Risk factors of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a prospective cohort study (YCOG1301).

PURPOSE: Although the effectiveness of antiemetic therapy for colorectal cancer chemotherapy has improved with further drug development, some patients still suffer from chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) even with only 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone. The present study investigated the risk factors of CINV in patients who received chemotherapy for colorectal cancer and clarified which patients need additional neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist. METHODS: Patients with colorectal cancer receiving moderate-emetic-risk chemotherapy (MEC) were enrolled in this prospective single-arm study with intravenous palonosetron 0.75 mg and dexamethasone 9.9 mg before chemotherapy and with paroral dexamethasone 8 mg on days 2 and 3. The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate for delayed-phase CINV. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients were eligible for this study. The delayed CR rate was 84.9% (152/179). There were no significant differences in any risk factors, but women with a low body mass index (BMI) (a combination of "female sex" and "BMI < 20") showed a significantly lower rate of CC (complete control) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.17-1.13; p = 0.039), and young patients with a low BMI (combination of "age < 65" and "BMI < 20") showed a significantly lower rate of CR (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.13-0.88; p = 0.022) than the other patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to identify any single risk factors associated with delayed CINV in patients who received chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer. However, combinations of "thin and women" or "young and thin patients" might be possible predictive conditions, thus, candidates for NK1 receptor antagonist administration in MEC. Further investigations are required to develop criteria for the supplementation of NK1 receptor antagonist.

A prospective multi-center registry concerning the clinical performance of laparoscopic colorectal surgery using an absorbable adhesion barrier (INTERCEED®) made of oxidized regenerated cellulose.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective multi-center registry was to evaluate the safety and clinical performance of INTERCEED® in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. METHODS: This study was a prospective, multi-center, single-arm registry wherein patients who received INTERCEED® in laparoscopic colorectal surgery were registered consecutively (UMIN-CTR 00001872). The primary outcome was the incidence rate of postoperative adhesive small intestinal obstruction within 6 months. The secondary outcomes were reoperation related to postoperative bleeding and anastomotic leak, surgical site infection (SSI) and anastomotic leak. RESULTS: Between March 2012 and March 2015, a total of 202 patients were enrolled from six institutions. INTERCEED® was not applied in two patients, so 200 patients were analyzed using the full analysis set population. The incidence rate of postoperative adhesive intestinal obstruction was 1.0% (2/200). The total SSI rate was 3.5% (7/200), the deep incisional SSI rate was 0.0% (0/200), and the organ SSI rate was 0.0% (0/200). The incidence of anastomotic leak was 1.0% (2/200). Reoperation was performed in two cases: one for anastomotic leak and the other as cardiac surgery due to heart disease. CONCLUSIONS: Using INTERCEED® in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe and may be useful for preventing postoperative adhesive small intestinal obstruction.

Portal encasement: Significant CT findings to diagnose local recurrence after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the utility of portal encasement as a criterion for early diagnosis of local recurrence (LR) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: A total of 61 patients who underwent PD for PDAC were included in this retrospective study. Portal stenosis was evaluated by sequential postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans and correlated with disease recurrence. In addition to the conventional LR diagnostic criterion of a growing soft tissue mass, LR was evaluated using portal encasement as an additional diagnostic criterion. Portal encasement was defined as progressive stenosis of the portal system accompanied by a soft tissue mass, notwithstanding the enlargement of the mass. RESULTS: Benign portal stenosis was found on the first postoperative CT imaging in 16 patients. However, stenosis resolved a median of 81 days later in all but one patient whose stenosis was due to portal reconstruction during PD. Portal encasement could be distinguished from benign portal stenosis based on the timing of emergence of the portal stenosis. Portal encasement developed in 13 of the 19 patients with LR, including 6 patients in whom the finding of portal encasement led to the diagnosis of LR a median of 147 days earlier with our diagnostic criterion compared with the conventional diagnostic criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Portal encasement should be considered as a promising diagnostic criterion for earlier diagnosis of LR after PD for PDAC.

Clinical evaluation of the aberrant left hepatic artery arising from the left gastric artery in esophagectomy.

PURPOSE: The left gastric artery (LGA) is commonly severed when the gastric tube is made for esophageal reconstruction. Sacrifice of the LGA can cause liver ischemic necrosis in patients with an aberrant left hepatic artery (ALHA) arising from the LGA. We experienced a case of life-threatening hepatic abscess after severing the ALHA. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes of severing the ALHA. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 176 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. They were classified into the ALHA (N = 16, 9.1%) and non-ALHA (N = 160, 90.9%) groups. Univariate analysis was performed to compare the clinicopathological variables. Long-term survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method in matched pair case-control analysis. RESULTS: The postoperative morbidities were not statistically different between the two groups, although serum alanine aminotransferase levels on postoperative days 1 and 3 were significantly higher in the ALHA group (36 IU/L, 14-515; 32 IU/L, 13-295) than in the non-ALHA group (24 IU/L, 8-163; 19 IU/L, 6-180), respectively (p = 0.0055; p = 0.0073). Overall survival was not statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: Severe hepatic abscess occurred in 6.3% of the patients with the ALHA after esophagectomy, even though the results presented here found no statistical differences in morbidity or mortality with or without the ALHA. Surgeons should probably attempt to preserve the ALHA especially in patients with altered liver function while making a gastric tube for esophageal reconstruction.

A randomized controlled trial of subcutaneous closed-suction Blake drains for the prevention of incisional surgical site infection after colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: The effects of subcutaneous closed-suction Blake drain for preventing incisional surgical site infections (SSIs) after colorectal surgery have never been evaluated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Thus, we performed a RCT to evaluate the clinical benefits of using a subcutaneous closed-suction Blake drain in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. METHOD: Consecutive patients who underwent colorectal surgery were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to the subcutaneous closed-suction drainage arm or the control (no subcutaneous drainage) arm. The primary endpoint was incidence rate of incisional SSIs. And, we performed logistic regression analysis to detect predictive factors for incisional SSIs after colorectal surgery. RESULTS: From November 2012 to September 2014, a total of 240 patients were enrolled in this study. One-hundred-seventeen patients who were treated by the control arm and 112 patients by the subcutaneous drainage arm were judged to be eligible for analysis. The incidence of incisional SSIs rate was 8.7 % in the overall patients. The incidence of incisional SSIs rate was 12.8 % in the control arm and 4.5 % in the subcutaneous drainage arm. There was significantly reduction of the incidence in the subcutaneous drainage arm than in the control arm (p = 0.025). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that thickness of subcutaneous fat >3.0 cm, forced expiratory volume in 1 s as percent of forced vital capacity (FEV1.0 %) >70 %, and subcutaneous drain were independent predictors of postoperative incisional SSIs (p = 0.008, p = 0.004, and p = 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results of our RCT suggest that a subcutaneous Blake drain is beneficial for preventing incisional SSIs in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Midterm follow-up of a randomized trial of open surgery versus laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has been widely accepted for the treatment of colorectal cancer; however, long-term outcomes in elderly patients remain controversial. The midterm results of a randomized trial comparing open surgery with laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer are presented. METHODS: This was a randomized trial comparing open surgery with laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. The primary outcome was complication rate, and secondary outcomes included 3-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival. A total of 200 patients were randomly assigned to open surgery or laparoscopic surgery between 2008 and 2012. The main study objective was to compare the midterm outcomes of open surgery with those of laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. This trial is registered with Clinical Trials.gov (NCT01862562). RESULTS: There were no differences between the laparoscopic surgery group and open surgery group in the 3-year overall survival rate (91.5% for laparoscopic surgery vs. 90.6% for open surgery, p = 0.638) or the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate (84.8% for laparoscopic surgery vs. 88.2% for open surgery, p = 0.324). The local recurrence rate was significantly higher in the laparoscopic surgery group than in the open surgery group in rectal cancer (13.8% for laparoscopic surgery vs. 0% for open surgery, p = 0.038). In subgroup analysis according to tumor location, there were no significant differences in the 3-year overall survival rate or 3-year recurrence-free survival rate between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The midterm outcomes of laparoscopic surgery are similar to those of open surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

Prediction of Lateral Pelvic Lymph-Node Metastasis in Low Rectal Cancer by Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for lateral pelvic lymph-node metastasis. PATIENTS: Eighty-four patients with primary lower rectal cancer were examined by MRI and subsequently underwent radical surgery with lateral pelvic lymph-node dissection, without preoperative treatment. Lateral lymph-node metastases were assessed preoperatively by MRI, and the results were compared with the histopathological findings. The criterion for lateral lymph-node metastasis was any recognizable lymph node in the pelvic wall, regardless of diameter. RESULT: Lateral pelvic lymph-node metastasis was diagnosed on preoperative MRI in 16 patients (19.9 %). The overall patient-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of MRI were 75, 69.1, 36.4, 92.2, and 70.2 %, respectively. When a cut-off value of 10 mm was used for diagnosis, the corresponding values were 43.8, 98.5, 87.5, 88.1, and 88.1 %, respectively. The mean diameter of metastatic nodes (14.7 mm) was significantly larger than that of negative nodes (5.7 mm; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: MRI is an effective technique for predicting lateral pelvic node involvement and thus may facilitate preoperative decision-making in rectal cancer treatment. A cut-off value of 10 mm is useful for avoiding unnecessary lateral lymph-node dissection.

Thrombomodulin improves rat survival after extensive hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rTM) protects against disseminated intravascular coagulopathy by inhibiting coagulation, inflammation, and apoptosis. This study tests the hypothesis that rTM is hepatoprotective after extensive hepatectomy (Hx) and investigates the mechanisms underlying this effect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experiment 1: rats (15 per group) were injected with rTM (1.0 or 2.0 mg/kg) or saline just before 95% Hx and their 7-d survival assessed. Experiment 2: rats were assigned to either a treated (2.0 mg/kg rTM just before Hx) or control group (n = 5 per group). Five rats per group were euthanized immediately after surgery, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively; serum and liver remnant samples were collected for biochemical and histologic analysis, as well as reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting. RESULTS: All saline-injected rats died within 52 h of Hx, whereas injection of 2.0 mg/kg rTM prolonged survival (P = 0.003). rTM increased the number of Ki67-positive cells and reduced the number of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling-positive cells. The number of myeloperoxidase-positive cells and the expression of high-mobility group box 1 protein did not differ. Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction revealed that rTM significantly enhanced protease-activated receptor-1 and sphingosine kinase 1 messenger RNA expression and significantly reduced plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and Bax messenger RNA expression. Immunohistochemistry and Western blotting demonstrated that protease-activated receptor-1 expression 24 h after Hx was significantly higher in rTM-treated than in control rats. CONCLUSIONS: rTM may improve survival after extensive Hx by inhibiting apoptosis and promoting liver regeneration.

Evaluation of the intestinal blood flow near the rectosigmoid junction using the indocyanine green fluorescence method in a colorectal cancer surgery.

PURPOSE: It has been reported that some patients do not have an anastomosis of a marginal artery near the rectosigmoid junction, but the frequency of this condition and its clinical significance so far remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the blood flow at the marginal artery near the rectosigmoid junction. METHODS: From January 2013 to January 2014, we enrolled consecutive patients with a preoperative diagnosis of left-sided colon cancer or rectal cancer who underwent surgery with lymph node dissection. During the operation, the blood flow through the point of origin of the last sigmoid arterial branch, originating from the inferior mesenteric artery, was interrupted, and the rectosigmoid junction was supplied by only the marginal artery. We injected indocyanine green intravenously and observed the blood flow using a near-infrared camera system. RESULTS: A total of 119 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study. Sixty-eight patients (57.1 %) had a good anastomosis of the marginal artery near the rectosigmoid junction (type A). In 27 patients (22.7 %), a fluorescence border was recognized, but the fluorescence border diminished within 60 s (Type B). In 18 patients (15.1 %), delayed fluorescence was recognized over 60 s (type C), and 6 patients (5.0 %) had no fluorescence at all (type D). A mean length of 14.8 cm was found from the peritoneal reflection to fluorescence border of blood flow. CONCLUSIONS: This study proves that cases without the anastomosis of the marginal artery of the rectosigmoid junction truly exist, using studies in living humans (UMIN000011186).

Incidence and risk factors for rectovaginal fistula after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The rectovaginal fistula (RVF) is a rare complication after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for RVF after LAR for rectal cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective multi-institution study of 371 female rectal cancer patients who underwent LAR with anastomosis between January 2007 and December 2011. Patient-, tumor-, and surgery-related variables were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The overall RVF rate was 3.0 % (11/371). The RVF was diagnosed on median postoperative day 83 (15-766). In 81.8 % (9/11) of the patients, the diagnosis of RVF was made after hospital discharge. Multivariate analysis identified prognostic nutritional index (PNI; odds ratio (OR) 6.97; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.47-33.08; P = 0.015), preoperative chemotherapy (OR 27.31; CI 3.49-213.62; P = 0.002), tumor size (OR 5.90; CI 1.04-33.47; P = 0.045), intraoperative bleeding (OR 13.91; CI 1.34-144.42; P = 0.027), and lateral lymph node dissection (OR 4.92; CI 1.02-23.63; P = 0.045) as independent risk factors for RVF after LAR. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors of RVF were PNI (<45), preoperative chemotherapy, tumor size (≧ 50 mm), intraoperative bleeding (≧ 200 ml), and lateral lymph node dissection. Before an operation, obtaining the information about these risk factors is of great importance in LAR for rectal cancer.

The potential role of microRNA-31 expression in early colorectal cancer.

The expression of microRNA-31 (miR-31) has been implicated in the progression of some human malignancies including colorectal cancer. However, the clinical significance of the expression of miR-31 in submucosally invasive (T1) colorectal cancer remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to delineate the relationship between clinicopathological features and the oncogenic modulator miR-31 in submucosally invasive colorectal cancer. We investigated the expression of miR-31 in 50 submucosally invasive colorectal cancer specimens, along with the corresponding non-tumoral mucosa specimens, using a real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The relationships between miR-31 expression levels and clinicopathological characteristics were assessed. The miR-31 host gene locus was investigated using fluorescence in situ hybridization. qRT-PCR revealed that the expression of miR-31 was higher in colorectal cancer tissue than in non-tumoral tissue (P = 0.0002). The up-regulated expression of miR-31 may play an oncogenic role in the early stage of carcinogenesis in colorectal cancers.

The impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.

PURPOSE: Although obesity is considered as a risk factor for postoperative morbidity in abdominal surgery, its effect on the outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy (LAC) is still unclear. The technical difficulty and risk factor for postoperative complication in LAC are thought to be influenced by visceral obesity. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the impact of visceral fat on the surgical outcomes of LAC. METHODS: Between April 2005 and December 2010, consecutive patients with preoperatively diagnosed colon cancer, excluding medium and low rectal cancer, who underwent LAC, were enrolled. Their visceral fat area (VFA) and body mass index (BMI) were prospectively collected. The VFA was assessed by Fat Scan software. The patients were classified into two groups as follows: VFA nonobese with VFA <100 cm(2) (VNO) and VFA obese with VFA ≧100 cm(2) (VO). The predictive factors for surgical complications of LAC were evaluated by univariate and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 338 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study. Of the 338 patients, 194 (57.4 %) and 138 (42.6 %) were classified into the VNO and VO groups, respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that high BMI (≧25 kg/m(2)) and VO independently predicted the incidence of overall postoperative complications (p = 0.040 and 0.007, respectively). VO was more highly related to the incidence of overall postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage (p = 0.021), and surgical site infection (SSI) (p = 0.013) than high BMI. CONCLUSIONS: VFA is a more useful parameter than BMI in predicting surgical outcomes after LAC.

A prospective randomized controlled trial of subcutaneous passive drainage for the prevention of superficial surgical site infections in open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

INTRODUCTION: A number of studies have evaluated the effects of subcutaneous drainage during digestive surgery. All of the previous studies assessed the usefulness of active-suctioning drain, including two randomized controlled studies which found no benefit for the placement of active-suctioning drains in digestive surgery. The utility of passive drainage has not been evaluated previously. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of subcutaneous passive drainage system for preventing surgical site infections during major colorectal surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 263 patients who underwent major colorectal surgery were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous passive drainage or no drainage. The primary outcome measured was the incidence of superficial surgical site infections. The secondary outcomes measured were the development of hematomas, seromas, and wound dehiscence. RESULTS: Finally, a total of 246 patients (124 underwent passive drainage, and 122 underwent no drainage) were included in the analysis after randomization. There was a significant difference in the incidence of superficial surgical site infections between patients assigned to the passive drainage and no drainage groups (3.2 % vs 9.8 %, respectively, P = 0.041). There were no cases that developed a hematoma, seroma, or wound dehiscence in either group. A subgroup analysis revealed that male gender, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status ≥2, blood loss ≥100 ml, and open access were factors that were associated with a beneficial effect of subcutaneous passive drainage. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous passive drainage provides benefits over no drainage in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery.

Short-term results of a randomized study between laparoscopic and open surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: In surgical treatment of elderly patients, securing the safety of surgery and radical cure must be balanced. Our purpose was to verify the safety and validity of laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer in elderly patients. METHODS: Patients with cTis­T4a colorectal cancer who were 75 years or older were randomized to receive open or laparoscopic surgery. Exclusion criteria were patients who had a bulky tumor, rectal cancer that required pelvic side wall lymphadenectomy, and history of colon resection. Patients were divided according to tumor location (right colon, left colon, and rectum). The short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: One hundred patients (right 43, left 28, and rectum 29) were registered in each group from August 2008 to August 2012. There were no differences in patient characteristics between the two groups. Three patients were converted from laparoscopic to open, because of bleeding, excision of peritoneum metastasis, and patient's desire, respectively. In the short-term results (open:laparoscopic), there were significant differences in the rates of complications (36:23 %) and ileus (12:4 %), amount of blood loss (157:63 mL), and duration of surgery (150:172 min). There were no significant differences in the pathological margins, and the number of dissected lymph nodes. In the subgroup analysis according to the tumor location, there were significant differences in the rate of complications (39.4:22.5 %), amount of blood loss (135:42 mL), duration of surgery (139:160 min), and length of postoperative stay (13.0:10.0 days) in the colon cancer. There were no significant differences in short-term results in the rectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients did not result in a difference in radical cure compared with open surgery, and the short-term results except the duration of surgery were excellent. It is an effective procedure for elderly patients with colorectal cancer, especially colon cancer.

The Effect of Pyridoxine for Prevention of Hand-Foot Syndrome in Colorectal Cancer Patients with Adjuvant Chemotherapy Using Capecitabine: A Randomized Study.

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND/Aims: To determine the effect of the pyridoxine for prevention of hand-foot syndrome in colorectal cancer patients with adjuvant chemotherapy using capecitabine. METHODOLOGY: Colorectal cancer patients scheduled for capecitabine chemotherapy as adjuvant setting were randomly assigned to with or without concurrent oral pyridoxine (60 mg/d) groups. Patients were monitored whether being a development of National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 2 or worse HFS until chemotherapy ended. RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled in this study. Relative dose intensity was 89.5% in total. The median number of chemotherapy cycles to grade 2 or worse HFS was four in both groups. Grade 2 or worse HES developed in 18 (60.0%) of 30 control patients and in 18 (60.0%) of 30 pyridoxine patients. The cumulative dose of capecitabine to grade 2 or worse HFS was not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pyridoxine is not effective in prevention of capecitabine-associated HFS.

Does resection of primary lesions show survival benefit for stage IV colorectal cancer patients with unresectable metastases?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aims of the current retrospective cohort study were to compare OS of the primary resection (R-g) and the non-resection group (NR-g) after 2005. METHODOLOGY: Ninety-five patients with stage IV colorectal cancer with unresectable distant metastases were divided into 2 groups; R-g; 37 and NR-g; 58. RESULTS: The only significant difference in clinical factors between the 2 was R0 resection rate (p = 0.007). The MST in R-g was superior to that in NR-g, 30.7 vs. 21.9 months (p = 0.031). After excluding the patients that underwent R0 resection, there was no difference in OS between the 2; however, the MST was 28.6 months in R-g and 17.1 months in NR-g. CONCLUSIONS: The advantage of resection of the primary is still unclear and a well-designed randomized Phase III study is expected. However, the current results suggest that resection of the primary lesion before intensive chemotherapy had some benefit for prognosis.

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery using colon-lifting technique for colorectal cancer: a matched case-control comparison with standard multiport laparoscopic surgery in terms of short-term results and access instrument cost.

BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been used for colorectal cancer as a minimally invasive procedure. However, there are still difficulties concerning effective triangulation and countertraction. The study's purpose was to clarify the usefulness of the colon-lifting technique (CLT) in SILS for colorectal cancer. METHODS: SILS was performed for cancer (cT2N0 or less) of the right-sided colon (near the ileocecum), sigmoid, or rectosigmoid. The SILS™ Port was used for transumbilical access. A suture string was inserted through the abdominal wall and passed through the mesocolon. The colon was retracted anteriorly and fixed to the abdominal wall. The main mesenteric vessels were placed under tension. Lymph node dissection was performed by medial approach. Short-term surgical outcomes and access port costs were compared between SILS (using CLT) and the standard multiport technique (MPT). The two groups were case-matched by propensity scoring. Analyzed variables included preoperative Dukes stage and tumor location. RESULTS: From June 2009 to April 2011, 27 patients underwent SILS, and from April 2005 to April 2011, 85 patients underwent MPT. Propensity scoring generated 23 matched patients per group for SILS versus MPT comparisons. There were no significant differences in operating time, blood loss, early complications, postoperative analgesic frequency, or length of hospital stay. One MPT patient was converted to open surgery (4.5%); no SILS patients were converted. There were no significant differences in the length of distal cut margin and the number of harvested lymph nodes, except incision length (SILS vs. MPT: 33 vs. 55 mm, P < 0.001). Significant differences favored SILS in access instrument cost (SILS vs. MPT: 62,761 vs. 77,130 Japanese yen, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SILS performed using CLT was safe and effective in providing radical treatment of cT2N0 cancer in the right-sided colon, sigmoid, or rectosigmoid. SILS was advantageous with respect to cosmesis and lower cost of access instruments.

The clinicopathological features of colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma and a therapeutic strategy for the disease.

BACKGROUND: The guidelines established by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network do not describe mucinous histology as a clinical factor that should influence the therapeutic algorithm. However, previous studies show conflicting results regarding the prognosis of colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma. In this study, we described the clinicopathological features of mucinous adenocarcinoma in Japan, to identify optimal therapeutic strategies. METHODS: 144 patients with mucinous and 2673 with non-mucinous adenocarcinomas who underwent primary resection in two major centers in Yokohama, Japan were retrospectively evaluated for clinicopathological features and treatment factors. A multivariate analysis for overall survival followed by the comparison of overall survival using Cox proportional hazard model were performed. RESULTS: Patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma had larger primary lesions, higher preoperative CEA levels, a deeper depth of invasion, higher rates of nodal and distant metastasis, and more metastatic sites. A multivariate analysis for overall survival revealed a mucinous histology to be an independent prognostic factor. In the subgroup analysis stratified by stage, Patients diagnosed as stageIII and IV disease had a worse survival in mucinous adenocarcinoma than non-mucinous, while survival did not differ significantly in patients diagnosed as Stage0-II disease. In stageIII, local recurrence in rectal cases and peritoneal dissemination were more frequently observed in patients with a mucinous histology. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indentified that mucinous adenocarcinoma was associated with a worse survival compared with non-mucinous in patients with stageIII and IV disease. In rectal StageIII disease with mucinous histology, additional therapy to control local recurrence followed by surgical resection may be a strategical alternative. Further molecular investigations considering genetic features of mucinous histology will lead to drug development and better management of peritoneal metastasis.

Solo surgery in laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched study comparing robotic and human scopist.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent technical developments have enabled solo surgery in laparoscopic surgery. Our experience of solo surgery using the voice-guided robotic arm in laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer was analyzed. METHODOLOGY: The colon-lifting method was used in this study. The laparoscope was handled by AESOP3000. The colon was retracted anteriorly by the thread that passed through the mesocolon. This method enables lymphadenectomy by stretching of feeding vessels and obviates the need for an assistant. The short-term outcomes and survival between robotic arm and human scopist in a series of laparoscopic colectomies were compared with a case-matched control study. RESULTS: The numbers of both group patients were 11 respectively. There was no conversion to open surgery in both groups. The operation time (Robotic vs. Human=269 min. vs. 265) and laparoscopic time (209 vs. 212) were not significant differences. There were also no significant differences in the bleeding, the morbidity rate and the numbers of dissected lymph nodes between the two groups. The five-year overall (81.8% vs. 72.7%) and disease-free (72.7% vs. 62.3%) survivals showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic solo-surgery in colectomy is safe and feasible, without any deterioration of the curative potential of the procedure.

Comparison of short, long-term surgical outcomes and mid-term health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open resection for colorectal cancer: a case-matched control study.

BACKGROUND: A multicenter randomized study is high quality, but it is also true that there are differences between institutions. The quality of treatment is consistent in a single center so comparisons in a retrospective study can be matched for many variables. METHODS: This single-center study examined short-term and long-term outcomes for colorectal cancer in 258 patients who underwent laparoscopic resection (LC) and 258 matched open resection (OC) cases. The health-related qualities of life (HRQOL) at 1-2 years after the operations in 62 patients (35 LC and 27 OC) were compared by SF-36. RESULTS: The conversion rate was 5.0%. Mean follow-up periods in LC and OC were 62.3 and 62.1 months, respectively. Operation time was longer in LC than in OC, although the difference was not significant in the later period. Bleeding and postoperative stay were reduced in LC. The morbidity rate was 18.6% in LC and 26.4% in OC. The 5-year overall survival in LC and OC were 94.6% vs. 92.0% for stage I, 95.2% vs. 91.8% for stage II, and 80.9% vs. 79.1% for stage III, respectively. The corresponding 5-year disease-free survival were 94.0% vs. 88.4%, 92.1% vs. 84.0%, and 64.3% vs. 65.4%, respectively. Recurrence rates did not differ between groups. In the analysis of HRQOL scores, role physical, bodily pain, social functioning, role emotional, and physical component summary scores in LC were better than in OC. CONCLUSIONS: In LC for colorectal cancer, short-term outcomes except operation time and mid-term HRQOL were better than in OC, and there were no adverse effects relating to long-term outcomes.