Association of peripheral artery disease with in-hospital outcomes after endovascular transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) and its association with in-hospital outcomes after endovascular transcatheter aortic valve replacement (EV-TAVR). BACKGROUND: TAVR is an established treatment for patients at prohibitive, high, or intermediate surgical risk. PAD is a significant comorbidity in the determination of surgical risk. However, data on association of PAD with outcomes after EV-TAVR are limited. METHODS: Patients in the National Inpatient Sample who underwent EV-TAVR between January 1, 2012 and September 30, 2015 were evaluated. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 51,685 patients underwent EV-TAVR during the study period. Of these, 12,740 (24.6%) had a coexisting diagnosis of PAD. The adjusted odds for in-hospital mortality [OR 1.08 (95% CI 0.83-1.41)], permanent pacemaker implantation [OR 0.98 (0.85-1.14)], conversion to open aortic valve replacement [OR 1.05 (0.49-2.26)], or acute myocardial infarction [OR 1.31(0.99-1.71)] were not different in patients with versus without PAD. However, patients with PAD had greater adjusted odds of vascular complications [OR 1.80 (1.50-2.16)], major bleeding [OR 1.20 (1.09-1.34)], acute kidney injury (AKI) [OR 1.19 (1.05-1.36)], cardiac complications [aOR 1.21 (1.01-1.44)], and stroke [OR 1.39(1.10-1.75)] compared with patients without PAD. Length of stay (LOS) was significantly longer for patients with PAD [7.23 (0.14) days vs. 7.11 (0.1) days, p < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: Of patients undergoing EV-TAVR, ~25% have coexisting PAD. PAD was not associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality but was associated with higher risk of vascular complications, major bleeding, AKI, stroke, cardiac complications, and longer LOS.

Comparison of Incidence and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Posterior (Inferior) Versus Anterior ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a catastrophic consequence of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). CS has been reported to be associated less often with inferior wall (IWMI) than anterior wall STEMI (AWMI). We queried the National Inpatient Sample databases from January 2010 to September 2015 to identify all patients aged ≥18 years admitted with AWMI or IWMI. Patients with a concomitant diagnosis of CS were then identified. Complex samples multivariable logistic regression models were used to compare the incidence, management, and in-hospital mortality of CS complicating IWMI versus AWMI. The incidence of CS was lower in IWMI (9.5%) versus AWMI (14.1%), adjusted OR (aOR) 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81 to 0.87). Revascularization rates with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting were similar in CS complicating IWMI versus AWMI (80.9% vs 80.3%; aOR 1.05; 95% CI 0.97 to 1.14). The reported use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices was lower in patients with CS-IWMI versus CS-AWMI (44.7% vs 61.0%; aOR 0.55; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.59). In-hospital mortality was modestly lower in patients with CS complicating IWMI versus AWMI (30.3% vs 31.9%; aOR, 0.80; 95% CI 0.75 to 0.86). Use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support was not associated with lower in-hospital mortality in either CS-AWMI (30.0% vs 34.7; aOR 1.04; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.14) or CS-IWMI (31.0% vs 29.8%; aOR 1.20; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.33). In conclusion, the incidence of CS in the contemporary era is lower in patients with IWMI compared with those with AWMI. CS complicating STEMI is associated with higher in-hospital mortality in AWMI versus IWMI, and outcomes were not different with or without percutaneous circulatory support.

Effect of cilostazol on platelet reactivity among patients with peripheral artery disease on clopidogrel therapy.

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel is recommended to reduce cardiovascular events in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD); however, clopidogrel efficacy has not been adequately studied in this patient population. Therefore, we aimed to determine the effects of cilostazol therapy on platelet reactivity among PAD patients on clopidogrel. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional pilot study of 46 Puerto Rican patients diagnosed with PAD. The cohort was divided based on use of clopidogrel and cilostazol (n=24) or clopidogrel alone (n=22). Platelet function was measured ex vivo using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples using the QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit, which was subjected to candidate variant genotyping (CYP2C19, ABCB1, PON1 and P2RY12) using TaqMan quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays. All analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute). RESULTS: Among all enrolled patients, 18 (39%) had high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR). The mean platelet reactivity was 207±53 (range, 78-325) with higher P2Y12 reaction units in the non-cilostazol group, 224±45 vs. 191±55 on the cilostazol group (p=0.03). No significant differences were observed in the clinical or genetic variables between the two groups. A multiple regression analysis determined that history of diabetes mellitus (p=0.03), use of cilostazol (p=0.03) and hematocrit (p=0.02) were independent predictors of platelet reactivity. CONCLUSIONS: In Puerto Rican PAD patients on clopidogrel therapy, history of diabetes mellitus, use of cilostazol and hematocrit are independent predictors of platelet reactivity. Adjunctive cilostazol therapy may enhance clopidogrel efficacy among PAD patients with HTPR.