Evidence-based recommendations for the management of acne fulminans and its variants.

BACKGROUND: Acne fulminans (AF) is a severe variant of inflammatory acne. It typically manifests as an explosive worsening and ulceration of skin lesions, and can be associated with systemic symptoms. However, there is a paucity of evidence-based information and no clear guidelines concerning the classification and treatment of AF. OBJECTIVE: To better define the spectrum of AF and its variants, devise optimal therapeutic approaches, and identify areas of future research. METHODS: A panel of physicians with expertise in severe acne vulgaris was convened after a comprehensive literature review of severe acne variants. Priority topics were reviewed and presented by each panelist at a 5-hour conference. Following review of the audiotape and scribed notes from the conference, surveys were utilized to address points of controversy and to clarify consensus recommendations. RESULTS: Appropriate clinical case presentations and consensus survey questions were utilized to create final recommendations based on both the literature and the expert consensus. LIMITATIONS: Limited evidenced-based data and prospective studies in the literature concerning the treatment of AF is available. CONCLUSION: These guidelines better characterize AF and provide health care practitioners approaches to the classification, treatment, and prevention of AF and its variants.

Laboratory tests in patients treated with isotretinoin: occurrence of liver and muscle abnormalities and failure of AST and ALT to predict liver abnormality.

Current laboratory monitoring may not be optimal. A retrospective chart review was performed on thelaboratory results of 246 patients who were treated with isotretinoin for acne over a 9-year period. Tests obtained were CBC, lipid panel, AST, ALT, CK, GGT,and C-reactive protein. Thirty-five patients had an elevated AST and 35 of these had an elevated CK; 32 had an elevated ALT and 11 of these had an elevated CK. Thirteen patients had an elevated GGT; in 5 this was the only abnormality, whereas 8 had a GGT elevation accompanied by an elevated AST or ALT. Two had an elevated GGT and an elevated CK with normal AST and ALT. Fifty-two patients had a single episode of elevated CK, of which 22 were female. However, 57 had multiple CK elevations and only one was female. Thirty-five patients had CK elevations <2 times normal; 38 had levels between 2 and 3 times normal, 18 had levels between 3 and 4 times normal, and 18 had levels greater than 4 times normal. We suggest that ALT and AST are not useful for monitoring isotretinoin therapy and that GGT and CK may be of greater value in managing patients.

Isotretinoin: Mechanism of Action and Patient Selection.

Oral isotretinoin is a highly effective treatment for appropriately selected patients with acne. This medication is the only treatment that targets all four of the identified factors underlying acne pathogenesis. In addition to the approved indication of resistant nodular scarring acne, clinical studies and experience have shown that other categories of patients benefit from isotretinoin therapy, including those with resistant scarring papular acne, those with resistant acne that interferes with normal living, those who have severe acne-related psychological sequelae, and those with acne who have a skin picking habit or compulsion. Semin Cutan Med Surg 34(supp5):S86-S88© 2015 published by Frontline Medical Communications.

Cutaneous tolerability to tretinoin shows little variation with Fitzpatrick skin type.

Determinants of skin irritability are poorly understood. This study aims to assess differences in cutaneous safety/irritation based on Fitzpatrick skin type among patients with acne treated with tretinoin gel microsphere (TGM). This was a phase 4, 12-week, prospective, nonrandomized, open-label, multicenter study. Approximately 500 patients with mild to moderate acne were treated with TGM 0.04% or 0.1% and assessed for cutaneous irritation at baseline and weeks 3, 6, and 12. In this post hoc analysis of patients with Fitzpatrick skin type I-III vs Fitzpatrick skin type IV-VI, there was a general trend toward initial worsening of cutaneous adverse events (AEs) by week 3 across all variables and groups. This was followed by a trend toward improvement and resolution of skin-related AEs from week 3 to week 12 regardless of Fitzpatrick skin type, with a few exceptions. Erythema was the only cutaneous AE that consistently decreased among patients with darker skin. Results from a subsequent 3-group analysis (Fitzpatrick I-II vs Fitzpatrick III-IV vs Fitzpatrick V-VI) generally mirrored those from the 2-group study. Study limitations include patient nonadherence, lack of a placebo arm, and lack of data regarding the impact of concurrent medications on outcomes. There was no correlation between irritation and Fitzpatrick skin type. ABBREVIATIONS USED: adverse event (AE), analysis of variance (ANOVA), benzoyl peroxide (BP), case report form (CRF), modified Global Acne Grading Score (mGAGS), tretinoin gel microsphere (TGM).

Results of a Phase III, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study evaluating the safety and efficacy of isotretinoin-Lidose in patients with severe recalcitrant nodular acne.

BACKGROUND: Isotretinoin-Lidose, the first new formulation of isotretinoin in 30 years, differs from previously approved isotretinoin formulations in that it is less dependent on the presence of fat in the gut for absorption. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the safety profiles of isotretinoin-Lidose and food-dependent generic isotretinoin in the largest clinical study with isotretinoin-925 randomized patients from 49 study sites. Determine if the efficacy of this new formulation is noninferior to an existing isotretinoin. METHODS: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, noninferiority trial. Study medication was taken with meals twice daily for 20 weeks. Patients were followed for 4 weeks after the last dose. Safety evaluations included recordings of adverse events, assessments for depression, anxiety, emergent psychotic symptoms, and suicidal ideation/behavior, as well as DEXA and X-ray evaluations and changes in bone age. Two co-primary efficacy outcomes were measured to assess noninferiority: a) change in total nodular facial and truncal lesion count at from baseline to week 20 and b) percentage of patients who experienced at least 90% reduction in nodular facial and truncal lesion count from baseline to week 20. LIMITATIONS: Although isotretinoin-Lidose can be taken without meals, it was given with food because the absorption of both formulations in the study had to be similar to detect noninferiority. RESULTS: The safety profile of the 2 formulations was comparable. Criteria for noninferiority for both co-primary efficacy outcomes were met based on predetermined margins. CONCLUSION: Safety and efficacy of isotretinoin-Lidose is similar and noninferior to food-dependent generic isotretinoin, respectively.

Effect of NFX-179 MEK inhibitor on cutaneous neurofibromas in persons with neurofibromatosis type 1.

This phase 2a trial investigated the efficacy of NFX-179 Topical Gel, a metabolically labile MEK inhibitor, in the treatment of cutaneous neurofibromas (cNFs) in neurofibromatosis type 1. Forty-eight participants were randomized to four treatment arms: NFX-179 Topical Gel 0.05%, 0.15%, and 0.5% or vehicle applied once daily to five target cNFs for 28 days. Treatment with NFX-179 Topical Gel resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in p-ERK levels in cNFs at day 28, with a 47% decrease in the 0.5% NFX-179 group compared to the vehicle (P = 0.0001). No local or systemic toxicities were observed during the treatment period, and systemic concentrations of NFX-179 remained below 1 ng/ml. In addition, 20% of cNFs treated with 0.5% NFX-179 Topical Gel showed a ≥50% reduction in volume compared to 6% in the vehicle group by ruler measurement with calculated volume (P = 0.021). Thus, NFX-179 Topical Gel demonstrated significant inhibition of MEK in cNF with excellent safety and potential therapeutic benefit.

Rosacea Core Domain Set for Clinical Trials and Practice: A Consensus Statement.

Importance: Inconsistent reporting of outcomes in clinical trials of rosacea is impeding and likely preventing accurate data pooling and meta-analyses. There is a need for standardization of outcomes assessed during intervention trials of rosacea. Objective: To develop a rosacea core outcome set (COS) based on key domains that are globally relevant and applicable to all demographic groups to be used as a minimum list of outcomes for reporting by rosacea clinical trials, and when appropriate, in clinical practice. Evidence Review: A systematic literature review of rosacea clinical trials was conducted. Discrete outcomes were extracted and augmented through discussions and focus groups with key stakeholders. The initial list of 192 outcomes was refined to identify 50 unique outcomes that were rated through the Delphi process Round 1 by 88 panelists (63 physicians from 17 countries and 25 patients with rosacea in the US) on 9-point Likert scale. Based on feedback, an additional 11 outcomes were added in Round 2. Outcomes deemed to be critical for inclusion (rated 7-9 by ≥70% of both groups) were discussed in consensus meetings. The outcomes deemed to be most important for inclusion by at least 85% of the participants were incorporated into the final core domain set. Findings: The Delphi process and consensus-building meetings identified a final core set of 8 domains for rosacea clinical trials: ocular signs and symptoms; skin signs of disease; skin symptoms; overall severity; patient satisfaction; quality of life; degree of improvement; and presence and severity of treatment-related adverse events. Recommendations were also made for application in the clinical setting. Conclusions and Relevance: This core domain set for rosacea research is now available; its adoption by researchers may improve the usefulness of future trials of rosacea therapies by enabling meta-analyses and other comparisons across studies. This core domain set may also be useful in clinical practice.

Comparative pharmacokinetic profiles of a novel isotretinoin formulation (isotretinoin-Lidose) and the innovator isotretinoin formulation: a randomized, 4-treatment, crossover study.

BACKGROUND: A high-fat meal is needed for optimal absorption of isotretinoin. A new formulation of isotretinoin, which enhances absorption of isotretinoin in the absence of dietary fat, has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of a new formulation of isotretinoin (isotretinoin-Lidose) with the innovator isotretinoin formulation. METHODS: This study was an open-label, single-dose, randomized, 4-treatment, crossover comparative trial between a new and innovator formulation of isotretinoin in the fasting and fed states. RESULTS: Both formulations were bioequivalent under fed conditions. As expected in a fasting state, absorption of both formulations was reduced. A considerable difference between the 2 drugs occurred under fasted conditions-there was a marked improvement in overall bioavailability of the isotretinoin-Lidose formulation. Mean plasma levels of the isotretinoin-Lidose formulation during fasting reached 66.8% of that observed with a fatty meal, and those of the isotretinoin formulation only reached 39.6% of that observed with a fatty meal. LIMITATIONS: Only the FDA-stipulated standard high-fat, high-calorie meal of 50-g fat was studied in the fed state. CONCLUSION: Isotretinoin-Lidose formulation is bioequivalent to the innovator formulation under fed conditions with regard to its pharmacokinetic profile but delivers twice as much isotretinoin and 4-oxo-isotretinoin when administered after an overnight fast.

Acne severity grading: determining essential clinical components and features using a Delphi consensus.

BACKGROUND: There are multiple global scales for acne severity grading but no singular standard. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the essential clinical components (content items) and features (property-related items) for an acne global grading scale for use in research and clinical practice using an iterative method, the Delphi process. METHODS: Ten acne experts were invited to participate in a Web-based Delphi survey comprising 3 iterative rounds of questions. RESULTS: In round 1, the experts identified the following clinical components (primary acne lesions, number of lesions, extent, regional involvement, secondary lesions, and patient experiences) and features (clinimetric properties, ease of use, categorization of severity based on photographs or text, and acceptance by all stakeholders). In round 2, consensus for inclusion in the scale was established for primary lesions, number, sites, and extent; as well as clinimetric properties and ease of use. In round 3, consensus for inclusion was further established for categorization and acceptance. Patient experiences were excluded and no consensus was achieved for secondary lesions. LIMITATIONS: The Delphi panel consisted solely of the United States (U.S.)-based acne experts. CONCLUSION: Using an established method for achieving consensus, experts in acne vulgaris concluded that an ideal acne global grading scale would comprise the essential clinical components of primary acne lesions, their quantity, extent, and facial and extrafacial sites of involvement; with features of clinimetric properties, categorization, efficiency, and acceptance.

Evidence-based review: fixed-combination therapy and topical retinoids in the treatment of acne.

Topical fixed-combination products and topical retinoid monotherapy are established first-line treatments for mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris, yet adequate comparative data are lacking. The following evidence-based review addresses the question: "In patients with mild-to-moderate acne, are topical fixed-combination products or topical retinoids a more efficacious choice in reducing noninflammatory, inflammatory and total lesions after 12 weeks of treatment?" To identify relevant studies, a PubMed search was performed using "acne" and search terms for adapalene, tretinoin, tazarotene, benzoyl peroxide, clindamycin, or erythromycin. Forty-two studies from January 1991 to November 2009 were included. The studies were evaluated using the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy, and all but seven received the highest level of evidence grade. To evaluate efficacy, a side-by-side comparison was made using reduction in acne lesion counts at week 12 for study groups treated with fixed-combination therapy or retinoid monotherapy. Twenty-nine studies containing relevant efficacy data for fixed-combination therapy and retinoid monotherapy are summarized here. Nine studies compared fixed-combination therapy with retinoid monotherapy; in eight of these studies, fixed-combination therapy was significantly more efficacious in reducing acne lesion counts. This evidence-based review analyzes clinical evidence to date for these therapies to provide guidance in determining appropriate treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate acne.

Is topical dapsone safe in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-deficient and sulfonamide-allergic patients?

Topical dapsone gel 5% is indicated for the treatment of acne vulgaris and has been marketed since late 2008. The topical formulation retains the anti-inflammatory benefits of dapsone while minimizing the risk of toxicity associated with systemic exposure. This review summarizes the pharmacokinetic and safety data of topical dapsone gel 5% in acne patients, including those with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, and provides support for dapsone usage in sulfonamide-allergic patients. Overall, topical dapsone gel has a favorable short- and long-term safety profile and has been shown to have no risk of hemolytic anemia, including in G6PD deficient patients. Although there are some structural similarities between dapsone and sulfonamides, dapsone is not a sulfonamide and cross-reaction with sulfonamides has not been demonstrated.

An open-label, community-based, 12-week assessment of the effectiveness and safety of monotherapy with doxycycline 40 mg (30-mg immediate-release and 10-mg delayed-release beads).

Rosacea is a common inflammatory disorder of the skin of middle-aged and older adults. A unique 40-mg formulation of doxycycline (30-mg immediate-release and 10-mg delayed-release beads) developed for its anti-inflammatory properties is the only US Food and Drug Administration-approved oral medication for the disorder. This report describes the results of the Oracea for Rosacea: A Community-Based Assessment (ORCA) trial, a phase 4 trial of the 40-mg formulation as monotherapy in adults with mild to severe papulopustular rosacea. A total of 1197 participants were enrolled in the monotherapy arm of the 12-week open-label study at 271 community-based investigational sites. The primary outcome measure was a change in the 5-point investigator global assessment (IGA) score from baseline to end point (week 12). Secondary outcome measures included change in the 5-point clinician erythema assessment (CEA) score from baseline to end point, IGA success, and adverse events (AEs). The monotherapy per-protocol (PP) population was selected a priori as the primary analysis population and safety assessments were performed on all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. In the PP population of 826 monotherapy participants who completed the trial, approximately 75% of participants with mild to severe rosacea at baseline were clear or near clear by week 12, according to IGA scores. Furthermore, approximately 75% of participants had CEA scores reflecting none or mild erythema after 12 weeks. In the safety population of 1196 participants, treatment-related AEs were reported in 6.7% of participants that were mainly mild or moderate in severity. Adverse events that occurred in more than 1% of the safety population included diarrhea (1.2%), nausea (1.3%), and headache (1.0%). The incidence of fungal and yeast infections was 0.4%. The results of the ORCA trial support the effectiveness and safety of the 40-mg formulation of doxycycline in patients with papulopustular rosacea.

Microencapsulated Benzoyl Peroxide and Tretinoin for the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris: Results from a Phase 2 Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Study.

This phase 2, 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active- and vehicle-controlled (VC), parallel-group trial assessed the efficacy and safety of silica encapsulated benzoyl peroxide BP (E-BP), two concentrations of silica encapsulated tretinoin (E-ATRA) and their combinations (TWIN high and low) vs VC in 726 males and females ≥9 years of age with moderate-to-severe inflammatory facial acne. The co-primary efficacy endpoints were Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) success rate ("clear" or "almost clear") and changes from baseline in inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts. TWIN high and low were each significantly superior vs VC for IGA success at 12 weeks (39.7% and 27.4%, respectively, vs 12.3%, P < 0.001 and P < 0.01). TWIN high and low resulted in mean reductions in inflammatory lesions of -16.9 (64%) and -17.0 (60.8%) vs -11.5 (42%) for VC. Reductions in non-inflammatory lesions were -23.7 for TWIN low (54.9%) and -23.6 for TWIN high (53.3%) vs -13.7 (32.4%) for VC (all P < 0.001 vs VC). Results for TWIN were also numerically superior to E-BP and E-ATRA. All treatments were safe with comparable skin tolerability. The significant superiority of both combinations over VC and numerical superiority over E-BP and E-ATRA were achieved without an increase in adverse events or reduced skin tolerability.

Current approach to acne management: a community-based analysis.

During fall 2008, 10 roundtable discussions involving 70 practicing dermatologists and a physician assistant were conducted across the United States to address patient considerations and treatment strategies for acne vulgaris. A case study format was used to initiate discussion. This supplement is based on the issues raised during the roundtable discussions and at a final working session among the authors where suggestions, trends, and the consensus from each of the 10 roundtable discussions were reviewed regarding published, evidence-based recommendations for treating acne vulgaris. Effective treatment of acne vulgaris can prevent adverse emotional sequelae and physical scarring. We hope that the information presented herein will help guide our colleagues in improving the care of patients with acne vulgaris.

Standard management options for rosacea, part 1: overview and broad spectrum of care.

The standard management options were developed by a consensus committee and review panel of 26 experts to assist in providing optimal patient care based on the standard classification and grading systems for rosacea that were developed to perform research; analyze results and compare data from different sources; and provide a common terminology and reference for the diagnosis, treatment, and assessment of results in clinical practice. We discuss standard management options for rosacea in 2 parts: (1) overview and broad spectrum of care, and (2) options according to subtype. The options are considered provisional and may be expanded and updated as appropriate. Managing the various potential signs and symptoms of rosacea calls for consideration of a broad spectrum of care, and a more precise selection of therapeutic options may become increasingly possible as the mechanism of action of therapies are more definitively established.

Standard management options for rosacea, part 2: options according to subtype.

The standard management options were developed by a consensus committee and review panel of 26 experts to assist in providing optimal patient care based on the standard classification and grading systems for rosacea that were developed to perform research; analyze results and compare data from different sources; and provide a common terminology and reference for the diagnosis, treatment, and assessment of results in clinical practice. We discuss the standard management options for rosacea in 2 parts: (1) overview and broad spectrum of care, and (2) management options according to subtype. The menu of options is considered provisional and may be expanded and updated as appropriate. Managing the various potential signs and symptoms of rosacea calls for consideration of a broad spectrum of care, and a more precise selection of therapeutic options may become increasingly possible as the mechanisms of action of therapies are more definitively established.

Antibiotic use in acne vulgaris and rosacea: clinical considerations and resistance issues of significance to dermatologists.

Antibiotics are commonly prescribed in dermatology practice for a variety of disorders, including acne vulgaris and rosacea. Importantly, they often are used long-term for these inflammatory dermatoses. Changes in bacterial ecology related to antibiotic prescribing have led to the decreased sensitivity of some bacterial organisms, such as Propionibacterium acnes, to antibiotics commonly prescribed by dermatologists. The potential clinical outcomes of altered bacterial sensitivities may vary among specific disease states and include decreased therapeutic response and the need to alter approaches in disease management. Additionally, changing patterns of antibiotic sensitivity and the emergence of more virulent pathogens, such as community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, macrolide-resistant staphylococci and streptococci, and mupirocin-resistant S aureus, have led to marked changes in how clinicians use antibiotics in clinical practice. This article reviews antibiotic prescribing in dermatology practice and provides important clinical perspectives and recommendations to preserve the therapeutic value of antibiotics based on a thorough review of current literature and clinical experience.

