Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 33(2): 495-504, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36862163

RESUMEN

Methylphenidate (MPH) is highly efficacious in reducing symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children. Generally increased doses are found to result in better symptom control; however, it remains unclear whether this pattern can be observed at the individual level, given the large heterogeneity in individual dose-response relationships and observed placebo responses. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over trial was used to compare weekly treatment with placebo and 5, 10, 15 and 20 mg of MPH twice daily on parent and teacher ratings of child ADHD symptoms and side effects. Participants were 5-13-year-old children with a DSM-5 diagnosis of ADHD (N = 45). MPH response was assessed at group and individual levels and predictors of individual dose-response curves were examined. Mixed model analysis showed positive linear dose-response curves at group level for parent and teacher rated ADHD symptoms and parent rated side effects, but not for teacher rated side effects. Teachers reported all dosages to improve ADHD symptoms compared to placebo, while parents only reported > 5 mg/dose as effective. At the individual level, most (73-88%) children, but not all, showed positive linear dose-response curves. Higher severity of hyperactive-impulsive symptoms and lower internalizing problems, lower weight, younger age and more positive opinions towards diagnosis and medication partly predicted steeper linear individual dose-response curves. Our study confirms that increased doses of MPH yield greater symptom control at a group level. However, large interindividual variation in the dose-response relationship was found and increased doses did not lead to greater symptom improvement for all children. This trial was registered in the Netherlands trial register (# NL8121).


Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central , Metilfenidato , Niño , Humanos , Preescolar , Adolescente , Metilfenidato/efectos adversos , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/tratamiento farmacológico , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/efectos adversos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Paediatr Drugs ; 26(3): 319-330, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38280943

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Concerns exist regarding the rising use of methylphenidate. A double-blind, placebo-controlled methylphenidate titration (PCT) for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has shown potential to improve titration (i.e., detection of placebo responders and larger ADHD symptom improvement) in experimental settings. This study aims to determine if these advantages can be transferred to clinical settings. METHOD: Children (aged 5-13 years) with an ADHD diagnosis and an indication to start methylphenidate (MPH) treatment were recruited. Participants were randomized to PCT or care as usual (CAU) in a 1:1 ratio followed by a 7-week randomized controlled trial (T1) and 6-month, naturalistic, open-label follow-up (T2). Parents, teachers, and physicians rated ADHD symptoms, ADHD medication use, MPH dosing, and treatment satisfaction using questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 100 children were enrolled and randomized to PCT (n = 49) or CAU (n = 51). In the PCT group, we found 8.2% placebo responders, 16.3% non-responders, and 65.3% responders to MPH. With PCT compared with CAU, a significantly larger number of children discontinued MPH (T1: 24.5 vs 5.9%, p = 0.009; T2: 41.7 vs 10.4%, p < 0.001) and refrained from using other pharmacological treatment (T1: 20.4 vs 3.9%, p = 0.013; T2: 20.83 vs 6.25%, p = 0.002). At both timepoints, there were no significant differences between the groups in the average dose of MPH, ADHD symptoms, or treatment satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: PCT can be used to improve detection of children who do not benefit from MPH, and may therefore potentially reduce overtreatment of ADHD with MPH.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central , Metilfenidato , Humanos , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/tratamiento farmacológico , Metilfenidato/administración & dosificación , Metilfenidato/uso terapéutico , Niño , Femenino , Masculino , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/administración & dosificación , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Adolescente , Preescolar , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA