Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Dermatology ; 236(1): 8-14, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31487719

RESUMEN

A wide variety of assessment tools have been proposed for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) until now, but none of them meets the criteria for an ideal score. Because there is no gold standard scoring system, the choice of the measure instrument depends on the purpose of use and even on the physician's experience in the subject of HS. The aim of this study was to assess the intrarater and interrater reliability of 6 scoring systems commonly used for grading severity of HS: the Hurley Staging System, the Refined Hurley Staging, the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Index (HSSI), the Sartorius Hidradenitis Suppurativa Score and the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Physician's Global Assessment Scale (HS-PGA). On the scoring day, 9 HS patients underwent a physical examination and disease severity assessment by a group of 16 dermatology residents using all evaluated instruments. Then, intrarater reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and interrater variability was evaluated using the coefficient of variation (CV). In all 6 scorings the ICCs were >0.75, indicating high intrarater reliability of all presented scales. The study has also demonstrated moderate agreement between raters in most of the evaluated measure instruments. The most reproducible methods, according to CVs, seem to be the Hurley staging, IHS4, and HSSI. None of the 6 evaluated scoring systems showed a significant advantage over the other when comparing ICCs, and all the instruments seem to be very reliable methods. The interrater reliability was usually good, but the most repeatable results between researchers were obtained for the easiest scales, including Hurley scoring, IHS4 and HSSI.


Asunto(s)
Hidradenitis Supurativa/diagnóstico , Internado y Residencia/normas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Competencia Clínica , Dermatología/educación , Dermatología/normas , Humanos , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
2.
Immunotherapy ; 11(1): 45-59, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30702012

RESUMEN

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory dermatosis characterized by an occurrence of nodules, abscesses, sinus tracks and scarring. Its pathogenesis is multifactorial and still not fully understood, therefore, current systemic therapies still remain a serious challenge. Increased levels of several proinflammatory cytokines have been reported in patients suffering from HS, therefore biologics appear as a new approach to therapy for this condition. Adalimumab is the only one internationally registered agent and should be considered first after the conventional therapies appear insufficient. The efficacy and safety profile of some preparations, like infliximab and etanercept was confirmed so far in randomized trials, but there are some new biologics which are still being evaluated and require more rigorous examination.


Asunto(s)
Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Hidradenitis Supurativa/terapia , Inmunoterapia/tendencias , Enfermedades de la Piel/terapia , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Proteína Antagonista del Receptor de Interleucina 1/uso terapéutico , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA