Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 2: CD003971, 2017 02 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28177515

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This is an updated review originally published in 2004 and first updated in 2007. This version includes substantial changes to bring it in line with current methodological requirements. Methadone is a synthetic opioid that presents some challenges in dose titration and is recognised to cause potentially fatal arrhythmias in some patients. It does have a place in therapy for people who cannot tolerate other opioids but should be initiated only by experienced practitioners. This review is one of a suite of reviews on opioids for cancer pain. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and tolerability of methadone as an analgesic in adults and children with cancer pain. SEARCH METHODS: For this update we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and clinicaltrials.gov, to May 2016, without language restriction. We also checked reference lists in relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: We sought randomised controlled trials comparing methadone (any formulation and by any route) with active or placebo comparators in people with cancer pain. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All authors agreed on studies for inclusion. We retrieved full texts whenever there was any uncertainty about eligibility. One review author extracted data, which were checked by another review author. There were insufficient comparable data for meta-analysis. We extracted information on the effect of methadone on pain intensity or pain relief, the number or proportion of participants with 'no worse than mild pain'. We looked for data on withdrawal and adverse events. We looked specifically for information about adverse events relating to appetite, thirst, and somnolence. We assessed the evidence using GRADE and created a 'Summary of findings' table. MAIN RESULTS: We revisited decisions made in the earlier version of this review and excluded five studies that were previously included. We identified one new study for this update. This review includes six studies with 388 participants. We did not identify any studies in children.The included studies differed so much in their methods and comparisons that no synthesis of results was feasible. Only one study (103 participants) specifically reported the number of participants with a given level of pain relief, in this case a reduction of at least 20% - similar in both the methadone and morphine groups. Using an outcome of 'no worse than mild pain', methadone was similar to morphine in effectiveness, and most participants who could tolerate methadone achieved 'no worse than mild pain'. Adverse event withdrawals with methadone were uncommon (12/202) and similar in other groups. Deaths were uncommon except in one study where the majority of participants died, irrespective of treatment group. For specific adverse events, somnolence was more common with methadone than with morphine, while dry mouth was more common with morphine than with methadone. None of the studies reported effects on appetite.We judged the quality of evidence to be low, downgraded due to risk of bias and sparse data. For specific adverse events, we considered the quality of evidence to be very low, downgraded due to risk of bias, sparse data, and indirectness, as surrogates for appetite, thirst and somnolence were used.There were no data on the use of methadone in children. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on low-quality evidence, methadone is a drug that has similar analgesic benefits to morphine and has a role in the management of cancer pain in adults. Other opioids such as morphine and fentanyl are easier to manage but may be more expensive than methadone in many economies.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Metadona/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morfina/uso terapéutico , Dolor/etiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
2.
Antioxid Redox Signal ; 19(1): 24-35, 2013 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23373818

RESUMEN

AIM: Ero proteins are central to oxidative protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), but their expression varies in a tissue-specific manner. The aim of this work was to establish the expression of Ero1α in the digestive system and to examine the behavior of Ero1α in premalignant Barrett's esophagus, esophageal (OE) and gastric cancers and esophageal cancer cell lines. RESULTS: Ero1α is expressed in the columnar epithelium of Barrett's tissue, and in OE tumors and gastric tumors. Homocysteine, a precursor in the metabolism of cysteine and methionine, induces the active Ox1 form of Ero1α in the OE cancer cell line OE33. INNOVATION: These results demonstrate for the first time that Ero1α can sense the level of an amino acid precursor, identifying a potential link between diet, antioxidants, and oxidative protein folding in the ER. CONCLUSION: The high expression of Ero1α in cancers of the esophagus and stomach demonstrates the importance of ER redox regulation in the gastro-intestinal (GI) tract in health and disease. Proteins and metabolites involved in disulfide bond formation and redox regulation may be suitable targets for both biomarker and drug development in GI cancer.


Asunto(s)
Retículo Endoplásmico/enzimología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/enzimología , Homocisteína/metabolismo , Glicoproteínas de Membrana/metabolismo , Oxidorreductasas/metabolismo , Pliegue de Proteína , Anciano , Línea Celular Tumoral , Disulfuros/metabolismo , Retículo Endoplásmico/metabolismo , Femenino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/metabolismo , Humanos , Oxidación-Reducción
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA