A Machine Learning Approach for Postoperative Outcome Prediction: Surgical Data Science Application in a Thoracic Surgery Setting.

BACKGROUND: The use of innovative methodologies, such as Surgical Data Science (SDS), based on artificial intelligence (AI) could prove to be useful for extracting knowledge from clinical data overcoming limitations inherent in medical registries analysis. The aim of the study is to verify if the application of an AI analysis to our database could develop a model able to predict cardiopulmonary complications in patients submitted to lung resection. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of patients submitted to lobectomy, bilobectomy, segmentectomy and pneumonectomy (January 2006-December 2018). Fifty preoperative characteristics were used for predicting the occurrence of cardiopulmonary complications. The prediction model was developed by training and testing a machine learning (ML) algorithm (XGBOOST) able to deal with registries characterized by missing data. We calculated the receiver operating characteristic curve, true positive rate (TPR), positive predictive value (PPV) and accuracy of the model. RESULTS: We analyzed 1360 patients (lobectomy: 80.7%, segmentectomy: 11.9%, bilobectomy 3.7%, pneumonectomy: 3.7%) and 23.3% of them experienced cardiopulmonary complications. XGBOOST algorithm generated a model able to predict complications with an area under the curve of 0.75, a TPR of 0.76, a PPV of 0.68. The model's accuracy was 0.70. The algorithm included all the variables in the model regardless of their completeness. CONCLUSIONS: Using SDS principles in thoracic surgery for the first time, we developed an ML model able to predict cardiopulmonary complications after lung resection based on 50 patient characteristics. The prediction was also possible even in the case of those patients for whom we had incomplete data. This model could improve the process of counseling and the perioperative management of lung resection candidates.

Computed tomography-guided microcoil placement for localizing small pulmonary nodules before uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic resection.

PURPOSE: The increasing number of computed tomography (CT) performed allows the more frequent identification of small, solid pulmonary nodules or ground-glass opacities. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) represents the standard in most lung resections. However, since VATS limit is the digital palpation of the lung parenchyma, many techniques of nodule localization were developed. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and safety of CT-guided microcoil insertion followed by uniportal VATS wedge resection (WR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study in a single institution, including patients undergone CT-guided microcoil insertion prior to uniportal VATS resection between May 2015 and December 2018. The lesion was identified using fluoroscopy. RESULTS: Forty-six consecutive patients were enrolled (22 male and 24 female). On CT: 5 cases of GGO, 2 cases of semisolid nodules, 39 cases of solid nodules. The median pathologic tumor size was 1.21 cm. Neither conversion to thoracotomy nor microcoil dislodgement was recorded. All patients underwent uniportal VATS WR (9/46 underwent completion lobectomy after frozen section). WR median time was 105 min (range 50-150 min). No patients required intraoperative re-resection for positive margins. After radiological procedure, 1 case of hematoma and 2 cases of pneumothorax were recorded. Four complications occurred in the postoperative period. The mean duration of chest drain and length of stay were 2.9 and 4.6 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CT-guided microcoil insertion followed by uniportal VATS resection was a safe and feasible procedure having a minimal associated complications rate and offering surgeons the ease of localization of small intrapulmonary nodules.

Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Anatomic Lung Resection after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Lung Cancer: A Case-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The advantages of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) are well-recognized in several studies. However, in the cases of advanced lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), the role of VATS is still questionable, with concerns about safety, technical feasibility, and oncological completeness. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of nCT on patients who had undergone uniportal VATS (U-VATS) anatomic lung resections for lung cancer, by comparing the short-term outcomes of patients after nCT with case-matched counterparts (treated by surgery alone). METHODS: We performed a retrospective, comparative study enrolling 927 patients (nCT: 60; non-nCT:867) who underwent U-VATS anatomic lung resections from 2014 to 2020 in two centers. Data were collected in a shared database with standardized variables' definition. Propensity score matching using 15 baseline preoperative patients' characteristics was performed in order to minimize selection-confounding factors between the two groups, which then were directly compared in terms of perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, two groups of 60 patients had been defined. The nCT-group had a higher conversion rate compared to the control group (13.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.003) without an increase in operation time or cardiopulmonary complications. In addition, no differences between the two groups were recorded in terms of prolonged air leaks, length of stay, and readmission. CONCLUSIONS: U-VATS after nCT is a feasible approach, showing a similar rate of cardiopulmonary complications and length of stay when compared with the control group. However, it remains a challenging surgery due to its great technical complexity as well as the clinical status of the patients.

Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Completion Lobectomy Long after Wedge Resection or Segmentectomy in the Same Lobe: A Bicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Completion lobectomy (CL) following a prior resection in the same lobe may be complicated by severe pleural or hilar adhesions. The role of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) has never been evaluated in this setting. METHODS: Data were collected from two Italian centers. Between 2015 and 2022, 122 patients (60 men and 62 women, median age 67.7 ± 8.913) underwent U-VATS CL at least 4 weeks after previous lung surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-eight (22.9%) patients were affected by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and twenty-five (20.4%) were active smokers. Among the cohort, the initial surgery was performed using U-VATS in 103 (84.4%) patients, triportal-VATS in 8 (6.6%), and thoracotomy in 11 (9.0%). Anatomical segmentectomy was the initial surgery in 46 (37.7%) patients, while hilar lymphadenectomy was performed in 16 (13.1%) cases. CL was performed on 110 (90.2%) patients, segmentectomy on 10 (8.2%), and completion pneumonectomy on 2 (1.6%). Upon reoperation, moderate pleural adhesions were observed in 38 (31.1%) patients, with 2 (1.6%) exhibiting strong adhesions. Moderate hilar adhesions were found in 18 (14.8%) patients and strong adhesions in 11 (9.0%). The median operative time was 203.93 ± 74.4 min. In four (3.3%) patients, PA taping was performed. One patient experienced intraoperative bleeding that did not require conversion to thoracotomy. Conversion to thoracotomy was necessary in three (2.5%) patients. The median postoperative drainage stay and postoperative hospital stay were 5.67 ± 4.44 and 5.52 ± 2.66 days, respectively. Postoperative complications occurred in 34 (27.9%) patients. Thirty-day mortality was null. Histology was the only factor found to negatively influence intraoperative outcomes (p = 0.000). Factors identified as negatively impacting postoperative outcomes at univariate analyses were male sex (p = 0.003), age > 60 years (p = 0.003), COPD (p = 0.014), previous thoracotomy (p = 0.000), previous S2 segmentectomy (p = 0.001), previous S8 segmentectomy (p = 0.008), and interval between operations > 5 weeks (p= 0.005). In multivariate analysis, only COPD confirmed its role as an independent risk factor for postoperative complications (HR: 5.12, 95% CI (1.07-24.50), p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: U-VATS CL seems feasible and safe after wedge resection and anatomical segmentectomy.

Patient satisfaction after pulmonary resection for lung cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction reflects the perception of the customer about the level of quality of care received during the episode of hospitalization. OBJECTIVE: To compare the levels of satisfaction of patients submitted to lung resection in two different thoracic surgical units. METHODS: Prospective analysis of 280 consecutive patients submitted to pulmonary resection for neoplastic disease in two centers (center A: 139 patients; center B: 141 patients; 2009-2010). Patients' satisfaction was assessed at discharge through the EORTC-InPatSat32 module, a 32-item, multi-scale self-administered anonymous questionnaire. Each scale (ranging from 0 to 100 in score) was compared between the two units. Multivariable regression and bootstrap were used to verify factors associated with the patients' general satisfaction (dependent variable). RESULTS: Patients from unit B reported a higher general satisfaction (91.5 vs. 88.3, p = 0.04), mainly due to a significantly higher satisfaction in the doctor-related scales (doctors' technical skill: p = 0.001; doctors' interpersonal skill: p = 0.008; doctors' availability: p = 0.005, and doctors information provision: p = 0.0006). Multivariable regression analysis and bootstrap confirmed that level of care in unit B (p = 0.006, bootstrap frequency 60%) along with lower level of education of the patient population (p = 0.02, bootstrap frequency 62%) were independent factors associated with a higher general patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: We were able to show a different level of patient satisfaction in patients operated on in two different thoracic surgery units. A reduced level of patient satisfaction may trigger changes in the management policy of individual units in order to meet patients' expectations and improve organizational efficiency.

Peak oxygen consumption measured during the stair-climbing test in lung resection candidates.

BACKGROUND: The stair-climbing test is commonly used in the preoperative evaluation of lung resection candidates, but it is difficult to standardize and provides little physiologic information on the performance. OBJECTIVE: To verify the association between the altitude and the V(O2peak) measured during the stair-climbing test. METHODS: 109 consecutive candidates for lung resection performed a symptom-limited stair-climbing test with direct breath-by-breath measurement of V(O2peak) by a portable gas analyzer. Stepwise logistic regression and bootstrap analyses were used to verify the association of several perioperative variables with a V(O2peak) <15 ml/kg/min. Subsequently, multiple regression analysis was also performed to develop an equation to estimate V(O2peak) from stair-climbing parameters and other patient-related variables. RESULTS: 56% of patients climbing <14 m had a V(O2peak) <15 ml/kg/min, whereas 98% of those climbing >22 m had a V(O2peak) >15 ml/kg/min. The altitude reached at stair-climbing test resulted in the only significant predictor of a V(O2peak) <15 ml/kg/min after logistic regression analysis. Multiple regression analysis yielded an equation to estimate V(O2peak) factoring altitude (p < 0.0001), speed of ascent (p = 0.005) and body mass index (p = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: There was an association between altitude and V(O2peak) measured during the stair-climbing test. Most of the patients climbing more than 22 m are able to generate high values of V(O2peak) and can proceed to surgery without any additional tests. All others need to be referred for a formal cardiopulmonary exercise test. In addition, we were able to generate an equation to estimate V(O2peak), which could assist in streamlining the preoperative workup and could be used across different settings to standardize this test.

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic left superior segmentectomy.

Obtaining adequate margins when performing lung cancer resection is crucially important. Therefore, during thoracoscopic segmentectomy, where the direct palpation of the tumor is not always possible, it is mandatory to accurately identify the intersegmental plane in order to achieve a satisfactory oncological and surgical result. In this video tutorial, we demonstrate a uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) superior segmentectomy of the left lower lobe, adopting two different techniques for identifying the intersegmental plane: the inflation-deflation method and selective resected segmental inflation, and we present the pros and cons of each. With the inflation/deflation technique, which is the most common maneuver used, we inflated the whole lung after occlusion of the target segmental bronchus, inducing collapse of the superior segment and inflation of the remaining lobe. However, this inexpensive and easy method often makes identification of the intersegmental plane unreliable because of the collateral ventilation. Moreover, because of the expansion of inflated segments, it limits thoracic working space during the VATS procedure. In contrast, selective resected segmental inflation guarantees an optimal surgical space even during a VATS procedure. In this case, we directly inflated the segmental bronchus of the superior segment through a butterfly needle in order to selectively expand only the selected segment. The careful demarcation of the intersegmental plane is mandatory in order to obtain adequate margins and achieve a high success rate for thoracoscopic segmentectomy. Although a one-size-fits-all method is not feasible, we strongly recommend  making every effort for identifying it as best as possible; indeed, its inadequate demarcation may be the main cause of unsatisfactory surgical and oncological results in terms of locoregional recurrence and long-term survival.

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy: the glove-port with carbon dioxide insufflation.

BACKGROUND: Since 2004, uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) approach was progressively widespread and also applied in the treatment of thymoma, with promising results. We report the first series of patients who undergone uniportal VATS thymectomy using a homemade glove-port with carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation. The aim of this article is to analyze the safety and feasibility to perform an extended thymectomy (ET). METHODS: A prospective, single-centre, short-term observational study including patients with mediastinal tumours undergoing scheduled uniportal VATS resection using a glove-port with CO2. Operations were performed through a single incision of 3.5 cm at the fifth intercostal space, right or left anterior axillary line. A 5 mm-30° camera and working instruments were employed through a glove-port with CO2. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (20 men; mean age 61.6 years) underwent ET between September 2016 and October 2019. Thirteen patients had a history of Myasthenia Gravis (MG) with thymoma and 8 had incidental findings of thymoma. Additionally, 8 mediastinal cysts and 9 thymic hyperplasia were included. Mean diameter of the tumor was 5.1 cm (range, 1.6-14 cm) and mean operation time was 143 minutes. Mean postoperative drainage duration and hospital stay were 2.3 and 4.3 days, respectively. Mean blood loss was 41 mL. There was no occurrence of surgical morbidity or mortality. During the follow-up period (1-36 months), no recurrence was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that uniportal VATS thymectomy through glove-port and CO2 is safe and feasible procedure, even with large thymomas. Furthermore, the glove-port system represents a valid, cheap and widely available alternative to the commercial devices usually adopted in thoracic surgery.

Oxygen desaturation during maximal stair-climbing test and postoperative complications after major lung resections.

OBJECTIVE: Non-univocal conclusions have been published regarding the definition of oxygen desaturation in relation to postoperative outcome. We aimed to verify whether oxygen desaturation during a maximal stair-climbing test was associated with postoperative cardiopulmonary complications and to assess which definition of oxygen desaturation (oxygen saturation <90% or desaturation >4% with respect to rest level) discriminated better between complicated and uncomplicated patients. METHODS: Five hundred and thirty-six patients performing a maximal stair-climbing test prior to major lung resection were analyzed. All patients performed the test on room air. Patients with and without cardiopulmonary complications were compared in terms of several preoperative and operative characteristics by univariate analysis, including the presence of oxygen desaturation at peak exercise (saturation <90% or desaturation >4%). Logistic regression analysis was then performed and validated by bootstrap procedure to identify predictors of complications and to see whether the exercise oxygen desaturation retained its significancy after multivariable adjustment. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients had an exercise oxygen saturation below 90%, but this parameter was not significantly associated with complications. Seventy-five patients experienced an exercise desaturation greater than 4%, which was a significant result associated with postoperative complications at univariate analysis (p=0.008) (36% complication rate). After adjusting for age, ppoFEV1, ppoDLCO, type of operation, height reached at stair-climbing test and cardiac co-morbidity, a desaturation greater than 4% retained its significance at logistic regression and proved to be stable at bootstrap. CONCLUSIONS: A stair-climbing test is an intense constant workload exercise, challenging a large amount of muscle mass, and appears particularly appropriate to elicit oxygen desaturation, which in turn may be a reliable marker of deficits in the oxygen transport system. A desaturation >4% appears a better cut-off definition than a saturation level <90% in predicting the occurrence of complications. The risk of complications was approximately two-fold higher in patients with oxygen desaturation >4% at peak exercise.

Evaluation of expiratory volume, diffusion capacity, and exercise tolerance following major lung resection: a prospective follow-up analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lung resections determine a variable functional reduction depending on the extent of the resection and the time elapsed from the operation. The objectives of this study were to prospectively investigate the postoperative changes in FEV(1), carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity (Dlco), and exercise tolerance after major lung resection at repeated evaluation times. METHODS: FEV(1), Dlco, and peak oxygen consumption (Vo(2)peak) calculated using the stair climbing test were measured in 200 patients preoperatively, at discharge, and 1 month and 3 months after lobectomy or pneumonectomy. Preoperative and repeated postoperative measures were compared, and a time-series, cross-sectional regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with postoperative Vo(2)peak. RESULTS: One month after lobectomy, FEV(1), Dlco, and Vo(2)peak values were 79.5%, 81.5%, and 96% of preoperative values and recovered up to 84%, 88.5%, and 97% after 3 months, respectively. One month after pneumonectomy, FEV(1) percentage of predicted, Dlco percentage of predicted, and Vo(2)peak values were 65%, 75%, and 87% of preoperative values, and were 66%, 80%, and 89% after 3 months, respectively. Three months after lobectomy, 27% of patients with COPD had improved FEV(1), 34% had improved Dlco, and 43% had improved Vo(2)peak compared to preoperative values. The time-series, cross-sectional regression analysis showed that postoperative Vo(2)peak values were directly associated with preoperative values of Vo(2)peak, and postoperative values of FEV(1) and Dlco, and were inversely associated with age and body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings may be used during preoperative counseling and for deciding eligibility for operation along with other more traditional measures of outcome.

Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy does not offer any functional recovery advantage in comparison to the open approach 3 months after the operation: a case matched analysis†.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study was to compare functional loss [forced expiratory volume in one second to forced vital capacity ratio (FEV1), DLCO and VO2max reduction] after VATS versus open lobectomies. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study on 195 patients who had a pulmonary lobectomy from June 2010 to November 2014 and who were able to complete a 3-months functional evaluation follow-up program. Since the VATS technique was our first choice for performing lobectomies from January 2012, we divided the patients into two groups: the OPEN group (112 patients) and the VATS group (83 patients). The open approach was intended as a muscle sparing/nerve sparing lateral thoracotomy. Fourteen baseline factors were used to construct a propensity score to match the VATS-group patients with their OPEN-group counterparts. These two matched groups were then compared in terms of reduction of FEV1, DLCO and VO2max (Mann-Whitney test). RESULTS: The propensity score analysis yielded 83 well-matched pairs of OPEN and VATS patients. In both groups, 3 months postoperatively, we found a reduction in FEV1, DLCO and VO2max values (OPEN patients: FEV1-10%, DLCO -11.9%, VO2max - 5.5%; VATS patients: FEV1-7.2%, DLCO-10.6%, VO2max-6.9%). The reductions in FEV1, DLCO and VO2max were similar to those in the two matched groups, with a Cohen effect size <0.2 for all the comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: In 3 months, both OPEN patients and VATS patients experienced a reduction in their preoperative functional parameters. VATS lobectomy does not offer any advantages in terms of FEV1, DLCO and exercise capacity recovery in comparison to the muscle-sparing thoracotomy approach.

Air leaks after lobectomy increase the risk of empyema but not of cardiopulmonary complications: a case-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess whether the presence and duration of air leaks after lobectomy are associated with an increased incidence of cardiopulmonary complications. METHODS: Propensity score analysis was used on 726 patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy from 1995 through 2004 to form three well-matched pairs of patients: patients with prolonged air leak (PAL) [> 7 days] and without air leak; patients with short air leak (SAL) [< or = 7 days] and without air leak; and patients with SAL and PAL. These matched groups were then compared to assess postoperative hospital stay and early outcome. RESULTS: Patients with SAL had a longer postoperative hospital stay compared to patients without air leak (8.6 days vs 7.8 days, respectively; p < 0.0001) but had similar morbidity and mortality. Patients with PAL had a longer postoperative hospital stay compared to patients without air leak (16.2 days vs 8.3 days, respectively; p < 0.0001) and with SAL (16.9 days vs 9 days, respectively; p < 0.0001), but similar cardiopulmonary complications were noted between the groups. Patients with PAL had a higher rate of empyema compared to patients without air leak and with SAL (8.2% vs 0%, p = 0.01 and 10.4% vs.1.1%, p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of air leak was not associated with an increased incidence of cardiopulmonary morbidity but was associated with an increased risk of empyema. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm safety of fast track in patients with air leak.

Recurrent air leak soon after pulmonary lobectomy: an analysis based on an electronic airflow evaluation†.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of recurrent air leak (RAL) occurring soon after pulmonary lobectomy based on electronic airflow measurements. METHODS: A prospective observational analysis of 129 consecutive patients managed with a single chest tube connected with an electronic chest drainage system. The incidence and timing of RAL among patients who had an air leak sealed within the first 24 postoperative hours was recorded. Stepwise logistic regression and bootstrap analyses were used to test the association of several baseline and surgical variables with RAL. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients (68%) had their air leak stopped within 24 h after the operation. Twelve patients had RAL (13%) after the first stop. All RALs occurred within the first 24 h from operation. Logistic regression showed that the presence of moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD; forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) <80% and FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio <0.7] was an independent risk factor associated with RAL (P = 0.02, bootstrap frequency 83%). Seven of 27 (26%) patients with COPD had RAL, a proportion significantly higher than in patients without COPD (5 of 68, 7.3%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of patients with COPD developed RAL. In this high-risk group, we advise against chest tube removal in the first 24 h after operation, even in the case of absence or cessation of air leak.

Regulated drainage reduces the incidence of recurrence after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic bullectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a propensity case-matched comparison of regulated and unregulated drainage†.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the recurrence rate of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) after uniportal video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) bullectomy and mechanical pleurodesis in patients managed with a regulating pressure drainage system compared and those managed with a traditional one. METHODS: Retrospective propensity score case-matched analysis of 174 consecutive patients submitted to uniportal VATS bullectomy and mechanical pleural abrasion (2007-13) in two centres. Definition of recurrence: Recurrent PSP requiring new treatment (i.e. aspiration, chest tube reinsertion, reoperation) within 12 months from the operation. All patients were managed with a single 24-Fr chest tube. Group 1 (106 patients): Tube connected to a traditional device (T) maintained on wall suction (-20 cmH2O) for 48 h. Group 2 (68 patients): Tube connected to a regulating pressure device (R) set at -20 cmH2O for 48 h. Chest tube removal criteria: No air leak (no bubbling or air flow <20 ml/min for at least 8 h) and pleural effusion <200 ml/day. Propensity score case-matching analysis was performed using the following variables: Age, gender, height, weight, side of operation, dystrophic score, length of stapled parenchyma. RESULTS: The two groups of 68 pairs were well matched for baseline and surgical characteristics. Patients of Group 2 (R) showed a significantly lower incidence of recurrence rate compared with matched counterparts (T) (3, 4.4 vs 10, 14%, P = 0.041). There were no differences in persistent air leak incidence, chest tube duration or hospital stay between the groups. Group 2 had a higher 48-h output of pleural effusion compared with Group 1 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: By stabilizing the pleural pressure at the preset values, novel regulating pressure devices may enhance pleurodesis, leading to a reduced incidence of PSP recurrences after uniportal VATS bullectomy and pleural abrasion.

Inability to perform maximal stair climbing test before lung resection: a propensity score analysis on early outcome.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to assess whether patients unable to perform a preoperative maximal stair climbing test had an increased incidence of morbidity and mortality after major lung resection compared to patients who were able to exercise. METHODS: Three hundred and ninety one patients submitted to pulmonary lobectomy or pneumonectomy for lung cancer were analyzed. Forty-five of these patients were unable to perform a preoperative maximal stair climbing test for underlying comorbidities. Unadjusted and propensity score case matched comparisons were performed between patients who could and who could not perform a preoperative stair climbing test. Multi-variable analyses were then performed to identify predictors of morbidity and mortality, and were validated by bootstrap bagging. RESULTS: Patients who could not perform the stair climbing test had similar morbidity rates (31.1 vs. 35.6%, respectively, P=0.7), but higher mortality rates (15.6 vs. 4.4%, respectively, P=0.08) and deaths among complicated patients (50 vs. 12.5%, respectively, P=0.025), compared to propensity score matched patients who could perform the stair climbing test. Logistic regression analyses showed that the inability to perform the stair climbing test was an independent and reliable predictor of mortality (P=0.005) but not of morbidity (P=0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Patients unable to perform a preoperative maximal exercise test had an increased risk of mortality after major lung resection. Half of these patients did not survive postoperative complications, due to their decreased aerobic reserve caused by physical inactivity which made them unable to cope with the increased oxygen demand.

Patient satisfaction with health-care professionals and structure is not affected by longer hospital stay and complications after lung resection: a case-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this investigation was to assess satisfaction with care of patients with long hospital stay (LHS) or complications after pulmonary resection in comparison with case-matched counterparts with a regular postoperative course. METHODS: This is a prospective observational analysis on 171 consecutive patients submitted to pulmonary resections (78 wedges, 8 segmentectomies, 83 lobectomies, 3 pneumonectomies) for benign (35), primary (93) or secondary malignant (43) diseases. A hospital stay >7 days was defined as long (LHS). Major cardiopulmonary complications were defined according to the ESTS database. Patient satisfaction was assessed by the administration of the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 module at discharge. The questionnaire is a 32-item self-administered survey including different scales, reflecting the perceived level of satisfaction about the care provided by doctors, nurses and other personnel. To minimize selection bias, propensity score case-matching technique was applied to generate two sets of matched patients: patients with LHS with counterparts without it; patients with complications with counterparts without it. RESULTS: Median length of postoperative stay was 4 days (range 2-43). Forty-one patients (24%) had a hospital stay>7 days and 21 developed cardiopulmonary complications (12%). Propensity score yielded two well-matched groups of 41 patients with and without LHS. There were no significant differences in any patient satisfaction scale between the two groups. The comparison of the results of the patient satisfaction questionnaire between the two matched groups of 21 patients with and without complications did not show significant differences in any scale. CONCLUSIONS: Patients experiencing poor outcomes such as long hospital stay or complications have similar perception of quality of care compared with those with regular outcomes. Patient-reported outcome measures are becoming increasingly important in the evaluation of the quality of care and may complement more traditional objective indicators such as morbidity or length of stay.

Predictors of early morbidity after major lung resection in patients with and without airflow limitation.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to identify predictors of morbidity after major lung resection for non-small cell lung carcinoma in patients with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) greater than or equal to 70% of predicted and in those with FEV1 less than 70% of predicted. METHODS: Five hundred forty-four patients who underwent lobectomy or pneumonectomy from 1993 through 2000 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: group A (450 cases), with FEV1 greater than or equal to 70%, and group B (94 cases), with FEV1 less than 70%. Differences between complicated and uncomplicated patients were tested within each group. RESULTS: Morbidity rate was not significantly different between group A and group B (20.4% and 24.5%, respectively; p = 0.4). In group A, multivariate analysis showed that predicted postoperative FEV1 was the only significant independent predictor of complications. In group B, no significant predictor was identified. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with preoperative FEV1 less than 70% of predicted, predicted postoperative FEV1 was not predictive of postoperative morbidity. Thus, predicted postoperative FEV1 should not be used alone as a selection criteria for operation in these high-risk patients.

Real-time database drawn from an electronic health record for a thoracic surgery unit: high-quality clinical data saving time and human resources.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to verify whether the implementation of an electronic health record (EHR) in our thoracic surgery unit allows creation of a high-quality clinical database saving time and costs. METHODS: Before August 2011, multiple individuals compiled the on-paper documents/records and a single data manager inputted selected data into the database (traditional database, tDB). Since the adoption of an EHR in August 2011, multiple individuals have been responsible for compiling the EHR, which automatically generates a real-time database (EHR-based database, eDB), without the need for a data manager. During the initial period of implementation of the EHR, periodic meetings were held with all physicians involved in the use of the EHR in order to monitor and standardize the data registration process. Data quality of the first 100 anatomical lung resections recorded in the eDB was assessed by measuring the total number of missing values (MVs: existing non-reported value) and inaccurate values (wrong data) occurring in 95 core variables. The average MV of the eDB was compared with the one occurring in the same variables of the last 100 records registered in the tDB. A learning curve was constructed by plotting the number of MVs in the electronic database and tDB with the patients arranged by the date of registration. RESULTS: The tDB and eDB had similar MVs (0.74 vs 1, P = 0.13). The learning curve showed an initial phase including about 35 records, where MV in the eDB was higher than that in the tDB (1.9 vs 0.74, P = 0.03), and a subsequent phase, where the MV was similar in the two databases (0.7 vs 0.74, P = 0.6). The inaccuracy rate of these two phases in the eDB was stable (0.5 vs 0.3, P = 0.3). Using EHR saved an average of 9 min per patient, totalling 15 h saved for obtaining a dataset of 100 patients with respect to the tDB. CONCLUSION: The implementation of EHR allowed streamlining the process of clinical data recording. It saved time and human resource costs, without compromising the quality of data.

Can maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures during exercise predict complications in patients submitted to major lung resections? A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The measurement of maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax) and maximal expiratory pressure (PEmax) generated at the mouth is an accepted non-invasive clinical method for evaluating the strength of respiratory muscles. The aim of our study was to verify whether PImax and PEmax measured before and after a symptom-limited stair-climbing test are associated with complications in patients submitted to major lung resections. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study of 283 consecutive patients submitted to lobectomy (231) or pneumonectomy (52) with a preoperative symptom-limited stair-climbing test, PImax and PEmax were measured before and immediately after the exercise. PImax and PEmax values were expressed as percentages of predicted values. ΔPImax and ΔPEmax were defined as the percentage difference between the pre- and postexercise values. Logistic regression analysis and the bootstrap resampling technique were performed to identify predictors of cardiopulmonary complications. RESULTS: On average, PImax dropped by 3.6% and PEmax increased by 0.8% after the exercise. In total, 173 patients (61%) experienced a reduction in their PImax after exercise, while 150 (53%) had their PEmax reduced. Postoperative cardiopulmonary complications occurred in 74 patients (26%). Complicated patients had a greater reduction in their PImax compared with non-complicated patients (8.7% vs 2.1%, P = 0.03), whereas ΔPEmax was similar in complicated and non-complicated patients (0.7% vs 1.3%, P = 0.5). Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that the best cut-off for predicting complications was a ΔPImax of 10%. Stepwise logistic regression analysis and bootstrap confirmed that ΔPImax of >10 was associated with cardiopulmonary complications after adjusting for baseline and surgical factors (ΔPImax regression coefficient -0.02, P = 0.09, bootstrap frequency 51%). A progressive increase in complications was observed in patients with greater reduction in ΔPImax after exercise, particularly for values >10% reduction. CONCLUSION: The measurement of PImax at the mouth during exercise represents an additional parameter that can be used to refine risk stratification of lung resection candidates and to identify patients who may benefit from inspiratory muscle training.

The use of the Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality system for the internal analysis of performance: a case-matched temporal audit.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of the Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality (TMM) scoring system in auditing the quality of care of our unit. METHODS: We analysed the performance of our unit comparing the incidence of complications and mortality occurring after anatomic lung resections during two different periods: early period (January 2000 to December 2009: 830 lobectomy, 134 pneumonectomy and 78 segmentectomy) and recent period (January 2010 to August 2012: 191 lobectomy, 8 pneumonectomy and 19 segmentectomy). The cardiopulmonary complications as traditionally defined in the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) database were also classified according to the TMM system: this method grades the postoperative adverse events from 1 to 5 reflecting an increasing severity of management regardless the type of complication. Complications graded higher than 2 are regarded as major complications. To account for confounders, several baseline and surgical factors were used to build a propensity score that was applied to match the patients of the most recent group with their early-group counterparts. These two matched groups were compared in terms of cardiopulmonary morbidity (codified by ESTS definitions) and mortality rates and incidence of major complications according to the TMM system. RESULTS: The propensity score analysis yielded 209 well-matched pairs of patients operated on in the two periods. The two groups had similar rates of ESTS-defined cardiopulmonary complications (recent: 38 patients vs early: 37 patients, P = 0.9). The use of the TMM system revealed a higher incidence of major (grade > 2) complications rate in the recent period (recent: 29 patients vs early: 14 patients, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The TMM scoring system for classifying the postoperative complications revealed a decline of quality of care of our unit otherwise undetected by applying traditional outcome measures. This tool can be used as an additional graded outcome endpoint to refine internal audit of performance.