Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 69
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 88(3-4): 166-73, 1996 Feb 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8632490

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Radical prostatectomy is one of the most commonly used curative procedures for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The probability that a patient will undergo additional cancer therapy after this procedure is largely unknown. PURPOSE: The objective was to determine the likelihood of additional cancer therapy after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Data for this study were derived from a linked dataset that combined information from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program and Medicare hospital and physician claims. Records were included in this study if patient histories met the following criteria: (a) residing in Connecticut, Washington (Seattle-Puget Sound), or Georgia (Metropolitan Atlanta); (b) having been diagnosed with prostate cancer during the period from January 1, 1985, through December 31, 1991; (c) undergoing radical prostatectomy by December 31, 1992; and (d) having no evidence of other types of cancer. Patients were considered to have had additional cancer therapy if they had had radiation therapy, orchiectomy, and/or androgen-deprivation therapy by injection after radical prostatectomy. The interval between the initial treatment and any follow-up treatment was calculated from the date of radical prostatectomy to the 1st day of the follow-up cancer therapy. All presented probabilities are based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 3494 Medicare patients, 3173 of whom underwent radical prostatectomy within 3 months of prostate cancer diagnosis. Although radical prostatectomy is often reserved for localized cancer, less than 60% (1934) of patients whose records were included in this study had organ-confined disease, according to final surgical pathology. Overall, the 5-year cumulative incidence of having any additional cancer treatment after radical prostatectomy reached 34.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 31.5%-38.5%). For patients with pathologically organ-confined cancer, the 5-year cumulative incidence was 24.3% (95% CI = 20.0%-29.3%) overall and ranged from 15.6% (95% CI = 9.7%-24.5%) for well-differentiated cancer (Gleason scores 2-4) to 41.5% (95% CI = 27.9%-58.4%) for poorly differentiated cancer (Gleason scores 8-10). The corresponding figures for pathologically regional cancer were 22.7% (95% CI = 12.0%-40.5%) and 68.1% (95% CI = 58.7%-77.1%). CONCLUSION: Further treatment of prostate cancer was done in about one third of patients who had had a radical prostatectomy with curative intent and in about one quarter of patients who were found to have organ-confined disease. IMPLICATIONS: Given the common requirement for follow-up cancer treatments after radical prostatectomy and the uncertainties about the effectiveness of the various follow-up treatment strategies, further investigation of these treatments is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Anciano , Diferenciación Celular , Terapia Combinada , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Grupos Raciales , Riesgo , Programa de VERF , Estados Unidos
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 14(8): 2258-65, 1996 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8708715

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study was designed to obtain representative estimates of the quality of life and probabilities of possible adverse effects among Medicare-age patients treated with external-beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer. METHODS: Patients treated for local or regional prostate cancer with high-energy external-beam radiation between 1989 and 1991 were sampled from a claims data base of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from three regions. Patients were surveyed primarily by mail, with telephone follow-up evaluation of non-respondents. There were 621 respondents (83% response rate). The results were compared with data from a previously published national survey of Medicare-age men who had undergone radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Although they were older at the time of treatment, radiation patients were less likely than surgical patients to wear pads for wetness (7% v 32%) and had a lower rate of impotence (23% v 56% for men < 70 years), while they were more likely to report problems with bowel dysfunction (10% v 4%). Both groups reported generally positive feelings about their treatments. Radiation and surgical patients reported similar rates of additional subsequent treatment (24% v 26% at 3 years after primary treatment). However, radiation patients were less likely to say they were cancer-free, and they reported more worry about cancer than did surgical patients. CONCLUSION: The health-related quality of life of radiation and surgical patients, on average, is similar, but the pattern of experience with adverse consequences of treatment differs by treatment.


Asunto(s)
Medicare , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Programa de VERF , Anciano , Estreñimiento/etiología , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/rehabilitación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología
3.
Arch Intern Med ; 152(9): 1877-80, 1992 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1520054

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and safety of quinine sulfate, vitamin E, and placebo in the treatment of nocturnal leg cramps. DESIGN: A random-order, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial was performed. SETTING: The study was conducted at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vt. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven male veterans, aged 38 to 73 years, who experienced at least six leg cramps per month were recruited through the general medicine walk-in clinic or were referred from other clinics. Fifty-five subjects were contacted, 30 were enrolled consecutively, and 27 completed the study. INTERVENTION: Subjects received, in random order, quinine sulfate (200 mg at supper and 300 mg at bedtime), vitamin E (800 U at bedtime), or placebo for 4-week periods. These periods were separated by 4-week washout intervals. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients reported cramp frequency, severity, and sleep disturbance caused by cramps. RESULTS: Compared with treatment with placebo, quinine reduced the frequency of cramps and sleep disturbance, but not the average cramp severity. Thirteen of 27 patients had at least a 50% reduction in the number of cramps while receiving quinine; the response was usually seen within 3 days. There was evidence of a mild increase in side effects while subjects received quinine. Vitamin E was not effective in reducing leg cramp frequency, severity, or sleep disturbance. CONCLUSIONS: Quinine sulfate, but not vitamin E, is superior to placebo in the treatment of nocturnal leg cramps.


Asunto(s)
Calambre Muscular/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinina/uso terapéutico , Vitamina E/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Pierna , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/prevención & control
4.
Arch Intern Med ; 150(1): 83-6, 1990 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2297300

RESUMEN

We investigated variations in the oral anticoagulant treatment of atrial fibrillation by physicians in three specialties: family physicians (or general practitioners), general internists, and cardiologists. Results showed general agreement in the anticoagulation decision regarding patients with either mitral valve disease or a history of chronic alcohol abuse, but substantial disagreement in other categories of patients. Estimations of the risk of embolization and risk of hemorrhage differed widely among all physicians, cardiologists generally rating the embolization risks lower than the other physicians. A physician's treatment decision was strongly related to the relative risk of embolism vs hemorrhage derived for each case. A relationship between physician specialty and treatment decision was also demonstrated, with cardiologists least likely, and family practitioners most likely, to institute anticoagulation in nonrheumatic patients with atrial fibrillation. The reason for this variation appears to be differences in the estimated risk of systemic embolism.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Cardiología , Recolección de Datos , Embolia/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Medicina Interna , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/complicaciones , Médicos de Familia , Cardiopatía Reumática/complicaciones
5.
Am J Med ; 104(6): 526-32, 1998 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9674714

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To describe practice patterns and beliefs of primary care physicians and urologists regarding early detection and treatment of prostate cancer. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: National probability samples of primary care physicians (n=444) and urologists (n=394) completed mail survey instruments in 1995. Physicians were asked about their use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for men of different ages and their beliefs about the value of radical prostatectomy, external-beam radiation therapy, and watchful waiting for men with differing life expectancies. RESULTS: Most primary care physicians report doing PSA tests during routine examination of men older than 50 years of age. The majority say they continue to do them on patients over 80 years and to refer men with abnormal values for biopsy. In contrast, only a minority of urologists would recommend PSA tests or biopsy for abnormal values for men over 75 years of age. More than 80% of primary care physicians and urologists doubt the value of radical prostatectomy for men with < 10 years of life expectancy; more primary care physicians than urologists see probable survival benefit in radiation therapy for patients with life expectancy < 10 years (48% versus 36%) or > 10 years (67% versus 53%). Thirteen percent of primary care physicians and only 3% of urologists consider watchful waiting to be as appropriate as aggressive therapy for men with > 10 years of life expectancy. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians are more aggressive about PSA testing and referral for biopsy than most urologists recommend. Both groups recommend PSA testing and believe that aggressive treatment is more beneficial than existing evidence indicates.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Tamizaje Masivo , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Urología/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Medicina Interna/estadística & datos numéricos , Esperanza de Vida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/inmunología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/prevención & control , Derivación y Consulta , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
6.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 46(7): 829-32, 1998 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9670868

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To address the question, "Is there enough overuse of Medicare reimbursement to hospitals that reallocation of excess could provide sufficient funds to enhance home care and community services?" DESIGN: Simulation using data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) to estimate dollars that might be reallocated from hospital reimbursement. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3577 persons aged 80 and older in a stratified sample of Medicare beneficiaries interviewed in September 1992 in the MCBS. MEASUREMENTS: We ranked the United States hospital service areas' (HSAs) Medicare hospital discharge rates. We assigned the beneficiaries in the MCBS to the HSAs based on their residence zip codes. The hospitalization expenditures and mortality rates of MCBS respondents living in HSAs in each quartile were compared. RESULTS: By reducing hospital utilization to the mean level now used by the lowest quartile of HSAs, $560 would be saved per Medicare beneficiary aged 80 or older (P=.004) with no difference in mortality rates. These savings could purchase 40 visiting nurse visits per year for those in need. Potential savings would be $152 per Medicare beneficiary if hospital utilization were reduced from that used by the highest quartile to the level of the lower three quartiles of HSAs, enough to purchase about 11 additional visiting nurse visits. CONCLUSION: This simulation suggests that the very old might safely receive less hospital care. Because relatively few older people need home and community services in a year, these per capita savings could be reallocated to purchase many services for those having the greatest need.


Asunto(s)
Atención Integral de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/economía , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Asignación de Recursos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Atención Integral de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/economía , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
7.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 47(9): 1058-64, 1999 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10484246

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To develop an alternative healthcare benefit (called MediCaring) and to assess the preferences of older Medicare beneficiaries concerning this benefit, which emphasizes more home-based and supportive health care and discourages use of hospitalization and aggressive treatment. To evaluate the beneficiaries' ability to understand and make a choice regarding health insurance benefits; to measure their likelihood to change from traditional Medicare to the new MediCaring benefit; and to determine the short-term stability of that choice. DESIGN: Focus groups of persons aged 65+ and family members shaped the potential MediCaring benefit. A panel of 50 national experts critiqued three iterations of the benefit. The final version was test marketed by discussing it with 382 older people (men > or = 75 years and women > or = 80 years) in their homes. Telephone surveys a few days later, and again 1 month after the home interview, assessed the potential beneficiaries' understanding and preferences concerning MediCaring and the stability of their responses. SETTINGS: Focus groups were held in community settings in New Hampshire, Washington, DC, Cleveland, OH, and Columbia, SC. Test marketing occurred in New Hampshire, Cleveland, OH; Columbia, SC, and Los Angeles, CA. PARTICIPANTS: Focus group participants were persons more than 65 years old (11 focus groups), healthcare providers (9 focus groups), and family decision-makers (3 focus groups). Participants in the in-home informing (test marketing group) were persons older than 75 years who were identified through contact with a variety of services. MEASUREMENTS: Demographics, health characteristics, understanding, and preferences. RESULTS: Focus group beneficiaries between the ages of 65 and 74 generally wanted access to all possible medical treatment and saw MediCaring as a need of persons older than themselves. Those older than age 80 were mostly in favor of it. Test marketing participants understood the key points of the new benefit: 74% generally liked it, and 34% said they would take it now. Preferences were generally stable at 1 month. In multivariate regression, those preferring MediCaring were wealthier, more often white, more often living in senior housing, and using more homecare services. However, they were not more often in poor health or needing ADL assistance. CONCLUSIONS: Older persons aged more than 80 years can understand a health benefit choice; most liked the aims of a new supportive care benefit, and 34% would change immediately from Medicare to a supportive care benefit such as MediCaring,. These findings encourage further development of special programs of care, such as MediCaring, that prioritize comfort and support for the old old.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/economía , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/economía , Beneficios del Seguro , Medicare , Cuidado Terminal/economía , Planificación Anticipada de Atención , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis de Varianza , Comprensión , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Política de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Comercialización de los Servicios de Salud , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Estados Unidos
8.
Urology ; 44(5): 692-8; discussion 698-9, 1994 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7526526

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the epidemiology of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and associated risks among Medicare beneficiaries during the period of 1984 to 1990. METHODS: Medicare hospital claims for a 20% national sample of Medicare beneficiaries were used to identify TURPs performed during the study period. All reported rates were adjusted to the composition of the 1990 Medicare population. Risks of mortality and reoperation were evaluated using life-table methods. RESULTS: The age-adjusted rate of TURP reached a peak in 1987 and declined thereafter. Similar trends were observed for all age groups. In 1990, the rates of TURP (including all indications) were approximately 25, 19, and 13 per 1000 for men over the age of 75, 70 to 74, and 65 to 69, respectively. The 30-day mortality following TURP for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) decreased from 1.20% in 1984 to 0.77% in 1990 (linear trend, p = 0.0001). The cumulative incidence of a second TURP among men with BPH has likewise decreased steadily over time; in this study, the average was 7.2% over 7 years (5.5% when the indication for the second TURP was restricted to BPH only). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of TURP has been declining since 1987, conceivably due to increasing availability of alternative treatments or changes in treatment preferences of patients and physicians. Over the same period, the outcomes following TURPs have improved, perhaps due to improved surgical care and changes in patient selection.


Asunto(s)
Medicare Part A , Prostatectomía , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Población Negra , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Prostatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Prostatectomía/tendencias , Hiperplasia Prostática/etnología , Hiperplasia Prostática/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/etnología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Reoperación , Investigación , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Población Blanca
9.
Urology ; 51(1): 63-6, 1998 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9457290

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and patient impact of using standardized video presentations concerning alternative treatments for managing localized prostate cancer. METHODS: One hundred eleven men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer were shown a video tape concerning the risks and benefits of four treatment options: radical surgery, external beam radiation, hormonal therapy, and watchful waiting. The impact of the video presentation was assessed using a questionnaire completed by the patient before and after viewing the video and again following a discussion with his treating physician. RESULTS: Patients demonstrated significant increases in their understanding of treatment options to manage prostate cancer after viewing the video presentation. Treating physicians confirmed the increased sophistication of their patients' knowledge of their disease and the potential outcomes associated with alternative treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized video presentations of treatment alternatives for prostate cancer can be incorporated into busy office practices. Both patients and physicians benefit from the increased level of understanding that allows physician/patient discussions to focus on the critical risk/benefit tradeoffs rather than simply describing treatment alternatives.


Asunto(s)
Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Grabación en Video , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
10.
Am J Prev Med ; 3(4): 223-6, 1987.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3330661

RESUMEN

The Dartmouth Primary Care Cooperative Information (COOP) Project conducted a controlled trial on the impact of antismoking advice from office-based physicians. Eighteen primary care medical practices were randomly assigned to be intervention or customary care practices. Medical personnel assigned to the intervention practices were to systematically identify cigarette smokers (among patients aged 35 to 59 years making an office visit), advise them to quit smoking, and provide educational materials. A random sample of 258 smokers was identified and followed-up four months later. Intervention-group smokers were more likely to report being advised to quit smoking (77 percent versus 47 percent) and to attempt quitting (39 percent versus 31 percent), but had success rates similar to those of the other group (6 percent versus 7 percent). We conclude that the medical office is an excellent place to identify large numbers of smokers and initiate attempts at quitting, but find that simple antismoking information and advice are not enough to improve cessation rates.


Asunto(s)
Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Atención Primaria de Salud , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Adulto , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Motivación
11.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 53 Suppl 2: S97-100, 1999 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10406446

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Nutritional care needs are overlooked in clinical practice. We review nutritional needs and describe an approach for improving nutritional care in clinical practice. DESIGN: Data from a controlled trial and several population cohorts. SETTING: Primary care practices and a population survey in New Hampshire and Vermont, USA. SUBJECTS: The controlled trial involved 1651 persons aged 70+years. The cohorts include information from 1879 persons aged 12+. INTERVENTION: All patients completed standard surveys which included information about nutritional needs. 22 practices participated in the trial. RESULTS: The higher the BMI, the less healthy the population. 15 30% of patients report problems or concerns with eating/weight and nutrition. Patients with problems or concerns are often bothered by other health and social problems. Patients who have productive interactions with clinicians have improved nutritional care and are more likely to report help with eating problems (68% vs 86%; Odds ratio 5.0 (95% CI: 0.9-27.0). CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional issues are common and complex. A productive provider-patient interaction can improve the nutritional care of patients. Essential elements for a productive interaction include an informed, educated patient and a provider (or clinical team) prepared to assess and manage the broad range of issues that are important to the patient. Technology facilitates necessary feedback between patient and provider.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , Estado de Salud , Ciencias de la Nutrición , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados como Asunto , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Renta , Masculino , New Hampshire , Ciencias de la Nutrición/educación , Estado Nutricional , Problemas Sociales , Vermont
12.
Med Decis Making ; 1(3): 215-24, 1981.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7052409

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to identify clinical characteristics that could predict the diagnosis in ambulatory patients with abdominal pain. We studied 552 unselected ambulatory male patients whose average age was 47 years and whose median duration of pain was 3 weeks. Potentially serious disease occurred in 21% of the patients. Single abnormal findings had a low predictive value for serious disease. However, by using combinations of clinical findings, we could construct and test a decision rule to identify a group of patients who had a low prevalence of serious disease. This "low risk" group contained 36% of all patients with abdominal pain. Laboratory tests were almost always normal in these patients. Our findings suggest a diagnostic strategy for evaluating abdominal pain: When the initial examination shows that there is little chance of serious disease, laboratory tests should be deferred or omitted altogether. In patients who have a very low likelihood of potentially serious disease, it may be useful to regard "nonspecific abdominal pain" as a positive diagnosis, rather than a diagnosis of exclusion.


Asunto(s)
Abdomen , Apendicitis/diagnóstico , Colelitiasis/diagnóstico , Obstrucción Intestinal/diagnóstico , Dolor/etiología , Úlcera Péptica/diagnóstico , Atención Ambulatoria , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Colelitiasis/complicaciones , Toma de Decisiones , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera Péptica/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos
13.
J Ambul Care Manage ; 24(3): 1-9, 2001 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11433550

RESUMEN

In the clinic, one method for improving the interaction is to ask patients to systematically report their health status, give them standard advice based on their responses, and ask them to discuss this advice with a health practitioner. In the school system, this approach provides aggregate information for targeting programs to meet student needs. In the workplace, this health assessment and personal feedback approach may be offered to employees to improve health care and lower health care costs. But why stop at the door of the clinic, school, or workplace when Internet technology can extend to an entire community the benefits of health assessment and feedback?


Asunto(s)
Educación en Salud , Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Gestión de la Calidad Total/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , California/epidemiología , Retroalimentación , Femenino , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Servicios de Información , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Medición de Riesgo , Autoevaluación (Psicología)
14.
J Ambul Care Manage ; 21(3): 56-9, 1998 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10181848

RESUMEN

This article describes some potential solutions to the many practical barriers that arise when trying to improve clinical care in everyday practice. A useful mnemonic for incorporating measurement into daily work is called GAPS--setting Goals, Assessing the current processes, Planning a new approach, and Starting it. The 80+ Project represents a foundation of information and offers promise to create durable, productive interactions for elderly individuals and their health care providers.


Asunto(s)
Anciano de 80 o más Años , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/normas , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos , Anciano , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/organización & administración , Humanos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estados Unidos
15.
J Ambul Care Manage ; 21(3): 27-33, 1998 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10181844

RESUMEN

This article describes a simple method for rating the patient-clinician interaction from the perspective of the older adult patient, with the goal of improving patient outcomes. A measure for rating the quality of an interaction with a patient who is bothered by a problem is called the Functional Education Index or FNXEI. Usually, sicker patients are known to be less satisfied with their medical care. What is unique about the FNXEI is that it is not affected by a patient's overall health, giving clinicians an accurate account of their interactions with patients. Considering this, the FNXEI becomes a useful tool for improving care because it has face validity and specificity about the type of care clinicians are providing for their older adult patients.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/normas , Satisfacción del Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Anciano , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Estados Unidos
16.
J Ambul Care Manage ; 21(3): 34-9, 1998 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10181845

RESUMEN

At age 80, about 4 of every ten 10 men and 3 of every 10 women will die within 5 years. What should the very old expect of the dying experience? National data reveal that very old adults experience considerable variation in the use of the hospital during their last 6 months of life. Physicians report these patients most often need assistance with self-care, emotional support, nutrition, and pain control. In order to minimize unnecessary and expensive hospitalization and improve home management, specific terminal care guidelines are proposed and illustrated.


Asunto(s)
Anciano de 80 o más Años , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/normas , Cuidado Terminal/normas , Anciano , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Guías como Asunto , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Esperanza de Vida , Masculino , Medicare , Médicos/psicología , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Análisis de Área Pequeña , Estados Unidos
17.
J Ambul Care Manage ; 20(1): 17-27, 1997 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10164030

RESUMEN

Health care is a service industry. A fundamental attribute of many successful service industries is the "small replicable unit (SRU)." There are three essential elements of an SRU: (1) the smallest core unit of activity, (2) micromeasures designed to help manage the core activities, and (3) combinations of the activities and measures to match local customer needs. In this article, we describe a model for geriatric care based on "SRU thinking." We demonstrate how this approach places measurement of patient values, clinical improvement strategies, and research objectives into day-to-day health care delivery.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/métodos , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Gestión de la Calidad Total/métodos , Anciano , Evaluación Geriátrica , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/normas , Humanos , Modelos Organizacionales , New Hampshire , Satisfacción del Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
18.
J Ambul Care Manage ; 21(3): 1-9, 1998 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10181841

RESUMEN

Today, managing care from the "outside in" is the predominant model for changing health care. The risk of this outside-in approach is that the health care system may lose sight of the people and communities for which it serves and cares. In this article, an "inside-out" model for viewing health care in a geriatric population is presented from the perspective of patients and providers, placing the provider in a proactive rather than reactive role. By focusing attention on the outcomes or value a patient is experiencing, providers are challenged to consider new ways of managing care.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/organización & administración , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/organización & administración , Modelos Organizacionales , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , Control de Costos , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/economía , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/normas , Humanos , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/normas , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos , Estados Unidos
19.
J Ambul Care Manage ; 21(3): 17-26, 1998 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10181843

RESUMEN

Understanding the barriers to obtaining care that the population of people age 80 and older (80+) experiences is one of the first steps toward developing organizational and clinical strategies aimed at improving care. This article reviews the data from the 80+ Project's survey to assess the prevalence of barriers to care and identify the characteristics that place the 80+ population at risk. Barriers to access for older adults occur on many levels. Ultimately, the ability to improve health outcomes through reducing barriers to care is dependent on the effectiveness and quality of care received. By recognizing the barriers to care that limit access, health care professionals can begin to develop strategies to eliminate these barriers and improve the health care of older adult patients.


Asunto(s)
Anciano de 80 o más Años , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/normas , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/normas , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Recolección de Datos , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/economía , Humanos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos
20.
J Ambul Care Manage ; 21(3): 40-8, 1998 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10181846

RESUMEN

This article describes an institutionwide geriatric educational initiative (called Geriatrics Awareness Month) that provided didactic and formal experiential learning designed for health professionals. From an educational perspective, to learn geriatrics requires systems thinking, and, to learn systems thinking, geriatrics provides an excellent clinical context. The authors evaluated the didactic and experiential aspects of Geriatric Awareness Month. For attendees of didactic sessions, the availability of pocket-sized educational materials was deemed most valuable. Despite busy schedules, house staff were able to make a change in their practice and study the effect of this change.


Asunto(s)
Educación Médica Continua/normas , Geriatría/educación , Geriatría/normas , Modelos Educacionales , Anciano , Concienciación , Medicina Comunitaria/educación , Administradores de Hospital/educación , Humanos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/educación , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Análisis de Sistemas , Enseñanza/métodos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA