Orteronel plus prednisone in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (ELM-PC 4): a double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Orteronel is an investigational, partially selective inhibitor of CYP 17,20-lyase in the androgen signalling pathway, a validated therapeutic target for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We assessed orteronel in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we recruited patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and no previous chemotherapy from 324 study centres (ie, hospitals or large urologic or group outpatient offices) in 43 countries. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 400 mg orteronel plus 5 mg prednisone twice daily or placebo plus 5 mg prednisone twice daily. Randomisation was done centrally with an interactive voice response system and patients were stratified by region (Europe, North America, and not Europe or North America) and the presence or absence of radiographic disease progression at baseline. The two primary endpoints were radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival, determined in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01193244. FINDINGS: From Oct 31, 2010, to June 29, 2012, 2353 patients were assessed for eligibility. Of those, 1560 were randomly assigned to receive either orteronel plus prednisone (n=781) or placebo plus prednisone (n=779). The clinical cutoff date for the final analysis was Jan 15, 2014 (with 611 deaths). Median follow-up for radiographic progression-free survival was 8·4 months (IQR 3·7-16·6). Median radiographic progression-free survival was 13·8 months (95% CI 13·1-14·9) with orteronel plus prednisone and 8·7 months (8·3-10·9) with placebo plus prednisone (hazard ratio [HR] 0·71, 95% CI 0·63-0·80; p<0·0001). After a median follow-up of 20·7 months (IQR 14·2-25·4), median overall survival was 31·4 months (95% CI 28·6-not estimable) with orteronel plus prednisone and 29·5 months (27·0-not estimable) with placebo plus prednisone (HR 0·92, 95% CI 0·79-1·08; p=0·31). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were increased lipase (137 [17%] of 784 patients in the orteronel plus prednisone group vs 14 [2%] of 770 patients in the placebo plus prednisone group), increased amylase (77 [10%] vs nine [1%]), fatigue (50 [6%] vs 14 [2%]), and pulmonary embolism (40 [5%] vs 27 [4%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 358 [46%] patients receiving orteronel plus prednisone and in 292 [38%] patients receiving placebo plus prednisone. INTERPRETATION: In chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, radiographic progression-free survival was prolonged with orteronel plus prednisone versus placebo plus prednisone. However, no improvement was noted in the other primary endpoint, overall survival. Orteronel plus prednisone was associated with increased toxic effects compared with placebo plus prednisone. On the basis of these and other data, orteronel is not undergoing further development in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. FUNDING: Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.

Randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study (EVOLUTION) of combinations of bortezomib, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, and lenalidomide in previously untreated multiple myeloma.

Combinations of bortezomib (V) and dexamethasone (D) with either lenalidomide (R) or cyclophosphamide (C) have shown significant efficacy. This randomized phase 2 trial evaluated VDC, VDR, and VDCR in previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM). Patients received V 1.3 mg/m2 (days 1, 4, 8, 11) and D 40 mg (days 1, 8, 15), with either C 500 mg/m2 (days 1, 8) and R 15 mg (days 1-14; VDCR), R 25 mg (days 1-14; VDR), C 500 mg/m2 (days 1, 8; VDC) or C 500 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15; VDC-mod) in 3-week cycles (maximum 8 cycles), followed by maintenance with V 1.3 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15, 22) for four 6-week cycles (all arms)≥very good partial response was seen in 58%, 51%, 41%, and 53% (complete response rate of 25%, 24%, 22%, and 47%) of patients (VDCR, VDR, VCD, and VCD-mod, respectively); the corresponding 1-year progression-free survival was 86%, 83%, 93%, and 100%, respectively. Common adverse events included hematologic toxicities, peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, and gastrointestinal disturbances. All regimens were highly active and well tolerated in previously untreated MM, and, based on this trial, VDR and VCD-mod are preferred for clinical practice and further comparative testing. No substantial advantage was noted with VDCR over the 3-drug combinations. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00507442).

Phase I/II study of bortezomib plus docetaxel in patients with advanced androgen-independent prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose, and evaluate the antitumor activity of bortezomib/docetaxel combination therapy in androgen-independent prostate cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Two bortezomib doses (1.3 and 1.6 mg/m(2)/dose) in combination with four docetaxel doses (25-40 mg/m(2)/dose) were evaluated. Both drugs were administered weekly for 2 out of 3 weeks. Antitumor activity was evaluated using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients received at least one dose of study drug. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed despite escalation to the highest dose level. PSA response (>or=50% decline in PSA levels from the baseline) occurred in 19 (28%) of 67 evaluable patients and was maintained for >or=4 weeks in 14 patients (21%). According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines, 11% achieved a partial response, and an additional 67% had stable disease. The degree of proteasome inhibition was similar to that reported with single-agent bortezomib. Treatment was well tolerated; fatigue was the most common drug-related adverse event, whereas diarrhea was the most common drug-related grade 3/4 adverse event. No clinically significant febrile neutropenia or neuropathy occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose of this 21-day regimen has not been reached. The highest dose level (1.6 mg/m(2) bortezomib plus 40 mg/m(2) docetaxel) was feasible and tolerable; bortezomib plus docetaxel showed antitumor activity. Activity and tolerability results were consistent with previous studies of bortezomib alone or in combination with docetaxel. Further investigations are warranted to determine activity and optimize bortezomib/docetaxel therapy in androgen-independent prostate cancers.

The Added Value of Circulating Tumor Cell Enumeration to Standard Markers in Assessing Prognosis in a Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Population.

Purpose: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a heterogeneous disease for which better prognostic models for survival are needed. We examined the added value of circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration relative to common prognostic laboratory measures from patients with CRPC.Methods: Utility of CTC enumeration as a baseline and postbaseline prognostic biomarker was examined using data from two prospective randomized registration-directed trials (COU-AA-301 and ELM-PC4) within statistical models used to estimate risk for survival. Discrimination and calibration were used to measure model predictive accuracy and the added value for CTC enumeration in the context of a Cox model containing albumin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), PSA, hemoglobin, and alkaline phosphatase (ALK). Discrimination quantifies how accurately a risk model predicts short-term versus long-term survivors. Calibration measures the closeness of actual survival time to the predicted survival time.Results: Adding CTC enumeration to a model containing albumin, LDH, PSA, hemoglobin, and ALK ("ALPHA") improved its discriminatory power. The weighted c-index for ALPHA without CTCs was 0.72 (SE, 0.02) versus 0.75 (SE, 0.02) for ALPHA + CTCs. The increase in discrimination was restricted to the lower-risk cohort. In terms of calibration, adding CTCs produced a more accurate model-based prediction of patient survival. The absolute prediction error for ALPHA was 3.95 months (SE, 0.28) versus 3.75 months (SE, 0.22) for ALPHA + CTCs.Conclusions: Addition of CTC enumeration to standard measures provides more accurate assessment of patient risk in terms of baseline and postbaseline prognosis in the mCRPC population. Clin Cancer Res; 23(8); 1967-73. ©2016 AACR.

Immunization using autologous dendritic cells pulsed with the melanoma-associated antigen gp100-derived G280-9V peptide elicits CD8+ immunity.

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicity, maximal tolerated dose, and clinical and immunologic response to autologous dendritic cells pulsed with melanoma-associated antigen gp100-derived G280-9V peptide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve HLA-A*0201(+) patients with advanced melanoma were administered dendritic cells pulsed with G280-9V peptide. Cohorts of three patients were administered 5 x 10(6), 15 x 10(6), and 50 x 10(6) cells i.v. every 3 weeks for six doses according to a dose escalation scheme. Three additional patients were treated at the highest dose. No additional cytokines or therapies were coadministered. The immunogenicity of G280-9V-pulsed dendritic cells was measured by IFN-gamma ELISPOT assay, tetramer assay, and (51)Cr release assay comparing prevaccination to postvaccination blood samples. Response to treatment was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. RESULTS: CD8(+) immunity to the native G280 was observed in 8 (67%) patients as measured by ELISPOT and in 12 (100%) patients as measured by tetramer assay. Of the 9 patients tested, 9 (100%) had measurable high-avidity CTL activity as defined by lysis of allogeneic melanoma lines, which coexpress HLA-A*0201 and gp100. The median follow-up of the entire cohort is 43.8 months. Two (17%) partial responses were observed and 3 (25%) patients had stable disease. The median survival of the treated population was 37.6 months. At this time, three patients are alive, including one patient who continues to respond without additional treatment. CONCLUSION: The high rate of immunization as measured by three independent assays and the occurrence of clinical regression support continued investigation of G280-9V peptide as a candidate epitope in melanoma vaccine formulations.

Phase 1/2 multiple ascending dose trial of the prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted antibody drug conjugate MLN2704 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: This phase 1/2 study evaluated the dose-limiting toxicity and maximum tolerated dose of MLN2704, a humanized monoclonal antibody MLN591 targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen, linked to the maytansinoid DM1 in patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 62 patients received MLN2704 at ascending doses on 4 schedules: weekly (60, 84, 118, and 165mg/m2; 12 patients); every 2 weeks (120, 168, 236, and 330mg/m2; 15 patients); every 3 weeks (330 and 426mg/m2; 18 patients); and on days 1 and 15 of a 6-week schedule (6-week cycle, 330mg/m2; 17 patients). The primary efficacy endpoint was a sustained ≥50% decline from baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) without evidence of disease progression. Toxicity, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and antitumor activity were assessed. RESULTS: Neurotoxicity was dose-limiting. Overall, 44 patients (71%) exhibited peripheral neuropathy: 6 (10%) had grade 3/4. Neurotoxicity rates remained high despite increasing the dosing interval to 3 (13 of 14; one grade 3) and 6 weeks (16 of 17; three grade 3). MLN2704 pharmacokinetics were dose-linear. Rapid deconjugation of DM1 from the conjugated antibody was seen. In all, 5 patients (8%) experienced ≥50% decline in PSA; 5 (8%) had PSA stabilization lasting≥90 days. Only 2 of 35 patients on the 3- and 6-week schedules achieved a PSA decline of >50%. CONCLUSIONS: MLN2704 has limited activity in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Disulfide linker lability and rapid deconjugation lead to neurotoxicity and a narrow therapeutic window.

Vaccination with irradiated, autologous melanoma cells engineered to secrete granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor by adenoviral-mediated gene transfer augments antitumor immunity in patients with metastatic melanoma.

PURPOSE: Vaccination with irradiated, autologous melanoma cells engineered to secrete granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) by retroviral-mediated gene transfer generates potent antitumor immunity in patients with metastatic melanoma. Further clinical development of this immunization scheme requires simplification of vaccine manufacture. We conducted a phase I clinical trial testing the biologic activity of vaccination with irradiated, autologous melanoma cells engineered to secrete GM-CSF by adenoviral-mediated gene transfer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Excised metastases were processed to single cells, transduced with a replication-defective adenoviral vector encoding GM-CSF, irradiated, and cryopreserved. Individual vaccines were composed of 1 x 10(6), 4 x 10(6), or 1 x 10(7) tumor cells, depending on overall yield, and were injected intradermally and subcutaneously at weekly and biweekly intervals. RESULTS: Vaccines were successfully manufactured for 34 (97%) of 35 patients. The average GM-CSF secretion was 745 ng/106 cells/24 hours. Toxicities were restricted to grade 1 to 2 local skin reactions. Eight patients were withdrawn early because of rapid disease progression. Vaccination elicited dense dendritic cell, macrophage, granulocyte, and lymphocyte infiltrates at injection sites in 19 of 26 assessable patients. Immunization stimulated the development of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions to irradiated, dissociated, autologous, nontransduced tumor cells in 17 of 25 patients. Metastatic lesions that were resected after vaccination showed brisk or focal T-lymphocyte and plasma cell infiltrates with tumor necrosis in 10 of 16 patients. One complete, one partial, and one mixed response were noted. Ten patients (29%) are alive, with a minimum follow-up of 36 months; four of these patients have no evidence of disease. CONCLUSION: Vaccination with irradiated, autologous melanoma cells engineered to secrete GM-CSF by adenoviral-mediated gene transfer augments antitumor immunity in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Vaccination with irradiated autologous tumor cells engineered to secrete granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor augments antitumor immunity in some patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We demonstrated that vaccination with irradiated tumor cells engineered to secrete granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) stimulates potent, specific, and long-lasting antitumor immunity in multiple murine models and patients with metastatic melanoma. To test whether this vaccination strategy enhances antitumor immunity in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we conducted a phase I clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Resected metastases were processed to single-cell suspension, infected with a replication-defective adenoviral vector encoding GM-CSF, irradiated, and cryopreserved. Individual vaccines consisted of 1 x 10(6), 4 x 10(6), or 1 x 10(7) cells, depending on overall yield, and were administered intradermally and subcutaneously at weekly and biweekly intervals. RESULTS: Vaccines were successfully manufactured for 34 (97%) of 35 patients. The average GM-CSF secretion was 513 ng/10(6) cells/24 h. Toxicities were restricted to grade 1 to 2 local skin reactions. Nine patients were withdrawn early because of rapid disease progression. Vaccination elicited dendritic cell, macrophage, granulocyte, and lymphocyte infiltrates in 18 of 25 assessable patients. Immunization stimulated the development of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions to irradiated, dissociated, autologous, nontransfected tumor cells in 18 of 22 patients. Metastatic lesions resected after vaccination showed T lymphocyte and plasma cell infiltrates with tumor necrosis in three of six patients. Two patients surgically rendered as having no evidence of disease at enrollment remain free of disease at 43 and 42 months. Five patients showed stable disease durations of 33, 19, 12, 10, and 3 months. One mixed response was observed. CONCLUSION: Vaccination with irradiated autologous NSCLC cells engineered to secrete GM-CSF enhances antitumor immunity in some patients with metastatic NSCLC.

Phase II study of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (PS-341) in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

PURPOSE: This phase II study was undertaken to assess objective response, toxicity, tumor marker response, and pharmacodynamics of bortezomib in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine (carcinoid and islet cell) tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A total of 16 patients with measurable metastatic carcinoid (n=12) or islet cell (n=4) tumors received i.v. bolus of single agent bortezomib at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 21 days. Tumor response was assessed at 12-week intervals using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. All patients were chemotherapy naïve and had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. RESULTS: No patient achieved a partial or a complete remission. The patients received total of 264 doses of therapy with a median of 15 doses per patient. Grade 4 toxicities were not observed. The most common grade 3 adverse events included peripheral sensory neuropathy (37%), diarrhea (25%), vomiting (18%), and ileus (18%). Six of 10 patients who experienced grade 2 to 3 peripheral sensory neuropathy also had grade 2 to 3 dizziness (n=2), orthostatic hypotension (n=2), syncope (n=1), ileus (n=2), or abdominal cramps (n=1). Changes in tumor marker levels did not correlate with tumor response. The mean percentage of 20S proteasome inhibition achieved in whole blood at 1 and 24 hours after bortezomib administration was 68 and 30%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite achieving the surrogate biologic end point, single-agent bortezomib did not induce any objective responses in patients with metastatic carcinoid or islet cell tumors. Additional investigation is warranted to clarify the possible association of autonomic neuropathy with bortezomib.

Correlation of primary tumor prostate-specific membrane antigen expression with disease recurrence in prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The restricted expression of the surface glycoprotein prostrate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) to normal prostate tissue, primary and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), and the neovasculature of various nonprostatic epithelial malignancies has enabled targeting strategies for PCa treatment using anti-PSMA antibodies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using prostatectomy specimens, immunohistochemical staining for PSMA (7E11 antibody) was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of 136 cases of PCa. Cytoplasmic immunoreactivity was scored for intensity and distribution, and results were correlated with tumor grade, pathological stage, DNA ploidy status (Feulgen spectroscopy), and disease recurrence. PSMA mRNA expression in selected primary tumors and metastatic lesions was also detected using in situ hybridization and autoradiography. RESULTS: Generally, PCa cells expressed relatively increased levels of PSMA as compared with benign elements. Among the PCa cases, increased (high) PSMA expression correlated with tumor grade (P = 0.030), pathological stage (P = 0.029), aneuploidy (P = 0.010), and biochemical recurrence (P = 0.001). The mean serum prostate-specific antigen level of 18.28 ng/ml at the time of diagnosis for the PSMA-overexpressing tumors was significantly greater than the mean serum prostate-specific antigen of 9.10 ng/ml for the non-PMSA-overexpressing group (P = 0.006). On multivariate analysis, pathological stage (P = 0.018) and PSMA expression (P = 0.002) were independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. PSMA protein overexpression in high-grade primary PCa tumors and metastatic lesions also correlated with increased PSMA mRNA expression levels using in situ hybridization and autoradiography. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates for the first time that overexpression of PSMA in primary PCa correlates with other adverse traditional prognostic factors and independently predicts disease outcome.

Health-related quality of life in advanced prostate cancer and its treatments: biochemical failure and metastatic disease populations.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to examine the impact of advanced prostate cancer and its treatments on patients' perceptions of their health and to better understand concerns not captured by currently available health-related quality of life (HRQL) instruments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Open ended one-on-one interviews were conducted with patients with prostate cancer who had biochemical failure or metastatic cancer to understand the impacts of disease and treatments on patients' perceptions of their lives. Interviews with 25 patients (7 biochemical failure and 18 metastatic) and 6 clinicians were conducted. Patient responses were analyzed to assess whether information saturation (ie, the point at which no new information is collected) was attained and compared with currently available HRQL instruments. The data informed the development of a comprehensive conceptual model illustrating the impacts of advanced disease and treatments. Clinical expert interviews also informed the conceptual model. RESULTS: Patients with prostate cancer reported many of the key symptoms already captured by current measures, such as bone pain, urinary functioning, bowel functioning, and fatigue. However, a number of impacts reported as bothersome by patients were identified that are not fully captured by existing HRQL measures. Specific examples include genital atrophy, muscle atrophy, stamina, body image, and emotional well-being. CONCLUSION: The conceptual model identified herein describes the impacts of prostate cancer and its treatments from the patient's perspective. The model can be useful in identifying key concepts important to patients that should be measured in trials to capture treatment benefits. The model also can help inform the selection of patient-reported outcomes to assess these benefits.

Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing orteronel (TAK-700) plus prednisone with placebo plus prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that has progressed during or after docetaxel-based therapy: ELM-PC 5.

PURPOSE: Orteronel (TAK-700) is an investigational, nonsteroidal, reversible, selective 17,20-lyase inhibitor. This study examined orteronel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that progressed after docetaxel therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In our study, 1,099 men were randomly assigned in a 2:1 schedule to receive orteronel 400 mg plus prednisone 5 mg twice daily or placebo plus prednisone 5 mg twice daily, stratified by region (Europe, North America [NA], and non-Europe/NA) and Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form worst pain score. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Key secondary end points (radiographic progression-free survival [rPFS], ≥ 50% decrease of prostate-specific antigen [PSA50], and pain response at 12 weeks) were to undergo statistical testing only if the primary end point analysis was significant. RESULTS: The study was unblinded after crossing a prespecified OS futility boundary. The median OS was 17.0 months versus 15.2 months with orteronel-prednisone versus placebo-prednisone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.886; 95% CI, 0.739 to 1.062; P = .190). Improved rPFS was observed with orteronel-prednisone (median, 8.3 v 5.7 months; HR, 0.760; 95% CI, 0.653 to 0.885; P < .001). Orteronel-prednisone showed advantages over placebo-prednisone in PSA50 rate (25% v 10%, P < .001) and time to PSA progression (median, 5.5 v 2.9 months, P < .001) but not pain response rate (12% v 9%; P = .128). Adverse events (all grades) were generally more frequent with orteronel-prednisone, including nausea (42% v 26%), vomiting (36% v 17%), fatigue (29% v 23%), and increased amylase (14% v 2%). CONCLUSION: Our study did not meet the primary end point of OS. Longer rPFS and a higher PSA50 rate with orteronel-prednisone indicate antitumor activity.

Phase I/II trial of orteronel (TAK-700)--an investigational 17,20-lyase inhibitor--in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The androgen receptor pathway remains active in men with prostate cancer whose disease has progressed following surgical or medical castration. Orteronel (TAK-700) is an investigational, oral, nonsteroidal, selective, reversible inhibitor of 17,20-lyase, a key enzyme in the production of androgenic hormones. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We conducted a phase I/II study in men with progressive, chemotherapy-naïve, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and serum testosterone <50 ng/dL. In the phase I part, patients received orteronel 100 to 600 mg twice daily or 400 mg twice a day plus prednisone 5 mg twice a day. In phase II, patients received orteronel 300 mg twice a day, 400 mg twice a day plus prednisone, 600 mg twice a day plus prednisone, or 600 mg once a day without prednisone. RESULTS: In phase I (n = 26), no dose-limiting toxicities were observed and 13 of 20 evaluable patients (65%) achieved ≥50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline from baseline at 12 weeks. In phase II (n = 97), 45 of 84 evaluable patients (54%) achieved a ≥50% decline in PSA and at 12 weeks, substantial mean reductions from baseline in testosterone (-7.5 ng/dL) and dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (-45.3 µg/dL) were observed. Unconfirmed partial responses were reported in 10 of 51 evaluable phase II patients (20%). Decreases in circulating tumor cells were documented. Fifty-three percent of phase II patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events irrespective of causality; most common were fatigue, hypokalemia, hyperglycemia, and diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: 17,20-Lyase inhibition by orteronel was tolerable and results in declines in PSA and testosterone, with evidence of radiographic responses.

Bortezomib plus dexamethasone is superior to vincristine plus doxorubicin plus dexamethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the IFM 2005-01 phase III trial.

PURPOSE: To compare efficacy and safety of bortezomib plus dexamethasone and vincristine plus doxorubicin plus dexamethasone (VAD) as induction before stem-cell transplantation in previously untreated myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred eighty-two patients were randomly assigned to VAD (n = 121), VAD plus dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (DCEP) consolidation (n = 121), bortezomib plus dexamethasone (n = 121), or bortezomib plus dexamethasone plus DCEP (n = 119), followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation. Patients not achieving very good partial response (VGPR) required a second transplantation. The primary end point was postinduction complete response/near complete response (CR/nCR) rate. RESULTS: Postinduction CR/nCR (14.8% v 6.4%), at least VGPR (37.7% v 15.1%), and overall response (78.5% v 62.8%) rates were significantly higher with bortezomib plus dexamethasone versus VAD; CR/nCR and at least VGPR rates were higher regardless of disease stage or adverse cytogenetic abnormalities. Response rates were similar in patients who did and did not receive DCEP. Post first transplantation, CR/nCR (35.0% v 18.4%) and at least VGPR (54.3% v 37.2%) rates remained significantly higher with bortezomib plus dexamethasone. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 36.0 months versus 29.7 months (P = .064) with bortezomib plus dexamethasone versus VAD; respective 3-year survival rates were 81.4% and 77.4% (median follow-up, 32.2 months). The incidence of severe adverse events appeared similar between groups, but hematologic toxicity and deaths related to toxicity (zero v seven) were more frequent with VAD. Conversely, rates of grade 2 (20.5% v 10.5%) and grades 3 to 4 (9.2% v 2.5%) peripheral neuropathy during induction through first transplantation were significantly higher with bortezomib plus dexamethasone. CONCLUSION: Bortezomib plus dexamethasone significantly improved postinduction and post-transplantation CR/nCR and at least VGPR rates compared with VAD and resulted in a trend for longer PFS. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone should therefore be considered a standard of care in this setting.

Phase I trial of the prostate-specific membrane antigen-directed immunoconjugate MLN2704 in patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: MLN2704 is an immunoconjugate designed to deliver the maytansinoid antimicrotubule agent drug maytansinoid-1 directly to prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-expressing cells via the PSMA-targeted monoclonal antibody MLN591. This novel immunoconjugate has shown cytotoxic anti-prostate cancer activity. This study investigated the safety profile, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and preliminary antitumor activity of MLN2704. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with progressive, metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer received MLN2704 intravenously over 2.5 hours. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and antitumor activity were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients received MLN2704 at doses of 18 to 343 mg/m(2). Eighteen of these patients received >or= three doses at 4-week intervals. Pharmacokinetics of conjugate levels were dose proportional. There was no correlation between clearance and body-surface area. MLN2704 was nonimmunogenic. Study drug-related grade 3 toxicities occurred in three (13%) of 23 patients, including uncomplicated febrile neutropenia (the only DLT) in one patient, reversible elevations in hepatic transaminases, leukopenia, and lymphopenia. No grade 4 toxicities were observed. The most frequent grade 1 or 2 toxicities included fatigue, nausea, and diarrhea. Neuropathy occurred in eight (35%) of 23 patients, including five of six patients treated at 343 mg/m(2). Two (22%) of the nine patients treated at 264 or 343 mg/m(2) had sustained a more than 50% decrease in prostate-specific antigen versus baseline, accompanied by measurable tumor regression in the patient treated at 264 mg/m(2). CONCLUSION: Therapeutic doses of MLN2704 can be administered safely on a repetitive basis. An MTD was not defined. MLN2704 is being administered at more frequent intervals in ongoing trials to determine an optimal dosing schedule.

Antibody-based therapeutics: focus on prostate cancer.

The recent clinical and commercial success of anti-cancer antibodies such as rituximab, trastuzumab, cetuximab and bevacizumab has continued to foster great interest in antibody-based therapeutics for the treatment of both hematopoietic malignancies and solid tumors. Given the likely lower toxicity for antibodies which, in contrast with traditional cytotoxic small molecule drugs, target tumor cells and have a lower impact on non-malignant by-stander organs, the potential increases in efficacy associated with conjugation to radioisotopes and other cellular toxins and the ability to characterize the target with clinical laboratory diagnostics to improve the drugs clinical performance, it is anticipated that current and future antibody therapeutics will find substantial roles alone and in combination therapy strategies for the treatment of patients with cancer. A significant number of cell surface proteins, glycoproteins, receptors, enzymes and peptides have been discovered that have become targets for the treatment of advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer. A variety of naked antibodies and antibody conjugates have currently progressed through preclinical development and are in early or more advanced stages of clinical development. Clinicians, scientists and prostate cancer patients are all keenly interested to learn whether these agents when administered alone or in combination with other hormonal-based and cytotoxic therapies will show lasting benefit for sufferers of this common disease.

Randomized trial of CD8+ T-cell depletion in the prevention of graft-versus-host disease associated with donor lymphocyte infusion.

The application of DLI is limited by the potential development of GVHD. Results of single-arm trials suggest that CD8+ depletion of DLI may reduce the incidence of GVHD while still inducing pathologic and cytogenetic remissions. To test the impact of CD8 depletion on GVHD, we initiated a randomized trial comparing outcome among patients receiving unselected donor lymphocytes or CD8+-depleted cells. DLI was administered to patients with disease in remission to prevent relapse 6 months after T-cell-depleted allogeneic BMT. CD8 depletion was performed with monoclonal antibody and rabbit complement. Donor lymphocytes obtained from the original donor were infused fresh without cryopreservation. Infusions were adjusted so that all patients received 1.0 x 10(7) CD4+ cells/kg. Patients randomized to CD8 depletion received a median of 0.7 x 10(5) versus 32.0 x 10(5) CD8+ cells/kg in the unmanipulated cohort. Six (67%) of 9 patients receiving unselected DLI developed acute GVHD compared with 0 (0%) of 9 recipients of CD8-depleted DLI (P = .009). In the unselected group, 2 patients died while the disease was in remission, and 3 patients had relapses. In the CD8-depleted cohort, there were no toxic deaths and only 1 relapse. Measures of immunologic reconstitution by T-cell receptor excision circle analysis and T-cell receptor spectratyping demonstrated similar patterns of T-cell recovery in both the CD8-depleted and the unselected cohorts. Both groups converted from mixed to full donor hematopoietic chimerism after DLI. Our results indicate that CD8 depletion reduces the incidence of GVHD associated with DLI without adversely affecting conversion to donor hematopoiesis or immunologic recovery.

Effective purging of autologous hematopoietic stem cells using anti-B-cell monoclonal antibody-coated high-density microparticles prior to high-dose therapy for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Contamination of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) with tumor cells has been associated with increased incidence of relapse in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma following autologous HSC transplantation. Effective purging of tumor cells may improve the results of HSC transplantation, but current methods of purging are technically difficult to perform with large numbers of cells and do not consistently remove all detectable cells. We report a pilot clinical trial in which 10 patients with relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma received high-dose chemotherapy followed by infusion of autologous HSCs depleted of B-cells by high-density microparticles (HDM) coated with anti-CD19 and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (BCell-HDM). HSCs were mobilized with cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. In 6 of the 10 patients, B-cells were detectable by immunocytochemical analysis of the apheresis products prior to treatment. Following treatment with the BCell-HDM, no B-cells were detected in the products from 5 of these patients, a result representing a median depletion of >2.2 logs (range, >0.4 to >5.1 logs). The median recovery of nontarget cells postdepletion was 73% for CD34 cells and 78% for CD3+ cells. All patients received high-dose cyclophosphamide, BCNU (carmustine), and etoposide prior to reinfusion of their B-cell-depleted autologous HSCs. The median number of CD34+ cells cryopreserved was 3.6 x 10(6) cells/kg (range, 2.2-10.1 x 10(6) cells/kg). Engraftment was rapid in all cases, with a median time to achieve an absolute neutrophil count of 0.5 x 10(9)/L of 10 days (range, 8-11 days). The median time to achieve a platelet count of 20 x 10(9)/L unsupported by platelet transfusion was 11.5 days (range, 8-17 days). This nonmagnetic negative-depletion technology is simple, rapid, and effective in depleting target cells to undetectable levels, with excellent recovery of nontarget cells.