Dynamics of Residential Water-Soluble Organic Gases: Insights into Sources and Sinks.

Water-soluble organic gas (WSOG) concentrations are elevated in homes. However, WSOG sources, sinks, and concentration dynamics are poorly understood. We observed substantial variations in 23 residential indoor WSOG concentrations measured in real time in a North Carolina, U.S., home over several days with a high-resolution time-of-flight chemical ionization mass spectrometer equipped with iodide reagent ion chemistry (I-HR-ToF-CIMS). Concentrations of acetic, formic, and lactic acids ranged from 30-130, 15-53, and 2.5-360 µg m-3, respectively. Concentrations of several WSOGs, including acetic and formic acids, decreased considerably (∼30-50%) when the air conditioner (AC) cycled on, suggesting that the AC system is an important sink for indoor WSOGs. In contrast to nonpolar organic gases, indoor WSOG loss rate coefficients were substantial for compounds with high oxygen-to-carbon (O/C) ratios (e.g., 1.6-2.2 h-1 for compounds with O/C > 0.75 when the AC system was off). Loss rate coefficients in the AC system were more uncertain but were estimated to be 1.5 h-1. Elevated concentrations of lactic acid coincided with increased human occupancy and cooking. We report several WSOGs emitted from cooking and cleaning as well as transported in from outdoors. In addition to indoor air chemistry, these results have implications to exposure and human health.

The chemical assessment of surfaces and air (CASA) study: using chemical and physical perturbations in a test house to investigate indoor processes.

The Chemical Assessment of Surfaces and Air (CASA) study aimed to understand how chemicals transform in the indoor environment using perturbations (e.g., cooking, cleaning) or additions of indoor and outdoor pollutants in a well-controlled test house. Chemical additions ranged from individual compounds (e.g., gaseous ammonia or ozone) to more complex mixtures (e.g., a wildfire smoke proxy and a commercial pesticide). Physical perturbations included varying temperature, ventilation rates, and relative humidity. The objectives for CASA included understanding (i) how outdoor air pollution impacts indoor air chemistry, (ii) how wildfire smoke transports and transforms indoors, (iii) how gases and particles interact with building surfaces, and (iv) how indoor environmental conditions impact indoor chemistry. Further, the combined measurements under unperturbed and experimental conditions enable investigation of mitigation strategies following outdoor and indoor air pollution events. A comprehensive suite of instruments measured different chemical components in the gas, particle, and surface phases throughout the study. We provide an overview of the test house, instrumentation, experimental design, and initial observations - including the role of humidity in controlling the air concentrations of many semi-volatile organic compounds, the potential for ozone to generate indoor nitrogen pentoxide (N2O5), the differences in microbial composition between the test house and other occupied buildings, and the complexity of deposited particles and gases on different indoor surfaces.

The fate of organic peroxides indoors: quantifying humidity-dependent uptake on naturally soiled indoor window glass.

Humidity plays an important role in the surface removal and concentrations of indoor pollutants such as ozone; however, the indoor surface dynamics and chemistry of organic peroxides is largely unknown. Organic hydroperoxides (ROOHs) are known to participate in the multiphase chemistry of outdoor aerosols and clouds, suggesting that reactive uptake in condensed grime on indoor surfaces is plausible, particularly in humid homes. Here, the effect of relative humidity (RH) on the deposition velocity (vd) and reaction probability (γ) of a model ROOH to naturally soiled indoor glass surfaces was investigated; specifically, by using authentic isoprene hydroxy hydroperoxide (1,2-ISOPOOH) as the model compound. Glass was soiled in 3 local homes for 1+ years and characterized. The removal of ISOPOOH by soiled and clean glass was measured under 5-6%, 56-58%, and 83-84% RH conditions using a novel flow reactor designed for indoor surfaces coupled to an iodide chemical ionization high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometer (I-HR-TOF-CIMS). The vd and γ increased with increasing RH, ranging from 0.001-0.059 cm s-1 and 0.4-4.6 (×10-6), respectively, on soiled glass surfaces. The vd and γ ranged from only 0.001-0.016 cm s-1 and 0.1-0.8 (×10-6), respectively, across RH conditions on clean glass, demonstrating a greater RH effect on soiled materials than clean. Loss rates calculated under humid conditions to soiled glass (∼1-6 h-1) were competitive in scale with ventilation rates in typical residences, indicating the importance of surface uptake for indoor ROOH concentrations. This work provides parameters for predictive modeling of indoor ROOHs. To our knowledge, these are the first direct measurements of the vd of an ROOH to naturally soiled indoor surfaces.

The persistence of smoke VOCs indoors: Partitioning, surface cleaning, and air cleaning in a smoke-contaminated house.

Wildfires are increasing in frequency, raising concerns that smoke can permeate indoor environments and expose people to chemical air contaminants. To study smoke transformations in indoor environments and evaluate mitigation strategies, we added smoke to a test house. Many volatile organic compounds (VOCs) persisted days following the smoke injection, providing a longer-term exposure pathway for humans. Two time scales control smoke VOC partitioning: a faster one (1.0 to 5.2 hours) that describes the time to reach equilibrium between adsorption and desorption processes and a slower one (4.8 to 21.2 hours) that describes the time for indoor ventilation to overtake adsorption-desorption equilibria in controlling the air concentration. These rates imply that vapor pressure controls partitioning behavior and that house ventilation plays a minor role in removing smoke VOCs. However, surface cleaning activities (vacuuming, mopping, and dusting) physically removed surface reservoirs and thus reduced indoor smoke VOC concentrations more effectively than portable air cleaners and more persistently than window opening.