Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Environ Manage ; 66(6): 1105-1119, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33070200

RESUMEN

Soil heavy metal pollution threatens ecological health and food security. It is significant to classify pollution risk management and control zones, which can effectively cope with soil pollution and scientifically carry out soil remediation projects. In this study, based on 665 soil samples collecting from Ningbo (southeast China), single pollution index and Nemerow composite pollution index (NCPI) were measured to assess soil pollution risk, and self-organization mapping model was applied to classify management and control zones. Results showed that the heavy metal pollution in the northwest part was more serious, while the east part was less polluted. Although more than 75% soil samples had negligible risks, the Hg and Cu pollution was greatly influential and notable as their polluted samples accounted for 24.21% and 12.48% respectively. Moreover, about 55.34% soil samples and more than half study region had pollution grades, and NCPI values were obviously high with the center of northwest study area. Results also showed that the study region could be classified into four zones with good spatial variabilities. Specifically, Monitored Zone with High-risk Pollution had the highest NCPI caused by human activities, while Controlled Zone with Severe Pollution had relatively high NCPI caused by industrial and agricultural production. Protected Zone with Ecological Conservation and Restricted Zone with Potential Pollution had low NCPIs attributing to historical or natural factors. Our study implies that the classified zones can provide fundamental and momentous information for establishing appropriate priorities of heavy metal risk management and control.


Asunto(s)
Metales Pesados , Contaminantes del Suelo , China , Ciudades , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Contaminación Ambiental , Humanos , Metales Pesados/análisis , Medición de Riesgo , Gestión de Riesgos , Suelo , Contaminantes del Suelo/análisis
2.
Sci Total Environ ; 902: 166456, 2023 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37607632

RESUMEN

Fire occurrence is synonymous to terrestrial ecosystems and an important component of the Earth system. Climate change, vegetation characteristics, and human activity regulate fire occurrence and spread, however, fires also interact with them in multiple ways. Due to the complicated mechanisms of interactions between fire and land use or cover, the spatial distribution, change trends and land use or cover types of fire occurrences exist wide discrepancies in different regions or countries around the world. Therefore, the quantitative and spatial relationship and differences between fire and land use or cover at the global scale remain poorly understood systematically. Here, we combine active fire and land cover products during 2001-2020 to explore the spatio-temporal features, trends, and types of active fires from global to continental scales. Globally, the annual changes of monthly active fire occurrences kept a dramatic increase in first two or three years but a circuitous decrease since then. Most areas prevailingly experienced active fires for once to five times, a small part of areas clustered in Africa, Southeast Asia, and South America experienced active fires for over five times in the last 20-years. In particular, above 60 % of active fires (re-)occurred in forest and 20-25 % in cropland, whereas grassland and construction land only accounted for about 5 % and less than 2 % respectively. Driven by active fires, the conversion of forest to cropland accounted for nearly 60 % and the transition of cropland to forest (about 10 %) followed and formed an interactive circle. Our findings improve the understanding of fire-land cover change interactions, particularly agricultural expansion and forest loss driven by active fires. Future efforts on agricultural expansion, urban safety, carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation should take the results of this research into account.

3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35627668

RESUMEN

The extensive pattern of economic growth has an inestimable negative impact on the ecological environment, which causes the soil pollution problem to become increasingly prominent. In order to improve the effectiveness and rationality of prevention and control of heavy metal pollution in regional soil, it is necessary to understand the current situation of pollution, identify pollution sources and clarify future pollution risks. In this paper, an industrially developed city in eastern China was taken as the study region. The positive matrix factorization model (PMF) model and Unmix model was applied to identify and apportion the pollution sources of soil potential toxic elements after evaluating the ecological risk of soil potential toxic elements. The PMF model identified six factors, including single source and composite source. The Unmix model also identified six sources, including sources of nature, industrial discharge and traffic emissions. The comparison between the two models showed that Hg and Ni pollution, as well as Cr enrichment in the study region, were related to the industrial discharge from enterprises and factories. Cd pollution was related to traffic emission sources. Cu and Zn pollution were related to the multiple sources mixed with soil parent material, traffic emissions and industrial discharge from electronic enterprises. Pb pollution was related to natural sources (e.g., soil pH) but also to industrial sources (e.g., industrial wastes discharge). Enrichment was related to soil parent material and agricultural inputs. Our study also implies that soil heavy metal pollution or enrichment in the study region was mainly from anthropogenic sources and supplemented by natural sources.


Asunto(s)
Metales Pesados , Contaminantes del Suelo , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Industrias , Metales Pesados/análisis , Metales Pesados/toxicidad , Suelo , Contaminantes del Suelo/análisis , Contaminantes del Suelo/toxicidad
4.
Environ Pollut ; 278: 116911, 2021 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33740600

RESUMEN

Heavy metal pollution is a notable threat to agricultural production. Soil heavy metal pollution can cause potential ecological risk (ERI), and crop heavy metal pollution can cause human health risk (HRI). However, most previous studies partially focused on heavy metal pollution in soil or crop but often neglected the relationship between them. Actually, soil heavy metal can pollute crops to some extent, while not all heavy metal pollution in crops comes from soil. The inner relationship of pollution risk in soil-crop system is worth attention. In this study, we selected Ningbo as the study region and used sample data to assess both soil and crop heavy metal risks, in order to explore the differences between heavy metal contamination risks in soil and crops as well as the relationships between heavy metal contents in soil and crops. Our results showed that Hg was the most polluted heavy metal in soil, which led to the highest ecological risk in Jiangbei (Comprehensive ERI = 567) with the maximum ERI of Hg (430). However, As in crops contributed the most to health risk and caused the highest health risk in Fenghua (HRI = 10) with the largest contribution of 64.5%. Such differences of pollution risk assessment indicated that the contents of the same heavy metal were inconsistent in soil and crops. Our results further showed that the heavy metals in soil had the greatest influence on Zn in crops. Pb and Cr in soil had synergistic effects on the crop absorption of Zn, whereas As, Hg and Cu played antagonistic roles in the crop absorption of Zn. Our study confirms that heavy metals in soil would variously influence heavy metals in crops and the interaction of heavy metals is very important for pollution risk control, which have been largely ignored yet.


Asunto(s)
Metales Pesados , Contaminantes del Suelo , China , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Humanos , Metales Pesados/análisis , Medición de Riesgo , Suelo , Contaminantes del Suelo/análisis
5.
Sci Total Environ ; 746: 141035, 2020 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32771755

RESUMEN

Cropland expansion and intensification are the two main strategies for increasing food production. Here, we investigated the spatio-temporal patterns of global cropland expansion and intensification between 2000 and 2010 using the GlobeLand30 dataset. In doing so, we first analyzed the expansion and loss of global cropland at different spatial scales. Second, we quantified cropland intensification from the perspective of output and mapped its global spatial distribution. Third, nine coupled patterns of cropland expansion and intensification were identified, and the contributions of these two strategies to global crop production were finally estimated and compared. The results show that global cropland increased slightly (2.19%) during 2000-2010, with the American continent having the largest net increase (0.21 million km2) and Africa having the highest magnitude of increase (7.42%) as well as the most substantial spatial variation. Among the world's top ten countries with the largest cropland areas, China was the only country which experienced cropland decrease, while cropland in Brazil and Argentina increased the most. Moreover, we found that Brazil ranked first in cropland intensification, followed by China, India and Ukraine. More than one-third of countries' cropland had stable area and moderate intensification, suggesting that agricultural land systems did not cause significant environmental harm globally during this period. Ten countries (e.g., Brazil and Algeria) experienced significant cropland expansion as well as a high level of intensification, suggesting that they could be major contributors to global crop production as well as environmental change. Cropland expansion largely boosted crop production improvement in Asia, while cropland intensification was the dominant factor for crop production in Europe and America. Overall, cropland intensification contributed much more than expansion to improving global agricultural production during 2000 and 2010. Our results gain a comprehensive overview of spatio-temporal patterns of global cropland expansion and intensification, which can provide helpful insights for the international community and individual countries to better guide land use planning, adjust agricultural structure and coordinate food trade so as to achieve a sustainable development of agriculture.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA