Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 29(53): 79816-79829, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34816347

RESUMEN

Biosorption has been examined for the treatment of aqueous solutions containing uranium, a radiotoxic pollutant. Nevertheless, the evaluation of the role of process variables by experimental design on the use of hydroxyapatite and bone meal as biosorbents for uranium has not yet been previously addressed. In this study, the effects of adsorbent dosage (M), initial uranium concentrations ([U]0), and solution pH were investigated, using a two-level factorial design and response surface analysis. The experiments were performed in batch, with [U]0 of 100 and 500 mg L-1, pH 3 and 5, and adsorbent/uranium solution ratios of 5 and 15 g L-1. Contact time was fixed at 24 h. Removal rates were higher than 88%, with a maximum of 99% in optimized conditions. [U]0 and M were found to be the most influential variables in U removal in terms of adsorption capacity (q). The experiments revealed that bone meal holds higher adsorption capacity (49.87 mg g-1) and achieved the highest uranium removal (~ 100%) when compared to hydroxyapatite (q = 49.20 mg g-1, removal = 98.5%). The highest value of q for both biomaterials was obtained for [U]0 = 500 mg L-1, pH 3, and M = 5 g L-1. Concerning the removal percentage, bone meal achieved the best performance for [U]0 = 500 mg L-1, pH 3, and M = 15 g L-1. Further experiments were made with real radioactive waste, resulting in a high uranium adsorption capacity for both materials, with 22.11 mg g-1 for hydroxyapatite and 22.08 mg g-1 for bone meal, achieving uranium removal efficiencies higher than 99%.


Asunto(s)
Residuos Radiactivos , Uranio , Contaminantes Radiactivos del Agua , Durapatita , Proyectos de Investigación , Adsorción , Materiales Biocompatibles , Cinética , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno
2.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 29(30): 45221-45229, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35146605

RESUMEN

The main goal of this study was to assess alternatives to the current challenges on environmental quality and circular economy. The former is here addressed by the treatment of radioactively contaminated solutions, and the latter by using abundant and low-cost biomass. In this paper, we examine the biosorption of hexavalent uranium (U(VI)) in a batch system using the macrophytes Limnobium laevigatum and Azolla sp. by three operational parameters: biomass dose, metal ion concentration, and contact time. Simulated solutions were firstly addressed with two biomasses, followed by studies with real liquid organic radioactive waste (LORW) with Azolla sp. The batch experiments were carried out by mixing 0.20 g biomass in 10 mL of the prepared solution or LORW. The total contact time employed for the determination of the equilibrium times was 240 min, and the initial U(VI) concentration was 0.63 mmol L-1. The equilibrium times were 15 min for L. laevigatum and 30 min for Azolla sp. respectively. A wide range of initial U(VI) concentrations (0.25-36 mmol L-1) was then used to assess the adsorption capacity of each macrophyte. Isotherm models validated the adsorption performance of the biosorption process. Azolla sp. presented a much higher U(VI) uptake (0.474 mmol g-1) compared to L. laevigatum (0.026 mmol g-1). When in contact with LORW, Azolla sp. removed much less uranium, indicating an adsorption capacity of 0.010 mmol g-1. In conclusion, both biomasses, especially Azolla sp., can be used in the treatment of uranium-contaminated solutions.


Asunto(s)
Helechos , Hydrocharitaceae , Uranio , Contaminantes Radiactivos del Agua , Adsorción , Biomasa , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Cinética , Soluciones , Agua
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA