Trends in Disparities in Advanced Neuroimaging Utilization in Acute Stroke: A Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Our primary objective was to evaluate if disparities in race, sex, age, and socioeconomic status (SES) exist in utilization of advanced neuroimaging in year 2015 in a population-based study. Our secondary objective was to identify the disparity trends and overall imaging utilization as compared with years 2005 and 2010. METHODS: This was a retrospective, population-based study that utilized the GCNKSS (Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study) data. Patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack were identified in the years 2005, 2010, and 2015 in a metropolitan population of 1.3 million. The proportion of imaging use within 2 days of stroke/transient ischemic attack onset or hospital admission date was computed. SES determined by the percentage below the poverty level within a given respondent's US census tract of residence was dichotomized. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the odds of advanced neuroimaging use (computed tomography angiogram/magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiogram) for age, race, gender, and SES. RESULTS: There was a total of 10 526 stroke/transient ischemic attack events in the combined study year periods of 2005, 2010, and 2015. The utilization of advanced imaging progressively increased (48% in 2005, 63% in 2010, and 75% in 2015 [P<0.001]). In the combined study year multivariable model, advanced imaging was associated with age and SES. Younger patients (≤55 years) were more likely to have advanced imaging compared with older patients (adjusted odds ratio, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.62-2.12]; P<0.01), and low SES patients were less likely to have advanced imaging compared with high SES (adjusted odds ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.75-0.93]; P<0.01). A significant interaction was found between age and race. Stratified by age, the adjusted odds of advanced imaging were higher for Black patients compared with White patients among older patients (>55 years; adjusted odds ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.15-1.57]; P<0.01), but no racial differences among the young. CONCLUSIONS: Racial, age, and SES-related disparities exist in the utilization of advanced neuroimaging for patients with acute stroke. There was no evidence of a change in trend of these disparities between the study periods.

Tremor-Dominant Cervical Dystonia: a Cerebellar Syndrome.

The objective of this study is to examine the role of the cerebellum in the tremor-dominant subtype of cervical dystonia (CD). CD patients with head tremor at onset (Tr-CD) were age- and sex-matched to CD patients without head tremor at onset (nTr-CD). All patients were evaluated for cerebellar disability using the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), gait variability using ProtoKinetics Zeno Walkway, and cerebellar volume analysis extracted from brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a semiquantitative scale. Compared to nTr-CD (n = 10, median age, 70.5 years), Tr-CD patients (n = 10, 71.5 years) exhibited higher median SARA scores (9 vs 7.5, p = 0.03) and greater median gait variability index (131 vs 124, p = 0.03). SARA scores inversely correlated with cerebellar volume in all patients (- 0.4, p = 0.04). Tr-CD patients exhibited greater superior vermian atrophy than nTr-CD patients (p = 0.01). Head tremor at onset heralds a CD subtype with prominent axial cerebellar disability and atrophy of the superior vermis of the cerebellum.

Multimodality Imaging Review of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to review the clinical manifestations, endocrine tumors types, and multimodality diagnostic tools available to physicians involved in the management of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) syndrome, in addition to discussing relevant imaging findings and appropriate imaging follow-up. CONCLUSION. Thorough knowledge of the spectrum of tumors associated with MEN gene mutations aids in the screening, diagnostic workup, and posttreatment monitoring of patients with MEN-related gene mutations.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Dizziness and Ataxia: 2023 Update.

Diagnostic evaluation of a patient with dizziness or vertigo is complicated by a lack of standardized nomenclature, significant overlap in symptom descriptions, and the subjective nature of the patient's symptoms. Although dizziness is an imprecise term often used by patients to describe a feeling of being off-balance, in many cases dizziness can be subcategorized based on symptomatology as vertigo (false sense of motion or spinning), disequilibrium (imbalance with gait instability), presyncope (nearly fainting or blacking out), or lightheadedness (nonspecific). As such, current diagnostic paradigms focus on timing, triggers, and associated symptoms rather than subjective descriptions of dizziness type. Regardless, these factors complicate the selection of appropriate diagnostic imaging in patients presenting with dizziness or vertigo. This document serves to aid providers in this selection by using a framework of definable clinical variants. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Cerebrovascular Diseases-Stroke and Stroke-Related Conditions.

Cerebrovascular disease encompasses a vast array of conditions. The imaging recommendations for stroke-related conditions involving noninflammatory steno-occlusive arterial and venous cerebrovascular disease including carotid stenosis, carotid dissection, intracranial large vessel occlusion, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis are encompassed by this document. Additional imaging recommendations regarding complications of these conditions including intraparenchymal hemorrhage and completed ischemic strokes are also discussed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. part I. Optimization model.

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a mathematical radiation dose optimization model for computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This quality improvement project was determined not to constitute human subject research. A model for measuring water-equivalent diameter (DW) based on the topogram was developed and validated on each axial section in eight CT examinations of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis (500 images). A model for estimating image noise and size-specific dose estimates (SSDEs) using image and metadata was developed and validated in 16 examinations of anthropomorphic phantoms. A model to quantify radiologist image quality preferences was developed and applied to evaluations of 32 CT examinations of the abdomen and pelvis by 10 radiologists. The scanners' dose modulation algorithms were modeled and incorporated into an application capable of prediction of image noise and SSDE over a range of patient sizes. With use of the application, protocol techniques were recommended to achieve specific image noise targets. Comparisons were evaluated by using two-tailed nonpaired and paired t tests. RESULTS: The mean difference between topogram- and axial-based DW estimates was -3.5% ± 2.2 (standard deviation). The mean difference between estimated and measured image noise and volume CT dose index on the anthropomorphic phantoms was -6.9% ± 5.5 and 0.8% ± 1.8, respectively. A three-dimensional radiologist image quality preference model was developed. For the prediction model validation studies, mean differences between predicted and actual effective tube current-time product, SSDE, and estimated image noise were -0.9% ± 9.3, -1.8% ± 10.6, and -0.5% ± 4.4, respectively. CONCLUSION: CT image quality and radiation dose can be mathematically predicted and optimized on the basis of patient size and radiologist-specific image noise target curves.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Headache: 2022 Update.

Headache is an ancient problem plaguing a large proportion of the population. At present, headache disorders rank third among the global causes of disability, accounting for over $78 billion per year in direct and indirect costs in the United States. Given the prevalence of headache and the wide range of possible etiologies, the goal of this document is to help clarify the most appropriate initial imaging guidelines for headache for eight clinical scenarios/variants, which range from acute onset, life-threatening etiologies to chronic benign scenarios. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Imaging of Headache Attributed to Vascular Disorders.

Imaging is essential in the diagnosis of vascular causes of headaches. With advances in technology, there are increasing options of imaging modalities to choose from, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. This article will focus on imaging pearls and pitfalls of vascular causes of headaches. These include aneurysms, vasculitides, vascular malformations, and cerebral venous thrombosis.

Sarcoidosis, the master mimicker.

Sarcoidosis is an idiopathic multisystem disorder characterized by noncaseating granulomas. The article focuses on the typical imaging manifestations of sarcoid and the common differentials that need to be included when appropriate. Mistaking a sarcoid-mimicking disease for sarcoid can result in increased patient morbidity and mortality. The pulmonary system is the most common system involved and is typically the best understood by the radiologist, however a deeper knowledge of the pulmonary findings and features of sarcoid in other organ systems is critical. There is a myriad of sarcoid imaging manifestations that can involve every organ system. Often a confidant diagnosis of sarcoid can be made, however a broad differential may need to be considered- differential diagnoses include primary neoplasm, metastatic disease, infectious, and inflammatory etiologies. Radiologist familiarity with the multimodality multisystem imaging findings of sarcoid can help guide clinical management and optimize patient care.

Accuracy of CT perfusion-predicted core in the late window.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recent endovascular trials have spurred a paradigm shift toward routine use of CT perfusion (CTP) for decision-making in acute ischemic stroke. CTP use in the late window, however, remains under evaluation. Our objective was to assess the accuracy of CTP-predicted core in the late window. METHODS: In a retrospective review of our prospectively identified stroke registry at a single, comprehensive stroke center, we included patients with anterior large vessel occlusions presenting within the 6-24 h window who underwent baseline CTP evaluation and achieved TICI2b or TICI3 reperfusion on endovascular treatment. We recorded baseline CTP-predicted core volumes at relative cerebral blood flow (CBF) thresholds of <30% <34%, and <38% using RAPID software. Final infarct volumes (FIV) were calculated using follow up MRI and CT, obtained within 72 h after stroke onset. RESULTS: Of the eligible patients, 134 met our inclusion criteria. Mean FIV was 39.5 (SD 49.6). Median CTP to reperfusion time was 93.5 min. Median absolute differences between CTP-predicted core and FIV were 14.7, 14.9, and 16.0 ml at <30%, <34%, and <38%, respectively. Correlation between CTP-predicted ischemic cores and FIV was moderate and statistically significant at all thresholds: r = 0.43 (p <0.001), r = 0.43 (p <0.001), and r = 0.42 (p <0.001) at the <30%, <34%, and <38% cutoffs, respectively. CONCLUSION: CTP cores in the 6-24 h period underestimate FIV, especially with larger infarcts. CTP-predicted core volumes in the late window show moderate positive correlation with FIV.

Automated grading of enlarged perivascular spaces in clinical imaging data of an acute stroke cohort using an interpretable, 3D deep learning framework.

Enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVS), specifically in stroke patients, has been shown to strongly correlate with other measures of small vessel disease and cognitive impairment at 1 year follow-up. Typical grading of EPVS is often challenging and time consuming and is usually based on a subjective visual rating scale. The purpose of the current study was to develop an interpretable, 3D neural network for grading enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVS) severity at the level of the basal ganglia using clinical-grade imaging in a heterogenous acute stroke cohort, in the context of total cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) burden. T2-weighted images from a retrospective cohort of 262 acute stroke patients, collected in 2015 from 5 regional medical centers, were used for analyses. Patients were given a label of 0 for none-to-mild EPVS (< 10) and 1 for moderate-to-severe EPVS (≥ 10). A three-dimensional residual network of 152 layers (3D-ResNet-152) was created to predict EPVS severity and 3D gradient class activation mapping (3DGradCAM) was used for visual interpretation of results. Our model achieved an accuracy 0.897 and area-under-the-curve of 0.879 on a hold-out test set of 15% of the total cohort (n = 39). 3DGradCAM showed areas of focus that were in physiologically valid locations, including other prevalent areas for EPVS. These maps also suggested that distribution of class activation values is indicative of the confidence in the model's decision. Potential clinical implications of our results include: (1) support for feasibility of automated of EPVS scoring using clinical-grade neuroimaging data, potentially alleviating rater subjectivity and improving confidence of visual rating scales, and (2) demonstration that explainable models are critical for clinical translation.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Cerebrovascular Diseases-Aneurysm, Vascular Malformation, and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Cerebrovascular disease is a broad topic. This document focuses on the imaging recommendations for the varied clinical scenarios involving intracranial aneurysms, vascular malformations, and vasculitis, which all carry high risk of morbidity and mortality. Additional imaging recommendations regarding complications of these conditions, including subarachnoid hemorrhage and vasospasm, are also covered. While each variant presentation has unique imaging recommendations, the major focus of this document is neurovascular imaging techniques. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Head Trauma: 2021 Update.

Head trauma (ie, head injury) is a significant public health concern and is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children and young adults. Neuroimaging plays an important role in the management of head and brain injury, which can be separated into acute (0-7 days), subacute (<3 months), then chronic (>3 months) phases. Over 75% of acute head trauma is classified as mild, of which over 75% have a normal Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15, therefore clinical practice guidelines universally recommend selective CT scanning in this patient population, which is often based on clinical decision rules. While CT is considered the first-line imaging modality for suspected intracranial injury, MRI is useful when there are persistent neurologic deficits that remain unexplained after CT, especially in the subacute or chronic phase. Regardless of time frame, head trauma with suspected vascular injury or suspected cerebrospinal fluid leak should also be evaluated with CT angiography or thin-section CT imaging of the skull base, respectively. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Syncope.

Syncope and presyncope lead to well over one million emergency room visits in the United States each year. Elucidating the cause of syncope or presyncope, which are grouped together given similar etiologies and outcomes, can be exceedingly difficult given the diverse etiologies. This becomes more challenging as some causes, such as vasovagal syncope, are relatively innocuous while others, such as cardiac-related syncope, carry a significant increased risk of death. While the mainstay of syncope and presyncope assessment is a detailed history and physical examination, imaging can play a role in certain situations. In patients where a cardiovascular etiology is suspected based on the appropriate history, physical examination, and ECG findings, resting transthoracic echocardiography is usually considered appropriate for the initial imaging. While no imaging studies are considered usually appropriate when there is a low probability of cardiac or neurologic pathology, chest radiography may be appropriate in certain clinical situations. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Association of Orthostatic Hypotension With Cerebral Atrophy in Patients With Lewy Body Disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether orthostatic hypotension (OH) or supine hypertension (SH) is associated with brain atrophy and white matter hyperintensities (WMH), we analyzed clinical and radiologic data from a large multicenter consortium of patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). METHODS: Supine and orthostatic blood pressure (BP) and structural MRI data were extracted from patients with PD and DLB evaluated at 8 tertiary-referral centers in the United States, Canada, Italy, and Japan. OH was defined as a systolic/diastolic BP fall ≥20/10 mm Hg within 3 minutes of standing from the supine position (severe ≥30/15 mm Hg) and SH as a BP ≥140/90 mm Hg with normal sitting BP. Diagnosis-, age-, sex-, and disease duration-adjusted differences in global and regional cerebral atrophy and WMH were appraised with validated semiquantitative rating scales. RESULTS: A total of 384 patients (310 with PD, 74 with DLB) met eligibility criteria, of whom 44.3% (n = 170) had OH, including 24.7% (n = 42) with severe OH and 41.7% (n = 71) with SH. OH was associated with global brain atrophy (p = 0.004) and regional atrophy involving the anterior-temporal (p = 0.001) and mediotemporal (p = 0.001) regions, greater in severe vs nonsevere OH (p = 0.001). The WMH burden was similar in those with and without OH (p = 0.49). SH was not associated with brain atrophy (p = 0.59) or WMH (p = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: OH, but not SH, was associated with cerebral atrophy in Lewy body disorders, with prominent temporal region involvement. Neither OH nor SH was associated with WMH.

Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for tremor: The critical role of intraoperative testing.

INTRODUCTION: Optimal placement of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) lead is critical to ensure an adequate therapeutic benefit and minimize stimulation-induced side effects. METHODS: We reviewed data from 2004 to 2018 of all cases of essential tremor treated with thalamic DBS at the University of Cincinnati. All procedures were performed with the patient awake. Change in parallel trajectory was classified as major repositioning, whereas a change in depth of electrode classified as minor repositioning. The following data were compared between groups (no vs. minor vs. major repositioning): age at surgery, sex, AC-PC length, third ventricle width, cerebral atrophy, small vessel disease burden, and intraoperative tremor control. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with intraoperative repositioning. RESULTS: Of the 127 encounters with essential tremor, 71 required repositioning (33 major and 38 minor). Comparing procedures with major, minor, and no repositioning, mean number of changes per procedure (4 vs. 1.2 vs 0; p < 0.001) and AC-PC length (26 vs. 27 vs. 27.2 mm; p = 0.021) differed between the three groups. Older age at surgery (OR 1.04, p = 0.042), left side (OR 2.56, p = 0.04) and decrease in AC-PC length (OR 1.33, p = 0.026) were associated with greater odds of any (minor or major) repositioning. A decrease in AC-PC length was associated with greater odds of major repositioning (OR 1.37, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative functional testing may be critical to ensure the accuracy of thalamic DBS targeting based on neuroimaging data, particularly in patients with reduced AC-PC length.

Deep brain stimulation in uncommon tremor disorders: indications, targets, and programming.

BACKGROUND: In uncommon tremor disorders, clinical efficacy and optimal anatomical targets for deep brain stimulation (DBS) remain inadequately studied and insufficiently quantified. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of PubMed.gov and ClinicalTrials.gov. Relevant articles were identified using the following keywords: "tremor", "Holmes tremor", "orthostatic tremor", "multiple sclerosis", "multiple sclerosis tremor", "neuropathy", "neuropathic tremor", "fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome", and "fragile X." RESULTS: We identified a total of 263 cases treated with DBS for uncommon tremor disorders. Of these, 44 had Holmes tremor (HT), 18 orthostatic tremor (OT), 177 multiple sclerosis (MS)-associated tremor, 14 neuropathy-associated tremor, and 10 fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). DBS resulted in favorable, albeit partial, clinical improvements in HT cases receiving Vim-DBS alone or in combination with additional targets. A sustained improvement was reported in OT cases treated with bilateral Vim-DBS, while the two cases treated with unilateral Vim-DBS demonstrated only a transient effect. MS-associated tremor responded to dual-target Vim-/VO-DBS, but the inability to account for the progression of MS-associated disability impeded the assessment of its long-term clinical efficacy. Neuropathy-associated tremor substantially improved with Vim-DBS. In FXTAS patients, while Vim-DBS was effective in improving tremor, equivocal results were observed in those with ataxia. CONCLUSIONS: DBS of select targets may represent an effective therapeutic strategy for uncommon tremor disorders, although the level of evidence is currently in its incipient form and based on single cases or limited case series. An international registry is, therefore, warranted to clarify selection criteria, long-term results, and optimal surgical targets.

Congenital and Hereditary Diseases of the Spinal Cord.

Congenital anomalies of the spinal cord can pose a diagnostic dilemma to the radiologist. Several classification systems of these anomalies exist. Antenatal ultrasound and fetal magnetic resonance imaging is playing an increasingly important role in the early diagnosis and management of patients. Understanding the underlying anatomy as well as embryology of these disorders can be valuable in correctly identifying the type of spinal cord dysraphic defect. Hereditary spinal cord diseases are rare but can be devastating. When the onset is in adulthood, delay in diagnosis is common. Although the spine findings are nonspecific, some imaging features combined with brain imaging findings can be distinctive. Sometimes, the radiologist may be the first to raise the possibility of these disorders.