Different View on Tumor Size Dilemma in Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging System for Thymoma.

BACKGROUND: Although tumor size is included in the definition of T descriptor in the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification of many solid tumors, it is not considered for thymomas. This study aimed to assess the relationship of tumor diameters (the largest tumor diameter [LTD] and the mean tumor diameter [MTD]) with survival in thymoma patients undergoing surgical resection in a single center. METHODS: The study included 127 thymoma patients (age, 49.2 ± 15.2 years; 65 males), who were evaluated based on pathological tumor sizes according to the LTD and MTD ([largest diameter + shortest diameter] / 2) and divided into three subgroups for each parameter as: patients with an LTD of ≤5 cm, 5.1 to 10 cm, and >10 cm and patients with an MTD of ≤5, 5.1 to 10, and >10 cm. RESULTS: In thymoma patients, survival significantly differed according to the presence of myasthenia gravis (p = 0.018), resection status (R0 or R1; p = 0.001), T status (p = 0.015), and the Masaoka-Koga stage (p = 0.003). In the LTD subgroups, the overall survival of those with R0 resection was lower in those with an LTD of 5.1 to 10 cm than in those with an LTD of ≤5 cm (p = 0.051) and significantly lower in those with an MTD of 5.1 to 10 cm than in those with an MTD of ≤5 cm (p = 0.027). In the MTD subgroups, survival decreased as the tumor size increased. CONCLUSION: Both smaller tumor size and complete resection are associated with better survival in thymoma patients. Therefore, the largest or the mean tumor size might be considered as a criterion in the TNM staging for thymoma.

Complete resections of giant thorax masses and experienced difficulties.

INTRODUCTION: Thoracic giant masses do not have a clear definition. In some publications, giant thoracic mass definition is used in tumors whose long axis is> 10 cm and in other publications covering more than 50% of the hemithorax. In this study, demographic data of patients with a massive resectable giant thoracic mass and the difficulties and experiences experienced in the peroperative process were reviewed with a general perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 14 giant intrathoracic masses operated at the department of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine, Ankara University were included in the study. The masses occupying more than half of the hemithorax and mediastinal lesions with a long axis of 15 cm or larger radiologically were included and evaluated. RESULT: 9 (64.3%) of our patients were male and 9 (35.7%) were female. The average age was 49.2 ± 17.1(between18-68). The tumor localizations of our patients were determined as 9 (64.2%) hemithorax and 5 (35.8%) mediastinal. When the radiological and intraoperative dimensions were examined separately, it was observed that the mean of long axis of CT image is average 18 ± 3.8 cm (between 12 cm and 26 cm), and the mean of long axis of specimen is average 18.14 ± 3.6 cm (between 15 cm and 23 cm). The heaviest mass was average 844 ± 473 g (350 g-2204 g). CONCLUSIONS: The surgical maneuvers and hence the excision of giant masses become difficult to operate due to the narrow localization of the masses and the frequent invasions of adjacent vascular structures and nerve tissues. However, complete resection of these slowly growing and generally encapsulated masses can provide the cure.