A preliminary prospective study of health-related quality of life among Chinese-American breast cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: This study examined the predictors of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and changes in HRQOL over a 1-year period among Chinese-American breast cancer survivors (BCS). METHODS: A two-wave longitudinal research design included participants from hospital-based cancer registries and community organizations in Los Angeles. Participants completed mailed questionnaires at baseline and 12-month follow-up. HRQOL was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G v.4). Change in HRQOL was assessed using a 7-point meaningful change score. RESULTS: Participants were 73 Chinese-American BCS, a majority of whom were middle-aged (M = 54.6, SD = 9.2), lower income (63% < 45K), and diagnosed with stage I-II (83%) breast cancer. Regression analyses showed that multilevel contextual factors including general health perception, quality of care, life stress, and improvement in general health perception significantly predicted HRQOL at baseline and follow-up. The final model explained 72% of the variance of HRQOL. The examination of meaningful change indicated that improvement was reported by 32% (n = 22) and deterioration by 25% (n = 17); the majority indicated minimal change (43%, n = 30). Improvement was associated with increases in family communication, social support, and general health perception, while deterioration was associated with declines in social support, family communication, and general health perception. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that among Chinese-American BCS, HRQOL is influenced by socioecological factors such as family communication and life stress. Results suggest that cancer survivorship outcomes research may benefit from theoretical foundations that examine the broader contextual dimensions that seem to impact and predict HRQOL. Implications for research are discussed.

Return to work after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retro-pubic prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: We compared the return-to-work interval (RTWI) after radical retro-pubic prostatectomy (RRP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in men being treated for early-stage prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We mailed a 28-item questionnaire to a random sample of 2,696 patients who either had RRP from 1995 to 2004 or RALP from 2004 to 2011. RESULTS: We received analyzable questionnaires from 315 patients; 178 had RALP and 137 had RPP. The median RTWI was shorter in the RALP group than in the RRP group (3 versus 4 weeks, p = .016). The percent of subjects who had not returned to work 4 weeks after surgery was 23.6% for RALP and 38.2% for RRP (p = .010). In multivariate regression analysis, surgical approach was a significant predictor of RTWI independent of other social/clinical variables that were associated with either surgical approach or RTWI (p = .014). CONCLUSION: Our data support a shortening of RTWI by RALP.

Social support sources, types, and generativity: a focus group study of cancer survivors and their caregivers.

Various research studies have identified the sources and types of support that people with cancer receive; however, few have focused on identifying the specific characteristics of emotional, instrumental, and informational support. In this study, focus groups consisting of Gilda's Club members explored the types of support that people with cancer and their caregivers experienced and valued. Results showed that although men and women with cancer and caregivers identify similar sources of support, they experience different types of support. Results also indicated a desire among participants to help and support others, a concept referred to as generativity. Implications for social workers and health care providers are explored.

Couple and family interventions for high mortality health conditions: A strategic review (2010-2019).

The earliest publications in the field of marriage and family therapy introduced interventions conducted with families experiencing complex health conditions. This strategic review captures an evaluation of efficacy for 87 couple and family interventions published between 2010 and 2019 with a focus on the leading causes of mortality in the United States. These health conditions include chromosomal anomalies and accidents with infants aged 0-4 years; accidents and cancer among children aged 5-14; accidents among adolescents aged 15-24; and heart disease, cancer, accidents, chronic lower respiratory diseases, stroke, Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, influenza/pneumonia, and nephritis/nephrosis among adults 25 and older. Results support the need for greater inclusion of couples and families in assessments and interventions. The greatest chasm in efficacy research was with minoritized couples and families. Implications include ways to initiate couple and family interventions in the context of health conditions with attention given to accessibility, recruitment, retention, and evaluation.