Initiation of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a patient receiving induction chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory failure is a leading cause of intensive care unit admission in patients with hematological malignancies; it carries a mortality rate exceeding 50%. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in patients with acute hematologic malignancies concurrently receiving induction chemotherapy is not well studied. CASE PRESENTATION: A 44-year-old male developed acute respiratory distress syndrome in the setting of newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia. He underwent successful induction chemotherapy while on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. His course was complicated by a devastating subarachnoid hemorrhage. Life support modalities were discontinued in accordance to the wishes of the family. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of data to guide use of induction chemotherapy in patients with acute hematologic malignancies requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, particularly with regard to dosing, safety, and efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents. This case highlights a potential role of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in select young acute myelogenous leukemia patients who might benefit from this intervention and warrants further research.

Itraconazole vs. posaconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing intensive chemotherapy: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare itraconazole with posaconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy. METHODS: Adult patients with AML received either itraconazole or posaconazole for antifungal prophylaxis while undergoing intensive chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was incidence of prophylaxis failure (change in antifungal agent due to suspected invasive fungal infection [IFI], drug intolerance, drug interaction, or adverse event). RESULTS: From February 2016 to January 2018, 90 patients were included in the itraconazole group and 45 patients in the posaconazole group. Prophylaxis failure occurred in 88% of itraconazole recipients compared with 33% of posaconazole recipients (P<0.001). The primary reason for prophylaxis failure with itraconazole was suspected IFI (58%) whereas for posaconazole, failure predominantly related to drug interaction (60%). An antifungal regimen was continued upon discharge in 47% of itraconazole recipients compared with 9% of posaconazole recipients (P<0.001). The use of breakthrough IFI diagnostic tests was not significantly different in the two groups. A larger proportion of drug concentrations were collected in the posaconazole group. CONCLUSIONS: In AML patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy, posaconazole was associated with significantly lower rates of prophylaxis failure and less need for continued antifungal therapy on discharge compared with itraconazole.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations in the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Ibrutinib, Idelalisib, and Venetoclax.

Management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia has changed markedly over the last several years with the emergence of several novel oral agents targeting B-cell receptor and Bcl-2 signaling pathways. For patients requiring treatment, ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax offer unique clinical benefits with a different set of therapeutic considerations compared with traditional parenteral therapy. Despite the conveniences afforded by oral therapy, these agents also carry unique logistical obstacles. Drug interactions with agents that are metabolized via the cytochrome P450 3A4 pathway are possible with all three agents. Unique treatment-related adverse events including bleeding and atrial fibrillation with ibrutinib, hepatotoxicity with idelalisib, and tumor lysis syndrome with venetoclax can be severe and dose limiting. Furthermore, dose adjustments for organ dysfunction may also be warranted. Here, we review the available literature on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of these novel agents to guide the reader in the appropriate use of ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax.