A Multicomponent Model to Improve Hospital Care of Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a multicomponent intervention improves care in hospitalized older adults with cognitive impairment. DESIGN: One-year retrospective chart review with propensity score matching on critical demographic and clinical variables was used to compare individauls with cognitive impairmenet on intervention and nonintervention units. SETTING: Large tertiary medical center. PARTICIPANTS: All hospitalized individuals age 65 and older with cognitive impairment admitted to medicine who required constant or enhanced observation for behavioral and psychological symptoms. INTERVENTION: Multicomponent intervention (geographic unit cohorting, multidisciplinary approach, patient engagement specialists (PES), staff education) or usual care. MEASUREMENTS: In-hospital mortality, length of stay, readmission, management of behavioral disturbances. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 476 of the 712 intervention visits were pair-matched with 476 of the 558 usual care visits. Matching was successful in balancing baseline covariates between intervention and usual care units. Individuals admitted to the intervention unit had lower in-hospital mortality (1.1% vs 2.9%, p=0.05) and shorter stays (5.0 vs 5.8 days, p=0.04). There was no difference in discharge home (p=0.90) or 30-day readmission rates (p=0.44). Individuals on the intervention unit were less likely than those receivng usual care to have an order for constant (12.0% vs 45.8%, p<0.01) or enhanced (22.1% vs 79.6%, p<0.01) observation, to be taking benzodiazepines (26.3% vs 38.0%, p<0.01), to be taking nothing by mouth (29.6% vs 40.8%, p=0.01), to be on bedrest (17.0% vs 25.8%, p=0.01), to be taking antipsychotics (41.2% vs 54.0%, p<0.01), or to have restraints (3.2% vs 6.9%, p=.01). CONCLUSION: A multicomponent intervention of geographic cohorting, multidisciplinary approach, PES, and staff education may offer a new paradigm in the management of hospitalized older adults with cognitive impairment.

Effects of nicotine nasal spray on cognitive function in schizophrenia.

Schizophrenics have among the highest rates of cigarette smoking. Some studies indicate that cigarette smoking or nicotine may ameliorate some of the cognitive or theoretically related neurophysiological deficits seen in schizophrenic patients. This study investigated the effects of nicotine nasal spray on measures of attention, verbal memory, and visual-spatial memory in schizophrenic patients who were chronic smokers, using a double-blind placebo-controlled pre-post experimental design. Compared to placebo, active nicotine spray significantly decreased reaction time on the Conner's CPT and improved scores on a measure purported to reflect spatial working memory on a dot task. There were trends for the increased number of hits and decreased number of errors in pre-post comparisons on the CPT task in the active nicotine session. There were no effects of active nicotine nasal spray on verbal memory. Our results suggest that nicotine may modestly enhance attention and spatial working memory in schizophrenic patients who are cigarette smokers and have been abstinent overnight.

Clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, and conventional antipsychotic drug effects on glucose, lipids, and leptin in schizophrenic patients.

Some reports have indicated increased rates of diabetes and increased prevalence of glucose and lipid abnormalities during treatment with second-generation antipsychotics, with most concern raised about clozapine and olanzapine. Most of the findings have come from case reports, retrospective examination of laboratory values, and analysis of health-care claims databases. This study investigated fasting levels of glucose, lipids, and leptin in a non-randomized, cross- sectional study of 210 patients, with schizophrenic or schizoaffective disorder, treated with a single antipsychotic medication - clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, or a conventional antipsychotic. Glucose tolerance tests (GTT), with a 75-g glucose load, were preformed in a subset of patients. In this sample most mean fasting glucose and lipid levels were within the normal range and were not significantly different across the four drug treatment groups. Patients treated with clozapine and olanzapine had higher triglyceride levels than risperidone patients. In patients receiving a GTT, risperidone-treated patients had higher glucose levels at 1 h than patients treated with olanzapine, and there were more patients on risperidone who met American Diabetes Association glucose metabolic criteria for diagnosis of diabetes. Although there were no significant differences in age or body mass index among the four drug groups, we cannot rule out some potential biasing factors we did not assess which could potentially influence our results. These include unknown physician preference in drug selection based on their beliefs about the weight-inducing or diabetes potential of different antipsychotics, differences in visceral fat, and differences in patients' antipsychotic drug history.