A Systematic Review of Early Results Following Synchronous or Staged Carotid Artery Stenting and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Background The optimal management of patients with concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) and severe carotid artery stenosis remains a controversy. We performed a systematic review of studies comparing early outcomes of synchronous or staged carotid artery stenting (CAS) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the treatment of patients with concomitant CAD and severe carotid artery stenosis. Methods Multiple databases were systematically searched to identify studies of synchronous or staged CAS and CABG in the treatment of concomitant severe carotid and coronary artery disease published from 2005 to 2015. The quality of studies was assessed using the MINORS scale. The demographic data, risk factors, 30-day outcomes, and antiplatelet strategy were extracted. Results 23 studies were identified with a total of 873 and 459 patients in the staged and synchronous group, respectively. The observed overall death/stroke/MI rate was 8.5% (95% CI: 7.6-9.4%) in staged group and 4.8% (95% CI: 3.8-5.8%) in synchronous group. It seems that the synchronous group has better 30-day outcomes, but these data could not be compared statistically. Conclusion Our systematic review suggests either synchronous or staged CAS and CABG can be chosen for the treatment of concomitant carotid and coronary artery disease. It seems that the synchronous approach is relatively convenient and the antiplatelet strategy is relatively definite. For these patients, hybrid revascularization by synchronous CAS and CABG might be a feasible and promising therapeutic strategy. Our conclusions and the quality of the existing data suggest that a randomized controlled trial is needed to define the best treatment for patients with concomitant carotid and coronary artery disease.

Feasibility and Safety of Simultaneous Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Stenting for Bilateral Carotid Stenosis: A Single-Center Experience using a Hybrid Procedure.

BACKGROUND: The treatment for bilateral carotid stenosis (BCS) is challenging, and the optimal treatment strategy is not clear. We report our experience of treating 8 patients with BCS by simultaneous carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid stenting (CAS), thereby providing an alternative for vascular surgeons. METHODS: Between October 2010 and August 2014, 8 patients (5 males and 3 females; range, 53-82 years; mean, 69 ± 8.8 years) underwent simultaneous CEA and CAS in our hospital. CEA before CAS was done in 5 patients, and CAS before CEA was done in 3 patients. One patient also underwent simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting due to unstable angina. Intraoperative transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, carotid shunts, patches, and embolic protection devices were used in all patients. Instances of hyperperfusion syndrome (HPS), hemodynamic depression, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and death were recorded. RESULTS: All patients completed the procedure. One patient developed postprocedural HPS. After systemic treatment, he recovered completely. There were no deaths, major and/or minor strokes, or MI, nor did any patient exhibit lower palsy in cranial nerves in the perioperative period (<30 days) or on clinical follow-up (3 and 6 months). We observed no restenosis and no recurrent symptoms during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: After careful preoperative assessment and preparation, simultaneous CEA and CAS for high-grade BCS may be considered as an alternative management strategy in carefully selected patients.

Impact of the number of examined lymph nodes on outcomes in patients with lymph node-negative gallbladder carcinoma.

AIM: To determine whether the number of examined lymph nodes (LNs) is correlated with the overall survival of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) patients. METHODS: Patients were collected from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database (2004-2013) and categorized by the number of LNs into six groups: 1 LN, 2 LNs, 3 LNs, 4 LNs, 5 LNs, and ≥ 6 LNs. Survival curves for overall survival were plotted with a Kaplan-Meier analysis. The log-rank test was used for univariate comparisons. RESULTS: In a cohort of 893 patients, the median number of examined LNs was two for the entire cohort. The survival for the 1 LN group was significantly poorer than those of the stage I and II disease groups and for the entire cohort. By dichotomizing the number of LNs from 1 to 6, we found that the minimum number of LNs that should be examined was four for stage I, four or five for stage II, and six for stage IIIA disease. Therefore, for the entire cohort, the number of examined LNs should be at least six, which is exactly consistent with the American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria. CONCLUSION: The examination of higher numbers of LNs is associated with improved survival after resection surgery for N0 GBC. The guidelines for GBC surgery, which recommend that six LNs be examined at least, are statistically valid and should be applied in clinical practice widely.

Stage III should be subclassified into Stage IIIA and IIIB in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (8th Edition) staging system for pancreatic cancer.

AIM: To ascertain the prognostic role of the T4 and N2 category in stage III pancreatic cancer according to the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification. METHODS: Patients were collected from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2013) and were divided into three groups: T(1-3)N2, T4N(0-1), and T4N2. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) of patients were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: For the first time, we found a significant difference in OS and DSS between T(1-3)N2/T4N(0-1) and T4N2 but not between T(1-3)N2 and T4N(0-1). A higher grading correlated with a worse prognosis in the T(1-3)N2 and T4N2 groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with stage T4N2 had a worse prognosis than those with stage T(1-3)N2/T4N(0-1) in the 8th edition AJCC staging system for pancreatic cancer. We recommend that stage III should be subclassified into stage IIIA [T(1-3)N2/T4N(0-1)] and stage IIIB (T4N2).

A Preliminary Study of the Therapeutic Role of Human Early Fetal Aorta-derived Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Inhibiting Carotid Artery Neointimal Hyperplasia.

BACKGROUND: Endothelial cell damage is an important pathophysiological step of restenosis after angioplasty and stenting. Cell transplantation has great therapeutic potential for endothelial recovery. We investigated the effect of transplanting endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) derived from human early fetal aortas in rat injured arteries. METHODS: The carotid arterial endothelium of Sprague-Dawley rats was damaged by dilatation with a 1.5 F balloon catheter, and then EPCs derived from human early fetal aortas (<14 weeks) were injected into the lumen of the injured artery in transplanted rats, with an equal volume of normal saline injected into control rats. Rats were sacrificed at 2 and 4 weeks after treatment and transplanted cells were identified by immunohistochemical staining with anti-human CD31 and anti-human mitochondria antibodies. Arterial cross-sections were analyzed by pathology, immunohistochemistry, and morphometry. RESULTS: Green fluorescence-labeled EPCs could be seen in the endovascular surface of balloon-injured vessels after transplantation. The intimal area and intimal/medial area ratio were significantly smaller in the transplanted group than in the control (P < 0.05) and the residual lumen area was larger (P < 0.05). After EPC transplantation, a complete vascular endothelial layer was formed, which was positive for human von Willebrand factor after immunohistochemical staining, and immunohistochemical staining revealed many CD31- and mitochondria-positive cells in the re-endothelialized endothelium with EPC transplantation but not control treatment. CONCLUSION: EPCs derived from human early fetal aorta were successfully transplanted into injured vessels and might inhibit neointimal hyperplasia after vascular injury.