The Codevelopment of "My Kidneys & Me": A Digital Self-management Program for People With Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: Health care self-management is important for people living with nondialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the few available resources are of variable quality. OBJECTIVE: This work describes the systematic codevelopment of "My Kidneys & Me" (MK&M), a theory-driven and evidence-based digital self-management resource for people with nondialysis CKD, guided by an established process used for the successful development of the diabetes education program MyDESMOND (Diabetes Education and Self-Management for Ongoing and Newly Diagnosed, DESMOND). METHODS: A multidisciplinary steering group comprising kidney health care professionals and researchers and specialists in the development of complex interventions and digital health provided expertise in the clinical and psychosocial aspects of CKD, self-management, digital health, and behavior change. A patient and public involvement group helped identify the needs and priorities of MK&M and co-design the resource. MK&M was developed in 2 sequential phases. Phase 1 involved the codevelopment process of the MK&M resource (content and materials), using Intervention Mapping (IM) as a framework. The first 4 IM steps guided the development process: needs assessment was conducted to describe the context of the intervention; intervention outcomes, performance objectives, and behavioral determinants were identified; theory- and evidence-based change methods and practical strategies to deliver change methods were selected; and program components were developed and refined. Phase 2 involved the adoption and adaptation of the existing MyDESMOND digital platform to suit the MK&M resource. RESULTS: The needs assessment identified that individuals with CKD have multiple differing needs and that delivering a self-management program digitally would enable accessible, tailored, and interactive information and support. The intended outcomes of MK&M were to improve and maintain effective self-management behaviors, including physical activity and lifestyle, improve knowledge, promote self-care skills, increase self-efficacy, and enhance well-being. This was achieved through the provision of content and materials designed to increase CKD knowledge and patient activation, reduce health risks, manage symptoms, and improve physical function. Theories and behavior change techniques selected include Self-Management Framework, Capability, Opportunity, Motivation Behavior model components of Behaviour Change Wheel and taxonomy of behavior change techniques, Health Action Process Approach Model, Common Sense Model, and Social Cognitive Theory. The program components developed comprised educational and behavior change sessions, health trackers (eg, monitoring blood pressure, symptoms, and exercise), goal-setting features, and forums for social support. The MyDESMOND digital platform represented an ideal existing platform to host MK&M; thus, the MyDESMOND interface and features were adopted and adapted for MK&M. CONCLUSIONS: Applying the IM framework enabled the systematic application of theory, empirical evidence, and practical perspectives in the codevelopment of MK&M content and materials. Adopting and adapting a preexisting platform provided a cost- and time-efficient approach for developing our digital intervention. In the next stage of work, the efficacy of MK&M in increasing patient activation will be tested in a randomized controlled trial.

Dietary interventions with dietitian involvement in adults with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: A comprehensive evidence base is needed to support recommendations for the dietetic management of adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The present study aimed to determine the effect of dietary interventions with dietitian involvement on nutritional status, well-being, kidney risk factors and clinical outcomes in adults with CKD. METHODS: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and EMBASE.com were searched from January 2000 to November 2019. Intentional weight loss and single nutrient studies were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Effectiveness was summarised using the mean difference between groups for each outcome per study. RESULTS: Twelve controlled trials (1906 participants) were included. High fruit and vegetable intake, as well as a multidisciplinary hospital and community care programme, slowed the decline in glomerular filtration rate in adults with stage 3-4 CKD. Interventions addressing nutrition-related barriers increased protein and energy intake in haemodialysis patients. A Mediterranean diet and a diet with high n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids improved the lipid profile in kidney transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: A limited number of studies suggest benefits as a result of dietary interventions that are delivered by dietitians and focus on diet quality. We did not identify any studies that focussed on our primary outcome of nutritional status or studies that examined the timing or frequency of the nutritional assessment. This review emphasises the need for a wider body of high-quality evidence to support recommendations on what and how dietetic interventions are delivered by dietitians for adults with CKD.

Impact of Dietetic Intervention on Skin Autofluorescence and Nutritional Status in Persons Receiving Dialysis: A Proof of Principle Study.

OBJECTIVE: Advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) are uremic toxins that result from oxidative stress and food consumption. It has been reported that markers of malnutrition are more important determinants of increased skin autofluorescence (SAF), a measure of AGE accumulation and risk factor for mortality, than high dietary AGE intake in a hemodialysis (HD) population, suggesting that correcting malnutrition may decrease SAF. DESIGN AND METHODS: We investigated this hypothesis in a single-center, nonrandomized proof-of-principle study. We enrolled 27 patients on HD and one on peritoneal dialysis with malnutrition who received individualized nutritional advice and support over 6 months. SAF was measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Dietary intake and nutritional status were assessed at baseline and 6 months. Results were compared with a control group of malnourished patients on dialysis (n = 41 HD and 8 peritoneal dialysis) from a previous observational study. RESULTS: The intervention group showed a significant increase in dietary intake, including AGEs, Subjective Global Assessment score, and serum albumin, while SAF levels remained stable for over 6 months (3.8 ± 0.7 arbitrary units [AU] vs. 3.7 ± 0.7 AU; P = .3). Conversely, in the control group, SAF increased significantly during the observation period (3.5 ± 0.9 AU vs. 3.8 ± 1.2 AU; P = .03) during which there was no improvement in nutritional intake and other markers of nutrition, although dietary AGE intake and Subjective Global Assessment score did increase. CONCLUSION: Dietetic support was associated with stable SAF levels in this proof-of-principal study despite an increase in dietary AGE intake, suggesting that interventions to improve nutrition may be important in preventing the rise in SAF observed in malnourished dialysis populations. Further long-term studies are needed to test this hypothesis and evaluate the impact on survival.

Demographic associations of high estimated sodium intake and frequency of consumption of high-sodium foods in people with chronic kidney disease stage 3 in England.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate sodium intake in a cohort of people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stage 3 in England to identify demographic characteristics of subgroups with high sodium intake and specific foods that contribute to excessive sodium intake. DESIGN AND METHODS: Study subjects (N = 1,729) included CKD patients from 32 general practices in the Renal Risk in Derby study. Patients had a glomerular filtration rate between 30 and 59 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) on 2 or more occasions at least 3 months apart before recruitment. Sodium excretion (assumed to be equal to intake) was estimated from early morning urine specimens using an equation validated for this study population. The frequency of intake of 12 salty foods was assessed by a food frequency questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean estimated urinary sodium excretion was 110.5 ± 33.8 mmol/day; 60.1% had values above the National Kidney Foundation recommendation (<100 mmol/day). Subgroups with a greater percentage of participants having sodium excretion above the recommendation were as follows: men, those younger than 75 years of age, those with central obesity or diabetes, those with formal educational qualifications, and those who were previous or current smokers. In multivariable analysis, gender, younger age, waist-to-hip ratio, and diabetes mellitus status were the main independent determinants of excessive sodium excretion. Specific food items that contributed to excessive intake were table and cooking salt, salted snacks, hard cheeses, processed meat, and tinned fish. The most important source of sodium varied by subgroup. CONCLUSION: A high prevalence of sodium excretion above the recommended value was detected, and independent determinants were gender, age, waist-to-hip ratio, and diabetes mellitus. Specific food items that contributed to excessive intake were also identified and varied in different subgroups. These data will be helpful in informing strategies to target dietetic advice to those most likely to have high sodium intake and will allow dietitians to focus on the most likely sources of sodium in different subgroups.

Best practice for the selection, design and implementation of UK Kidney Association guidelines: a modified Delphi consensus approach.

BACKGROUND: Despite research into how to effectively implement evidence-based recommendations into clinical practice, a lack of standardisation in the commissioning and development of clinical practice guidelines can lead to inconsistencies and gaps in implementation. This research aimed to ascertain how topics in kidney care worthy of guideline development within the UK should be chosen, prioritised, designed and implemented. METHODS: Following a modified Delphi methodology, a multi-disciplinary panel of experts in kidney healthcare from across the UK developed 35 statements on the issues surrounding the selection, development and implementation of nephrology guidelines. Consensus with these statements was determined by agreement using an online survey; the consensus threshold was defined as 75% agreement. RESULTS: 419 responses were received. Of the 364 healthcare practitioners (HCPs), the majority had over 20 years of experience in their role (n=123) and most respondents were nephrologists (n=95). Of the 55 non-clinical respondents, the majority were people with kidney disease (n=41) and the rest were their carers or family. Participants were from across England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. Consensus between HCPs was achieved in 32/35 statements, with 28 statements reaching ≥90% agreement. Consensus between patients and patient representatives was achieved across all 20 statements, with 13/20 reaching ≥90% agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The current results have provided the basis for six recommendations to improve the selection, design and implementation of guidelines. Actioning these recommendations will help improve the accessibility of, and engagement with, clinical guidelines, contributing to the continuing development of best practice in UK kidney care.

Feasibility and effectiveness of pre-emptive rehabilitation in persons approaching dialysis (PREHAB).

INTRODUCTION: End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is characterised by several complications, leading to reduced functional ability and quality of life during transition to dialysis. This study aimed to establish the feasibility and effectiveness of a patient-centred programme of exercise, nutritional intervention and multidisciplinary education for persons approaching dialysis. METHODS: Patients with eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m2 and anticipated to start dialysis within 6-12 months were invited to participate. The 10-week pre-dialysis intervention included a weekly 1-hour gym-based exercise circuit and an education programme. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed through recruitment and retention rates, adherence to the intervention, and from patient feedback following the intervention. Physical function, nutritional status, and anxiety and depression, were assessed at baseline, after intervention, and as dialysis commenced. RESULTS: Thirty patients agreed to participate, with 22 completing the pre-dialysis intervention. Thirteen (59%) participants achieved 100% attendance at the exercise and education sessions, with only two participants attending less than 8/10 sessions. The intervention also led to improved physical function, demonstrated by significant increase in both incremental shuttle walk distance (330 vs. 385 m, p = 0.006) and quadriceps one repetition maximum (p = 0.007), and a trend towards increased sit-to-stand repetitions (20-23, p = 0.11). There was a trend for improved patient perception of activity (Duke Activity Status Index score 31.55 vs. 33.75, p = 0.09). Hand grip strength (29.1 vs. 29.8 kg), body mass index (30.4 vs. 30.5 kg/m2 ) and nutritional status assessed by subjective global assessment (73% well-nourished) were maintained. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of a patient-centred exercise and education programme in those approaching dialysis. Further research is therefore required to evaluate the impact of this programme on clinical outcomes.

The dietary management of patients with diabetes and renal disease: challenges and practicalities.

Diabetes mellitus is one of the major causes of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. Diet and lifestyle modification are vital components of optimal treatment for both conditions. This paper will address appropriate and often diverse treatment for each individual, understanding that advising changes which positively impact both conditions is a major challenge for health care professionals working within either speciality. It will also highlight where overlap can be contradictory rather than complementary, and offers practical guidance to support patients in making the necessary lifestyle changes to have maximal positive impact upon both conditions and their overall health.