Kidney Transplantation From Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg)-Positive Living Donors to HBsAg-Negative Recipients: Clinical Outcomes at a High-Volume Center in China.

BACKGROUND: Data on kidney transplantation (KTx) from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive (HBsAg+) donors to HBsAg-negative (HBsAg-) recipients [D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg-)] are limited. We aimed to report the outcomes of D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg-) KTx in recipients with or without hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb). METHODS: Eighty-three D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg-) living KTx cases were retrospectively identified. The 384 cases of KTx from hepatitis B core antibody-positive (HBcAb+) living donors to HBcAb-negative (HBcAb-) recipients [D(HBcAb+)/R(HBcAb-)] were used as the control group. The primary endpoint was posttransplant HBsAg status change from negative to postive (-- →+). RESULTS: Before KTx, 24 donors (28.9%) in the D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg-) group were hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA positive, and 20 recipients were HBsAb-. All 83 D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg-) recipients received HBV prophylaxis, while no D(HBcAb+)/R(HBcAb-) recipients received prophylaxis. After a median follow-up of 36 months (range, 6-106) and 36 months (range, 4-107) for the D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg-) and D(HBcAb+)/R(HBcAb-) groups, respectively, 2 of 83 (2.41%) D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg-) recipients and 1 of 384 (0.26%) D(HBcAb+)/R(HBcAb-) became HBsAg+, accompanied by HBV DNA-positive (P = .083). The 3 recipients with HBsAg-→+ were exclusively HBsAb-/HBcAb- before KTx. Recipient deaths were more frequent in the D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg-) group (6.02% vs 1.04%, P = .011), while liver and graft function, rejection, infection, and graft loss were not significantly different. In univariate analyses, pretransplant HBsAb-/HBcAb- combination in the D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg-) recipients carried a significantly higher risk of HBsAg-→+, HBV DNA-→+, and death. CONCLUSIONS: Living D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg-) KTx in HBsAb+ recipients provides excellent graft and patient survivals without HBV transmission. HBV transmission risks should be more balanced with respect to benefits of D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg-) KTx in HBsAb-/HBcAb- candidates.

Pre-transplant donor HBV DNA+ and male recipient are independent risk factors for treatment failure in HBsAg+ donors to HBsAg- kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: In order to reduce the burden on organ shortage around the world, using potential infectious donor might be an option. However, scarce evidences have been published on kidney transplantation (KTx) from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) + donors to HBsAg- recipients [D (HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg-)] without hepatitis B virus (HBV) immunity. Here, we reported the results of D(HBsAg+/HBV DNA- or +)/R(HBsAg-) living KTx recipients with or without HBV immunity. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 83 D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg-) living KTx recipients, and 83 hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) + living donors to HBcAb- recipients [D(HBcAb+)/R(HBcAb-)] were used as control group by reviewing medical archives and propensity score matching. Treatment failure (defined as any HBV serology conversion, liver injury, graft loss, or recipient death) is the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Twenty-four donors (28.9%) were HBV DNA+, and 20 recipients had no HBV immunity in the D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg-) group pre-transplantation. HBV prophylaxis was applied in all D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg-) recipients, while none was applied in the D(HBcAb+)/R(HBcAb-) group. We observed a significant higher treatment failure in D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg-) than D(HBcAb+)/R(HBcAb-) group (21.7% vs. 10.8%, P < 0.001). Interestingly, no significant difference was found between groups on HBV seroconversion, liver and graft function, rejection, infection, graft loss, or death. However, 2/20 recipients without HBV immunity in the D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg-) group developed HBV DNA+ or HBsAg+, while none observed in the D(HBcAb+)/R(HBcAb-) group. HBV DNA+ donor and male recipient were significant risk factors for treatment failure. CONCLUSION: D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg-) should be considered for living kidney transplantation, but with extra caution on donors with HBV DNA+ and male candidates.

[Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography and Color Doppler Ultrasonography for Dynamic Assessment of Intracranial Changes in Early MCAO Rats Models].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and color Doppler ultrasound (DUS) on hemodynamic changes and cerebral perfusion quantitative analyses in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats with focal permanent ischemic stroke. METHODS: Sixteen SD rats with thin skulls were subjected to establish middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model. CEUS images were performed before modeling (T 0), immediately after modeling (5-15 min after modeling, T 1), 3 h after modeling (T 2), followed by the measurement of bilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA), anterior cerebral artery (ACA), posterior cerebral artery (PCA) using DUS. The peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV) and mean velocity (MV) of these arteries were obtained. The brain time-intensity curve was taken as interest region of the whole right brain, and the quantitative parameters of CEUS were obtained, including peak intensity (PI), area under the curve ( AUC), wash in slope (WIS), time to peak (TTP), rise time (RT) and time from peak to one half (TPH). The modified neurological deficit score (mNSS) of the rats was performed 3 h after the modeling, and the data of the rats with a score of 9-11 were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 12 rats were successfully modeled and completed with mNSS score 9-11. No blood flow signals were observed on the right MCA and ACA in the 12 rats at T 1 and T 2. From T 0 to T 1, PI, AUC and WIS of the right hemisphere decreased sharply with TTP and RT significantly prolonged, and the differences were statistically significant. However, there was no significant difference in hemodynamic parameters at that period of time. From T 1 to T 2, there were no significant changes in CEUS quantitative parameters (except AUCand TPH), while PSV, EDV, MV of LMCA and bilateral PCA showed significant acceleration, and the differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: CEUS and DUS can reveal the intracranial hemodynamics and brain tissue perfusion trends of MCAO rats, which could be new methods in assessment of ischemic stroke model at multiple time points.