non-Q wave MI (28% vs. 16%, p = 0.009) in the multiple SVG group. During follow-up (18 months), target lesion revascularization was 11% in multiple SVG and 15% in single SVG interventions (p = 0.19), and repeat revascularization (calculated per treated patient) was also similar for both groups (19% vs. 18%, p = 0.94). There was no difference in death (5.6% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.92) and Q wave MI rate (4.3% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.55) after the multiple SVG intervention. Overall cardiac event-free survival was similar for both groups (62% vs. 60%, p = 0.75). The study was powered to detect a clinically meaningful difference of 10% in mortality; smaller differences could not be evaluated on the basis of this sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous stenting of multiple SVGs in carefully selected patients has similar in-hospital procedural success and major complications rates, as well as mid-term (18-month) clinical outcomes, as compared with single SVG stenting. Thus, multiple SVG interventions using stents may be a viable revascularization strategy for carefully selected patients and suitable lesions in multiple SVG disease.

Edge stenosis and geographical miss following intracoronary gamma radiation therapy for in-stent restenosis.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the relationship between geographical miss (GM) and edge restenosis (ERS) following intracoronary radiation therapy. BACKGROUND: Edge restenosis may be a limitation of intracoronary irradiation to prevent in-stent restenosis (ISR). Inadequate radiation source coverage of the injured segment (GM) has been proposed as a cause of ERS. We studied the relationship between GM and ERS following 192Ir treatment of ISR. METHODS: There were 100 patients with native vessel ISR in WRIST (Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trial), in which patients with ISR were first treated with conventional techniques and then randomized to gamma irradiation (192Ir) or placebo. Geographical miss was defined as segments proximal or distal to the treated lesion that were subjected to injury during primary intervention but were not covered by the radiation source. RESULTS: Geographical miss was documented in 56 of 164 edges (34%). Edge restenosis was noted at eight of 80 radiated edges and in four of 84 placebo edges. In the irradiated group, ERS was observed in 21% of edges with GM and in 40% of edges without GM (p = 0.035). In contrast, in the placebo group, ERS was observed in only 7% of edges with GM and in 4% of edges without GM (p = NS). The late edge lumen loss was higher in the irradiated group with GM as compared to placebo with GM (0.74 +/- 0.57 vs. 0.41 +/- 0.50 mm, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Edge restenosis following gamma irradiation treatment of ISR is related to GM: a mismatch between the segment of artery injured during the primary catheter-based intervention and the length of the radiation source.