Epithelial herpetic simplex keratitis recurrence and graft survival after corneal transplantation in patients with and without atopy.

PURPOSE: To compare the incidence of herpes simplex virus (HSV) epithelial recurrence and graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in patients with and without self-reported atopy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort comparative study. SETTING: Cornea Service, Wills Eye Hospital. STUDY POPULATION: Patients who presented with previously diagnosed ocular HSV between March 2003 and March 2004 and who underwent primary PK for ocular HSV at the Cornea Service. From the 58 patients invited, 49 patients (50 eyes) were included. Nine patients were ineligible in accordance with the exclusion criteria: no active classic HSV episode before PK, immunosuppression, less than one year of follow-up, previous history of PK before presentation at the Service. Eligible patients filled out a questionnaire regarding their history of atopic disease, considering: presence of allergic rhinitis, asthma, or atopic dermatitis. Ocular history was obtained through chart review. main outcome measures: Incidence of epithelial HSV recurrences and corneal graft survival in both groups. RESULTS: Each group (atopic and nonatopic) included 25 eyes. The atopic patients had a mean incidence of 0.07 episode/eye year (SD +/- 0.9) compared with 0.12/eye year (standard deviation [SD] +/- 0.21) in the nonatopics (P = .002). At 10 years of follow-up, the survival rate in the atopics was of 92% and in the nonatopics was of 79% (P = .88). CONCLUSIONS: Nonatopics had significantly more epithelial recurrences after PK compared to atopics; however, both groups presented low incidences of recurrences and high graft survival rates.

Two randomized phase III clinical trials evaluating anti-inflammatory dose doxycycline (40-mg doxycycline, USP capsules) administered once daily for treatment of rosacea.

BACKGROUND: Doxycycline monotherapy at antimicrobial doses has been shown to be effective for the treatment of rosacea. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily anti-inflammatory dose doxycycline for the treatment of rosacea. METHODS: In two phase III, parallel-group, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (studies 301 and 302), patients received 40-mg of controlled-release doxycycline (n = 269) or placebo (n = 268) for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the mean change from baseline in facial inflammatory lesion count. RESULTS: The mean lesion count at baseline was approximately 20 in each study arm. At week 16, the mean change from baseline in lesion count in the active-treatment groups was -11.8 in study 301 and -9.5 in study 302 compared with -5.9 and -4.3, respectively, in the placebo groups (P < .001 for both comparisons). Anti-inflammatory dose doxycycline was well tolerated; the most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis (4.8%), diarrhea (4.4%), and headache (4.4%). LIMITATIONS: In both studies, the reduction of inflammatory lesion counts did not plateau within the 16-week time frame in either treatment group. Rosacea is often treated for a period of months or years. The duration of the studies did not allow for assessment of safety beyond 16 weeks or whether the progressive improvement seen with active treatment would continue beyond 16 weeks. Neither study assessed the effect of treatment in patients with only erythematotelangiectatic (subtype 1) rosacea. CONCLUSION: Once-daily anti-inflammatory dose doxycycline appears to be effective and safe for the treatment of rosacea.

Clinical considerations in the treatment of acne vulgaris and other inflammatory skin disorders: focus on antibiotic resistance.

Propionibacterium acnes is an anaerobic bacterium that plays an important role in the pathogenesis of acne. Certain antibiotics that can inhibit P acnes colonization also have demonstrated anti-inflammatory activities in the treatment of acne, rosacea, and other noninfectious diseases. Decreased sensitivity of P acnes to antibiotics, such as erythromycin and tetracycline, has developed and may be associated with therapeutic failure. Benzoyl peroxide (BPO) is a nonantibiotic antibacterial agent that is highly effective against P acnes and for which no resistance against it has been detected to date. Retinoids are important components in combination therapy for acne, including use with antibiotics, and can serve as an alternative to these agents in maintenance therapy. By increasing our understanding of the multifaceted actions of antibiotics and the known clinical implications of antibiotic resistance, physicians can improve their decision making in prescribing these agents.