Natural history and long-term outcomes of medically managed Type B intramural hematoma.

OBJECTIVE: Type B intramural hematoma (IMH) is often managed medically, yet may progress to dissection, aneurysmal dilation, or rupture. The aim of this study was to report the natural history of medically managed Type B IMH, and factors associated with progression. METHODS: We reviewed patients with medically managed Type B IMH between January 1995 to December 2022 at a single center. Any patients with immediate surgical or endovascular intervention were excluded. Demographic profiles, comorbidities, imaging, and follow-up details were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 had isolated IMH, and Group 2 had IMH along with aneurysm or dissection at the time of presentation. On follow-up, progression was defined as degeneration to aneurysm/dissection or increase in the thickness of IMH in Group 1. In Group 2, progression was an increase in the size of aneurysm or development of new dissection. RESULTS: Of 104 patients with Type B IMH during the study period, 92 were medically managed. The median age was 77 years, and 45 (48.9%) were females. Comorbidities included hypertension (83.7%), hypercholesterolemia (44.6%), and active smoking (47.8%). Mean Society for Vascular Surger comorbidity score was 6.3. Mean IMH thickness and aortic diameter at presentation were 8.9 mm and 38.3 mm, respectively. Median follow-up was 55 months. Overall survival at 1 year and 5 years was 85.8% and 61.9%, respectively. During follow-up, 19 patients (20.7%) required intervention, more common in Group 2 (Group 1, 8/66; 12.3% vs Group 2, 11/26; 42.3%; P = .001). This resulted in higher freedom from intervention in Group 1 at 1 year (93.5% vs 62.7%) and 5 years (87.5% vs 51.1%; P < .001). Indication for intervention was dissection (n = 4), aneurysm (n = 12), and progression of IMH (n = 3). In Group 1, progression was seen in 25 (37.9%), three (4.5%) remained stable, 29 (43.9%) had complete resolution of IMH, and nine patients were lost to follow-up. In Group 2, 11 patients (42.3%) had progression, seven (26.9%) remained stable, and eight were lost to follow-up. IMH thickness at presentation >7.2 mm is associated with both increased odds of progression (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-11.1; P = .03) and intervention (odds ratio, 5.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-36.9; P = .03) during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Although many patients with Type B IMH managed medically stabilize or regress, progression or need for intervention can occur in up to 40% of cases. This is associated with the presence of aneurysm, dissection, and IMH thickness. Long-term follow-up is mandatory as late interventions occur, particularly for higher risk patients.

Factors associated with successful median arcuate ligament release in an international, multi-institutional cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Prior research on median arcuate ligament syndrome has been limited to institutional case series, making the optimal approach to median arcuate ligament release (MALR) and resulting outcomes unclear. In the present study, we compared the outcomes of different approaches to MALR and determined the predictors of long-term treatment failure. METHODS: The Vascular Low Frequency Disease Consortium is an international, multi-institutional research consortium. Data on open, laparoscopic, and robotic MALR performed from 2000 to 2020 were gathered. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as no improvement in median arcuate ligament syndrome symptoms after MALR or symptom recurrence between MALR and the last clinical follow-up. RESULTS: For 516 patients treated at 24 institutions, open, laparoscopic, and robotic MALR had been performed in 227 (44.0%), 235 (45.5%), and 54 (10.5%) patients, respectively. Perioperative complications (ileus, cardiac, and wound complications; readmissions; unplanned procedures) occurred in 19.2% (open, 30.0%; laparoscopic, 8.9%; robotic, 18.5%; P < .001). The median follow-up was 1.59 years (interquartile range, 0.38-4.35 years). For the 488 patients with follow-up data available, 287 (58.8%) had had full relief, 119 (24.4%) had had partial relief, and 82 (16.8%) had derived no benefit from MALR. The 1- and 3-year freedom from treatment failure for the overall cohort was 63.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.0%-68.3%) and 51.9% (95% CI, 46.1%-57.3%), respectively. The factors associated with an increased hazard of treatment failure on multivariable analysis included robotic MALR (hazard ratio [HR], 1.73; 95% CI, 1.16-2.59; P = .007), a history of gastroparesis (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.09-3.09; P = .023), abdominal cancer (HR, 10.3; 95% CI, 3.06-34.6; P < .001), dysphagia and/or odynophagia (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.27-4.69; P = .008), no relief from a celiac plexus block (HR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.00-4.72; P = .049), and an increasing number of preoperative pain locations (HR, 1.12 per location; 95% CI, 1.00-1.25; P = .042). The factors associated with a lower hazard included increasing age (HR, 0.99 per increasing year; 95% CI, 0.98-1.0; P = .012) and an increasing number of preoperative diagnostic gastrointestinal studies (HR, 0.84 per study; 95% CI, 0.74-0.96; P = .012) Open and laparoscopic MALR resulted in similar long-term freedom from treatment failure. No radiographic parameters were associated with differences in treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS: No difference was found in long-term failure after open vs laparoscopic MALR; however, open release was associated with higher perioperative morbidity. These results support the use of a preoperative celiac plexus block to aid in patient selection. Operative candidates for MALR should be counseled regarding the factors associated with treatment failure and the relatively high overall rate of treatment failure.

