A cost and efficacy analysis of performing arthroscopic excision of wrist ganglions under wide-awake anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic excision has currently become popular for the treatment of wrist ganglions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness of arthroscopic wrist ganglion excisions under Wide-Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet versus general anaesthesia. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent arthroscopic ganglionectomy from April 2009 to October 2016 at our institute. They were separated into two groups according to anaesthesia techniques: general anaesthesia and Wide-Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet. We compared the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of the two groups. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included. Both groups were matched with regard to the demographics and preoperative clinical assessments. We found no significant differences between groups in postoperative visual analog scale, modified Mayo wrist score, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, recurrence, residual pain, or complications. Recurrence was found in five of 74 patients, one (4.3%) in the Wide-Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet group and four (7.8%) in the general anaesthesia group. One extensor tendon injury and four extensor tenosynovitis cases occurred in the general anaesthesia group. Regarding cost effectiveness, the mean operating time in the Wide-Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet and general anaesthesia groups were 88.7 ± 24.51 and 121.5 ± 25.75 min, respectively (p < 0.001). The average total costs of the Wide-Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet and general anaesthesia groups were €487.4 ± 89.15 and €878.7 ± 182.13, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For arthroscopic wrist ganglion resections, both anaesthesia techniques were effective and safe regarding recurrence rates, complications, and residual pain. The most important finding of this study was that arthroscopic ganglionectomy under Wide-Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet was superior to that under general anaesthesia for cost-effectiveness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective comparative study.

Erratum - A Novel Model for Studying Voltage-Gated Ion Channel Gene Expression during Reversible Ischemic Stroke.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.7150/ijms.27442.].

A Novel Model for Studying Voltage-Gated Ion Channel Gene Expression during Reversible Ischemic Stroke.

The dysfunction of voltage-gated ion channels contributes to the pathology of ischemic stroke. In this study, we developed rat models of transient ischemic attack (TIA) and reversible ischemic neurological deficit (RIND) that was induced via the injection of artificial embolic particles during full consciousness, that allow us to monitor the neurologic deficit and positron emission tomography (PET) scans in real-time. We then evaluated the infarction volume of brain tissue was confirmed by 2,3,5-triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining, and gene expressions were evaluated by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). We found that rats with TIA or RIND exhibited neurological deficits as determined by negative TTC and PET findings. However, the expression of voltage-gated sodium channels in the hippocampus was significantly up-regulated in the qPCR array study. Furthermore, an altered expression of sodium channel ß-subunits and potassium channels, were observed in RIND compared to TIA groups. In conclusion, to our knowledge, this is the first report of the successful evaluation of voltage-gated ion channel gene expression in TIA and RIND animal models. This model will aid future studies in investigating pathophysiological mechanisms, and in developing new therapeutic compounds for the treatment of TIA and RIND.

Early surgery with antibiotics treatment had better clinical outcomes than antibiotics treatment alone in patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pyogenic spondylodiscitis is a form of spinal infection that can result in severe back pain and even death. However, information is lacking on the relative effectiveness of various therapies. A retrospective chart review was conducted to investigate whether early surgical treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis coupled with intravenous antibiotics results in better patient prognoses than intravenous antibiotics therapy alone. METHODS: All patients treated for pyogenic spondylodiscitis at a single medical center from July 2006 to July 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria consisted of diagnosis of an early stage infection without neurological deficit, and patients without severe sepsis who were suitable candidates for early surgery as determined by a Pittsburgh bacteremia score < 4, and patients with delayed diagnosis and lost to outpatient follow-up were excluded. Clinical outcomes included patient demographic data, kyphosis angle, length of treatment, Oswestry Disability Index and visual analogue pain scale were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 90 enrolled patients, Group 1 (n = 47) received only antibiotic therapy and Group 2 (n = 43) received early surgery with post-surgery antibiotics for 2 to 4 weeks. Group 2 exhibited significantly better results than Group 1 for mean antibiotic administration period, mean hospitalization period, kyphotic angle correction. Of 61 patients who participated in telephone follow-up after discharge, Group 2 (n = 26) had significant lower mean ODI score, and mean back pain score than Group 1 (n = 35). CONCLUSIONS: While infection control was similar for both groups, patients treated with early surgery and antibiotics were hospitalized for fewer days and required less antibiotics than those treated with antibiotics alone, also having better functional outcomes. In short, early surgical treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis typically achieves a better prognosis, shorter hospitalization period, and subsequent significant improvement in kyphotic deformity and quality of life.

Biomechanical Comparison of Open and Arthroscopic Transosseous Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Foveal Tears: A Cadaveric Study.

PURPOSE: To biomechanically compare the stability between open repair and arthroscopic transosseous repair technique for reattachment of the foveal triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC). We also evaluated the feasibility of a new aiming device for the creation of 2 bone tunnels simultaneously during the arthroscopic technique. METHODS: Six matched pairs of fresh-frozen forearm cadaver specimens were prepared for testing. Group I specimens were treated by open repair with suture anchor. Group II specimens were treated by arthroscopic transosseous suture with a new aiming device. Before and after disruption of the TFCC fovea and after its repair, dorsal and palmar translation of the ulna was measured in both groups in response to a load (3 kg) applied in the palmar and then in the dorsal direction. The total translation of the ulna was calculated as the sum of the mean dorsal and palmar translations. RESULTS: The mean total ulnar translation before and after TFCC disruption, and after TFCC repair was 5.94 ± 2.16 mm, 9.08 ± 2.64 mm, and 6.04 ± 2.18 mm, respectively. The specimens demonstrated a significant increase in the total translation of the ulna after disruption of the ulnar attachment of TFCC (P = .003), whereas a significant decrease was observed after TFCC foveal repair (P = .003). The median percentage of eliminated translation after TFCC repair was 64% and 172%, respectively, in groups I and II (P = .043). CONCLUSIONS: The athroscopic transosseous suture technique demonstrated superior repair efficacy to the open repair technique in terms of biomechanical strength. This cadaveric study also demonstrated the feasibility of a new aiming device. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When making decisions about TFCC foveal repair, arthroscopic transosseous suture technique may provide better biomechanical strength than the open repair technique.

Single posterior approach for circumferential decompression and anterior reconstruction using cervical trabecular metal mesh cage in patients with metastatic spinal tumour.

BACKGROUND: The goal of surgical management of metastatic spinal tumours is to remove the tumour mass, restore spinal stability and alignment, and provide a better quality of life. A single posterior transpedicular approach, with circumferential decompression, for anterior reconstruction has been advocated to reduce the risk of complication and morbidity associated with a combined anterior-posterior approach. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent a single posterior approach for anterior reconstruction at our institution to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of the approach, including the use of a cervical trabecular metal (TM) mesh cage as a vertebral body replacer. As a secondary aim, we evaluated the effect of accumulated experience with the surgical approach on clinical outcomes. METHODS: Twenty consecutive cases of single posterior approach were identified from a retrospective review of spinal surgeries performed at our institution between January 2009 and December 2012. Information on the following clinical outcomes was retrieved from the medical charts for analysis: visual analogue pain score (VAS); neurological status, classified on the Frankel scale; vertebral body reconstruction; spinal alignment, using Cobb's angle; operative time; volume of blood loss; complications; and the modified Brodsky criteria score, which was used to classify functional recovery as excellent, good, fair, or poor. RESULTS: Pre- to post-surgical evaluation of outcomes demonstrated a significant decrease in pain (p < 0.001), improved spinal alignment, with a mean correction angle of 12° (range, 3°-29°), and higher Frankel score (p < 0.001). No severe complications were identified, including deep surgical infection or neurologic deterioration. Eighteen patients achieved good to excellent outcomes, based on the modified Brodsky criteria (p < 0.001), with two patients dying within 9 and 11 months of their surgery. Accumulated surgical experience reduced operative time and intraoperative blood loss (p ≤ 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: A single posterior approach provided good to excellent clinical and functional outcomes. Based on this evidence, we propose that a posterior approach provides a feasible alternative to the combined posterior-anterior approach for managing patients with metastatic spinal tumours.

Extended indications of percutaneous endoscopic lavage and drainage for the treatment of lumbar infectious spondylitis.

PURPOSE: The treatment of spinal infection remains a challenge for spinal surgeons because of the variable presentations and complicated course. The diagnostic and therapeutic value of percutaneous endoscopic lavage and drainage (PELD) has been proved in some recent studies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of PELD in patients with advanced infectious spondylitis which may traditionally require open surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 21 patients who underwent PELD to treat their advanced lumbar infectious spondylitis. Patients with severe infection resulting in significant neurological deficit and mechanical instability were excluded from the PELD procedure, which was only used on selected patients with less severe disease. The 21 patients were categorized into three groups based on their past history, clinical presentation, and imaging studies: those with paraspinal abscesses, postoperative recurrent infection, and multilevel infection. Clinical outcomes were assessed by careful physical examination, Odom's criteria, regular serologic testing, and imaging studies to determine whether continued conservative treatment or surgical intervention was necessary. RESULTS: Causative bacteria were identified in 19 (90.5%) of 21 biopsy specimens. Appropriate parenteral antibiotics for the predominant pathogen isolated from the infected tissue biopsy cultures were prescribed for the patients. All patients reported satisfactory recovery and relief of back pain, except three with multilevel infections who underwent anterior debridement and fusion within 2 weeks after treatment with PELD. The overall infection control rate was 86%. One patient with epidural abscess and spondylolytic spondylolisthesis of the L5-S1 received instrumented fusion surgery due to mechanical instability 5 months later. No surgery-related major complications were found, except 2 patients who had transient paraesthesia in the affected lumbar segment. CONCLUSIONS: PELD was successful in obtaining a bacteriologic diagnosis, relieving the patient's symptoms, and assisting in eradication of lumbar infectious spondylitis. The indications of this minimally invasive procedure could be extended to treat patients suffering from spinal infections with paraspinal abscesses and postoperative recurrent infection. Patients with multilevel infection may have trivial benefits from PELD due to poor infection control and mechanical instability of the affected segments.

Minimally invasive endoscopic treatment for lumbar infectious spondylitis: a retrospective study in a tertiary referral center.

BACKGROUND: Spinal infections remain a challenge for clinicians because of their variable presentation and complicated course. Common management approaches include conservative administration of antibiotics or aggressive surgical debridement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic debridement with dilute betadine solution irrigation (PEDI) for treating patients with lumbar infectious spondylitis. METHODS: From January 2005 to July 2010, a total of 32 patients undergoing PEDI were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The surgical indications of the enrolled patients included single-level infectious spondylodiscitis, postoperative infectious spondylodiscitis, advanced infection with epidural abscess, psoas muscle abscess, pre-vertebral or para-vertebral abscess, multilevel infectious spondylitis, and recurrent infection after anterior debridement and fusion. Clinical outcomes were assessed by careful physical examination, Macnab criteria, regular serologic testing, and imaging studies to determine whether continued antibiotics treatment or surgical intervention was required. RESULTS: Causative bacteria were identified in 28 (87.5%) of 32 biopsy specimens. Appropriate parenteral antibiotics for the predominant pathogen isolated from infected tissue biopsy cultures were prescribed to patients. Twenty-seven (84.4%) patients reported satisfactory relief of their back pain after PEDI. Twenty-six (81.3%) patients recovered uneventfully after PEDI and sequential antibiotic therapy. No surgery-related major complications were found, except 3 patients with transient paresthesia in the affected lumbar segment. CONCLUSIONS: PEDI was successful in obtaining a bacteriologic diagnosis, relieving the patient's symptoms, and assisting in the eradication of lumbar infectious spondylitis. This procedure could be an effective alternative for patients who have a poor response to conservative treatment before a major open surgery.

Interim Use of Antibiotic-Loaded Cement Spacer for Patients with Infected Cervical Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: The management of postoperative deep infection after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) remains challenging for spine surgeons. Our institution uses handmade antibiotic-loaded cement spacers to treat these complex cases. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and feasibility of this treatment. METHODS: This study included 4 patients with deep cervical spine infections after ACDF who underwent our treatment between March 2012 and January 2022. Patients' laboratory data, visual analog scale scores, comorbidities, complications, and neurological status were recorded. Their clinical conditions were also evaluated based on the Neck Disability Index, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, and Odom criteria. RESULTS: Infection eradication was achieved in all patients after treatment. The average preoperative visual analog scale score was 7.5 (range: 7-8); this decreased to 1.25 (range: 1-2) at 1 year postoperatively. None of the patients experienced severe complications, such as neurological deterioration or bone graft dislodgement. The Neck Disability Index improved from a preoperative value of 54% (range: 48-60%) to 6% (range: 4-8%) at 1 year postoperatively. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score improved from a preoperative score of 10.25 (range: 10-11)-14.75 (range: 14-16) at 1 year postoperatively. All patients achieved excellent outcomes based on Odom criteria at 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Good clinical outcomes were achieved in this study. Although 2-stage surgery is required, this technique could be an alternative for patients with postoperative deep infection after ACDF.

Dislodgment Effects of Different Cage Arrangements in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Study.

The vertebral cage has been widely used in posterior lumbar interbody fusion. The risk of cage dislodgment is high for patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to use a lumbar fusion model to investigate the effects of cage dislodgment on different cage arrangements after PLIF. Finite element analysis was used to compare three PEEK cage placements, together with the fibula-type cage, with respect to the four kinds of lumbar movements. The results revealed that a horizontal cage arrangement could provide a better ability to resist cage dislodgment. Overall lumbar flexion movements were confirmed to produce a greater amount of cage slip than the other three lumbar movements. The lower part of the lumbar fusion segment could create a greater amount of cage dislodgment for all of the lumbar movements. Using an autograft with a fibula as a vertebral cage cannot effectively reduce cage dislodgment. Considering the maximum movement type in lumbar flexion, we suggest that a horizontal arrangement of the PEEK cage might be considered when a single PEEK cage is placed in the fusion segment, as doing so can effectively reduce the extent of cage dislodgment.

Game-theory-based search engine to automate the mass assignment in complex native electrospray mass spectra.

Electrospray ionization coupled to native mass spectrometry (MS) has evolved into an important tool in structural biology to decipher the composition of protein complexes. However, the mass analysis of heterogeneous protein assemblies is hampered because of their overlapping charge state distributions, fine structure, and peak broadening. To facilitate the mass analysis, it is of importance to automate preprocessing raw mass spectra, assigning ion series to peaks and deciphering the subunit compositions. So far, the automation of preprocessing raw mass spectra has not been accomplished; Massign was introduced to simplify data analysis and decipher the subunit compositions. In this study, we develop a search engine, AutoMass, to automatically assign ion series to peaks without any additional user input, for example, limited ranges of charge states or ion mass. AutoMass includes an ion intensity-dependent method to check for Gaussian distributions of ion series and an ion intensity-independent method to address highly overlapping and non-Gaussian distributions. The minimax theorem from game theory is adopted to define the boundaries. With AutoMass, the boundaries of ion series in the well-resolved tandem mass spectra of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) capsids and those of the mass spectrum from CRISPR-related cascade protein complex are accurately assigned. Theoretical and experimental HBV ion masses are shown in agreement up to ~0.03%. The analysis is finished within a minute on a regular workstation. Moreover, less well-resolved mass spectra, for example, complicated multimer mass spectra and norovirus capsid mass spectra at different levels of desolvation, are analyzed. In sum, this first-ever fully automatic program reveals the boundaries of overlapping ion peak series and can further aid developing high-throughput native MS and top-down proteomics.

Clinical evaluation of percutaneous vertebroplasty for symptomatic adjacent vertebral compression fracture.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) for treating patients with symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) adjacent to lumbar instrumented circumferential fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few studies have investigated adjacent VCFs and their management after spinal fusion surgery for degenerative lumbar disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2005 to July 2011, a total of 23 patients with lumbar instrumented circumferential fusion suffered from adjacent symptomatic osteoporotic VCFs. All of these patients received PV using polymethylmethacrylate bone cement augmentation in our institute. Radiography and magnetic resonance imaging were used for imaging studies. The visual analog scale and modified Brodsky criteria were used to compare clinical outcomes before and after surgery. The minimum follow-up period was 18 months (range, 18-45 mo). RESULTS: One level PV was performed in 18 patients and 2 levels were performed in 5 patients. The patients' visual analog scale scores improved by an average of 54.3 points after the procedure. Twenty patients returned to their preinjury activities of daily living. Lumbar lordosis was increased from 28.9 degrees before PV to 36.2 degrees after PV. The average restoration of the fractured vertebral body height was 14.0%. No surgery-related complications occurred except asymptomatic cement leakage in 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: PV is a minimally invasive and effective procedure to treat patients with symptomatic osteoporotic VCFs adjacent to lumbar instrumented circumferential fusion.

Percutaneous Sacroplasty for Symptomatic Sacral Pedicle Screw Loosening.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous sacroplasty in patients with sacral pedicle screws loosening after instrumented spinal fusion. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 18 patients who underwent percutaneous sacroplasty to treat sacral pedicle screws loosening from January 2016 to December 2019. Imaging studies, visual analog scale (VAS), length of hospital stay, and complications were recorded. The clinical outcomes based on the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and the modified Brodsky's criteria (MBC) were also evaluated to determine the efficacy of percutaneous sacroplasty. Results: All patients had undergone at least 1 year of follow-up in our institute (range, 12-24 months). The average VAS score was 5.6 (range, 4-7) before surgery and decreased to 1.7 (range, 1-3) at the final visit. All patients were discharged on the next day after surgery. No patients experienced complications, such as cement leakage, deep infection, or neurologic deterioration. All patients achieved good or excellent outcomes based on the MBC. The ODI scores improved from 51.8 preoperatively to 25.6 postoperatively. Conclusion: Percutaneous sacroplasty was an effective treatment approach for relieving the patient's symptoms caused by sacral pedicle screws loosening and could be a valuable treatment alternative to extensive revision surgery. Level of clinical evidence: IV.

Single Posterior Approach for Circumferential Debridement and Anterior Reconstruction Using Fibular Allograft in Patients With Skipped Multifocal Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis.

OBJECTIVE: Skipped multifocal pyogenic spondylodiscitis is a rare presentation of spinal infection. In our institution, we used the single posterior approach for circumferential debridement and anterior reconstruction with fibular allograft for treatment. This study aimed to ascertain the viability and reliability of this technique for these difficult cases. METHODS: Nine patients with skipped pyogenic spondylodiscitis who received our treatment method from January 2012 to December 2019 were enrolled in this study. Visual analog scale scores, causative agents, laboratory data, comorbidities, and complications were recorded. The patients' clinical conditions were evaluated based on modified Brodsky's criteria, visual analogue scale, and Oswestry Disability Index. RESULTS: All the patients achieved infection eradication without repeat surgical treatment. The average visual analog scale score was 8.4 (range, 8-9) before operation, which decreased to 1.9 (range, 1-3) 1 year after the surgery. No patient experienced severe complications such as neurologic deterioration or fixation failure. All patients achieved a good or excellent outcome based on modified Brodsky's criteria. The Oswestry Disability Index improved from 80.4 (range, 70-86) preoperatively to 25.1 (range, 20-32) 1 year after the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In our case series, good clinical outcomes and high successful rates could be achieved through the single-stage posterior-only approach. This could be considered an alternative method to manage patients with skipped pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

Differences in Pain Assessments Between Inpatients and Nurses Leads to Considerable Misestimated Pain.

BACKGROUND: Pain assessments are an important aspect of health care quality because the high prevalence of pain in inpatients may contribute to complications. Several studies revealed a gap in the pain intensity evaluated by nurses (PEN) and patients (PEP). The aim of the present study was to analyze the correlation and agreement between pain assessments conducted by nurses and patients, and to determine patients at high risk of misestimated pain. OBJECTIVES: To compare the difference of pain intensity between the questionnaires conducted by additional assessors and electronic records by nursing staff. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: A medical center in Taichung, Taiwan. METHODS: We approached 1,034 patients admitted from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 in our hospital. We compared the assessments of pain intensity using questionnaires conducted by additional assessors with those entered into electronic records by nursing staff. Continuous data were reported as the mean (± standard deviation). The analysis of agreement and correlation were performed by kappa statistics or weighted kappa statistics, and correlation (Spearman rank correlation method). RESULTS: Among the 1,034 patients, 307 patients were excluded. Thus, the final analysis included 686 patients. Patients' median pain intensity was 5 in PEP and 1 in PEN. The patients' pain intensity was underestimated (PEN < PEP) in 539 patients (78.6%), matched (PEN = PEP) in 126 patients (18.3%), and overestimated (PEN > PEP) in 21 patients (3.1%). The surgical interventions (chi squared = 7.996, and P = 0.018) and pain in the past 24 hours (chi squared = 17.776, and P < 0.001) led to a significant difference. LIMITATIONS: The limitation of the study was the single-center and retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: The gap in pain assessments between inpatients and nurses is an important issue in daily practice. The underestimations of pain were more common than overestimations (78.6% vs 3.1%). Surgical interventions and persistent pain lasting over 24 hours were high risk factors for underestimation, but patients' gender, receiving anesthesia, type of anesthesia, and patient-controlled analgesia did not contribute significantly to differences in pain estimation.

Clinical evaluation of repeat percutaneous vertebroplasty for symptomatic cemented vertebrae.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) with polymethylmethacrylate is widely used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture and satisfactory clinical outcomes have been reported in the literature. However, recurrent or persistent back pain after PV is not uncommon. Sometimes, the pain may result from pathogenesis within the previously treated vertebra. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of repeat PV for treating patients with recurrent back pain caused by the previously cemented vertebrae. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 18 patients who underwent repeat PV to treat symptomatic cemented vertebrae. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on clinical presentation and imaging studies: those with refracture (RF), residual vacuum (RV), and osteonecrosis (ON) along the bone-cement interface. A bipedicle approach was used for repeat PV in all patients. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and modified Brodsky criteria were used to evaluate clinical outcomes before and after surgery. The Kruskal-Wallis test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Spearman correlation analyses were used to analyze patient surgical prognosis and radiologic findings. RESULTS: Nine patients were diagnosed with RF, 5 with RV, and 4 with ON. The average VAS score was 77.1 (range, 62-90) before repeat PV (80.1, 72.4, and 76.3 for the RF, RV, and ON groups, respectively) and 34.4 (range, 25-45) after repeat PV treatment (33.1, 36.8, and 34.3 for the RF, RV, and ON groups, respectively). The VAS score significantly decreased in all 3 groups. The vertebral body height was significantly restored by a mean of 13.9% across all groups (17.8%, 12.7%, and 6.8% in the RF, RV, and ON groups, respectively). Fifteen patients recovered from vertebral compression fracture and regained their preinjury activities of daily living. No surgery-related complications occurred except asymptomatic cement leakage in 5 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this research demonstrate that repeat PV may be an effective method for relieving recurrent or persistent pain in patients with symptomatic cemented vertebrae, allowing them to regain functional activity.

Comparison of Dynesys posterior stabilization and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spinal stenosis L4L5.

The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the radiological and clinical outcome after treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis L4L5 with or without spondylolisthesis, with either posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) (26 patients) or Dynesys posterior stabilization (27 patients). Demographic characteristics were comparable in both groups. Dynesys stabilization resulted in significantly higher preservation of motion at the index level (p < 0.001), and significantly less (p < 0.05) hypermobility at the adjacent segments. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and VAS for back and leg pain improved significantly (p < 0.05) with both methods, but there was no significant difference between groups. Operation time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay were all significantly (p < 0.001) less in the Dynesys group. The latter benefits may be of particular importance for elderly patients, or those with significant comorbidities. Complications were comparable in both groups. Dynesys posterior stabilization was effective for treating spinal stenosis L4L5 with or without spondylolisthesis.

Single posterior approach for circumferential debridement and anterior reconstruction using fibular allograft in patients with skipped multifocal spinal tuberculosis.

BACKGROUND: Skipped multifocal spinal tuberculosis (TB) is an atypical presentation of spinal TB. Surgical treatment for these unusual cases remains a challenge for spine surgeons. In our institute, we used single-stage circumferential debridement and anterior reconstruction with fibular allograft followed by posterior instrumentation through posterior-only approach for these patients. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and feasibility of this technique. METHODS: Twelve patients with skipped multifocal spinal TB who received our treatment method from January 2012 to June 2020 were enrolled in this study. The visual analog score (VAS), laboratory data, comorbidities, complications, and neurologic status based on Frankel scale were recorded. The patients' clinical conditions were evaluated based on modified Brodsky's criteria and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULTS: All the patients were infection free at the end of the treatment. The average VAS score was 7.5 (range, 7-8) before surgery and decreased to 2.1 (range, 1-3) one year postoperatively. No one experienced any severe complications such as neurologic deterioration, fixation failure, or bone graft dislodgement. Out of the three patients requiring debridement surgery, two had wound infection and one had seroma formation. The ODI score improved from 76.8 (range, 70-84) preoperatively to 25.5 (range, 22-28) one year after surgery. All patients achieved good or excellent outcome based on modified Brodsky's criteria one year postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the patients could achieve a good clinical outcome. This technique could be an alternative for patients with skipped spinal TB.

Using external and internal locking plates in a two-stage protocol for treatment of segmental tibial fractures.

BACKGROUND: The tibial segmental fractures usually follow high-energy trauma and are often associated with many complications. We designed a two-stage protocol for these complex injuries. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of tibial segmental fractures treated according to this protocol. METHODS: A prospective series of 25 consecutive segmental tibial fractures were treated using a two-stage procedure. In the first stage, a low-profile locking plate was applied as an external fixator to temporarily immobilize the fractures after anatomic reduction had been achieved followed by soft-tissue reconstruction. The second stage involved definitive internal fixation with a locking plate using a minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis technique. The median follow-up was 32 months (range, 20-44 months). RESULTS: All fractures achieved union. The median time for the proximal fracture union was 23 weeks (range, 12-30 weeks) and that for distal fracture union was 27 weeks (range, 12-46 weeks; p = 0.08). Functional results were excellent in 21 patients and good in 4 patients. There were three cases of delayed union of distal fracture. Valgus malunion >5 degrees occurred in two patients, and length discrepancy >1 cm was observed in two patients. Pin tract infection occurred in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the two-stage procedure for treatment of segmental tibial fractures is recommended. Surgeons can achieve good reduction with stable temporary fixation, soft-tissue reconstruction, ease of subsequent definitive fixation, and high union rates. Our patients obtained excellent knee and ankle joint motion, good functional outcomes, and a comfortable clinical course.

Insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway is more successful with the Flexi-Slip™ stylet than with the introducer.

PURPOSE: The ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway (PLMA™) may be difficult to insert because of its large soft cuff, even when using a dedicated introducer tool. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether introduction of a stylet (Flexi-Slip™) in the drainage tube improved insertion characteristics compared with the standard introducer. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 160 adults were allocated randomly to either the Introducer group (n = 80) or to the Flexi-Slip stylet group (n = 80). In the Introducer group, the PLMA was inserted with an introducer as described in the manufacturer's instructions. In the Flexi-Slip stylet group, a Flexi-Slip stylet was inserted into the drainage tube of the PLMA and bent to form a near 90° angle at the junction of the cuff and the airway tube. The primary outcome measurement was the success rate at first attempt. Insertion time, visible blood staining, and complications were also noted. RESULTS: Success at first attempt was more frequent with the Flexi-Slip stylet than with the introducer (100% vs 86%, respectively; P = 0.001). Overall time (mean ± standard deviation) taken for successful placement was shorter with the Flexi-Slip stylet than with the introducer (19.9 ± 5.6 sec vs 28.4 ± 15.2 sec, respectively; P < 0.001). The incidences of blood staining and postoperative sore throat were lower in the Flexi-Slip stylet group than in the Introducer group (4% vs 15%, respectively; P = 0.015 and 8% vs 23%, respectively; P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Insertion of the PLMA with a Flexi-Slip stylet has a higher success rate at first attempt, requires less time, and results in fewer airway complications than the introducer technique.