Outcomes among elderly bariatric patients at a high-volume center.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery in elderly patients remains controversial. With a growing morbidly obese elderly population, management strategies and treatment outcomes need to be evaluated. METHODS: We reviewed all bariatric cases from 2001 to 2005 at a single institution. The preoperative factors (body mass index, smoking status, co-morbid conditions, number of medications) and surgical information (operation and length of stay) were recorded. Patients >60 years old who had undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) were followed up, and their surgical outcomes were analyzed (reduction in medications, resolution of diabetes mellitus and hypertension, percentage of excess body weight loss, complications, and mortality). RESULTS: Of 1065 patients, 76 (7.1%) were aged > or =60 years. Of these 76 patients, 61 (5.7%) underwent RYGB. The other 989 patients (92.9%) were <60 years old, and 952 of these underwent RYGB. In the older group, the mean number of co-morbid conditions was 10 +/- 3.3, 70.5% had diabetes, and 83.6% had hypertension. In the younger group, the mean number of co-morbidities was 4.7 +/- 2.3. The mean number of preoperative medications was 10 +/- 4.5 in the older group compared with 6.0 +/- 4.3 in the younger group. The mean length of stay was 2.9 days in both groups. Postoperatively, medications were reduced by nearly 50% in both groups. Diabetes and hypertension resolved or improved significantly in both groups. The mean percentage of excess body weight loss was lower in the older patients (54.9% versus 60.1%; P = .09). The 90-day operative mortality rate was 1.64% in the older group versus 0.53% for the younger group (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Our data support the use of RYGB in older patients in programs prepared to comprehensively manage the medical co-morbidities. Although the percentage of excess body weight loss was less, the mortality was acceptable despite the greater number of co-morbidities. Both diabetes and hypertension were more common in this population, with trends toward better improvement after RYGB than in younger patients.

Feasibility and impact of an evidence-based program for gastric bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: Health care in the United States is expensive and quality is variable. The aim of this study was to investigate whether our integrated health system, composed of academic hospitals, a practice plan, and a managed care payer, could reliably implement an evidence-based program for gastric bypass surgery. A secondary aim was to evaluate the impact of the program on clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: A standardized program for delivery of clinical best-practice elements for patients undergoing initial open or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was implemented in 2008. Best-practice elements were embedded into the workflow. The best-practice elements were refined after reviewing failures observed during the early implementation period. The study period was divided into 3 groups: group α = year preceding program implementation (control), group ß = first year of implementation (unreliable), and group Ω = 2nd to 4th years of implementation (reliable). Outcomes data were collected for all patients who had undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass between May 2008 and April 2012 and were compared with a control group from the preceding year using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Two thousand and sixty-one patients were studied, with no significant demographic differences between study groups. Best-practice elements delivery was 40% in group ß, but was >90% for group Ω (p < 0.001). Length of stay for group α was 3.5 days and improved to 2.2 days (p < 0.001) for group Ω. Complications and readmission rates improved considerably with reliable delivery of best-practice elements. CONCLUSIONS: Standardization of evidence-based care delivery for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was feasible and reliable delivery of this pathway improved clinical outcomes.