Injuries and Fatalities on Sailboats in the United States 2000-2011: An Analysis of US Coast Guard Data.

BACKGROUND: Prior sailing injury studies have been small, focused investigations. This large, population-based study examined the mechanisms and factors contributing to sailboat-related injuries and deaths. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis of the Boating Accident Report Database compiled by the US Coast Guard between 2000 and 2011 was performed. The database was analyzed looking at frequency of events. For each subgroup, proportions were determined and 95% CIs were calculated. These data, used in conjunction with the 2011 US Coast Guard National Recreational Boating Survey, were used to estimate a fatality rate. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-one sailing-related fatalities and 841 injuries were reported. A fatality rate was calculated at 1.19 deaths per million sailing person-days. Weather or hazardous waters were listed as primary contributing factors in 28.0% (95% CI, 22.7-33.4) of deaths; 70.1% (95% CI, 64.7-75.6) of deaths occurred after falling overboard or capsizing. Drowning was the most common cause of death (73.1%; 95% CI, 67.8-78.4), and 81.6% of victims were not wearing a life jacket. Alcohol intoxication contributed to 12.2% (95% CI, 8.3-16.1) of deaths. Operator- or passenger-preventable factors contributed to 52.7% (95% CI, 49.3-56.1) of all injuries; 51.6% (95% CI, 46.1-57.1) of injuries on nonmotorized sailboats were the result of capsizing, and 46.4% (95% CI, 42.1-50.7) of all injuries on motorized sailboats were the result of collisions or grounding. CONCLUSIONS: The calculated fatality rate is similar to that of alpine skiing. Falls overboard and capsizing were the most common fatal accidents. Operator inattention, inexperience, and alcohol use were common preventable factors contributing to fatal and nonfatal injury.

Novel test method (sickle confirm) to differentiate sickle cell anemia from sickle cell trait for potential use in developing countries.

The objective of this study was to develop a diagnostic testing method to detect HbS, distinguish sickle cell homozygotes from heterozygotes, and overcome testing barriers encountered in laboratories in underdeveloped countries. Blood samples positive and negative for sickle cell were subjected to the standard hemoglobin solubility test followed by a variety of centrifugation and filtration procedures. Each procedure was evaluated for the ability to remove insoluble HbS from the sample. The hemoglobin types that remain (HbA, HbA2 and HbF) were measured spectrophotometrically or estimated visually allowing samples to be categorized into three genotypes (AA, AS and SS) as confirmed by hemoglobin electrophoresis. De-identified EDTA blood samples were obtained from Saint Louis University and Cardinal Glennon Children's hospitals and tested in the Department of Clinical Laboratory Science at Saint Louis University. The main outcome measures were turbidity of the solubility solution; color of the supernatant and the material on the surface of the solution following centrifugation; precipitate trapped on the filter paper; absorbance of the filtrate; and hemoglobin electrophoresis patterns. Centrifugation and filtration successfully separated HbS from HbA/A2/F allowing for the differentiation of seven sickle cell homozygotes from sixteen heterozygotes with a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. This method has the potential to reliably distinguish homozygous from heterozygous sickle cell patients and it is fast, inexpensive, and simple. These characteristics make Sickle Confirm a desirable method in developing countries like Haiti and Africa where sickle cell anemia is prevalent and modern diagnostic methods like electrophoresis, HPLC and nucleic acid testing are impractical.

Assessment of celecoxib pharmacodynamics in pancreatic cancer.

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors are being developed as chemopreventive and anticancer agents. This study aimed to determine the biological effect of the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib in pancreatic cancer as an early step to the further development of the agent in this disease. Eight patients scheduled for resection of an infiltrating adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were randomized to receive celecoxib at a dose of 400 mg twice daily or placebo for 5 to 15 days before the surgery. In addition, carcinomas from nine additional patients were xenografted in nude mice, expanded, and treated with vehicle or celecoxib for 28 days. Celecoxib markedly decreased the intra-tumor levels of prostaglandin E2 in patient carcinomas and in the heterotransplanted xenografts. However, this effect did not result in inhibition of cell proliferation or microvessel density (as assessed by Ki67 and CD31 staining). In addition, a panel of markers, including bcl-2, COX-1, COX-2, and VEGF, did not change with treatment in a significant manner. Furthermore, there was no evidence of antitumor effects in the xenografted carcinomas. In summary, celecoxib efficiently inhibited the synthesis of prostaglandin E2 both in pancreatic cancer surgical specimens and in xenografted carcinomas but did not exert evident antitumor, antiproliferative, or antiangiogenic effect as a single agent. The direct pancreatic cancer xenograft model proved to be a valuable tool for drug evaluation and biological studies and showed similar results to those observed in resected pancreatic cancer specimens.

Characterizing DNA methylation patterns in pancreatic cancer genome.

We performed a global methylation profiling assay on 1505 CpG sites across 807 genes to characterize DNA methylation patterns in pancreatic cancer genome. We found 289 CpG sites that were differentially methylated in normal pancreas, pancreatic tumors and cancer cell lines. We identified 23 and 35 candidate genes that are regulated by hypermethylation and hypomethylation in pancreatic cancer, respectively. We also identified candidate methylation markers that alter the expression of genes critical to gemcitabine susceptibility in pancreatic cancer. These results indicate that aberrant DNA methylation is a frequent epigenetic event in pancreatic cancer; and by using global methylation profiling assay, it is possible to identify these markers for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in this disease.

Pharmacodynamic-guided modified continuous reassessment method-based, dose-finding study of rapamycin in adult patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Pharmacodynamic studies are frequently incorporated into phase I trials, but it is uncommon that they guide dose selection. We conducted a dose selection study with daily rapamycin (sirolimus) in patients with solid tumors employing a modified continuous reassessment method (mCRM) using real-time pharmacodynamic data as primary dose-estimation parameter. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We adapted the mCRM logit function from its classic toxicity-based input data to a pharmacodynamic-based input. The pharmacodynamic end point was skin phospho-P70 change after 28 days. Pharmacodynamic effect was defined as at least 80% inhibition from baseline. The first two dose levels (2 and 3 mg) were evaluated before implementing the mCRM, and the data used to estimate the next dose level based on statistical modeling. Toxicity-based boundaries limited the escalation steps. Other correlates analyzed were positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography, pharmacokinetics, phospho-P70 in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells, and tumor biopsies in patients at the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled at doses between 2 and 9 mg. Pharmacodynamic effect occurred across dose levels, and toxicity boundaries ultimately drove dose selection. The MTD of daily oral rapamycin was 6 mg. Toxicities in at least 20% were hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, elevated transaminases, anemia, leucopenia, neutropenia, and mucositis. Pharmacokinetics were consistent with prior data, and exposure increased with dose. No objective responses occurred, but five previously progressing patients received at least 12 cycles. PET showed generalized stable or decreased glucose uptake unrelated to antitumor effect. CONCLUSION: mCRM-based dose escalation using real-time pharmacodynamic assessment was feasible. However, the selected pharmacodynamic end point did not correlate with dose. Toxicity ultimately drove dose selection. Rapamycin is a well-tolerated and active oral anticancer agent.

Coordinated epidermal growth factor receptor pathway gene overexpression predicts epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor sensitivity in pancreatic cancer.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor erlotinib is approved for treatment of pancreatic cancer but the overall activity is minimal, and known predictive factors for EGFR inhibitor efficacy are infrequent in this disease. We tested the hypothesis that global activation of the EGFR pathway is predictive of EGFR inhibitor efficacy. Pancreatic cancer tumors directly xenografted at surgery were treated with the EGFR inhibitors erlotinib and cetuximab and analyzed for biological features. Two of 10 tumors were sensitive, and by global gene expression profiling with gene set enrichment analysis, the EGFR pathway was highly expressed in sensitive compared with resistant tumors. The core gene components driving EGFR pathway overexpression were pathway ligands and positive effectors. In a prospective validation, the EGFR pathway-based signature correctly predicted anti-EGFR treatment response in eight additional tumors and was not predictive of response to gemcitabine and CI1040 (a MEK inhibitor). Analysis of EGFR, KRAS, and PIK3CA mutations and gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification showed that none of these genetic abnormalities were neither predictive nor responsible for the EGFR pathway activation. Coordinated overexpression of the EGFR pathway predicts susceptibility to EGFR inhibitors in pancreatic cancer. These results suggest a phenomenon of pathway addiction and support the value of unbiased system biology approaches in drug development.