RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Current guidelines recommend 6 hours of solid food and 2 hours of clear liquid fasting for patients undergoing cardiac procedures with conscious sedation. There are no data to support this practice, and previous single centre studies support the safety of removing fasting requirements. The objective of this study was to determine the non-inferiority of a no fasting strategy to fasting prior to cardiac catheterisation procedures which require conscious sedation. METHODS: This is a multicentre, investigator-initiated, non-inferiority randomised trial conduced in Australia with a prospective open label blinded endpoint design. Patients referred for coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) related procedures were enrolled. Patients were randomised 1:1 to fasting as normal (6 hours solid food and 2 hours clear liquid) or no fasting requirements (encouraged to have regular meals but not mandated to do so). Recruitment occurred from 2022 to 2023. The primary outcome was a composite of aspiration pneumonia, hypotension, hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia assessed with a Bayesian approach. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction score, new ventilation requirement (non-invasive and invasive), new intensive care unit admission, 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, 30-day pneumonia. RESULTS: 716 patients were randomised with 358 in each group. Those in the fasting arm had significantly longer solid food fasting (13.2 versus 3.0 hours, Bayes factor >100 indicating extreme evidence of difference) and clear liquid fasting times (7.0 versus 2.4 hours, Bayes factor >100). The primary composite outcome occurred in 19.1% of patients in the fasting arm and 12.0% of patients in the no fasting arm. The estimate of the mean posterior difference in proportions in the primary composite outcome was -5.2% (95% CI -9.6 to -0.9, ) favouring no fasting. This result confirms non-inferiority (posterior probability >99.5%) and superiority (posterior probability 99.1%) of no fasting for the primary composite outcome. The no fasting arm had improved patient satisfaction scores with a posterior mean difference of 4.02 points (95% CI 3.36 to 4.67, Bayes factor >100). Secondary outcome events were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation and CIED related procedures, no fasting was non-inferior and superior to fasting for the primary composite outcome of aspiration pneumonia, hypotension, hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia. Patient satisfaction scores were significantly better with no fasting. This supports removing fasting requirements for patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation laboratory procedures that require conscious sedation.
RESUMEN
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has increased exponentially in many developed countries, including Australia and New Zealand. This Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation from the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) recognises healthcare factors, expertise and expenditure relevant to the Australian and New Zealand healthcare environments including considerations of potential implications for First Nations Peoples. The statement is cognisant of international advice but tailored to local conditions and populations, and is intended to be used by electrophysiologists, cardiologists and general physicians across all disciplines caring for patients with AF. They are also intended to provide guidance to healthcare facilities seeking to establish or maintain catheter ablation for AF.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Australia , Cardiología/normas , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Ablación por Catéter/normas , Nueva Zelanda , Sociedades MédicasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Report on feasibility, use and effects on investigations and treatment of a neurologist-supported stroke clinic in rural Australia. DESIGN: Data were collected prospectively for consecutive patients referred to atelehealth stroke clinic from November 2018 to August 2021. SETTINGS, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Patients attended the local hospital, with a rural stroke care coordinator, and were assessed by stroke neurologist over videoconference. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The following feasibility outcomes on the first appointments were analysed: (1) utility (a) change in medication, (b) request of additional investigations, (c) enrolment/offering clinical trials or d) other; (2) acceptability (attendance rate); and (3) process of care (waiting time to first appointment, distance travelled). RESULTS: During the study period, 173 appointments were made; 125 (73.5%) were first appointments. The median age was 70 [63-79] years, and 69 patients were male. A diagnosis of stroke or transient ischemic attack was made by the neurologist in 106 patients. A change in diagnosis was made in 23 (18.4%) patients. Of the first appointments, 102 (81.6%) resulted in at least one intervention: medication was changed in 67 (53.6%) patients, additional investigations requested in 72 (57.6%), 15 patients (12%) were referred to a clinical trial, and other interventions were made in 23 patients. The overall attendance rate of booked appointments was high. The median waiting time and distance travelled (round-trip) for a first appointment were 38 [24-53] days and 60.8 [25.6-76.6] km respectively. CONCLUSION: The telestroke clinic was very well attended, and it led to high volume of interventions in rural stroke patients.
Asunto(s)
Pacientes Ambulatorios , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Citas y Horarios , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Población Rural , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Comunicación por VideoconferenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon ablation is an effective treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation. We sought to compare outcomes with the first and second generation cryoballoon, with the second generation balloon incorporating the Achieve Lasso catheter, in terms of freedom from symptomatic recurrence and major complications. METHODS: The first 200 patients who underwent cryoballoon ablation with the first generation balloon were compared with the first 200 patients using the second-generation balloon. All patients had symptomatic atrial fibrillation and had failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug. The primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from symptomatic recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after a single pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedure using the cryoballoon. The primary safety endpoint was major procedural complications. RESULTS: At 12 months, freedom from symptomatic AF after a single procedure in the first generation cohort was 64.3% compared with 78.6% in the second-generation cohort (p = 0.002). At 24 months, freedom from symptomatic AF in the first generation cohort was 51.3% compared with 72.6% in the second-generation cohort (p < 0.001). Procedural time (150 min vs 101 min; p < 0.001) and fluoroscopy time (32.5 min vs 21.4 min; p < 0.001) was lower in the second-generation group. The rate of major complications was comparably low in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The second-generation cryoballoon was associated with improved freedom from symptomatic AF with reduction in procedure and fluoroscopy time, with a similar low rate of major complications.
Asunto(s)
Antiarrítmicos/administración & dosificación , Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Criocirugía , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Fibrilación Atrial/mortalidad , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic poses a significant stress on health resources in Australia. The Heart Rhythm Council of the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand aims to provide a framework for efficient resource utilisation balanced with competing risks when appropriately treating patients with cardiac arrhythmias. This document provides practical recommendations for the electrophysiology (EP) and cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) services in Australia. The document will be updated regularly as new evidence and knowledge is gained with time.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Desfibriladores Implantables , Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Australia/epidemiología , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/fisiopatología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Humanos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/fisiopatología , Neumonía Viral/terapia , SARS-CoV-2Asunto(s)
Fascículo Atrioventricular Accesorio , Electrocardiografía , Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Taquicardia por Reentrada en el Nodo Atrioventricular/diagnóstico , Taquicardia Supraventricular/diagnóstico , Potenciales de Acción , Adulto , Ablación por Catéter , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Taquicardia por Reentrada en el Nodo Atrioventricular/fisiopatología , Taquicardia por Reentrada en el Nodo Atrioventricular/cirugía , Taquicardia Supraventricular/fisiopatología , Taquicardia Supraventricular/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Direct current cardioversion is frequently used to return patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm. Chest pressure during cardioversion may improve the efficacy of cardioversion through decreasing transthoracic impedance and increasing cardiac energy delivery. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of upfront chest pressure during direct current cardioversion for AF with anterior-posterior pad positioning. METHODS: This was a multicenter, investigator-initiated, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Recruitment occurred from 2021 to 2023. Follow-up was until hospital discharge. Recruitment occurred across 3 centers in New South Wales, Australia. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, referred for cardioversion for AF, and anticoagulation for 3 weeks or transesophageal echocardiography excluding left atrial appendage thrombus. Exclusion criteria were other arrhythmias requiring cardioversion, such as atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia. The intervention arm received chest pressure during cardioversion from the first shock. The primary efficacy outcome was total joules required per patient encounter. Secondary efficacy outcomes included first shock success, transthoracic impedance, cardioversion success, and sinus rhythm at 30 minutes post cardioversion. RESULTS: A total of 311 patients were randomized, 153 to control and 158 to intervention. There was no difference in total joules applied per encounter in the control arm vs intervention arm (355.0 ± 301 J vs 413.8 ± 347 J; P = 0.19). There was no difference in first shock success, total shocks provided, average impedance, and cardioversion success. CONCLUSIONS: This study does not support the routine application of chest pressure for direct current cardioversion in atrial fibrillation (PRESSURE-AF [Investigating the Efficacy of Chest Pressure for Direct Current Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Controlled Trial]; ACTRN12620001028998).
RESUMEN
Aims: Cardiac catheterization procedures are typically performed with local anaesthetic and proceduralist guided sedation. Various fasting regimens are routinely implemented prior to these procedures, noting the absence of prospective evidence, aiming to reduce aspiration risk. However, there are additional risks from fasting including patient discomfort, intravascular volume depletion, stimulus for neuro-cardiogenic syncope, glycaemic outcomes, and unnecessary fasting for delayed/cancelled procedures. Methods and results: This is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomized trial with a prospective, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) assessment based in New South Wales, Australia. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to fasting (6â h solid food and 2â h clear liquids) or to no fasting requirements. The primary outcome will be a composite of hypotension, hyperglycaemia, hypoglycaemia, and aspiration pneumonia. Secondary outcomes will include patient satisfaction, contrast-induced nephropathy, new intensive care admission, new non-invasive or invasive ventilation requirement post procedure, and 30-day mortality and readmission. Conclusions: This is a pragmatic and clinically relevant randomised trial designed to compare fasting verse no fasting prior to cardiac catheterisation procedures. Routine fasting may not reduce peri-procedural adverse events in this setting.
Asunto(s)
Equipos y Suministros , Tecnología de Sensores Remotos/métodos , Telemetría/métodos , Australia , Confidencialidad , Conflicto de Intereses/economía , Desfibriladores Implantables , Equipos y Suministros/economía , Financiación Gubernamental/economía , Adhesión a Directriz , Gastos en Salud , Industrias/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Marcapaso Artificial/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Tecnología de Sensores Remotos/economía , Telemetría/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel form of ablation using electrical fields to ablate cardiac tissue. There are only limited data assessing the feasibility and safety of this type of ablation in humans. METHODS: PULSED AF (Pulsed Field Ablation to Irreversibly Electroporate Tissue and Treat AF; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; unique identifier: NCT04198701) is a nonrandomized, prospective, multicenter, global, premarket clinical study. The first-in-human pilot phase evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation using a novel PFA system delivering bipolar, biphasic electrical fields through a circular multielectrode array catheter (PulseSelect; Medtronic, Inc). Thirty-eight patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation were treated in 6 centers in Australia, Canada, the United States, and the Netherlands. The primary outcomes were ability to achieve acute pulmonary vein isolation intraprocedurally and safety at 30 days. RESULTS: Acute electrical isolation was achieved in 100% of pulmonary veins (n=152) in the 38 patients. Skin-to-skin procedure time was 160±91 minutes, left atrial dwell time was 82±35 minutes, and fluoroscopy time was 28±9 minutes. No serious adverse events related to the PFA system occurred in the 30-day follow-up including phrenic nerve injury, esophageal injury, stroke, or death. CONCLUSIONS: In this first-in-human clinical study, 100% pulmonary vein isolation was achieved using only PFA with no PFA system-related serious adverse events. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter , Venas Pulmonares/cirugía , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Australia , Canadá , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Tempo Operativo , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Venas Pulmonares/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia worldwide. Direct current cardioversion is commonly used to restore sinus rhythm in patients with AF. Chest pressure may improve cardioversion success through decreasing transthoracic impedance and increasing cardiac energy delivery. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of routine chest pressure with direct current cardioversion for AF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Multicentre, double blind (patient and outcome assessment), randomised clinical trial based in New South Wales, Australia. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to control and interventional arms. The control group will receive four sequential biphasic shocks of 150 J, 200 J, 360 J and 360 J with chest pressure on the last shock, until cardioversion success. The intervention group will receive the same shocks with chest pressure from the first defibrillation. Pads will be placed in an anteroposterior position. Success of cardioversion will be defined as sinus rhythm at 1 min after shock. The primary outcome will be total energy provided. Secondary outcomes will be success of first shock to achieve cardioversion, transthoracic impedance and sinus rhythm at post cardioversion ECG. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been confirmed at all participating sites via the Research Ethics Governance Information System. The trial has been registered on the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620001028998). De-identified patient level data will be available to reputable researchers who provide sound analysis proposals.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Cardioversión Eléctrica/métodos , Electrocardiografía , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Pared Torácica/fisiopatología , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Método Doble Ciego , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Nueva Gales del Sur/epidemiología , Presión , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
We report the case of a 69-year-old man who presented with worsening exertional angina where subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention resulted in a coronary arteriovenous fistula. Attempts to occlude the fistula using a relatively conservative management approach with acute reversal of intraprocedural heparin and prolonged balloon inflation unfortunately resulted in extensive coronary artery thrombosis without immediate resolution of the arteriovenous fistula. However, follow-up at 6 months revealed resolution of the fistula. This case study emphasizes the uncommon but potentially life-threatening complications of percutaneous coronary interventions with implications not only relating to the hazards of managing iatrogenic arteriovenous fistula, but reversing intraprocedural heparin using protamine, during any coronary angiogram.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Fístula Arteriovenosa/etiología , Fístula Arteriovenosa/prevención & control , Vasos Coronarios/lesiones , Vasos Coronarios/cirugía , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/prevención & control , Anciano , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , MasculinoRESUMEN
We examined the initial effect of sleeping at a simulated moderate altitude of 2,650 m on the frequency of apneas and hypopneas, as well as on the heart rate and blood oxygen saturation from pulse oximetry (SpO2) during rapid eye movement (REM) and non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep of 17 trained cyclists. Pulse oximetry revealed that sleeping at simulated altitude significantly increased heart rate (3 +/- 1 beats/min; means +/- SE) and decreased SpO2 (-6 +/- 1%) compared with baseline data collected near sea level. In response to simulated altitude, 15 of the 17 subjects increased the combined frequency of apneas plus hypopneas from baseline levels. On exposure to simulated altitude, the increase in apnea was significant from baseline for both sleep states (2.0 +/- 1.3 events/h for REM, 9.9 +/- 6.2 events/h for NREM), but the difference between the two states was not significantly different. Hypopnea frequency was significantly elevated from baseline to simulated altitude exposure in both sleep states, and under hypoxic conditions it was greater in REM than in NREM sleep (7.9 +/- 1.8 vs. 4.2 +/- 1.3 events/h, respectively). Periodic breathing episodes during sleep were identified in four subjects, making this the first study to show periodic breathing in healthy adults at a level of hypoxia equivalent to 2,650-m altitude. These results indicate that simulated moderate hypoxia of a level typically chosen by coaches and elite athletes for simulated altitude programs can cause substantial respiratory events during sleep.
Asunto(s)
Hipoxia/fisiopatología , Periodicidad , Respiración , Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño/fisiopatología , Sueño , Adulto , Altitud , Apnea/fisiopatología , Cámaras de Exposición Atmosférica , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Humanos , Hipoxia/complicaciones , Masculino , Oximetría , Oxígeno/sangre , Aptitud Física , Polisomnografía , Sueño/fisiología , Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño/etiología , Fases del SueñoAsunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Traumatismos Vertebrales , Vértebras Torácicas , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Dolor de Espalda/diagnóstico , Dolor de Espalda/etiología , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Tratamiento Conservador , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/métodos , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos Vertebrales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Vertebrales/etiología , Traumatismos Vertebrales/terapia , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Torácicas/lesiones , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between sleep complaints, primary insomnia, excessive daytime sleepiness, and lifestyle factors in a large community-based sample. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Blood donor sites in New Zealand. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: 22,389 individuals aged 16-84 years volunteering to donate blood. INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS: A comprehensive self-administered questionnaire including personal demographics and validated questions assessing sleep disorders (snoring, apnea), sleep complaints (sleep quantity, sleep dissatisfaction), insomnia symptoms, excessive daytime sleepiness, mood, and lifestyle factors such as work patterns, smoking, alcohol, and illicit substance use. Additionally, direct measurements of height and weight were obtained. RESULTS: One in three participants report < 7-8 h sleep, 5 or more nights per week, and 60% would like more sleep. Almost half the participants (45%) report suffering the symptoms of insomnia at least once per week, with one in 5 meeting more stringent criteria for primary insomnia. Excessive daytime sleepiness (evident in 9% of this large, predominantly healthy sample) was associated with insomnia (odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50 to 2.05), depression (OR 2.01, CI 1.74 to 2.32), and sleep disordered breathing (OR 1.92, CI 1.59 to 2.32). Long work hours, alcohol dependence, and rotating work shifts also increase the risk of daytime sleepiness. CONCLUSIONS: Even in this relatively young, healthy, non-clinical sample, sleep complaints and primary insomnia with subsequent excess daytime sleepiness were common. There were clear associations between many personal and lifestyle factors-such as depression, long work hours, alcohol dependence, and rotating shift work-and sleep problems or excessive daytime sleepiness.