The Role of Advanced Practice Providers in Pediatric Emergency Care Across Nine Emergency Departments.

OBJECTIVES: Advance practice providers (APPs) have been increasingly incorporated into emergency department (ED) staffing. The objective of this study was to describe patient factors that predict when pediatric patient care is provided by APPs and/or physicians. We hypothesized that APPs care for a significant proportion of pediatric patients and are more likely to care for lower acuity patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of encounters in patients aged younger than 18 years across 9 EDs from January 2018 to December 2019. Data on age, acuity level, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision code, procedures performed, disposition, provider type, and length of stay were extracted from the electronic health record. RESULTS: Of 159,035 patient encounters, 37% were cared for by an APP (30% APP independently, 7% physician + APP) and 63% by physicians independently. Advance practice providers were more likely to care for lower acuity patients (60.8% vs 4.4%, P < 0.05) and those in EDs with less pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) coverage (33.4% vs 6.8%, P < 0.05). In an adjusted multinomic regression model, APPs were less likely than physicians to care for high-acuity patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.09), admitted patients (OR, 0.31; CI, 0.28-0.35) and patients in EDs with more PEM coverage (OR, 0.09; CI, 0.09-0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Advance practice providers cared for more than one third of pediatric patients and tended to care for lower acuity patients and for patients in EDs with less PEM coverage. These data highlight the importance of integrating APPs into initiatives aiming to improve pediatric emergency care.

Comparing Leadership Skills of Senior Emergency Medicine Residents in 3-Year Versus 4-Year Programs During Simulated Pediatric Resuscitation: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVES: The majority of pediatric patients in the United States (US) are evaluated and treated at general emergency departments. It is possible that discrepancies in length of emergency medicine (EM) residency training may allow for variable exposure to pediatric patients, critical resuscitations, and didactic events. The goal of this pilot study was to compare leadership skills of graduating EM residents from 3- to 4-year programs during simulated pediatric resuscitations using a previously validated leadership assessment tool, the Concise Assessment of Leader Management (CALM). METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, simulation-based cohort pilot study that included graduating 3 rd - and 4 th -year EM resident physicians from 6 EM residency programs. We measured leadership performance across 3 simulated pediatric resuscitations (sepsis, seizure, cardiac arrest) using the CALM tool and compared leadership scores between the 3 rd - and 4 th -year resident cohorts. We also correlated leadership to self-efficacy scores. RESULTS: Data was analyzed for 47 participating residents (24 3 rd -year residents and 23 4 th -year residents). Out of a total possible CALM score of 66, residents from 3-year programs scored 45.2 [SD ± 5.2], 46.8 [SD ± 5.0], and 46.6 [SD ± 4.7], whereas residents from 4-year programs scored 45.5 [SD ± 5.2], 46.4 [SD ± 5.0], and 48.2 [SD ± 4.3] during the sepsis, seizure, and cardiac arrest cases, respectively. The mean leadership score across all 3 cases for the 3-year cohort was 46.2 [SD ± 4.8] versus 46.7 [SD ± 4.5] ( P = 0.715) for the 4-year cohort. CONCLUSIONS: These data show feasibility for a larger cohort project and, while not statistically significant, suggest no difference in leadership skills between 3 rd - and 4 th -year EM residents in our study cohort. This pilot study provides the basis of future work that will assess a larger multicenter cohort with the hope to obtain a more generalizable dataset.

The Effect of a Collaborative Pediatric Emergency Readiness Improvement Intervention on Patients' Hospital Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that collaborative intervention to improve weighted pediatric readiness score (WPRS) will be associated with decreased pediatric intensive care (PICU) mortality, PICU and hospital length of stay. METHODS: This study analyzes the transfer of acutely ill and injured patients from general emergency departments (GEDs) to our institution. The intervention involved customized assessment reports focusing on team performance and systems improvement for pediatric readiness, sharing best practices and clinical resources, designation of a nurse PECC at each GED and ongoing interactions at 2 and 4 months. Data was collected from charts before and after the intervention, focusing on patients transferred to our pediatric emergency department (ED) or directly admitted to our PICU from the GEDs. Clinical outcomes such as PICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and PICU mortality were assessed. Descriptive statistics were used for demographics, and various statistical tests were employed to analyze the data. Bivariate analyses and multivariable models were utilized to examine patient outcomes and the association between the intervention and outcomes. RESULTS: There were 278 patients in the pre-intervention period and 314 patients in the post-intervention period. Multivariable analyses revealed a significant association between the change in WPRS and decreased PICU LOS (ß=-0.05 [95% CI: -0.09, -0.01), p=0.023), and hospital LOS (ß=-0.12 [95% CI: -0.21, -0.04], p=0.004), but showed no association between the intervention and other patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, improving pediatric readiness scores in GEDs was associated with significant improvements in PICU and hospital length of stay. Future initiatives should focus on disseminating pediatric readiness efforts to improve outcomes of critically ill children nationally. WHATS NEW: Improving pediatric readiness scores in general emergency departments is associated with improved downstream clinical outcomes demonstrated by reduced PICU and hospital length of stay.