Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Ann Pharmacother ; 42(9): 1229-38, 2008 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18682544

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An antipsychotic utilization pattern has evolved substantially over the past 20 years or so due to the introduction of the second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) and the increasing understanding of their adverse effect profile. OBJECTIVE: To understand antipsychotic utilization trends (including monotherapy, antipsychotic switching, and combination therapy) and to investigate factors associated with antipsychotic index medication selection (SGAs vs first-generation antipsychotics [FGAs]) among Texas veterans. METHODS: Data were taken from the Veterans Administration North Texas Health Care System (VANTHCS) and South Texas Veterans Health Care System (STVHCS) from January 1996 to December 2003. Adults with continuous enrollment (1 y before and after the index date) who had newly initiated antipsychotic therapy were included. Prescriptions were followed for up to 12 months. Descriptive analyses examined utilization trends; logistic regression evaluated factors associated with antipsychotic index medication selection. RESULTS: A total of 8096 patients were included in the study (VANTHCS n = 4477; STVHCS n = 3619), with the majority being male (93.6%) and white (62.6%) and nearly half aged 55 years or older (44.1%). Between 1997 and 2002, antipsychotic prescriptions changed from primarily FGAs (1997: 71.7%; 1999: 25.2%; 2002: 5.7%) to SGAs. Over the 6-year time frame, risperidone (31.0%) and olanzapine (30.7%) were most commonly prescribed. The overall combination therapy slightly increased over time (4.3%), switching to another antipsychotic remained stable (14.2%), and antipsychotic monotherapy remained dominant (81.5%). Hispanic and black patients were less likely than white patients to be initiated on SGAs. Patients who were older, had hypertension, and were in STVHCS were less likely to start on SGAs. Patients with dyslipidemia, bipolar disorder, and treatment in recent years were more likely to start on SGAs. CONCLUSIONS: SGAs have replaced FGAs as first-line medications for patients with mental disorders. Race, age, physical comorbidities (ie, dyslipidemia, hypertension), and treatment initiation year were important factors in index medication selection.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Utilización de Medicamentos/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Antipsicóticos/economía , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Texas/epidemiología , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Clin Ther ; 29(6): 1214-25, 2007 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17692735

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There have been many studies of underadherence to antipsychotics, but antipsychotic overadherence, or medication oversupply, in which patients receive more prescription medications than are needed, has been overlooked. Both underadherence and oversupply can have an important impact on clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study examined adherence (based on the medication possession ratio [MPR]) among patients treated with antipsychotics in the Central Texas Veterans Health Care System (CTVHCS) and investigated factors associated with their adherence status. METHODS: Data from September 1995 to October 2002 were extracted from the computerized patient record system of the CTVHCS for continuously enrolled adult outpatients receiving antipsychotic monotherapy and filling at least 2 prescriptions within a year of the index date. Patients' prescription records were tracked for up to 12 months. Underadherence was defined as an MPR <0.8, good adherence as an MPR from 0.8 to 1.2, and oversupply as an MPR >1.2. RESULTS: Of 3268 eligible patients, 49.9% had good adherence, 42.6% were underadherent, and 7.6% had medication oversupply. The overall mean (SD) MPR was 0.83 (0.33). Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that compared with patients with good adherence, underadherent patients were significantly more likely to be nonwhite (P < 0.001), younger (P < 0.01), and receiving chlorpromazine therapy (P < 0.05), and were less likely to be receiving fluphenazine (P < 0.01), olanzapine (P < 0.05), or risperidone (P < 0.05). Patients with medication oversupply were significantly more likely to be receiving olanzapine (P < 0.001), quetiapine (P < 0.01), or risperidone (P < 0.05) than those with good adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Although half of adult outpatients receiving antipsychotic monotherapy in the CTVHCS were adherent to their treatment regimens, a large proportion were underadherent, and a small proportion had medication oversupply. Patients receiving second-generation antipsychotics were more likely to be adherent and were more likely to have medication oversupply than patients receiving first-generation antipsychotics.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/provisión & distribución , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Autoadministración/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antipsicóticos/clasificación , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Autoadministración/psicología , Texas , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos/psicología
3.
Drug Saf ; 29(7): 621-32, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16808554

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The search for NSAIDs with less gastrointestinal toxicity led to the introduction of the selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors. However, following their introduction into the market, concerns have developed regarding their safety, particularly their cardiovascular safety. The purpose of this study was to assess the cardiovascular risk (events included were myocardial infarction, stroke and myocardial infarction-related deaths) associated with long-term (>180 days of exposure) and short-term (or=35 years of age who received celecoxib, rofecoxib, ibuprofen, etodolac and naproxen from 1 January 1999 through 31 December 2001, were included. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyse the relationship between cardiovascular risk and NSAID use, including selective COX-2 inhibitor use, while adjusting for various risk factors. RESULTS: We identified 12 188 exposure periods (11 930 persons) and 146 cardiovascular events over the entire study period. Compared with long-term ibuprofen use, long-term use of celecoxib (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3.64; 95% CI 1.36, 9.70) and rofecoxib (adjusted HR 6.64; 95% CI 2.17, 20.28) was associated with a significant increase in cardiovascular risk. When restricted to patients >or=65 years of age, the cardiovascular risks associated with long-term celecoxib (adjusted HR 7.36; 95% CI 1.62, 33.48) and rofecoxib (adjusted HR 13.24; 95% CI 2.59, 67.68) use increased. Short-term use of celecoxib (adjusted HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.42, 1.35) and rofecoxib (adjusted HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.39, 1.86) was not associated with any significant change in cardiovascular risk when compared with short-term ibuprofen use. Neither long- nor short-term exposure to naproxen and etodolac was associated with cardionegative or cardioprotective effects when compared with ibuprofen use. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this observational study, along with recent clinical trial results, suggest that prolonged exposure to selective COX-2 inhibitors may be associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Inhibidores de la Ciclooxigenasa 2/efectos adversos , Lactonas/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Sulfonas/efectos adversos , Factores de Edad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Celecoxib , Estudios de Cohortes , Etodolaco/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Naproxeno/uso terapéutico , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
Ann Intern Med ; 140(12): 1015-24, 2004 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15197019

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Depression frequently occurs in combination with diabetes mellitus, adversely affecting the course of illness. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether enhancing care for depression improves affective and diabetic outcomes in older adults with diabetes and depression. DESIGN: Preplanned subgroup analysis of the Improving Mood-Promoting Access to Collaborative Treatment (IMPACT) randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: 18 primary care clinics from 8 health care organizations in 5 states. PATIENTS: 1801 patients 60 years of age or older with depression; 417 had coexisting diabetes mellitus. INTERVENTION: A care manager offered education, problem-solving treatment, or support for antidepressant management by the patient's primary care physician; diabetes care was not specifically enhanced. MEASUREMENTS: Assessments at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months for depression, functional impairment, and diabetes self-care behaviors. Hemoglobin A(1c) levels were obtained for 293 patients at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, diabetic patients who were assigned to intervention had less severe depression (range, 0 to 4 on a checklist of 20 depression items; between-group difference, -0.43 [95% CI, -0.57 to -0.29]; P < 0.001) and greater improvement in overall functioning (range, 0 [none] to 10 [unable to perform activities]; between-group difference, -0.89 [CI, -1.46 to -0.32]) than did participants who received usual care. In the intervention group, weekly exercise days increased (between-group difference, 0.50 day [CI, 0.12 to 0.89 day]; P = 0.001); other self-care behaviors were not affected. At baseline, mean (+/-SD) hemoglobin A1c levels were 7.28% +/- 1.43%; follow-up values were unaffected by the intervention (P > 0.2). LIMITATIONS: Because patients had good glycemic control at baseline, power to detect small but clinically important improvements in glycemic control was limited. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative care improves affective and functional status in older patients with depression and diabetes; however, among patients with good glycemic control, such care minimally affects diabetes-specific outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus/psicología , Anciano , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus/sangre , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Cooperación del Paciente , Psicoterapia , Autocuidado , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Pharmacotherapy ; 24(11): 1529-38, 2004 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15537558

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the frequency of new-onset diabetes mellitus differs between patients taking atypical antipsychotic agents and those taking typical agents, whether the frequency of new-onset diabetes differs among those taking the atypical antipsychotic agents, and what clinical and demographic factors influence the occurrence of new-onset diabetes. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Central Texas Veterans Health Care System. PATIENTS: Continuously enrolled adult (> or = 18 yrs) patients with no previous (6 mo) antipsychotic use and no history (previous 1 yr) of diabetes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data from the Central Texas Veterans Health Care System were extracted from September 1995-November 2002. Clinical and demographic factors used in the analysis were antipsychotic agent taken, body mass index, diabetes-related risk factors, type of mental health comorbidity, age, sex, and race. Among those who met the inclusion criteria (3469 patients), chi2 analyses revealed no significant difference in the frequency of diabetes between the typical and atypical groups (p=0.5553) or among those taking atypical agents (p=0.6520). Multivariate logistic regression (1587 patients) revealed that increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 1.213, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.016-1.447, p=0.0324), nonwhite race (OR 1.761, 95% CI 1.174-2.640, p=0.0062), and hyperlipidemia (OR 1.606, 95% CI 1.064-2.425, p=0.0242) were significantly related to new-onset diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Among veterans taking antipsychotic agents, no difference was noted in the frequency of diabetes between patients who took typical agents and those who took atypical agents. After controlling for demographic and clinical variables, still no significant difference was noted among the agents. The main factors (increasing age, nonwhite race, and hyperlipidemia) related to new-onset diabetes were those that are typically associated with the disease.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Comorbilidad , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Sistemas de Registros Médicos Computarizados , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Texas/epidemiología , Veteranos
6.
Ann Fam Med ; 2(6): 555-62, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15576541

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Our objective was to examine the relative association of depression severity and chronicity, other comorbid psychiatric conditions, and coexisting medical illnesses with multiple domains of health status among primary care patients with clinical depression. METHODS: We collected cross-sectional data as part of a treatment effectiveness trial that was conducted in 8 diverse health care organizations. Patients aged 60 years and older (N = 1,801) who met diagnostic criteria for major depression or dysthymia participated in a baseline survey. A survey instrument included questions on sociodemographic characteristics, depression severity and chronicity, neuroticism, and the presence of 11 common chronic medical illnesses, as well as questions screening for panic disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder. Measures of 4 general health indicators (physical and mental component scales of the SF-12, Sheehan Disability Index, and global quality of life) were included. We conducted separate mixed-effect regression linear models predicting each of the 4 general health indicators. RESULTS: Depression severity was significantly associated with all 4 indicators of general health after controlling for sociodemographic differences, other psychological dysfunction, and the presence of 11 chronic medical conditions. Although study participants had an average of 3.8 chronic medical illnesses, depression severity made larger independent contributions to 3 of the 4 general health indicators (mental functional status, disability, and quality of life) than the medical comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Recognition and treatment of depression has the potential to improve functioning and quality of life in spite of the presence of other medical comorbidities.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/epidemiología , Atención Primaria de Salud , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA