Analysis of biopsy pathology and risk factors of lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between biopsy pathology and lymph node metastasis in patients with prostate cancer (PCa), and to identify risk factors of lymph node metastasis (LNM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer were respective screened between Jan 2015 and May 2022. Patients diagnosed PCa via 13-core ultrasound-guided biopsies and underwent radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection were identified. The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were recorded. Relationships between LNM and non-LNM were analyzed using chi-square and independent samples t-test. Logistic regression model was fitted to analyze the risk factors of lymph node metastases. RESULTS: Two hundreds and fifteen patients were included, sixty-seven patients had lymph node metastasis. Gleason scores in LNM group were higher than that in non-LNM group (8.5 ± 0.9 VS 7.5 ± 1.5, p < 0.001), positive biopsy in non-LNM group was significantly lower than that in LNM group (p < 0.001), Binary logistic regression analysis indicated number of positive biopsy and number of removed lymph nodes increased the risks of LNM (odds ratio, OR = 1.28, 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.16-1.42, p < 0.001; OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.06-1.17, p < 0.001; respectively). Number of positive biopsy in internal gland but not external gland was significant associated with LNM (OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.34-2.06, p < 0.001; OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.88-1.61, p = 0.262; respectively). The patients with lymph nodes dissection more than 13 were about four times more likely to detect lymph node metastasis than those fewer than 13 (OR = 3.92, 95% CI = 2.10-7.33, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of lymph node metastasis increased with the number of positive prostate biopsy cores, and tumors in the internal gland were more likely to cause lymph node metastasis. In addition, lymph node metastasis was more likely to be found when the number of lymph nodes dissection was greater than 13.

Development and preliminary validation of a PROS scale for Chinese bladder cancer patients with abdominal stoma.

Bladder cancer is a common malignant tumor, and patients who have undergone radical cystectomy and urinary diversion require a lifelong abdominal stoma. This greatly affects their physiological, psychological, and social well-being. However, there is currently a lack of a self-assessment outcome scale specifically designed for bladder cancer patients with abdominal stomas. Therefore, we developed and validated a self-assessment outcome scale (PROS-BCAS) for Chinese bladder cancer patients with abdominal stomas. The scale was initially developed through literature research and expert consultation, and it comprised four dimensions: physiological, psychological, social, and treatment, with a total of 66 items. After item analysis, 44 items were retained. We collected scale data from 382 patients to examine its validity and reliability. The results showed that the PROS-BCAS scale had good content validity (S-CVI/Ave = 0.992), construct validity (KMO > 0.6), and discriminant validity (correlation coefficient 0.404-0.870). The Cronbach's alpha coefficients (0.801-0.954), test-retest reliability (0.778-0.956), and split-half reliability (0.896-0.977) all demonstrated good internal consistency for each dimension and the overall scale. The study demonstrated that the PROS-BCAS scale is a reliable and valid tool for accurately assessing the health-related quality of life of bladder cancer patients with abdominal stomas, providing reference for developing individualized clinical care plans.