Effect of preoperative erector spinae muscles mass on postoperative outcomes in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: Frailty influences the postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Recently, erector spinae muscle (ESM) mass has been proposed as a parameter to assess frailty accurately. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether preoperative ESM mass is associated with short- and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with LVAD. METHODS: A total of 119 consecutive patients with LVAD were enrolled between January 2010 and October 2017 at a single heart center. The ESM area, ESM index, and Hounsfield units (HU) of the ESM were calculated by computed tomography for preoperative ESM mass evaluation. We then statistically evaluated the in-hospital mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), duration of hospital stay, and long-term survival. RESULTS: In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, ESM mass indicated no effect on all clinical outcomes. In addition, the ESM area presented a weak but significant negative linear correlation only with the duration of hospital stay (r = -0.21, p < .05). In contrast, the Model For End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and preoperative venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (va-ECMO) were significant predictive factors for in-hospital mortality (MELD score: p < .001, hazard ratio [HR] 1.1; preoperative va-ECMO: p < .01, HR 2.72) and MACE (MELD score: p < .001, HR 1.07; preoperative va-ECMO: p < .005, HR 2.62). CONCLUSION: Preoperative ESM mass might predict the length of hospital stay in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. In contrast, it had no effect on MACE, in-hospital mortality, or long-term survival in this study.

Pectoral muscle mass is not a robust prognostic factor for survival after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are an established treatment for end-stage left ventricular heart failure. Parameters are needed to identify the most appropriate patients for LVADs. This study aimed to evaluate pectoral muscle mass and density as prognostic parameters. METHODS: This single-center study included all patients with LVAD implantation between January 2010 and October 2017 and a preoperative chest CT scan. Pectoral muscle mass was assessed using the Pectoralis Muscle Index (PMI, surface area indexed to height, cm2/m2) and pectoral muscle density by Hounsfield Units (HU). Overall mortality was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and 1-year and 3-year mortality with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Cox regression models. RESULTS: 57 patients (89.5% male, mean age 57.8 years) were included. 64.9% of patients had end-stage left ventricular failure due to ischemic heart disease and 35.1% due to dilated cardiomyopathy. 49.2% of patients had preoperative INTERMACS profile of 1 or 2 and 33.3% received mechanical circulatory support prior to LVAD implantation. Total mean PMI was 4.7 cm2/m2 (± 1.6), overall HU of the major pectoral muscle was 39.0 (± 14.9) and of the minor pectoral muscle 37.1 (± 16.6). Mean follow-up was 2.8 years (± 0.2). Mortality rates were 37.5% at 1 year and 48.0% at 3 years. Neither PMI nor HU were significantly associated with overall mortality at 1-year or 3-year. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study do not confirm the association between higher pectoral muscle mass and better survival after LVAD implantation previously described in the literature.

Preoperative atrial fibrillation predicts worse outcomes after LVAD implantation.

Introduction: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is a common therapy for end-stage heart failure. Heart failure patients often present with atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of preoperative AF as well as vascular complications on outcome in LVAD patients. Methods: Between 01/2010 and 12/2017, 168 patients (141 male) with end-stage heart failure underwent LVAD implantation at a single center. Patient outcome was retrospectively studied by using the Kaplan-Meier method for analyzing crude survival as well as Cox regression for analyzing risk factors. Results: Sixty-two patients suffered from preoperative atrial fibrillation at LVAD implantation. Mean age was 56.8±11.9 years (range: 22-79) and 141 (84%) were male. Postoperative vascular or visceral surgical management due to malperfusion was needed in 27 patients (16.1%) and did not correlate with postoperative mortality (P=0.121, HR=1.587, CI=0.885-2.845). Patients with preoperative AF had a worse outcome in the Kaplan-Meier analysis (P=0.069). In contrast, cox regression showed that postoperative AF could not to be considered to be an independent predictor of mortality in this study group. Conclusion: Our data suggest that preoperative AF may be a potential predictor of mortality and impaired long-term outcome in LVAD patients. In contrast, preoperative ECLS and vascular or visceral surgery after LVAD implantation did not represent limiting factors with regard to mortality after LVAD implantation.

Impact of psoas muscle evaluation on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation.

AIMS: The measurement of muscle mass reflects the physical components of frailty, which might affect postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between preoperative skeletal muscle evaluation and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2017, a total of 63 patients were enrolled in this single-centre study. A retrospective analysis of preoperative abdominal computed tomography (CT) for psoas muscle index (PSMI) and Hounsfield-Units of the Psoas Muscle (PSHU) at the level of the mid-L4 vertebra was performed. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (male; n = 49, 78%), with a mean age of 58.0 ±â€Š11.8 years, were treated with LVAD due to dilated (32%) or ischemic cardiomyopathy (68%). Among them, 43 patients (68.3%) were categorized in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile I. The survival rate was 73.0% at 30 days and 44.4% at 1 year. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses revealed that PSMI was a significant numeric predictor of 1-year mortality (P = 0.04). In contrast, PSHU displayed a significant predictive potential for pericardial effusion (P = 0.03) and respiratory insufficiency (P = 0.01). In addition, comparative ROC curve analysis revealed no significant difference in the predictive potential of PSMI and PSHU. CONCLUSION: Preoperative PSMI might be a predictor of 1-year mortality in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. In contrast, the PSHU seemed to potentially assume postoperative adverse events in this study. Thus, the evaluation of the preoperative psoas muscle using CT appears to be promising.

Treatment of Postoperative New Onset Atrial Fibrillation with Repolarization Delaying Agents after Heart Surgery.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the multichannel-blocker dronedarone for postoperative new onset atrial fibrillation (POAF) as compared to amiodarone. METHODS: Out of 990 patients who underwent cardiothoracic surgery between March 2011 and March 2012, 166 patients who developed POAF and treated with amiodarone or dronedarone were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were treated with amiodarone and 77 patients were treated with dronedarone at discharge. Seventy-five percent of patients with dronedarone were treated initially with intravenous amiodarone but quickly converted to oral dronedarone as soon as the mechanical ventilation was weaned off. The rate of conversion in sinus rhythm was not influenced by the resulting amiodarone-to-dronedarone crossover as compared to oral dronedarone only (p <0.247 at the ICU and p <0.640 at the normal care unit). At hospital discharge sinus rhythm was documented in 44% of the amiodarone patients and 99% of the dronedarone patients (p <0.001). The maintenance of sinus rhythm was demonstrated in 82% of the amiodarone patients versus 81% of the dronedarone patients at 6-month follow-up (p <0.804). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated the higher conversion rate to sinus rhythm in the early phase in the dronedarone group despite a comparable conversion rate in the mid-term phase compared to amiodarone.