Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Br J Surg ; 102(10): 1267-71, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26122401

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Altered immune function after appendicectomy has been associated with autoimmune disease, even though the mechanisms are not clearly elucidated. This study aimed to investigate whether the frequency of new-onset type II diabetes was increased after appendicectomy in a case-control study. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study from the Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2000. The relative risk was compared with that in the general population using population-based data. Each patient was tracked for a 3-year interval to identify those who developed type II diabetes. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to assess the risk of type II diabetes during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 31,512 patients were included in the study, of whom 5252 had an appendicectomy (study cohort) and 26,260 were matched for comparison. Some 714 patients (2.3 per cent) developed type II diabetes during the 3-year follow-up, 161 in the study cohort (3.1 per cent) and 553 in the comparison cohort (2.1 per cent). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for type II diabetes in the study cohort was 1.45 (95 per cent c.i. 1.22 to 1.74). This increased risk was most pronounced in men (adjusted HR 1.47, 1.16 to 1.88) and in those with a perforated appendix (adjusted HR 2.28, 1.71 to 3.03), and applied only to patients younger than 65 years of age. CONCLUSION: An increased risk of new-onset type II diabetes within 3 years after appendicectomy was found in patients aged less than 65 years. The risk was highest in men and in those with complicated appendicitis.


Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Apendicitis/cirugía , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Taiwán/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo
4.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 11(1): 9-13, 2001 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11269563

RESUMEN

Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) is an effective treatment for morbid obesity. Recent advancement in laparoscopic surgery has made laparoscopic VBG possible. The authors compared retrospectively the outcomes of laparoscopic VBG versus open VBG in patients with morbid obesity. From June 1998 to April 1999, 100 patients (18 men, 82 women; average age, 32.6 years) underwent laparoscopic VBG, and 40 patients (7 men, 33 women; average age, 28.8 years) underwent conventional open VBG. The two groups were similar regarding sex, age, and body mass index distribution. Mean surgical time, blood loss estimate, duration of postoperative recovery, analgesic usage, complications, and weight reduction were compared among the two groups. Laparoscopic VBG was successful in 99 (99%) of the 100 patients. Mean surgical time was longer in duration for the laparoscopic VBG group than it was for the open VBG group (173 vs. 101 minutes, P < 0.01). The laparoscopic VBG group had earlier flatus passage (1.9 vs. 2.6 days; P < 0.01), less usage of analgesics (meperidine 50 mg/unit; 0.9 vs. 2.3 units; P < 0.01), and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (3.7 vs. 6.0 days; P < 0.01). Estimated blood loss, surgical complication rate, and weight reduction were similar among the two groups. Although laparoscopic VBG required a longer surgical time and was technically more demanding, it resulted in shorter recovery time, less analgesic use, and less severe physical discomfort. The authors' findings show that the two methods were approached safely equally.


Asunto(s)
Gastroplastia/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Seguridad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de Peso
5.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 11(5): 306-12, 2001 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11668227

RESUMEN

SUMMARY: The benefits of laparoscopic appendectomy appear to be controversial. Since 1994, several abdominal procedures have been completed by using the needlescopic technique, but there appear to be no prospective studies to demonstrate the perceived benefits of needlescopic appendectomy. The authors compared open, laparoscopic, and needlescopic appendectomy in a randomized fashion with regard to duration of surgery, length of hospitalization, analgesic dosage, and surgery-associated complications. From March to July 1998, 75 patients admitted at the emergency station of the authors' hospital with a final diagnosis of acute appendicitis without tumor formation were randomized to receive one of the three treatment categories: open (OA), laparoscopic (LA), and needlescopic (nLA) appendectomy. Laparoscopic and needlescopic appendectomy were performed by using a three-port technique, although the size of the trocar used varied. There were 26 patients in the OA group, 23 in the LA group, and 26 in the nLA group. The mean operation durations for the OA, LA, and nLA groups were 55.4 +/- 28.0 minutes, 69.1 +/- 48.8 minutes, and 62.3 +/- 26.3 minutes, respectively, and these were not significantly different from one another. The mean number of the analgesic doses (Pethidine 1 mg/kg) required was 1.3 +/- 1.2 mg/kg, 0.5 +/- 0.8 mg/kg, and 0.2 +/- 0.6 mg/kg, respectively. Significant differences were noted when comparing the OA with the LA or nLA groups (OA vs. LA, P = 0.02; OA vs. nLA, P = 0.0002; LA vs. nLA, P = 0.06). The mean oral intake durations were 32.2 +/- 16.9 hours, 21.0 +/- 14.6 hours, and 20.8 +/- 16.4 hours, respectively, after surgery for the OA, LA, and nLA groups, and the between-group differences were statistically significant for the OA versus LA group ( P = 0.004) and for the OA versus nLA group ( P = 0.003). The mean durations of hospitalization for the OA, LA, and nLA groups were 3.6 +/-1.8 days, 2.8 +/- 1.4 days, and 2.4 +/- 0.9 days, and difference was detected between the OA and the nLA groups ( P = 0.02). The OA group rendered a greater wound-complication rate and ileus than did the other two groups, but the differences were not detected between the three categories ( P = 0.065, 0.6935). The result of the current study confirmed that the nLA procedure is a feasible and safe one. The nLA procedure provided substantial advantages over the OA procedure in the contexts of diminished postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay without significant increases in postoperative complication rate or surgical time.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparotomía/métodos , Microcirugia/métodos , Dolor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/diagnóstico , Cefazolina/administración & dosificación , Niño , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Premedicación , Probabilidad , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Hernia ; 18(2): 177-83, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23644775

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernioplasty is significantly less painful than open repair, but it is not completely painless. Local anesthetics are thought to decrease postoperative pain when placed at the surgical site. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy of extraperitoneal bupivacaine treatment during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair for the reduction of postoperative pain. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs that investigated the outcomes of extraperitoneal bupivacaine analgesia versus control in laparoscopic TEP hernia repair. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale at 4-6 h and at 24 h following the surgery. The secondary outcomes included complications and analgesia consumption. RESULTS: We reviewed eight trials that included a total of 373 patients. We found no difference between the groups in postoperative pain reduction following laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair. The intensity of pain was not significantly different between the bupivacaine treatment group and the control group. The pooled mean differences in pain scores were -0.26 (95% CI -0.72 to 0.21) at 4-6 h and -0.47 (95% CI -1.24 to 0.29) at 24 h. No bupivacaine-related complications were reported. CONCLUSION: Extraperitoneal bupivacaine treatment during laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernioplasty is not more efficacious for the reduction of postoperative pain than placebo.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Bupivacaína/administración & dosificación , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Humanos , Laparoscopía , Manejo del Dolor , Dimensión del Dolor , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
10.
Pediatr Res ; 39(6): 1041-9, 1996 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8725267

RESUMEN

Zinc protoporphyrin IX (ZnPP) has been shown to inhibit heme oxygenase (HO) activity effectively in vivo and has potential in the treatment of neonatal jaundice. Because this is a transitional or temporary condition lasting only several days, an effective chemopreventive agent with a relatively short duration of action would be desirable for the treatment of severe neonatal jaundice. To determine the effective duration of action of ZnPP, we administered either 40 nmol/g of body weight ZnPP or 5 microL/g body weight diluent intraperitoneally to neonatal rats 24-36 h after birth. Between 0 and 21 d after ZnPP dosing, the duration of action was investigated through measurements of serum bilirubin and hepatic and splenic HO inhibition, which were correlated to measurements of ZnPP distribution. Significant (p < 0.05) hepatic HO inhibition, ranging from 27 to 51%, was observed in the liver between 1 and 4 d after dosing, concurrent with a 23-28% reduction in serum bilirubin levels, and was associated with ZnPP tissue concentrations of 27-38 nmol/g. Splenic HO was not inhibited measurably by the much lower concentrations of ZnPP found in the spleen (2.8-20.1 nmol/g) between 0 and 21 d after dosing. Furthermore, HO isoform 1 (HO-1) induction was apparently not a confounding factor in the duration of action of ZnPP, because the modest increases in HO-1 protein levels were not sustained longer than 24 h after ZnPP administration. Our findings demonstrated that the duration of action of ZnPP in neonatal rats is less than 1 wk. The reduction in serum bilirubin levels, the short duration of action and minimal confounding effects suggest that ZnPP may be an effective chemopreventive agent for the treatment of severe neonatal jaundice.


Asunto(s)
Bilirrubina/sangre , Hemo Oxigenasa (Desciclizante)/metabolismo , Protoporfirinas/farmacología , Animales , Animales Recién Nacidos , Peso Corporal , Expresión Génica , Hemo Oxigenasa (Desciclizante)/genética , Metaloporfirinas/metabolismo , Tamaño de los Órganos , ARN Mensajero/metabolismo , Ratas , Ratas Wistar , Distribución Tisular
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA