Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Environ Sci Technol ; 49(16): 9400-14, 2015 Aug 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25950504

RESUMEN

The addition of iron is a convenient way for removing phosphorus from wastewater, but this is often considered to limit phosphorus recovery. Struvite precipitation is currently used to recover phosphorus, and this approach has attracted much interest. However, it requires the use of enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR). EBPR is not yet widely applied and the recovery potential is low. Other phosphorus recovery methods, including sludge application to agricultural land or recovering phosphorus from sludge ash, also have limitations. Energy-producing wastewater treatment plants increasingly rely on phosphorus removal using iron, but the problem (as in current processes) is the subsequent recovery of phosphorus from the iron. In contrast, phosphorus is efficiently mobilized from iron by natural processes in sediments and soils. Iron-phosphorus chemistry is diverse, and many parameters influence the binding and release of phosphorus, including redox conditions, pH, presence of organic substances, and particle morphology. We suggest that the current poor understanding of iron and phosphorus chemistry in wastewater systems is preventing processes being developed to recover phosphorus from iron-phosphorus rich wastes like municipal wastewater sludge. Parameters that affect phosphorus recovery are reviewed here, and methods are suggested for manipulating iron-phosphorus chemistry in wastewater treatment processes to allow phosphorus to be recovered.


Asunto(s)
Hierro/química , Fósforo/química , Fósforo/aislamiento & purificación , Aguas Residuales/química , Sustancias Húmicas , Purificación del Agua
3.
Water Res ; 260: 121905, 2024 Jun 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38878308

RESUMEN

Phosphorous not only needs to be removed to prevent eutrophication of wastewater effluent receiving surface water bodies, but it also has to be recovered as a scarce finite reserve. Phosphorus chemical precipitation as NH4MgPO4·6H2O, Ca3(PO4)2, or Fe3(PO4)2 ·8H2O is the most common method of phosphorus recovery from phosphorus-rich streams. These minerals ideally form under neutral to alkaline pH conditions, making acidic streams problematic for their formation due to the need for pH adjustments. This study proposes FePO4 .2H2O (strengite-like compounds) recovery from acidic streams due to its simplicity and high efficiency, while also avoiding the need for pH-adjusting chemicals. The effect of initial pH, temperature, Fe (III) dosing rates, and Fe (II) dosage under different oxidation conditions (pO2 = 0.2, 1, 1.5 bar, different H2O2 dosing rates) on phosphorus recovery percentage and product settleability were evaluated in this study. The precipitates formed were analyzed using optical microscopy, SEM, XRD, SQUID, Raman, and ICP. Experiments showed that Fe (III) dosing achieved phosphorus recovery of over 95 % at an initial pH of 3 or higher, and the product exhibited poor settleability in all initial pH (1.5-5), and temperature (20-80 °C) tests. On the other hand, Fe (II) dosage instead of Fe (III) resulted in good product settleability but varying phosphorus recovery percentages depending on the oxidation conditions. The novelty of the study lies in revealing that the Fe (II) oxidation rate serves as a crucial process-design parameter, significantly enhancing product settleability without the requirement of carrier materials or crystallizers. The study proposes a novel strategy with controlled Fe2+-H2O2 dosing, identifying an Fe (II) oxidation rate of 4.7 × 10-4 mol/l/min as the optimal rate for achieving over 95 % total phosphorus recovery, along with excellent settleability with a volumetric index equal to only 8 ml/gP.

4.
Water Res ; 234: 119819, 2023 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36889090

RESUMEN

The study evaluated the combined phosphorus, nitrogen, methane, and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) recovery from aerobic granular sludge (AGS) wastewater treatment plants. About 30% of sludge organics are recovered as EPS and 25-30% as methane (≈260 ml methane/g VS) by integrating alkaline anaerobic digestion (AD). It was shown that 20% of excess sludge total phosphorus (TP) ends in the EPS. Further, 20-30% ends in an acidic liquid waste stream (≈600 mg PO4-P/L), and 15% in the AD centrate (≈800 mg PO4-P/L) as ortho-phosphates in both streams and is recoverable via chemical precipitation. 30% of sludge total nitrogen (TN) is recovered as organic nitrogen in the EPS. Ammonium recovery from the alkaline high-temperature liquid stream is attractive, but it is not feasible for existing large-scale technologies because of low ammonium concentration. However, ammonium concentration in the AD centrate was calculated to be 2600 mg NH4-N/L and ≈20% of TN, making it feasible for recovery. The methodology used in this study consisted of three main steps. The first step was to develop a laboratory protocol mimicking demonstration-scale EPS extraction conditions. The second step was to establish mass balances over the EPS extraction process on laboratory and demonstration scales within a full-scale AGS WWTP. Finally, the feasibility of resource recovery was evaluated based on concentrations, loads, and integration of existing technologies for resource recovery.


Asunto(s)
Aguas del Alcantarillado , Aguas Residuales , Aguas del Alcantarillado/química , Reactores Biológicos , Fósforo , Nitrógeno , Metano , Eliminación de Residuos Líquidos
5.
Environ Technol ; 41(2): 260-266, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29993337

RESUMEN

Biogenic iron oxides (BioFeO) formed by Leptothrix sp. and Gallionella sp. were compared with chemically formed iron oxides (ChFeO) for their suitability to remove and recover phosphate from solutions. The ChFeO used for comparison included a commercial iron-based adsorbent (GEH) and chemically oxidized iron precipitates from groundwater. Despite contrary observations in earlier studies, the batch experiments showed that BioFeO do not have superior phosphate adsorption capacities compared to ChFeO. However, it seems multiple mechanisms are involved in phosphate removal by BioFeO which make their overall phosphate removal capacity higher than that of ChFeO. The overall phosphate removal capacity of Leptothrix sp. deposits was 26.3 mg P/g d.s., which could be attributed to multiple mechanisms. This included adsorption on the solid phase (6.4 mg P/g d.s.) as well as removal via precipitation and/or adsorption onto suspended complexes released from the BioFeO of Leptothrix sp. (19.6 mg P/g d.s.). Only a very small part of phosphorus (0.3 mg P/g d.s.) was retained in the Leptothrix sp. sheats during bacterial growth. Deposits of Gallionella sp. had an overall phosphate removal capacity of 39.6 mg P/g d.s. Significant amounts of phosphate were apparently incorporated into the Gallionella sp. stalks during their growth (31.0 mg P/g d.s.) and only one-fifth of the total phosphate removal can be related to adsorption (8.6 mg P/g d.s.). Their overall ability to immobilize large quantities of phosphate from solutions indicates that BioFeO could play an important role in environmental and engineered systems for removal of contaminants.


Asunto(s)
Leptothrix , Fosfatos , Adsorción , Compuestos Férricos , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Hierro , Óxidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA