Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Sex Transm Dis ; 37(12): 777-83, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20679963

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis are characterized by different risk factors, thus control strategies for each also differ. In contrast, risk factors for Mycoplasma genitalium have not been well characterized. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2006, 1090 women ages 14 to 45 attending the Public Health-Seattle & King County Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinic in Seattle, WA, underwent clinical examination and computer-assisted survey interview. M. genitalium was detected by transcription mediated amplification from self-obtained vaginal swab specimens. C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae were detected by culture from cervical swab specimens. RESULTS: Prevalent M. genitalium infection was detected in 84 women (7.7%), C. trachomatis in 63 (5.8%), and N. gonorrhoeae in 26 (2.4%). Age <20 and nonwhite race were associated with increased risk for all 3 organisms. In addition, risk for M. genitalium was higher for women with a black partner (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 3.4; 95% confidence interval = 1.83-6.29), those never married (AOR: 2.6; 1.08-6.25), using Depo-Provera (AOR: 2.3; 1.19-4.46), and smoking (AOR: 1.7; 1.03-2.83). Drug use, history of STI in the past year, ≤high school education, meeting and having intercourse the same day, anal sex, douching, and hormonal contraception were associated with N. gonorrhoeae or C. trachomatis, but not with M. genitalium. Number of partners was not associated with any of the 3 organisms. CONCLUSIONS: The limited number of risk factors for prevalent infection common to all 3 pathogens suggests that M. genitalium may circulate in different sexual networks than N. gonorrhoeae or C. trachomatis. The predominance of sociodemographic risk factors for M. genitalium, rather than high-risk sexual behaviors, suggests broad-based testing may be the most effective control strategy.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Mycoplasma/diagnóstico , Mycoplasma genitalium , Asunción de Riesgos , Adolescente , Adulto , Cuello del Útero/microbiología , Infecciones por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Chlamydia/epidemiología , Chlamydia trachomatis/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Gonorrea/diagnóstico , Gonorrea/epidemiología , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/métodos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones por Mycoplasma/epidemiología , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/aislamiento & purificación , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Conducta Sexual , Parejas Sexuales , Factores Socioeconómicos , Washingtón , Adulto Joven
2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 44(9): 3306-12, 2006 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16954265

RESUMEN

Mycoplasma genitalium is now recognized as a possible cause of several idiopathic sexually transmitted disease (STD) syndromes. However, due to the difficulty of culture of this fastidious bacterium, nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are necessary for its detection in patient specimens. In the current study we compared a newly developed research-only transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay (Gen-Probe Incorporated) to our in-house DNA-based PCR assay for detection of M. genitalium. The relative performance characteristics of these two NAATs were assessed with genital specimens from 284 women and 352 men reporting to an STD clinic in Seattle, WA. Among the women, M. genitalium was detected by the TMA and PCR assays in 36 (13%) and 39 (14%) vaginal swab specimens, respectively (kappa = 0.923); 26 (9%) and 23 (8%) cervical swab specimens, respectively (kappa = 0.843); and 25 (9%) and 28 (10%) urine specimens, respectively (kappa = 0.687). Among the M. genitalium-positive women, the relative sensitivities of detection for the TMA and PCR assays were 84% and 91%, respectively, for vaginal swab specimens; 60% and 53%, respectively, for cervical swab specimens; and 58% and 65%, respectively, for urine specimens. By using an infected patient (a woman positive at any site by TMA assay and at any site by PCR) as a proxy for a "gold standard," the specificities of detection were >99.5% for both the TMA and the PCR assays. Among the men, M. genitalium was detected in 24 urine specimens (6.8%) by the TMA assay, 26 (7.4%) urine specimens by PCR assay, and 32 urine specimens (9%) by either test (kappa = 0.791). We conclude that the M. genitalium TMA and PCR assays are highly specific and that vaginal swab specimens are the most sensitive specimen type for the detection of M. genitalium in women.


Asunto(s)
Cuello del Útero/microbiología , Infecciones por Mycoplasma/microbiología , Mycoplasma genitalium/aislamiento & purificación , Técnicas de Amplificación de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Orina/microbiología , Vagina/microbiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Mycoplasma genitalium/genética , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Transcripción Genética
3.
Sex Transm Dis ; 31(2): 113-6, 2004 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14743074

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rescreening patients after treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection has had high yield but low rates of participation. GOAL: The goal of this study was to determine if rescreening for gonorrhea and chlamydial infection in a largely urban sexually transmitted disease population would be more successful if individuals were given the option of submitting a specimen for testing through the mail. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized clinical trial involving 122 patients of whom 62 were assigned to clinic rescreening and 60 were given the option of either mailing a specimen for testing or going to a clinic for rescreening. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (45%) given the option of either rescreening in the clinic or through the mail and 20 (32%) assigned to clinic rescreening were rescreened within 28 days of enrollment in the study (odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-3.8). Of the 60 patients randomized to the clinic rescreening or mailing option, 11 of 18 (61%) who opted to mail in a specimen and 16 of 42 (38%) who chose clinic rescreening were rescreened within 28 days of enrollment (P = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Although not statistically significant, this study indicates that mailed rescreening could be a successful method to increase rescreening rates.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Correspondencia como Asunto , Gonorrea/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Cooperación del Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Infecciones por Chlamydia/prevención & control , Chlamydia trachomatis/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Gonorrea/prevención & control , Humanos , Masculino , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/aislamiento & purificación , Visita a Consultorio Médico , Salud Urbana , Washingtón
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA