Tranexamic acid and blood loss in pancreaticoduodenectomy: TAC-PD randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) may reduce intraoperative blood loss, but it has not been investigated in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: A pragmatic, multicentre, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial was conducted. Adult patients undergoing planned PD for biliary, duodenal, or pancreatic diseases were randomly assigned to TXA or placebo groups. Patients in the TXA group were administered 1 g TXA before incision, followed by a maintenance infusion of 125 mg/h TXA. Patients in the placebo group were administered the same volume of saline as those in the placebo group. The primary outcome was blood loss during PD. The secondary outcomes included perioperative blood transfusions, operating time, morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: Between September 2019 and May 2021, 218 patients were randomly assigned and underwent surgery (108 in the TXA group and 110 in the placebo group). Mean intraoperative blood loss was 659 ml in the TXA group and 701 ml in the placebo group (mean difference -42 ml, 95 per cent c.i. -191 to 106). Of the 218 patients, 202 received the intervention and underwent PD, and the mean blood loss during PD was 667 ml in the TXA group and 744 ml in the placebo group (mean difference -77 ml, 95 per cent c.i. -226 to 72). The secondary outcomes were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Perioperative TXA use did not reduce blood loss during PD. REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs041190062 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp).

Removing part of the pancreas is an operation with a risk of major blood loss. Tranexamic acid is a drug thought to reduce blood loss. This study asked the question, 'Does tranexamic acid reduce blood loss during surgery on the pancreas?' Half of patients received tranexamic acid during surgery. The other half received only standard care. This study showed that tranexamic acid did not decrease the blood loss during the surgery and may have little effect in patients having a pancreaticoduodenectomy.

[Case Report of an Elderly Patient with Interstitial Pneumonia Caused by the Administration of Trastuzumab plus Anastrozole for the Treatment of Inflammatory Breast Cancer].

An 83‒year‒old woman received trastuzumab plus anastrozole as first‒line chemotherapy for inflammatory breast cancer in her left breast. Following the treatment, the induration and redness in her breast gradually improved; however, 2 days after receiving the 5th course of chemotherapy, she developed dyspnea and was referred to the emergency room. Her SpO2 was 88%; her KL‒6 level had increased to 2,613 U/mL; and a chest CT scan showed ground‒glass opacity in the bilateral lung fields, yielding a diagnosis of interstitial pneumonia requiring steroid pulse therapy. The dyspnea improved immediately after steroid administration, and the patient was discharged 20 days after hospitalization. Thereafter, the steroid dosage was gradually lowered to 5 mg/day. We discontinued steroid therapy after a chest CT confirmed the reduction of ground‒glass opacity. However, she was later readmitted for interstitial pneumonia for which she was readministered steroid pulse therapy. Trastuzumab‒induced interstitial pneumonia is rare, but we must be aware of the possibility that patients may develop severe pulmonary disorders or experience cardiotoxic effects.

Human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 expression is a predictor in patients with resected pancreatic cancer treated with adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy.

The high expression of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 (hENT1) and the low expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) are reported to predict a favorable prognosis in patients treated with gemcitabine (GEM) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) as the adjuvant setting, respectively. The expression of hENT1 and DPD were analyzed in patients registered in the JASPAC 01 trial, which showed a better survival of S-1 over GEM as adjuvant chemotherapy after resection for pancreatic cancer, and their possible roles for predicting treatment outcomes and selecting a chemotherapeutic agent were investigated. Intensity of hENT1 and DPD expression was categorized into no, weak, moderate or strong by immunohistochemistry staining, and the patients were classified into high (strong/moderate) and low (no/weak) groups. Specimens were available for 326 of 377 (86.5%) patients. High expression of hENT1 and DPD was detected in 100 (30.7%) and 63 (19.3%) of 326 patients, respectively. In the S-1 arm, the median overall survival (OS) with low hENT1, 58.0 months, was significantly better than that with high hENT1, 30.9 months (hazard ratio 1.75, P = 0.007). In contrast, there were no significant differences in OS between DPD low and high groups in the S-1 arm and neither the expression levels of hENT1 nor DPD revealed a relationship with treatment outcomes in the GEM arm. The present study did not show that the DPD and hENT1 are useful biomarkers for choosing S-1 or GEM as adjuvant chemotherapy. However, hENT1 expression is a significant prognostic factor for survival in the S-1 arm.

Phase 2 Trial of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With S - 1 for Node-Positive Biliary Tract Cancer (N-SOG 09).

BACKGROUND: Nodal metastasis is a leading attributable factor of poor survival in biliary tract cancer (BTC), and adjuvant chemotherapy targeting this high-risk feature has not been attempted to date. This study aimed to test the efficacy of adjuvant S - 1 for patients with node-positive BTC. METHODS: This single-arm multicenter phase 2 trial enrolled patients who underwent resection for histologically proven node-positive BTC. In this trial, S - 1 was administered at a dose of 80-120 mg/day on 14 days of a tri-weekly cycle for 6 months. The primary end point of the trial was 3-year overall survival (OS), in which the result would be promising if the 90% confidence interval (CI) surpassed a threshold of 30% (alpha error, 0.1; beta error, 0.2). The secondary end points were relapse-free survival (RFS), feasibility, and toxicity. RESULTS: The trial included 50 patients with perihilar (n = 23) or distal (n = 20) cholangiocarcinoma, or gallbladder cancer (n = 7). The median numbers of positive lymph nodes and examined lymph nodes were respectively 2 and 15. The 3-year OS and RFS were respectively 50% (90% CI, 40.9-59.1%) and 32.0% (95% CI, 19.1-44.9%), with median survival times of 34.6 months (95% CI, 19.3-49.8 months) and 18.4 months (95% CI, 11.9-24.9 months). Although hematologic toxicity often occurred, grades 3 and 4 toxicity were rare. The completion rate of the test therapy was 64%, and the median relative dose intensity was 87.5% (interquartile range, 50-100%). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy with S - 1 may be promising for patients with node-positive BTC.

Pathological impact of transanal colorectal tube for obstructive colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) with acute colorectal obstruction (ACO) is an emergency. Transanal colorectal tube (TCT) use can be a safe single-stage surgery with laparoscopy-assisted colectomy; it offers long-term outcomes equivalent to emergency surgery for stage-II/III CRC with ACO. Self-expanding metallic stent use, another alternative, may have detrimental pathological and molecular effects, whereas the pathological impact of TCT placement remains unclear. We hypothesized that TCT placement might exert little damage on primary tumor. Hence, the current study analyzed the pathological impact of TCT placement for CRC with ACO compared to emergency surgery. METHODS: Data from consecutive patients with stage-II/III distal CRC with ACO who underwent surgery between January 2007 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed at two Japanese affiliate hospitals. Inflammatory and malignant potential-related parameters were analyzed by a single blinded pathologist. We extracted mRNA from tumor tissues to analyze inflammatory cytokines. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients with stage-II/III distal CRC with ACO were identified (surgery: 25 patients; TCT: 43 patients). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. TCT showed a significantly lower frequency of abscess (surgery vs TCT, 36.0% vs 11.6%; P = 0.017) and a lower tendency of pathological perforation (surgery vs TCT, 20.0% vs 4.7%, respectively; P = 0.091), compared to the surgery group. There were no significant intergroup differences in oncological factors, including perineural invasion (surgery vs TCT, 52.0% vs 62.8%; P = 0.383), microlymphatic involvement (surgery vs TCT, 52.0% vs 58.1%; P = 0.623), and microvascular involvement (surgery vs TCT, 32.0% vs 25.6%; P = 0.570). No significant intergroup differences were found in interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, or IL-1ß gene expression levels (P = 0.580, 0.250, 0.941). CONCLUSIONS: TCT placement had no pathologically detrimental effects on the tumor or surrounding tissues and might be an attractive non-invasive strategy for cases of curative distal CRC with ACO.

Correction to: Pathological impact of transanal colorectal tube for obstructive colorectal cancer.

In Methods of Abstract, the word "2015" should be changed to "2011".

Colorectal obstruction is a potential prognostic factor for stage II colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive colorectal cancer (CRC) is an emergency situation with high morbidity and mortality, but long-term outcomes of stage II/III obstructive CRC remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors, including colorectal obstruction. METHODS: Data were retrospectively reviewed from consecutive patients with stage II/III CRC who underwent curative surgery between January 2007 and December 2011 at two Japanese institutions. We analyzed overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS), according to various prognostic factors including colorectal obstruction. RESULTS: In total, 979 patients with stage II/III CRC were identified for this study. Among these 979 patients, 94 patients showed colorectal obstruction (9.6%). In both stage II and stage III CRCs, colorectal obstruction showed significantly poorer OS and RFS compared to non-obstruction (5-year OS, obstruction vs. non-obstruction, stage II: 65.9 vs. 86.5%, P = 0.002; stage III: 55.9 vs. 73.6%, P = 0.007) (5-year RFS, obstruction vs. non-obstruction, stage II: 59.2 vs. 77.8%, P = 0.008; stage III 31.3 vs. 56.3%, P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated colorectal obstruction as a significant independent and poor prognostic factor in terms of both OS (hazard ratio (HR) 2.469; 95% CI 1.339-4.545; P = 0.004) and RFS (HR 1.992; 95% CI 1.160-3.425; P = 0.012) for stage II CRC, as well as pT4 stage. On multivariate analysis for stage III CRC, colorectal obstruction was a significant predictor of poor RFS (HR 1.626; 95% CI 1.070-2.469; P = 0.023), but not poor OS. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal obstruction is an independent poor prognostic factor for stage II CRC. Adjuvant chemotherapy might be feasible for stage II CRC with colorectal obstruction.

Adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial (JASPAC 01).

BACKGROUND: Although adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine is standard care for resected pancreatic cancer, S-1 has shown non-inferiority to gemcitabine for advanced disease. We aimed to investigate the non-inferiority of S-1 to gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer in terms of overall survival. METHODS: We did a randomised, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority phase 3 trial undertaken at 33 hospitals in Japan. Patients who had histologically proven invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas, pathologically documented stage I-III, and no local residual or microscopic residual tumour, and were aged 20 years or older were eligible. Patients with resected pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2), intravenously administered on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks [one cycle], for up to six cycles) or S-1 (40 mg, 50 mg, or 60 mg according to body-surface area, orally administered twice a day for 28 days followed by a 14 day rest, every 6 weeks [one cycle], for up to four cycles) at the data centre by a modified minimisation method, balancing residual tumour status, nodal status, and institutions. The primary outcome was overall survival in the two treatment groups, assessed in the per-protocol population, excluding ineligible patients and those not receiving the allocated treatment. The protocol prespecified that the superiority of S-1 with respect to overall survival was also to be assessed in the per-protocol population by a log-rank test, if the non-inferiority of S-1 was verified. We estimated overall and relapse-free survival using the Kaplan-Meier methods, and assessed non-inferiority of S-1 to gemcitabine using the Cox proportional hazard model. The expected hazard ratio (HR) for mortality was 0.87 with a non-inferiority margin of 1.25 (power 80%; one-sided type I error 2.5%). This trial is registered at UMIN CTR (UMIN000000655). FINDINGS: 385 patients were randomly assigned to treatment between April 11, 2007, and June 29, 2010 (193 to the gemcitabine group and 192 to the S-1 group). Of these, three were exlcuded because of ineligibility and five did not receive chemotherapy. The per-protocol population therefore consisted of 190 patients in the gemcitabine group and 187 patients in the S-1 group. On Sept 15, 2012, following the recommendation from the independent data and safety monitoring committee, this study was discontinued because the prespecified criteria for early discontinuation were met at the interim analysis for efficacy, when all the protocol treatments had been finished. Analysis with the follow-up data on Jan 15, 2016, showed HR of mortality was 0.57 (95% CI 0.44-0.72, pnon-inferiority<0.0001, p<0.0001 for superiority), associated with 5-year overall survival of 24.4% (18.6-30.8) in the gemcitabine group and 44.1% (36.9-51.1) in the S-1 group. Grade 3 or 4 leucopenia, neutropenia, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase were observed more frequently in the gemcitabine group, whereas stomatitis and diarrhoea were more frequently experienced in the S-1 group. INTERPRETATION: Adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 can be a new standard care for resected pancreatic cancer in Japanese patients. These results should be assessed in non-Asian patients. FUNDING: Pharma Valley Center, Shizuoka Industrial Foundation, Taiho Pharmaceutical.

Retroperitoneal and Mediastinal Emphysema after Sigmoid Colon Resection.

Retroperitoneal and mediastinal emphysema after colon resection is extremely rare, especially in the absence of anastomotic leakage. The feasibility and safety of conservative treatment for this complication are unknown. We report a patient who underwent open sigmoid colon resection for colon cancer and developed retroperitoneal and mediastinal emphysema that was not caused by anastomotic leakage. Retroperitoneal and mediastinal emphysema occurred as a result of diverticular perforation. We were able to treat this patient successfully with conservative management.

A calcitonin-producing pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm treated with distal pancreatectomy a lengthy time after a left trisectionectomy for liver metastases: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Calcitonin-producing pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) are extremely rare. There have been no reports of a patient in whom liver metastases were the presenting finding, and a calcitonin-producing PanNEN was subsequently detected after a lengthy period. CASE PRESENTATION: A 53-year-old man had diarrhea for several years. Computed tomography (CT) revealed multiple liver tumors. We performed a left trisectionectomy with a bile duct resection. The histologic examination showed neuroendocrine tumors G1. Immunohistochemistry was positive for calcitonin and the serum calcitonin level was elevated. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of hepatic origin are extremely rare, so a systemic exploration was performed, but no tumor was detected. CT showed a 4-mm calcification in the pancreatic body, but no contrast-enhanced mass was noted. Although the liver tumors were resected, the diarrhea and high serum calcitonin level persisted. Serial examinations were performed for 6 years, but no tumor was identified; however, 6.5 years after the hepatectomy the serum calcitonin level increased. CT showed a 10-mm contrast-enhanced mass in the calcified area of the pancreatic body. A distal pancreatectomy was performed. The histologic examination showed a neuroendocrine tumor G1, which mimicked the liver tumors. Immunohistochemistry was positive for calcitonin. After the distal pancreatectomy, the serum calcitonin level decreased and diarrhea resolved. The calcitonin-producing neuroendocrine neoplasm was considered the pancreatic primary and the hepatic tumors were metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Calcitonin-producing PanNENs may be initially recognized as liver tumors and may become evident after a lengthy period, thus long-term observation is recommended. Aggressive surgeries may contribute to long-term survival.

Eosinophilic pancreatitis presenting as rupture of a pancreatic cystic lesion into the chest cavity.

A 71-year-old man was receiving follow-up examination because of a retention cyst in the pancreatic body that extended to the dorsal extrahepatic area, but presented to the Emergency Department at our hospital with dyspnea and cough. Chest X-ray showed a large amount of left-sided pleural effusion and abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed reduction in size of the cystic lesion. Biochemical testing of the pleural effusion revealed high levels of pancreatic enzymes. We, therefore, diagnosed rupture of the pancreatic cystic lesion into the chest cavity. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) demonstrated stenosis of the pancreatic duct and leakage of contrast medium at the cystic lesion. CT after ERCP revealed leakage of contrast medium from the cystic lesion through the dorsal extrahepatic area into the chest cavity. Endoscopic naso-pancreatic drainage was performed, but the cystic lesion and pleural effusion remained unimproved. Distal pancreatectomy was, therefore, performed. Microscopic examination revealed eosinophilic infiltration of the pancreatic parenchyma, leading to a diagnosis of eosinophilic pancreatitis (EP). Pancreatic retention cyst secondary to chronic pancreatitis associated with eosinophilic infiltration was considered to have ruptured into the chest cavity. EP is a rare etiology of pancreatitis and few cases have been reported. This case was thus considered valuable.

Concordance of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 expressions between murine (10D7G2) and rabbit (SP120) antibodies and association with clinical outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer: A collaborative study from the JASPAC 01 trial.

BACKGROUND: Expression of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 (hENT1) is reported to predict survival of gemcitabine (GEM)-treated patients. However, predictive values of immunohistochemical hENT1 expression may differ according to the antibodies, 10D7G2 and SP120. AIM: We aimed to investigate the concordance of immunohistochemical hENT1 expression between the two antibodies and prognosis. METHODS: The subjects of this study were totally 332 whose formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens and/or unstained sections were obtained. The individual H-scores and four classifications according to the staining intensity were applied for the evaluation of hENT1 expression by 10D7G2 and SP120, respectively. RESULTS: The highest concordance rate (79.8%) was obtained when the cut-off between high and low hENT1 expression using SP120 was set between moderate and strong. There were no correlations of hENT1 mRNA level with H-score (p = .258). Although the hENT1 mRNA level was significantly different among four classifications using SP120 (p = .011), there was no linear relationship among them. Multivariate analyses showed that adjuvant GEM was a significant predictor of the patients with low hENT1 expression using either 10D7G2 (Hazard ratio [HR] 2.39, p = .001) or SP120 (HR 1.84, p < .001). In contrast, agent for adjuvant chemotherapy was not significant predictor for the patients with high hENT1 expression regardless of the kind of antibody. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that the two antibodies for evaluating hENT1 expression are equivalent depending on the cut-off point and suggests that S-1 is the first choice of adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer with low hENT1 expression, whereas either S-1 or GEM can be introduced for the pancreatic cancer with high hENT1 expression, no matter which antibody is used.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy with malrotation following reoperation due to torsion of efferent loop: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Malrotation is a congenital anomaly during the development of the embryonic intestine. Although it is generally considered a pediatric surgical condition, it can have significant implications for adult surgery in terms of reconstruction. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was an 85-year-old man with pancreatic cancer and intestinal malrotation. He underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with modified Child's reconstruction. Because the ascending colon and efferent loop twisted easily, we fixed the ascending colon to the abdominal wall. Thereafter, right twist and stenosis of the efferent loop occurred. On the 22nd day after the initial surgery, detorsion and Braun anastomosis were performed for efferent loop fixation. Postoperative oral intake was good, and the patient was discharged from our hospital on the 24th day after the reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: This is a rare case of pancreaticoduodenectomy with malrotation following reoperation due to a complication after Child's reconstruction. In similar cases of intestinal malrotation, it is important to consider avoiding coaxial positioning of intestinal parts and an upper abdominal space while selecting a reconstruction method.

Long-term Outcomes of One Stage Surgery Using Transanal Colorectal Tube for Acute Colorectal Obstruction of Stage II/III Distal Colon Cancer.

PURPOSE: Since oncological outcomes of transanal colorectal tube (TCT) placement, an endoscopic treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) with acute colorectal obstruction (ACO), remain unknown, this study analyzed long-term outcomes of TCT placement for stage II/III CRC with ACO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively reviewed from consecutive patients with distal stage II/III CRC who underwent surgery between January 2007 and December 2011 at two Japanese hospitals. One hospital conducted emergency surgery and the other performed TCT placement as the standard treatment for all CRCs with ACO. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to adjust baseline characteristics between two groups. RESULTS: Among 754 patients with distal stage II/III CRC, 680 did not have ACO (non-ACO group) and 74 had ACO (ACO group). The PS matching between both hospitals identified 234 pairs in the non-ACO group and 23 pairs in the ACO group. In the non-ACO group, the surgical quality was equivalent between the two institutions, with no significant differences in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). In the ACO group, the rate of primary resection/anastomosis was higher in the TCT group than in the surgery group (87.0% vs. 26.1%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were noted between the surgery and the TCT groups in OS (5-year OS, 61.9% vs. 51.5%; p=0.490) and DFS (5-year DFS, 45.9% vs. 38.3%; p=0.658). CONCLUSION: TCT placement can achieve similar long-term outcomes to emergency surgery, with a high rate of primary resection/anastomosis for distal stage II/III colon cancer with ACO.

A long-term survival case after resection of the pancreatic metastasis from lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic metastasis from lung cancer is not an indication for surgical resection because patients with such a condition present with multiple-organ metastases. Therefore, the significance of resection in patients with pancreatic metastasis from lung cancer remains unclear. Here we report a case of a long-term survivor of pancreatic metastasis from lung cancer after pancreatectomy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 67-year-old woman presented with a pancreatic mass. She had undergone left lower lobectomy for stage IIIA lung adenocarcinoma 6 years prior to presentation. Following surgery, she received adjuvant treatment with gefitinib for 7 months. However, this treatment was discontinued due to its side effects. The patient received radiation therapy for mediastinal lymph node metastasis 2 years after resection and she became cancer-free. Six years after the initial pulmonary resection, the patient's tumor marker level increased, and abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a 20-mm tumor in the pancreatic tail. Positron emission tomography-CT revealed an abnormal uptake in the pancreatic tail. However, no other abnormal lesions were observed. The diagnosis was primary pancreatic cancer or metastasis from lung cancer. Distal pancreatectomy with lymph node dissection was performed, and the pathological diagnosis was metastasis from lung cancer. The patient survived for more than 5 years without recurrence but she died of acute renal failure after acquiring pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment should be considered for pancreatic metastasis from lung cancer if the disease is localized and the patient's condition is good. Additionally, combined therapy, including surgical resection, may be effective for repeated recurrence.

Long-term survival after surgical resection for recurrent hepatic and pulmonary metastases of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a case report.

BACKGROUND: A few reports to date have described the effectiveness of surgical resection for recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). We report in this study a patient who achieved long-term survival after surgical resection for recurrent hepatic and pulmonary metastases of ICC. CASE PRESENTATION: A 62-year-old man was referred to our hospital for examination of a tumor in the left lobe of the liver. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the abdomen revealed a hypovascularized tumor, 30 mm in hepatic segment 2 (S2). The patient was diagnosed with a mass-forming type of ICC. A left lateral sectionectomy with regional lymph node dissection was performed. Histopathological examination showed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma in the hepatic S2 with lymph node metastasis. There were two intrahepatic metastases around the main tumor. The pathological stage of the ICC was pT2pN1M0pStageIIIB. The patient did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. Twelve months after surgery, liver lesions in S4/S8 and S7 were detected on CT scans. A partial hepatectomy was performed. The histopathological features were similar to those of the previous ICC. The patient did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy after the repeat hepatectomy. Four years and four months after this repeat hepatectomy, CT scans showed multiple nodes in S4 and S10 of the left lung and in S1 of the right lung. Wedge resection of the left upper lobe and sectionectomy in S10 of the left lung were performed. Histopathological findings of the resected lung nodules were compatible with metastatic ICC. The nodule in S1 of the right lung was too small to be diagnosed as metastasis; therefore, it was not resected. After pulmonary resection, the patient was treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin for 6 months. After chemotherapy, the size of the nodule in S1 increased gradually. One year and ten months after the pulmonary resection, we performed wedge resection of S1 of the right lung, and the histopathological findings were compatible with metastatic ICC. The patient is alive without evidence of disease 8 years after the initial surgery and 8 months after the last pulmonary resection. CONCLUSIONS: ICC with poor prognostic factors can frequently recur; however, surgical resection for recurrent ICC might, for selected patients, enable long-term survival.

Efficacy of Mucosal Cutting Biopsy for the Histopathological Diagnosis of Gastric Submucosal Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors occur frequently. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is performed commonly for diagnosis. However, the success rate of histological diagnosis is insufficient when the submucosal tumor (SMT) is small. Recently, another technique, mucosal cutting biopsy (MCB) has been reported. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MCB. METHOD: Between January 2012 and August 2018, MCB and EUS-FNA were performed 16 and 31 times for diagnosing gastric SMT. The diagnostic rate, the rate of successful immunohistochemistry, and the safety were reviewed. Difficult locations for EUS-FNA were also evaluated. RESULTS: The mean SMT sizes measured on MCB and EUS-FNA were 21.2 and 36.2 mm. The diagnostic rates of MCB and EUS-FNA were almost the same (88 vs. 81%), but successful immunohistochemistry was significantly higher in the MCB group (93 vs. 59%, p = 0.03). In the subgroup of SMTs < 20 mm, the successful histological diagnosis rate from EUS-FNA was relatively low. There were no complications. Failures of EUS-FNA were more frequent in the middle third of the stomach. CONCLUSIONS: MCB was an effective procedure for diagnosing gastric SMT, especially in the case of small SMTs located at the middle third of the stomach.

Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct with rapidly progressive multicentric recurrence: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Knowledge on the pattern of recurrence and prognosis of intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct (IPNB) is limited. Few studies have reported IPNB recurrence in the remnant intrahepatic bile duct, which is indicative of the true multicentricity of IPNB. Herein, we report a case of IPNB with rapidly progressive recurrence in the remnant intrahepatic bile duct and review the literature for discussing the prognosis of IPNB with multicentricity. CASE PRESENTATION: A 72-year-old male was diagnosed with IPNB in the hepatic duct of segment 3 that had spread to the left hepatic duct. The patient underwent left hepatectomy, total caudate lobectomy, and extra-hepatic bile duct resection with biliary reconstruction. Histologically, the tumor was IPNB with noninvasive adenocarcinoma with a negative surgical margin. Although dilatation of B8 and biliary enzyme elevation were observed beginning at 7-10 months postoperatively, there was no evidence of recurrence. At 17 months postoperatively, the recurrent tumor diffusely spread throughout the remnant intrahepatic bile duct. Internal drainage stents were placed within the intrahepatic bile ducts with relapsed IPNB to relieve jaundice, and a course of chemotherapy was considered. However, the patient did not receive any therapies up to his death at 21 months postoperatively because of rapid disease progression. CONCLUSION: According to a literature review, some cases of multicentric IPNB have shown rapidly progressive recurrence and poor prognosis. We should consider multicentricity of IPNB even a few months after curative resection, and narrow examinations should also be considered.

Health-related quality of life of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: Results from a randomised phase III trial (JASPAC 01).

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 for resected pancreatic cancer demonstrated survival benefits compared with gemcitabine in the JASPAC 01 trial. We investigated the effect of these agents on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients in the JASPAC 01 trial. METHODS: Patients with resected pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 weekly for three of four weeks for up to six cycles) or S-1 (40, 50, or 60 mg twice daily for four of six weeks for up to four cycles). HRQOL was assessed using the EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D) questionnaire at baseline, months three and six, and every 6 months thereafter. HRQOL end-points included change in EQ-5D index from baseline, responses to five items in the EQ-5D, and quality-adjusted life months up to 24 months. RESULTS: Of randomised 385 patients, 354 patients were included in HRQOL analysis. Mean change in the EQ-5D index was similar in the S-1 and gemcitabine groups within 6 months from treatment initiation (difference, 0.024; P = 0.112), whereas corresponding mean from 12 to 24 months was better in the S-1 group than in the gemcitabine group (difference, 0.071; P < 0.001). Problems in mobility and pain/discomfort were also less frequent in the S-1 group than in the gemcitabine group in that period. Quality-adjusted life months were longer in the S-1 group than in the gemcitabine group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 does not improve HRQOL within 6 months from treatment initiation but does improve HRQOL thereafter and quality-adjusted life months. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000000655 at UMIN CTR.