Impact of Shunting Practice Patterns During Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the effect of surgeons' shunting practice and shunt use on the early outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in recently symptomatic patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study based on a multicenter national prospective database. The Vascular Quality Initiative database (2010-2019) was queried for CEAs performed within 14 days after an ipsilateral stroke or transient ischemic attack. Surgeons were gauged as routine shunters if they shunted in >95% of CEAs, otherwise were classified as selective shunters. In-hospital stroke and death rates were compared between routine and selective shunters, stratifying by type of index event (transient ischemic attack versus stroke) and timing of CEA (≤2 versus >2 days). RESULTS: Thirteen thousand four hundred sixty-nine CEAs were performed after a transient ischemic attack (43%) or stroke (57%), 3186 (24%) by routine shunters, and 10 283 (76%) by selective shunters. Comparing routine and selective shunters, in-hospital stroke (1.9% versus 2.4%; P=0.09) and death (0.4% versus 0.5%; P=0.73) rates were similar. A lower stroke rate (1.5% versus 4.2%; P=0.02) was achieved by routine shunters for CEA performed <2 days after an ischemic stroke. Among selective shunters, a higher stroke rate occurred in case of shunt use (2.9% versus 2.3%; P<0.01), mainly due to cases presenting with stroke (3.5% versus 2.4%; P<0.01) but not transient ischemic attack (1.8% versus 1.5%; P=0.57). Awake anesthesia was adopted in 7.8% of cases by selective shunters and in 0.8% by routine shunters, without impact on the perioperative stroke rate (1.8% versus 2.3%; P=0.349). CONCLUSIONS: In this large national cohort, the overall outcomes of CEA were similar between routine and selective shunters. A lower postoperative stroke rate was achieved by routine shunters in CEA performed <2 days after an ischemic stroke. Among selective shunters, intraoperatively indicated shunting determined an increased stroke rate, likely due to intraoperative hypoperfusion. These data may guide the decision regarding timing of CEA and shunting intention in symptomatic patients.

External vs Internal Focus of Attention in Procedural Skills Learning: A Randomized Study.

PURPOSE: The Optimizing Performance Through Intrinsic Motivation and Attention for Learning theory postulates that directing attention to the intended movement effect or outcome (external focus) is more effective than directing attention to the internal body motion or body part (internal focus). This study compared external vs internal focus of attention as novice students learned ultrasound-guided peripheral cannulation. The authors hypothesized that conditions promoting an external (vs internal) focus of attention would result in better performance on immediate and delayed (retention) testing. METHOD: The authors conducted a randomized, experimental study from October 2022 to February 2023 comparing external and internal focus using ultrasound-guided peripheral venous cannulation followed by practice using an ultrasound training block. Undergraduate health science students performed 4 practice trials with instructions to focus on the needle tip (external focus) or their hands (internal focus), followed by an immediate assessment and a retention assessment 2 weeks later. The primary outcome was time to successful cannulation. Results were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and parametric survival analysis regression (accelerated failure time) models. RESULTS: Seventy participants completed the immediate assessment. The external focus group completed successful cannulation a mean of 2.33 times faster (95% CI = 1.47, 3.67; P < .001) than those in the internal focus group (median time, 12.0 vs 29.5 seconds). Results also favored the external focus group during practice, with the external focus group successfully completing the task a mean of 1.83 times faster (95% CI = 1.04, 3.21; P = .04) than the internal focus group. In the retention assessment, the external focus group successfully completed the task a mean of 2.37 times faster (95% CI = 1.19, 4.74; P = .02) than the internal focus group. CONCLUSIONS: External focus of attention compared with internal focus of attention improves medical motor skill learning in novice learners.

Gender Differences in Autonomy Granted to Residents and Fellows During Procedural Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Supervisors may be prone to implicit (unintentional) bias when granting procedural autonomy to trainees due to the subjectivity of autonomy decisions. The authors aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the differences in perceptions of procedural autonomy granted to physician trainees based on gender and/or race. METHOD: MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched (search date: January 5, 2022) for studies reporting quantitative gender- or race-based differences in perceptions of procedural autonomy of physician trainees. Reviewers worked in duplicate for article selection and data abstraction. Primary measures of interest were self-reported and observer-rated procedural autonomy. Meta-analysis pooled differences in perceptions of procedural autonomy based on trainee gender. RESULTS: The search returned 2,714 articles, of which 16 were eligible for inclusion. These reported data for 6,109 trainees (median, 90 per study) and 2,763 supervisors (median, 54 per study). No studies investigated differences in perceptions of autonomy based on race. In meta-analysis of disparities between genders in autonomy ratings (positive number favoring female trainees), pooled standardized mean differences were -0.12 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.19 to -0.04; P = .003; n = 10 studies) for trainee self-rated autonomy and -0.05 (95% CI, -0.11 to 0.01; P = .07; n = 9 studies) for supervisor ratings of autonomy. CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence suggests that female trainees perceived that they received less procedural autonomy than did males. Further research exploring the degree of gender- and race-based differences in procedural autonomy, and factors that influence these differences is warranted.