Insights into cancer surveillance in Central and Eastern Europe, Israel and Turkey.

The current cancer landscape within transitional economies in central and Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean area is not particularly optimistic. Current perceptions are often based on extrapolations from other countries and regions; and hence the authors collaborated with the South Eastern Europe Oncology Group (SEEROG) to collect information on cancer registration in Central and Eastern Europe, Israel and Turkey. Healthcare authorities and specialist oncology centres in 21 countries in the region were contacted for information on cancer registries in their countries. Based on this information, the authors believe that the recording and reporting of data on cancer in the region is at an acceptable level. The authors discuss and compare institution- and population-based registries, and present opinions on elements of an 'ideal registry' based on the survey replies and comparisons with other registries. A comparison with the sources used for GLOBOCAN 2008 illustrates the need for consistent data to be communicated, published and utilised throughout the region and the oncology community. The authors conclude by considering the potential value of collaboration between health authorities across the region, as well as between the clinical and epidemiological communities, to ensure that cancer data are consistently collected, verified and made public.

Health-related quality of life during hormone therapy after breast cancer: a randomized trial.

AIM: To study the effects of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) on health-related quality of life in women after breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the Stockholm trial, breast cancer survivors were randomized to HT (estradiol and progestogen) or to a control group (no treatment). A subgroup of 75 women was studied (38 with HT, 37 controls). Fifty patients were on concomitant tamoxifen. Patients completed three questionnaires (EORTC QLQ C-30, EORTC QLQ-BR 23 and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)) during 1 year of treatment. RESULTS: A significant group-by-time interaction was found for improvement of insomnia in the HT group (p < 0.001). Within the HT group, but not in the control group, there was significant improvement for HADS anxiety, HADS depression, emotional, cognitive, and social functions and global quality of life. When HT was added to tamoxifen, the increase in global quality of life was significant (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The effects of HT on quality of life in breast cancer survivors have not previously been reported. The present data suggest that this controversial treatment may improve quality of life after breast cancer.

Market and patient access to new oncology products in Europe: a current, multidisciplinary perspective.

To air challenging issues related to patient and market access to new anticancer agents, the Biotherapy Development Association--an international group focused on developing targeted cancer therapies using biological agents--convened a meeting on 29 November 2007 in Brussels, Belgium. The meeting provided a forum for representatives of pharmaceutical companies and academia to interact with European regulatory and postregulatory agencies. The goal was to increase all parties' understanding of their counterparts' roles in the development, licensure, and appraisal of new agents for cancer treatment, events guided by an understanding that cancer patients should have rapid and equitable access to life-prolonging treatments. Among the outcomes of the meeting were a greater understanding of the barriers facing drug developers in an evolving postregulatory world, clarity about what regulatory and postregulatory bodies expect to see in dossiers of new anticancer agents as they contemplate licensure and reimbursement, and several sets of recommendations to optimize patients' access to innovative, safe, effective, and fairly priced cancer treatments.

Hormone replacement therapy after breast cancer: attitudes of women eligible in a randomized trial.

Objectives To investigate the attitudes of breast cancer patients who accepted or declined participation in a randomized trial with hormone replacement therapy that might increase their risk of recurrence (the Stockholm trial). Methods A total of 115 patients free from breast cancer recurrence were interviewed; 57 were participants and 58 were non-participants in the Stockholm trial. Patients answered five questionnaires regarding information needs (two), attitudes to participation in trials (two) and patient role in treatment decisions (one). Results Participants in the Stockholm trial had a lower risk of breast cancer recurrence (measured by node-positive disease and tumor size) and were older than non-participants. Their information needs were the same. Participants in the trial were more prepared to accept uncertainty, to have an altruistic attitude, to accept risks including an increased risk of recurrence of breast cancer, if their quality of life or general health was improved. Most patients preferred a collaborative role in relation to their physician but participants often wanted more influence than they had in treatment decisions. Conclusion A patient's decision to accept or decline participation in the Stockholm trial was influenced by her objective risk of breast cancer recurrence and reflected her attitude to risk, uncertainty and preference to be active in treatment decisions.

Effectiveness of third-generation chemotherapy on the survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Norway: a national study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether the introduction of modern third-generation chemotherapy was associated with survival benefits in a national population of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (ANSCLC) and to explore geographical and temporary variations in the utilisation of chemotherapy. METHODS: All patients with ANSCLC in the Cancer Registry of Norway during 1994-2005 were included. Using sales of vinorelbine as an indicator for chemotherapy, annual county utilisation rates were calculated. Survival before and after the general introduction of vinorelbine and associations between survival and variations in utilisation in counties were investigated. In a subgroup, the predictors of having received chemotherapy were explored. RESULTS: Of 24 875 registered patients with lung cancer, 13 757 had ANSCLC. The annual utilisation of the indicator drug in Norway increased from 3.7 to 184.2 g (1998-2005). Median survival increased from 149 to176 days (p<0.001). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for a diagnosis after the introduction was 0.93 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.99). County utilisation rates of vinorelbine (increments of 100 mg/1000 inhabitants) were inversely associated with the risk of death (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.98). County of residence predicted chemotherapy utilisation with odds ratios in the range 0.13 (95% CI 0.1 to 0.19) to 1.04 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.69), a county with traditionally high utilisation as reference. CONCLUSION: Utilisation of third-generation chemotherapy was associated with slightly increased survival of patients with ANSCLC. Geographical and temporal differences in utilisation indicate variable quality of delivered care.

Radiation-induced breast cancer: long-term follow-up of radiation therapy for benign breast disease.

BACKGROUND: From the 1920s through the 1950s, radiation therapy was used in Sweden as a treatment for benign breast diseases. It is now known that exposure of the breast to ionizing radiation increases the relative risk of subsequent breast cancer, especially for younger women. However, the degree to which the patient's age contributes to the elevation of risk for subsequent development of breast cancer is not yet completely understood. PURPOSE: The purpose was to study the risk of breast cancer after irradiation of the female breast and, in particular, to analyze the duration of the effect and the risk for women older than 40 years at first exposure. METHODS: In this cohort study, data were obtained through population-based registers. The exposed group consisted of 1216 women (median age, 40 years) who, during the period spanning 1925 through 1954, received radiation therapy for benign breast disease. The reference group consisted of 1874 women (median age, 36 years) who had the same diagnosis during that time period but did not receive radiation therapy. The radiation doses were determined from the original medical records (mean dose, 5.8 Gy; range, 0.003-50.1 Gy). The follow-up lasted up to 60 years after first exposure. The incidence rate ratio was analyzed with Poisson regression models. RESULTS: The total number of breast cancers in the exposed cohort was 198 versus 101 in the unexposed cohort. Overall, the radiation-associated incidence rate ratio was 3.58 (95% confidence interval = 2.77-4.63). The dose-response gradient was statistically significant (P < .001) but leveled off at higher doses. The incidence rate ratios decreased starting about 25 years after first exposure but were at increased levels throughout the entire follow-up period. The incidence rate ratio decreased with age at first exposure but was significantly increased (P < .001) even when the age at time of first exposure was greater than 40 years. CONCLUSIONS: Total dose, age at first exposure, and time since first exposure were all determinants of the incidence rate ratio of breast cancer after exposure of the breast to ionizing radiation. A statistically significant increase in the incidence of breast cancer following radiation treatment of various benign breast diseases was observed even among women older than 40 years at the time of first treatment. IMPLICATIONS: These findings need to be considered when weighing the relative benefits versus risks of generalized screening of younger women for breast cancer by mammography.

Adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for early stage breast cancer and second primary malignancies. Stockholm Breast Cancer Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen is being increasingly used for the treatment of breast cancer and is undergoing study for the primary prevention of breast cancer. However, concerns have been raised that the drug may increase the incidence of new primary malignancies, such as endometrial, liver, and colorectal cancers. PURPOSE: Our goal was to assess the carcinogenic risks associated with long-term use of tamoxifen in women with early stage breast cancer. METHODS: The incidence of new primary cancers among 2729 women participants of the Stockholm Trial was determined at a median follow-up of 9 years. In this trial, after primary surgery, postmenopausal patients aged less than 71 years with unilateral invasive breast cancer were randomly allocated to receive either 2 years of adjuvant tamoxifen (40 mg daily) or no adjuvant endocrine therapy. Information on second cancers was obtained by retrospective linkage to the Swedish Cancer Registry. To increase statistical power, a joint analysis of the incidence of endometrial and gastrointestinal cancers was performed in the following three major studies in Scandinavia evaluating adjuvant tamoxifen therapy: the Stockholm Trial, the Danish Breast Cancer Group Trial, and the South-Swedish Trial. These studies included a total of 4914 patients with a median follow-up of 8-9 years. All P values were calculated from two-tailed tests of statistical significance. RESULTS: In the Stockholm Trial, there was a statistically significant (P = .008) reduction in the incidence of second primary cancers in the contralateral breast among the tamoxifen-treated patients. However, there was a nearly sixfold increase in endometrial cancers (P < .001) and a threefold increase in gastrointestinal cancers in the tamoxifen-treated patients. The results of the joint studies showed a statistically significant increase in endometrial cancers among the tamoxifen-treated patients (relative risk [RR] = 4.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.9-8.9). There was also an excess of gastrointestinal cancers associated with tamoxifen. Most of this excess involved colorectal cancers (RR = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.1-3.3) and stomach cancer (RR = 3.2; 95% CI = 0.9-11.7). There was no substantial increase in any other type of gastrointestinal cancer (e.g., liver cancer) among the tamoxifen-treated patients. CONCLUSION: The endometrium and gastrointestinal organs may be target sites for tamoxifen-induced carcinogenesis in humans. IMPLICATIONS: The increased incidence of colorectal and stomach cancers reported here should be regarded as tentative until supported by long-term data from a larger number of tamoxifen trials. Also, appropriate surveillance of cancer incidence is warranted for the protection of participants enrolled in current tamoxifen chemoprevention trials.

Contralateral primary tumors in breast cancer patients in a randomized trial of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy.

Prophylactic treatment with the anti-estrogen tamoxifen may reduce the risk of breast cancer because estrogens are thought to act as promoters in the pathogenesis of the disease. This article presents results on the incidence of contralateral new primary tumors among 1846 postmenopausal breast cancer patients included in a randomized trial of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for 2 or 5 years after surgery versus no adjuvant endocrine therapy. The median follow-up was 7 years (range, 3-13 years). There was a significant reduction of contralateral breast cancer in the 931 patients in the tamoxifen group versus that in the 915 control patients (29 versus 47 cases, respectively; P = .03). The cumulative incidence at 10 years in the tamoxifen group and the control group was 5% and 8%, respectively. Analysis of the relative hazard of contralateral tumor over time showed that the benefit with tamoxifen therapy was greatest during the first 1-2 years, but there was a continued risk reduction during the entire follow-up period, i.e., more than 10 years after cessation of treatment. There was no significant difference in the number of contralateral cancers in the patients randomly assigned to 2 or 5 years of treatment, but the 95% confidence interval of the relative hazard was wide. The proportion of estrogen receptor-negative contralateral breast cancers was higher in the tamoxifen group than in the control group. There was no difference, however, between the two groups in recurrence-free survival time from the diagnosis of the contralateral cancer.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Purification and partial characterization of a 17 beta-estradiol-binding macromolecule in the human pancreas.

Studies have been performed in order to investigate the presence of estrogen-binding proteins in the human pancreas that may provide the biochemical basis for tissue-specific treatment of pancreatic carcinoma with estrogen-based cytotoxic drugs. Using in vitro techniques, an estrogen-binding macromolecule has been purified from pancreatic cytosol. With estradiol a ligand, Kd was calculated to be 1.7 X 10(-7) M, and this protein was found to constitute about 4% of the total protein content in the cytosol. No metabolism of estradiol was detected under the in vitro conditions used. Competition experiments indicated that, besides estradiol, the protein also had some affinity for estrone and estriol but not for testosterone, progesterone, or dexamethasone. The protein was purified to homogeneity using chromatography on concanavalin A and hydroxylapatite followed by preparative polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The purified protein, still able to bind, [3H]-estradiol, gave one single protein-staining band when analyzed using different electrophoretic systems. The steroid-protein and did not bind to phosphocellulose or DNA-cellulose and did not show any similarities to steroid receptor proteins. The complex has a Strokes' radius of 52 A and a sedimentation coefficient of 3S. The biological significance of the macromolecule is known, but the protein is probably synthesized in the pancreas since no similar protein could be detected in serum. Studies are now being carried out to investigate whether this novel protein in the human pancreas may interact with complexes between cytotoxic agents and estrogens and provide the basis for tissue-specific treatment of pancreatic carcinoma.

Correlation of vascular endothelial growth factor content with recurrences, survival, and first relapse site in primary node-positive breast carcinoma after adjuvant treatment.

PURPOSE: To determine the predictive value of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in primary node-positive breast cancer (NPBC) after adjuvant endocrine treatment or adjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: VEGF was quantitatively measured in tumor cytosols from 362 consecutive patients with primary NPBC using an enzyme immunoassay for human VEGF(165). Adjuvant treatment was given to all patients, either as endocrine therapy (n = 250) or chemotherapy (n = 112). The median follow-up time was 56 months. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed VEGF to be a significant predictor of RFS (P =.0289) and OS (P =.0004) in the total patient population and in patients who received adjuvant endocrine treatment (RFS, P =.0238; OS, P =.0121). In the group of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, no significant difference was seen in RFS, but a difference was seen in OS (P =.0235). Patients with bone recurrences tended to have lower VEGF expression (median, 2.17 pg/microg DNA) than patients with visceral metastasis (4.41 pg/microg), brain metastasis (8.29 pg/microg), or soft tissue recurrences (3.16 pg/microg). Multivariate analysis showed nodal status (P =.0004), estrogen receptor (ER) status (P <.0001), and tumor size (P =.0085) to be independent predictors of RFS. VEGF was found to be an independent predictor of OS (P =.0170; relative risk [RR] = 1.82), as were ER (P <.0001; RR = 5.19) and nodal status (P =.0002; RR = 2.58). For patients receiving adjuvant endocrine treatment, multivariate analysis showed VEGF content to be an independent predictor of OS (P =.0420; RR = 1.90) but not of RFS. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that VEGF(165) content in tumor cytosols is a predictor of RFS and OS in primary NPBC. VEGF content might also predict outcome after adjuvant endocrine treatment, but further studies in a prospective setting with homologous treatments are required.

Influence of prior and subsequent pregnancy on breast cancer prognosis.

PURPOSE AND METHODS: The prognostic influence of pregnancies 5 years before (n = 173) and after (n = 50) breast cancer diagnosis was investigated in 2,119 women less than 50 years of age with a primary operable breast cancer. The main end point was distant metastasis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. In the analyses of the effect of pregnancy after diagnosis of breast cancer, a Cox model with a time-dependent covariate was applied. RESULTS: Women with a pregnancy before diagnosis had slightly larger tumors than the control group. However, they did not differ with respect to nodal status and estrogen receptor (ER) status. There was no evidence that women with a pregnancy during the 5-year period preceding breast cancer diagnosis had a worse prognosis compared with women without pregnancy during the same period. Similarly, there was no evidence that women with a pregnancy after breast cancer diagnosis had a worse prognosis. CONCLUSION: The hormonal changes associated with pregnancy thus seem to have little, if any, influence on the prognosis of breast cancer. In the present study, at least, there was no indication of a worse prognosis. In fact, the relative hazard for women who became pregnant after diagnosis of breast cancer in comparison with women without a subsequent pregnancy was 0.48 (P = .14), which suggested a possible decreased risk of distant dissemination.

Adjuvant tamoxifen in early-stage breast cancer: effects on intercurrent morbidity and mortality.

Intercurrent mortality and the pattern of inpatient hospital care was studied among 1,846 postmenopausal patients included in the Stockholm randomized trial of adjuvant tamoxifen (40 mg daily for 2 years) versus no adjuvant endocrine therapy. The median follow-up time was 54 months (range, 2 to 123 months). The patients were matched to the Swedish National Registry of Causes of Death and a computerized register covering about 95% of all hospital admissions in Stockholm County. There was no significant difference in the pattern of intercurrent mortality among the tamoxifen and control patients. The total number of hospital admissions was similar in both groups, but the tamoxifen patients were admitted significantly less frequently because of immunologic diseases (relative risk [RR] = 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2 to 0.9). Admissions because of thrombotic diseases were slightly, but not significantly, more frequent among the tamoxifen patients (RR = 1.2; 95% [CI], 0.6 to 2.3). The risk of hospital stay for benign gynecologic diseases other than prolapse or uterine bleeding was increased in the tamoxifen group (RR = 3.2; 95% CI, 1.2 to 8.6). No significant differences were found for diseases related to arteriosclerosis or osteoporosis. The study confirms and extends previous reports, which have shown that tamoxifen has few and usually mild side effects. However, the current results should be judged cautiously because of the relatively short median follow-up time (4.5 years) and the limitation of data in detecting morbidity that does not necessarily result in hospitalization.

Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus mitomycin plus vinblastine in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. 304 Study Group.

PURPOSE: This phase III study compared docetaxel with mitomycin plus vinblastine (MV) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n=392) were randomized to receive either docetaxel 100 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks (n=203) or mitomycin 12 mg/m2 i.v. every 6 weeks plus vinblastine 6 mg/m2 i.v. every 3 weeks (n=189), for a maximum of 10 3-week cycles. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, docetaxel produced significantly higher response rates than MV overall (30.0% v 11.6%; P < .0001), as well as in patients with visceral involvement (30% v 11%), liver metastases (33% v 7%), or resistance to previous anthracycline agents (30% v 7%). Median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival were significantly longer with docetaxel than MV (19 v 1 weeks, P=.001, and 1 1.4 v 8.7 months, P=.0097, respectively). Neutropenia grade 3/4 was more frequent with docetaxel (93.1 % v62.5%; P < .05); thrombocytopenia grade 3/4 was more frequent with MV (12.0% v 4.1%; P < .05). Severe acute or chronic nonhematologic adverse events were infrequent in both groups. Withdrawal rates because of adverse events (MV, 10.1%; docetaxel, 13.8%) or toxic death (MV, 1.6%; docetaxel, 2.0%) were similar in both groups. Quality-of-life analysis was limited by a number of factors, but results were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is significantly superior to MV in terms of response, TTP, and survival. The safety profiles of both therapies are manageable and tolerable. Docetaxel represents a clear treatment option for patients with MBC progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy.

A comparative study of the estrogenic effects of tamoxifen and 17 beta-estradiol in postmenopausal women.

The effects of tamoxifen and 17 beta-estradiol on the levels of FSH, PRL, and pregnancy zone protein were compared in two groups of postmenopausal women. Seventeen women with breast cancer were treated with tamoxifen (20 mg, twice a day). Fourteen women with climacteric complaints were given 17 beta-estradiol (2 mg, daily). A close parallelism between the effects of 17 beta-estradiol and the antiestrogen was obtained in all three markers studied. The percent decreases in FSH after 1 month were 29 and 44 and, after 3 months, 26 and 34 in the tamoxifen and estradiol groups, respectively. The decreases in PRL after 1 and 3 months of treatment with tamoxifen were 36% and 71%, and 19% and 31% after treatment with estradiol. Both treatments increased PZP serum levels, tamoxifen by 32% and 44% and estradiol by 55% and 70% after 1 and 3 months. Thus, tamoxifen was found to exert weak estrogenic effects in postmenopausal women.

Lack of correlation between anxiety parameters and oestrogen receptor status in early breast cancer.

Correlation between anxiety parameters and oestrogen receptor levels (ER) were investigated in 89 patients with primary breast cancer. Patients were divided into two groups, ER poor (< 0.05 fmol/microgram DNA) and ER rich (> 0.05 fmol/microgram DNA). No differences were found between anxiety levels, determined by a modified Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale, in the two groups. This report does not support the findings from other studies, claiming an association between psychological parameters and oestrogen receptor status, which is believed to be a prognostic predictor.

Oestrogenic effects of adjuvant tamoxifen in postmenopausal breast cancer.

Oestrogenic influence of the non-steroidal anti-oestrogen tamoxifen may have consequences for the morbidity pattern among women on long-term adjuvant treatment. Subclinical oestrogenic effects of adjuvant tamoxifen on the tissue level was studied among 16 postmenopausal women in three different organ systems: the pituitary, the liver and bone. After 3 months of adjuvant tamoxifen prolactin levels decreased 66% (P < 0.001) in comparison with pretreatment levels. There was an 80% increase in basal growth hormone after 3 months of treatment in comparison with pretreatment levels, which did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07). Sex hormone binding globulin levels increased 39% (P < 0.01) and IGF-1 (somatomedin C) levels decreased 20% (P < 0.05). The levels of bone GLA protein (BGP; osteocalcin), a marker of bone osteoblastic activity, decreased 28% (P < 0.01). In 13 of the patients bone mineral density (BMD) was measured before treatment and after 1 year. No significant change in BMD was observed. The results thus suggest a clear oestrogenic effect of tamoxifen on the pituitary, liver and bone in postmenopausal women.

Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Liaison Office: an attempt to organise clinical research in Europe.

The Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Liaison Office (GITCLO) was developed in an attempt to organise the increasing body of clinical research in gastrointestinal tumours in Europe. This paper represents an analysis, by tumour localisation, of the trials collected for the second edition of the GITCLO booklet. The list of cooperative groups, chairmen and study coordinators is given with their respective telephone and telefax numbers. A total of 84 trials were collected, conducted by 46 co-operative groups in 14 countries. For each organ and stage of disease, a summary of concepts investigated is given with the references of the study co-ordinator. Obviously, too many questions are raised at the same time. In colorectal cancer, for example, a total of 41 trials exploring 22 concepts are currently open for patients' registration. We hope that the present attempt to clarify the situation of clinical research in the field of gastrointestinal cancers in Europe will speed up therapeutic progress in the best interest of the patients.

High activity and tolerability demonstrated for exemestane in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer who had previously failed on tamoxifen treatment.

This phase II, multicentre, open-label, clinical trial evaluated antitumoral efficacy, tolerability and endocrine effects following 25 mg of treatment with oral exemestane given daily to postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. Eligibility criteria included oestrogen and/or progesterone positivity or a prior response to hormonal therapy if receptor status was unknown; prior failure to tamoxifen therapy; and progressive disease. Patients were divided into three strata: patients who did not respond to tamoxifen or progressed after disease stabilisation (SD) for less than 6 months (stratum 1); patients who, after an initial response or SD lasting at least 6 months, experienced disease progression whilst on tamoxifen (stratum 2); patients with recurrent metastatic disease during or within 12 months of discontinuing adjuvant tamoxifen (stratum 3). Of the 137 patients who received exemestane, 4 experienced a complete response (CR) and 28 a partial response (PR), for an overall response rate of 23%. Another 33 patients had SD for > or = 24 weeks, resulting in an overall success rate of 47%. The median time to objective response was 16.1 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI) 9.9-24.1). The median response duration was 69.4 weeks, the median duration of overall success 59.1 weeks, the median time to progression (TTP) 25.1 weeks and the median time to treatment failure (TTF) 24 weeks. Response to previous hormonal therapy had little effect on the results, except that there was a trend toward a higher overall success rate in patients who did not respond to previous hormonal therapy. After 8 weeks of therapy, serum levels of oestradiol (E2), oestrone (E1) and oestrone sulphate (E1S) were suppressed to 15.2%, 9.7% and 10.7% of baseline, respectively. The most common adverse events of drug-related or indeterminate cause were hot flushes (14%), dizziness (9%), nausea (8%) and increased sweating (5%). Exemestane had a favourable effect on performance status and tumour-related signs and symptoms, both of which improved or stabilised in approximately 67% and 68% of patients respectively. Exemestane is a unique therapy that is highly active and well tolerated as a new treatment for women with metastatic breast cancer.

Phase I study of UFT plus leucovorin with radiotherapy in patients with inextirpable non-rectal gastrointestinal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chemoradiotherapy is increasingly used in the primary management of patients with loco-regionally advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. Oral chemotherapy with uracil and tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV) may represent a convenient way of delivering protracted infusion of fluorouracil. Our goal was to evaluate the safety of UFT plus LV combined with radiation and determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and a recommended dose for further testing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with inextirpable GI cancer received escalating doses of UFT (starting at 300 mg/m(2)/d with 50 mg/m(2)/d increments between consecutive cohorts) and fixed doses of LV (90 mg/d). UFT and LV were given 5 days per week concurrently with radiation to 50 Gy (2 Gy/fraction). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were treated, and 22 received the planned treatment. Three patients were withdrawn from treatment, two due to disease-progression and one due to toxicity. The MTD of UFT with radiation was 400 mg/m(2)/d with 90 mg/d of LV. Diarrhoea was the main dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Since some toxicity (3/12 DLTs) was seen in the expanded cohort at the level below, but none (0/9 DLT) at the starting level, the recommended dose chosen for further testing is 300-350 mg/m(2)/d depending upon the size of the target volume. CONCLUSION: Concomitant chemoradiation with oral UFT plus LV is feasible and well tolerated and should be further investigated since tumour responses were frequently seen.

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support in patients with responding stage IV breast cancer.

Ninety-four patients underwent high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support for stage IV breast cancer. The high-dose chemotherapy consisted of the Stamp V regimen in all patients comprising cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin (CTCb). Twenty-three patients received sequential high-dose therapies with the first consisting of high-dose melphalan and the second of Stamp V. Two patients died from chemotherapy-related complications resulting in a transplant-related mortality at 100 days of 2.2%. The progression-free survival at 3 years was 36% in patients with no evidence of disease at the first course of high-dose therapy compared with 17% in patients with remaining disease at time of the high-dose therapy (P = 0.03). There was no difference in overall survival between patients with no evidence of disease and other patients. The source of stem cells, single or double courses of high-dose therapy, positive selection of CD34+ cells, or number of involved sites had no influence on either progression-free survival or overall survival. Further studies of more intensive induction chemotherapy followed by high-dose therapy with stem cell support are indicated.