The qualitative analysis of characteristic of callers to a psychological hotline at the early stage of COVID-19 in China.

BACKGROUND: As the outbreak of COVID-19, traditional face-to-face psychological intervention are difficult to achieve, so hotline becomes available and recommended strategies. The callers' characteristic could help us to study their experiences of emotional distress, as well as the reasons for calling during the pandemic, which can be used to inform future service design and delivery. METHODS: The information of 1558 callers called our hospital' s hotline for help from February 3, 2020, to March 16, 2020 were collected in the form of Tick-box and Free text, and the inductive content analysis was undertaken focusing on the reasons for caller engagement. RESULTS: It was indicated that more than half of the callers are female (59.7%), mostly between the age of 18-59 (76.5%). The average age was 37.13 ± 13.76 years old. The average duration of a call to the hotline was 10.03 ± 9.84 min. The most frequent description emotional state were anxious (45.1%) and calm (30.3%), with the sub-sequence of scared (18.2%), sad (11.9%), and angry (6.9%). All callers displayed a wide range of reasons for calling, with needing support around their emotion (64.6%), seeking practical help (44.0%), and sleep problems (20.3%) constituting the majority of calls. Among the subthemes, 314 callers thought the epidemic has made them upset, 198 asked questions about the epidemic, and 119 reported their life routines were disrupted. The prevalence of key reasons does not appear to differ over time. Through their feedback, 79.1% agreed that they felt emotionally better after calling, and 95.0% agreed that hotline had helped them. CONCLUSIONS: During the epidemic, the most concern of the public is still related to epidemics and its adverse effects. Fortunately, the hotline can be an active and effective rescue measure after an emergency happened.

The enclosed ward management strategies in psychiatric hospitals during COVID-19 outbreak.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, as a large city located in Southwest China, Chengdu was mainly affected by imported cases. For a psychiatric hospital, the enclosed management model, the crowded wards and the uncooperative patients are the risk factors of nosocomial infection. Admitting new patients while preventing the COVID-19 outbreak within the institutions was a crucial challenge. The Mental Health Centre of Chengdu proposed a series of effective management strategies to deal with the rapidly evolving situation during the COVID-19 pandemic which included regulation for the inpatients, their families and staff, and achieved Zero infection in our hospital.

Comparison of the Clinical Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid Injection with and without Needle Release of the Transverse Carpal Ligament in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical effectiveness of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection with and without needle release of the transverse carpal ligament (TCL) in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS: Between May 2014 and June 2016, 52 patients (56 wrists) with CTS were included in this study. Among these patients, 28 wrists were treated with ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection plus needle release of the TCL (group A) and 28 wrists were treated with a single ultrasound-guided corticosteroids injection (group B). The following parameters were assessed and compared including postoperative results of procedure based on relief of symptoms, electrophysiological parameters (distal motor latency, sensory conduction velocity, and sensory nerve action potential of median nerve), and ultrasound parameters (anteroposterior diameter and cross-sectional area of the median nerve at the levels of pisiform and hamate bone, and the thicknesses of TCL on the cross-section at the level of hamate bone). RESULTS: The overall excellent and good rate regarding the postoperative results of procedure based on the relief of symptoms at 1 month postoperatively was 82.1% in group A and 46.4% in group B (p = 0.004). There was significant difference in the above electrophysiological and ultrasound parameters between the preoperative and postoperative values in both groups (all p < 0.05). Furthermore, a significant difference was also observed in the postoperative values of the above-mentioned electrophysiological and ultrasound parameters in the 2 groups (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both approaches had treatment benefit in CTS. Ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection in combination with needle release of the TCL is superior to the single ultrasound-guided corticosteroids injection.

Ultrasound-guided needle release of the transverse carpal ligament with and without corticosteroid injection for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.

BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical effectiveness of ultrasound-guided needle release of the transverse carpal ligament (TCL) with and without corticosteroid injection in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS: From June 2016 to June 2017, 49 CTS patients (50 wrists) were included in this study. Twenty-five wrists were treated with ultrasound-guided needle release of the TCL plus corticosteroid injection (group A), and 25 wrists were treated with single ultrasound-guided needle release of the TCL (group B). The following parameters were assessed and compared including postprocedure results according to relief of symptoms, ultrasound parameters (cross-sectional area of the median nerve at the levels of pisiform, flattening ratio of median nerve at the levels of the hamate bone, and the thicknesses of TCL on the cross-section at the level of the hamate bone), and electrophysiological parameters (distal motor latency and sensory conduction velocity). RESULTS: Group A had higher overall excellent and good rate 3 months after the procedure than group B (84 vs 52%, P < 0.05). There were significant differences regarding the above ultrasonic and electrophysiological parameters between the baseline and postprocedure values in both groups (all P < 0.05). There were significant differences regarding the postprocedure values of above ultrasonic and electrophysiological parameters between the two groups (all P < 0.05). No complications such as infection or tendon rupture were noted. No procedures were converted to the open release. CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques are effective in treating CTS. Ultrasound-guided needle release of the TCL with corticosteroid injection had better treatment benefits than single ultrasound-guided needle release of the TCL in treating CTS.