Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 33(11): 1834-1838, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29664147

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Nonadherence is a risk factor of disease worsening in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We analyzed the frequency, predictors, and clinical outcomes of patients with IBD who are lost to follow-up in outpatient clinics. METHODS: Medical records of 784 IBD patients visiting our IBD clinic between January 2010 and December 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Overall, 285 newly diagnosed IBD patients who were followed up for at least 12 months were included in the analysis. RESULTS: For 285 IBD patients (161 ulcerative colitis and 124 Crohn's disease), the mean disease duration was 66.3 ± 34.0 months (7-137 months). Forty-two patients (14.7%; 27 ulcerative colitis and 15 Crohn's disease) were lost to follow-up. On multivariate regression analysis, travel time to clinic (odds ratio, 2.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-3.45; P = 0.01) and C-reactive protein levels at diagnosis (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.68; P = 0.01) were significantly associated with follow-up loss. Among the 42 patients lost to follow-up, 36 (85.7%) revisited the clinic. The cause of revisit was disease flare-up in 22 patients (61.1%). Step-up treatment was needed in 15 patients (41.7%). Steroid was introduced in 14 patients (38.9%). Azathioprine and an antitumor necrosis factor agent were newly prescribed in three patients (8.3%) and one patient (2.8%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up loss rate for IBD patients in remission state was 14.7%, and the predictors were far from hospital and low C-reactive protein levels. Because most of follow-up loss patients experienced flare-up, clinicians need to try to encourage patients to keep their adherence.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Perdida de Seguimiento , Cooperación del Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Azatioprina/administración & dosificación , Biomarcadores/sangre , Proteína C-Reactiva , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Predicción , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Brote de los Síntomas , Factores de Tiempo , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto Joven
2.
Intest Res ; 16(2): 293-298, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29743843

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Inadequate bowel preparation can result in prolonged procedure time and increased missed lesion and complication rates. This prospective study aimed to evaluate bowel preparation quality and identify the predictive factors for inadequate bowel preparation in actual clinical practice. METHODS: We included 399 patients who underwent colonoscopy between June 2015 and July 2016. Using the Aronchick bowel preparation scale, we defined a score ≤2 as adequate preparation and a score >2 as inadequate preparation. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 58.38±12.97 years; 60.6% were male. Indications for colonoscopy included screening (69.7%) and surveillance after polyp removal (21.3%). A split-dose regimen was prescribed to 55.4% of patients. The inadequate bowel preparation rate was 28.1%. Overall, the median time between the last bowel preparation agent dose and start of colonoscopy was 5.0 hours (range, 1.5-16.0 hours); that of the adequate group was 5.0 hours (range, 1.5-16.0 hours); and that of the inadequate group was 5 hours (range, 2-23 hours). The mean bowel preparation scale score of the ascending colon (1.94±0.25) was significantly higher than that of other colon segments. On multivariate analysis, elderly age, history of cerebrovascular disease, history of gastrectomy or appendectomy, and total preparation solution uptake <2 L were the independent predictors of inadequate bowel preparation. CONCLUSIONS: The inadequate bowel preparation rate was 28.1%. Risk factors included elderly age and history of cerebrovascular disease or abdominal surgery. Patients with these risk factors require special care and education.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA