Initial response and 12-month outcomes after commencing dexamethasone or vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors for retinal vein occlusion in the FRB registry.

To compare baseline characteristics, initial response and 12-month efficacy and safety outcomes in eyes with branch and central retinal vein occlusion (BRVO and CRVO) treated with dexamethasone implants (DEX) or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) we performed a multi-centre, retrospective and observational study using Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry. Of 725 eligible eyes, 10% received DEX initially with very frequent adjunctive anti-VEGF (BRVO-DEX 49%, CRVO-DEX 60%). The primary outcome of mean adjusted change in VA at 12 months with DEX and anti-VEGF initiated groups were not statistically significantly different (BRVO: DEX + 6.7, anti-VEGF + 10.6 letters; CRVO: DEX + 2.8, anti-VEGF + 6.8 letters). DEX initiated eyes had fewer injections and visits than anti-VEGF initiated eyes. The BRVO-DEX eyes had greater initial mean changes in VA and central subfield thickness (CST) and achieved inactivity sooner than BRVO-anti-VEGF eyes. The mean CST after the first three months was above 350 µm in all but the BRVO-anti-VEGF group, suggesting undertreatment. In routine care DEX is uncommonly used when available as initial treatment of BRVO and CRVO requiring supplemental anti-VEGF within the first year. The 12-month outcomes were similar, but DEX initiated eyes had fewer injections and visits but more episodes of raised IOP Vs those starting anti-VEGF.

Effect of baseline fluid localization on visual acuity and prognosis in type 1 macular neovascularization treated with anti-VEGF.

PURPOSE: To assess the prognostic value of subretinal (SRF) and intraretinal fluid (IRF) localizations in type 1 macular neovascularization (MNV) due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). SUBJECTS: Eyes were prospectively treated with anti-vascular epithelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) intravitreal injections (IVT) according to a Pro-Re-Nata (PRN) or Treat and Extend (TAE) regimen during 24 months. A total of 211 eyes with treatment-naïve type 1 MNV secondary to AMD were consecutively included. Eyes were divided between 2 groups according to the fluid localization: presence of SRF alone (SRF group), or presence of IRF associated or not with SRF (IRF ± SRF group). RESULTS: At baseline the mean BCVA was 66.2 letters. SRF was present in 94.8% of eyes, IRF in 30.8%, and both in 25.6%. Data were available for 201 eyes at 12 months, and 157 eyes at 24 months. The presence of IRF at baseline was associated with lower baseline BCVA and significantly lower BCVA at 12 months (p < 0.001) and 24 months (p < 0.001). Eyes with SRF alone displayed better visual outcomes (BCVA at month 12, SRF = 74.3 letters, IRF ± SRF = 56.9 letters). In the presence of baseline IRF, fibrosis (p = 0.03) and atrophy (p < 0.001) were more frequently found at 24 months. In a multivariate model, the presence of baseline IRF was significantly associated with lower BCVA at month 12 but not at month 24. CONCLUSION: In type 1 MNV, the presence of baseline IRF was associated with worse visual outcomes compared to SRF alone, and more frequent atrophy and fibrosis.

Treat-and-Extend Versus Pro re nata Regimens of Ranibizumab and Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Comparative Study from Routine Clinical Practice.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is generally given using pro re nata or "treat-and-extend" (T&E) regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Randomized clinical trials have reported that T&E is superior to Pro re nata (PRN), but results from clinical trials may not always be replicated in clinical practice. Real-world data comparing T&E and PRN regimens for nAMD are limited. The objective of this work was to report 24-month outcomes of PRN versus T&E regimens for ranibizumab and aflibercept to treat nAMD in routine clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from a prospectively designed observational outcomes registry, the Fight Retinal Blindness! Project (FRB). Treatment-naïve eyes starting nAMD treatment with at least three injections using a T&E or PRN regimen were tracked by using the FRB. The primary outcome was the mean change in visual acuity (VA) measured by the number of letters read on a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution chart at 2 years versus baseline. The secondary outcome was the number of injections at 2 years. RESULTS: From January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2019, 3313 eyes from 2948 patients with nAMD were included: 1243 eyes from 1065 patients were classified as PRN and 2070 eyes from 1935 patients started a T&E regimen. At 24 months, patients on the T&E regimen experienced significantly greater mean (95% confidence interval) improvement in VA than those on PRN (+ 4.2 [3.1, 5.2] vs. + 1.3 [0.1, 2.6] letters; p < 0.001), with more injections (14.9 standard deviation(SD) 4.3) vs. 9.8(SD 4.3); p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Eyes treated with a T&E regimen had better VA outcomes from VEGF inhibitors than eyes treated PRN. This large real-world data assessment supports previous data from randomized clinical trials that the T&E regimen delivers better outcomes than PRN.

This study focused on comparing two methods of treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration, a common eye condition. The treatments used were ranibizumab and aflibercept. We looked at the reactive "pro re nata" method, where treatment is given sporadically and only when the condition reactivates, and the proactive "treat-and-extend" method, which aims to keep the disease inactive with the fewest treatments at regular intervals. The main aim was to determine which method provides the best vision outcomes over a 24-month period and the frequency of treatment required. We found that the treat-and-extend method resulted in a greater improvement in vision than the pro re nata method, although it did require more injections. This study highlights the effectiveness of the treat-and-extend method for neovascular age-related macular degeneration, suggesting it gets better outcomes despite requiring more injections.

Efficacy and Safety of 0.19-mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant in Postoperative Cystoid Macular Edema after Pars Plana Vitrectomy: the ILUCYD study.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of 0.19-mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (Iluvien®) in treating chronic postoperative cystoid macular edema (PCME) after pars plana vitrectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective multicentric case series in clinical settings. SUBJECTS: Patients with chronic PCME who underwent vitrectomy in tertiary care centers in France. All eyes had a documented good response to the DEX implant prior to FAc implantation. METHODS: Review of charts and OCT scans of patients treated with a FAc intravitreal implant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoints were the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT). Secondary endpoints were the intraocular pressure (IOP); proportion of patients maintaining a BCVA ≥20/40; need for additional non-study treatment; differences between eyes that underwent a single and multiple surgeries and OCT biomarkers of better BCVA. RESULTS: Forty-nine eyes of 49 patients with a mean follow-up of 24.5 ± 3.9 months were included. The mean BCVA increased from 0.40 ± 0.26 logMAR at baseline to 0.32 ± 0.24 logMAR at month 24 (M24) (p=0.0035). The mean CRT decreased from 409.37 ± 139.43 µm at baseline to 340 ± 91 µm at M24 (p=0.0001). The mean IOP was 14.0 ± 4 mmHg at baseline and remained stable at 14.03 ± 4.1 mmHg at M24 (p=0.99). During the follow-up, the IOP exceeded 21 mmHg in 9 eyes. The IOP rise was controlled with topical therapy in all eyes except one, which required cyclophotocoagulation. The BCVA was ≥20/40 in 47% of eyes (95% CI: 34%-61%) at baseline and in 58% of eyes at M24 (95% CI: 41%-73%). At M18, the likelihood of achieving a BCVA ≥20/40 was higher in eyes with intact external limiting membrane and ellipsoid zone. Additional dexamethasone implant (DEXi) was injected in 14 eyes (28.57%). The treatment burden of 2.45 ± 1.35 DEXi/year was decreased to 0.57 ± 0.60 DEXi/year after FAc implantation (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: FAc implant improved the BCVA and reduced the CRT in eyes with chronic PCME after vitrectomy. The IOP rise could be anticipated by the previous response to corticosteroids. FAc implant in eyes with chronic PCME also allowed reducing the treatment burden.