Expression and Clinical Significance of MAGE-A Proteins and mRNA in Lung Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Objective: This study investigated the expression and clinical significance of Melanoma Associated Antigen (MAGE)-A proteins and mRNA in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted, and we selected a cohort of 88 NSCLC patients treated at our hospital from January 2015 to January 2020. Adjacent tissues were chosen as controls. The expression of MAGE-A proteins in lung cancer and adjacent tissues was assessed via Western blot, while MAGE-As mRNA expression was measured using RT-PCR. Results: The relative expression levels of MAGE-A proteins and mRNA in NSCLC tissues were significantly higher than those in adjacent tissues (P < .05), with values of (0.343 ± 0.101) and (0.728 ± 0.112), respectively. Furthermore, MAGE-As protein expression was significantly higher in stage III - IV lung cancer compared to stage I - II (P < .05). No significant differences were observed in MAGE-A protein expression concerning gender, age, tumor diameter, pathological type, and differentiation degree (P > .05). The relative expression of MAGE-As mRNA was significantly higher in clinical stage III - IV and moderately differentiated lung cancer tissues compared to stage I - II and well-differentiated tissues (P < .05). No significant differences were found in MAGE-As mRNA expression concerning gender, age, tumor diameter, and pathological type (P > .05). Patients with high MAGE-As mRNA expression had a significantly shorter median overall survival of 33 months (95% CI: 31.64-34.36) compared to those with low MAGE-As mRNA expression (P < .05). However, no significant difference was observed in median overall survival between patients with high and low MAGE-As protein expression (P > .05). Conclusions: In NSCLC, the up-regulation of MAGE-A proteins and mRNA is associated with clinical stage and differentiation degree, warranting further investigation.

Predictive Value of EGFR Mutation Status for First-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer.

Objective: This study aims to investigate and analyze the correlation between EGFR-TKI first-line therapy and EGFR mutation status in patients with advanced lung cancer. Methods: We selected 60 patients with advanced lung cancer and EGFR mutations (diagnosed as stage IIIb or IV) from our hospital between January 2019 and November 2022. Each patient underwent an EGFR mutation test and was categorized into two groups based on their mutation status: 28 patients with exon 21 mutations and 32 with exon 19 deletions. After three months of therapy, we assessed treatment efficacy and adverse reactions. Results: Our data revealed that in the EGFR exon 21 mutation group, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 57.14% and 60.71%, respectively. In the EGFR exon 19 deletion group, the ORR and DCR were 68.75% and 84.38%, respectively. There were significant differences in DCR and ORR between the two EGFR mutation states, with statistical significance (P < .05). The progression-free survival (PFS) in the EGFR exon 21 mutant group was 8.4 months after third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment, while the EGFR exon 19 deletion group had a PFS of 12.7 months after the same treatment, with a statistically significant difference (P < .05). Cox regression analysis showed that female patients with no smoking history and an adenocarcinoma pathological type had significantly better PFS after treatment compared to male patients with a smoking history and squamous cell carcinoma type, with statistical significance (P < .05). Age and clinical stage did not significantly impact PFS after third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment (P > .05). Adverse reaction incidences, such as nausea, fatigue, diarrhea, vomiting, and rash, did not significantly differ in either the EGFR exon 21 mutation group or the EGFR exon 19 deletion group (P > .05). Conclusion: The status of EGFR mutations serves as a predictive factor for PFS, DCR, and ORR in lung cancer patients undergoing EGFR-TKI first-line therapy. This status can be a valuable predictive indicator of lung cancer treatment efficacy, with potential applications in clinical practice.

Perioperative fluid balance and early acute kidney injury after lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) after lung transplantation (LTx) is an important factor affecting the short-term outcomes. The focus item of transplantation centers is how to improve the incidence of AKI through optimal management during the perioperative period. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to investigate the influence of perioperative volume in the development of early AKI following LTx. METHOD: The study involved patients who had undergone LTx between October 2018 to December 2021 at China-Japan Friendship Hospital in Beijing. The patients were monitored for AKI occurring within 72 hours after LTx, as well as the renal outcomes within 30 days. The perioperative volumes were compared and analyzed to determine the impact on various clinical outcomes. RESULTS: 248 patients were enrolled in the study ultimately, with almost half of them (49.6 %) experiencing AKI. 48.8 % of AKI patients received continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), with 57.7 % recovered by the end of the 30-day follow-up period. A J-shaped relationship was demonstrated between perioperative volume and AKI incidence. Moreover, maintaining a positive fluid balance would increase the 30-day mortality and lead to poor renal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Perioperative volume is an independent risk factor of early AKI after LTx. Positive fluid balance increases the risk of AKI, 30-day mortality, and adverse renal prognosis. The LTx recipients may benefit from a relatively restrict fluid strategy during and after the lung transplantation.