Three-Dimensional-Digital Image Correlation Methodology for Kinematic Measurements of Non-Penetrating Blunt Impacts.

Blunt force trauma remains a serious threat to many populations and is commonly seen in motor vehicle crashes, sports, and military environments. Effective design of helmets and protective armor should consider biomechanical tolerances of organs in which they intend to protect and require accurate measurements of deformation as a primary injury metric during impact. To overcome challenges found in velocity and displacement measurements during blunt impact using an integrated accelerometer and two-dimensional (2D) high-speed video, three-dimensional (3D) digital image correlation (DIC) measurements were taken and compared to the accepted techniques. A semispherical impactor was launched at impact velocities from 14 to 20 m/s into synthetic ballistic gelatin to simulate blunt impacts observed in behind armor blunt trauma (BABT), falls, and sports impacts. Repeated measures Analysis of Variance resulted in no significant differences in maximum displacement (p = 0.10), time of maximum displacement (p = 0.21), impact velocity (p = 0.13), and rebound velocity (p = 0.21) between methods. The 3D-DIC measurements demonstrated equal or improved percent difference and low root-mean-square deviation compared to the accepted measurement techniques. Therefore, 3D-DIC may be utilized in BABT and other blunt impact applications for accurate 3D kinematic measurements, especially when an accelerometer or 2D lateral camera analysis is impractical or susceptible to error.

Response of Thoraco-Abdominal Tissue in High-Rate Compression.

Body armor is used to protect the human from penetrating injuries, however, in the process of defeating a projectile, the back face of the armor can deform into the wearer at extremely high rates. This deformation can cause a variety of soft and hard tissue injuries. Finite element modeling (FEM) represents one of the best tools to predict injuries from this high-rate compression mechanism. However, the validity of a model is reliant on accurate material properties for biological tissues. In this study, we measured the stress-strain response of thoraco-abdominal tissue during high-rate compression (1000 and 1900 s-1) using a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB). High-rate material properties of porcine adipose, heart, spleen, and stomach tissue were characterized. At a strain rate of 1000 s-1, adipose (E = 4.7 MPa) had the most compliant stress-strain response, followed by spleen (E = 9.6 MPa), and then heart tissue (E = 13.6 MPa). At a strain rate of 1900 s-1, adipose (E = 7.3 MPa) had the most compliant stress-strain response, followed by spleen (E = 10.7 MPa), heart (E = 14.1 MPa), and stomach (E = 32.6 MPa) tissue. Only adipose tissue demonstrated a consistent rate dependence for these high strain rates, with a stiffer response at 1900 s-1 compared to 1000 s-1. However, comparison of all these tissues to previously published quasi-static and intermediate dynamic experiments revealed a strong rate dependence with increasing stress response from quasi-static to dynamic to high strain rates. Together, these findings can be used to develop a more accurate finite element model of high-rate compression injuries.

Influence of cervical spine sagittal alignment on range of motion after corpectomy: a finite element study.

BACKGROUND: Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine might influence the development of radiological adjacent segment pathology (RASP) after central corpectomy (CC). Range of motion (ROM) of the adjacent segments is closely linked to the development of RASP. METHODS: To investigate the ROM of the adjacent segments after CC, we developed a C2-T1 finite element (FE) model. The model with a lordotic sagittal alignment served as the baseline model. Models with straight and kyphotic alignment were generated using mesh morphing methods. Single-level corpectomy at C5 was done on these models. Segmental ROMs of intact and corpectomized spines were compared for physiologic flexion-extension loads. RESULTS: The flexion ROM decreased by an average of 13% with the change in sagittal alignment from lordosis to kyphosis; however, a consistent decrease was not observed in extension. After CC, the ROM increased by an average of 95% and 31% in the superior and inferior adjacent segments. With kyphotic change in the sagittal alignment, the postoperative increase in flexion ROM exhibited a decreasing trend, while this was not seen in extension. CONCLUSIONS: Kyphotic changes of the intact spine resulted in segmental stiffening, and after corpectomy, it resulted in inconsistent variations of segmental extension ROMs.

Unique biomechanical signatures of Bryan, Prodisc C, and Prestige LP cervical disc replacements: a finite element modelling study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to examine the biomechanical alterations in the index and adjacent levels of the human cervical spine after cervical arthroplasty with Bryan, Prodisc C, or Prestige LP. METHODS: A previously validated C2-T1 osteoligamentous finite element model was used to perform virtual C5-6 arthroplasty using three different FDA-approved artificial cervical discs. Motion-controlled moment loading protocol was used. Moment was varied until Bryan, Prodisc C, and Prestige LP models displayed the same total range of motion across C3-C7 as the intact spine model at 2 Nm of pure moment loading. Range of motion (ROM) and facet force (FF) were recorded at the index level. ROM, FF, and intradiscal pressure (IDP) were recorded at the adjacent levels. RESULTS: Prodisc C and Prestige LP led to supraphysiologic ROM and FF at the index level while decreasing ROM and FF at the adjacent levels. In contrast, Bryan reduced ROM and FF at the index level. Bryan increased ROM and FF at the adjacent levels in flexion, but decreased ROM and FF in the adjacent levels in extension. Prodisc C decreased IDP at the adjacent levels. Bryan reduced IDP in extension only. Prestige LP increased adjacent-level IDP. CONCLUSIONS: The distinct designs and material compositions of the three artificial discs result in varying biomechanical alterations at the index and adjacent levels in the cervical spine after implantation. The findings confirm the design and material influence on the spine biomechanics, as well as the advantages and contraindications of cervical arthroplasty in general. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Rear-Impact Neck Whiplash: Role of Head Inertial Properties and Spine Morphological Variations on Segmental Rotations.

Whiplash injuries continue to be a concern in low-speed rear impact. This study was designed to investigate the role of variations in spine morphology and head inertia properties on cervical spine segmental rotation in rear-impact whiplash loading. Vertebral morphology is rarely considered as an input parameter in spine finite element (FE) models. A methodology toward considering morphological variations as input parameters and identifying the influential variations is presented in this paper. A cervical spine FE model, with its morphology parametrized using mesh morphing, was used to study the influence of disk height, anteroposterior vertebral depth, and segmental size, as well as variations in head mass, moment of inertia, and center of mass locations. The influence of these variations on the characteristic S-curve formation in whiplash response was evaluated using the peak C2-C3 flexion marking the maximum S-curve formation and time taken for the formation of maximum S-curve. The peak C2-C3 flexion in the S-curve formation was most influenced by disk height and vertebral depth, followed by anteroposterior head center of mass location. The time to maximum S-curve was most influenced by the anteroposterior location of head center of mass. The influence of gender-dependent variations, such as the vertebral depth, suggests that they contribute to the greater segmental rotations observed in females resulting in different S-curve formation from men. These results suggest that both spine morphology and head inertia properties should be considered to describe rear-impact responses.

Male and Female Cervical Spine Biomechanics and Anatomy: Implication for Scaling Injury Criteria.

There is an increased need to develop female-specific injury criteria and anthropomorphic test devices (dummies) for military and automotive environments, especially as women take occupational roles traditionally reserved for men. Although some exhaustive reviews on the biomechanics and injuries of the human spine have appeared in clinical and bioengineering literatures, focus has been largely ignored on the difference between male and female cervical spine responses and characteristics. Current neck injury criteria for automotive dummies for assessing crashworthiness and occupant safety are obtained from animal and human cadaver experiments, computational modeling, and human volunteer studies. They are also used in the military. Since the average human female spines are smaller than average male spines, metrics specific to the female population may be derived using simple geometric scaling, based on the assumption that male and female spines are geometrically scalable. However, as described in this technical brief, studies have shown that the biomechanical responses between males and females do not obey strict geometric similitude. Anatomical differences in terms of the structural component geometry are also different between the two cervical spines. Postural, physiological, and motion responses under automotive scenarios are also different. This technical brief, focused on such nonuniform differences, underscores the need to conduct female spine-specific evaluations/experiments to derive injury criteria for this important group of the population.

Cervical spine injuries, mechanisms, stability and AIS scores from vertical loading applied to military environments.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine injuries to osteo-ligamentous structures of cervical column, mechanisms, forces, severities and AIS scores from vertical accelerative loading. METHODS: Seven human cadaver head-neck complexes (56.9 ± 9.5 years) were aligned based on seated the posture of military soldiers. Army combat helmets were used. Specimens were attached to a vertical accelerator to apply caudo-cephalad g-forces. They were accelerated with increasing insults. Intermittent palpation and radiography were done. A roof structure mimicking military vehicle interior was introduced after a series of tests and experiments were conducted following similar protocols. Upon injury detection, CT and dissection were done. Temporal force responses were extracted, peak forces and times of occurrence were obtained, injury severities were graded, and spine stability was determined. RESULTS: Injuries occurred in tests only when the roof structure was included. Responses were tri-phasic: initial thrust, secondary tensile, tertiary roof contact phases. Peak forces: 1364-4382 N, initial thrust, 165-169 N, secondary tensile, 868-3368 N tertiary helmet-head roof contact phases. Times of attainments: 5.3-9.6, 31.7-42.6, 55.0-70.8 ms. Injuries included fractures and joint disruptions. Multiple injuries occurred in all but one specimen. A majority of injury severities were AIS = 2. Spines were considered unstable in a majority of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Spine response was tri-phasic. Injuries occurred in roof contact tests with the helmeted head-neck specimen. Multiplicity and unstable nature of AIS = 2 level injuries, albeit at lower severities, might predispose the spine to long-term accelerated degenerative changes. Clinical protocols should include a careful evaluation of sub-catastrophic injuries in military patients.

Deflection corridors of abdomen and thorax in oblique side impacts using equal stress equal velocity approach: comparison with other normalization methods.

The first objective of the study was to determine the thorax and abdomen deflection time corridors using the equal stress equal velocity approach from oblique side impact sled tests with postmortem human surrogates fitted with chestbands. The second purpose of the study was to generate deflection time corridors using impulse momentum methods and determine which of these methods best suits the data. An anthropometry-specific load wall was used. Individual surrogate responses were normalized to standard midsize male anthropometry. Corridors from the equal stress equal velocity approach were very similar to those from impulse momentum methods, thus either method can be used for this data. Present mean and plus/minus one standard deviation abdomen and thorax deflection time corridors can be used to evaluate dummies and validate complex human body finite element models.

Is Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Better Than Fusion for Warfighters?: A Biomechanical Study.

INTRODUCTION: Cervical spondylosis in the warfighter is a common musculoskeletal problem and can be career-ending especially if it requires fusion. Head-mounted equipment and increased biomechanical forces on the cervical spine have resulted in accelerated cervical spine degeneration. Current surgical gold standard is anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) is a nonfusion surgical alternative, and this can be effective in alleviating radiculopathy from foraminal stenosis caused by disc-osteophyte complex. Biomechanical studies have not been done to analyze motion associated with military aircrew personnel following PCF. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical responses of the effects of ACDF and PCF with different grades of facet resection under simulated military aircrew conditions using range of motion, disc pressure, and facet loads at the index and adjacent levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A validated 3D finite element model of the human cervical spinal column was used to simulate various graded PCF and ACDF. All surgical simulations were performed at the most commonly operated level (C5-C6) in warfighters. Pure moment loading under flexion, extension, and lateral bending, and in vivo follower force of 75 N were applied to the intact spine. Hybrid loading protocol was used to achieve 134 degrees of combined flexion-extension and 83 degrees of lateral bending in intact and surgical models to reflect military loading conditions. Segmental motions, disc pressure, and facet load were obtained and normalized with respect to the intact model to quantify the biomechanical effect. RESULTS: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion decreased range of motion at the index and increased motion at the adjacent levels, while all graded PCF responses had an opposite trend: increased motion at the index and decreased motion at adjacent levels. The magnitude of changes depended on the level of resection, spinal level, and loading mode. Disc pressure increased at the index level and decreased at the adjacent levels after PCF. These changes were exaggerated with increasing extent of facet resection. Facet load increased at the index level after PCF especially with extension and right (contralateral) lateral bending. Complete facetectomy led to facet load increases greater than ACDF at the adjacent levels in both flexion and extension. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior cervical foraminotomy is a motion-preserving implant-free surgical alternative to ACDF for warfighters with cervical radiculopathy after failure of conservative management. The treating surgeon must pay close attention to the extent of facet resection to avoid potential spinal instability and future disc and facet degeneration after PCF. Posterior cervical foraminotomy can be more advantageous than ACDF in terms of adjacent segment degeneration, motion preservation, reoperation rate, surgical cost, and retention of warfighters.

Complex Neck Loading and Injury Tolerance in Lateral Bending With Head Rotation From Human Cadaver Tests.

Advancements in automated vehicles may position the occupant in postures different from the current standard posture. It may affect human tolerance responses. The objective of this study was to determine the lateral bending tolerance of the head-cervical spine with initial head rotation posture using loads at the occipital condyles and lower neck and describe injuries. Using a custom loading device, head-cervical spine complexes from human cadavers were prepared with load cells at the ends. Lateral bending loads were applied to prerotated specimens at 1.5 m/s. At the occipital condyles, peak axial and antero-posterior and medial-lateral shear forces were: 316-954 N, 176-254 N, and 327-508 N, and coronal, sagittal, and axial moments were: 27-38 N·m, 21-38 N·m, and 9.7-19.8 N·m, respectively. At the lower neck, peak axial and shear forces were: 677-1004 N, 115-227 N, and 178-350 N, and coronal, sagittal, and axial moments were: 30-39 N·m, 7.6-21.3 N·m, and 5.7-13.4 N·m, respectively. Ipsilateral atlas lateral mass fractures occurred in four out of five specimens with varying joint diastasis and capsular ligament involvements. Acknowledging that the study used a small sample size, initial tolerances at the occipital condyles and lower neck were estimated using survival analysis. Injury patterns with posture variations are discussed.

A guide to finite element analysis models of the spine for clinicians.

Finite element analysis (FEA) is a computer-based mathematical method commonly used in spine and orthopedic biomechanical research. Advances in computational power and engineering modeling and analysis software have enabled many recent technical applications of FEA. Through the use of FEA, a wide range of scenarios can be simulated, such as physiological processes, mechanisms of disease and injury, and the efficacy of surgical procedures. Such models have the potential to enhance clinical studies by allowing comparisons of surgical treatments that would be impractical to perform in human or animal studies, and by linking model results to treatment outcomes. While traditional ex vivo experiments are limited by variabilities in tissue, the complexity of test setup, cost, measurable biomechanical parameters, and the repeatability of experiments, FEA models can be used to measure a wide range of clinically relevant biomechanical parameters. Generic or patient-specific anatomical models can be modified to simulate different clinical and surgical conditions under simulated physiological conditions. Despite these capabilities, there is limited understanding of the clinical applicability and translational potential of FEA models. For spine surgeons, a comprehensive understanding of the key features, strengths, and limitations of FEA models of the spine and their ability to personalize treatment options and assist in clinical decision-making would significantly enhance the impact of FEA research. Furthermore, fostering collaborations between surgeons and engineers could augment the clinical use of these models. The purpose of this review was to highlight key features of FEA model building for clinicians. To illustrate these features, the authors present an example of the use of FEA models in comparing FDA-approved disc arthroplasty implants.

Hybrid III Manikin Lumbar Spine Loading Under Vertical Impact.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical investigations have attributed lumbar spine injuries in combat to the vertical vector. Injury prevention strategies include the determination of spine biomechanics under this vector and developing/evaluating physical devices for use in live fire and evaluation-type tests to enhance Warfighter safety. While biological models have replicated theater injuries in the laboratory, matched-pair tests with physical devices are needed for standardized tests. The objective of this investigation is to determine the responses of the widely used Hybrid III lumbar spine under the vertical impact-loading vector. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our custom vertical accelerator device was used in the study. The manikin spinal column was mounted between the inferior and superior six-axis load cells, and the impact was delivered to the inferior end. The first group of tests consisted of matched-pair repeatability tests, second group consisted of adding matched-pair tests to this first group to determine the response characteristics, and the third group consisted of repeating the earlier two groups by changing the effective torso mass from 12 to 16 kg. Peak axial, shear, and resultant forces at the two ends of the spine were obtained. RESULTS: The first group of 12 repeatability tests showed that the mean difference in the axial force between two tests at the same velocity across the entire range of inputs was <3% at both ends. In the second group, at the inferior end, the axial and shear forces ranged from 4.9-25.2 kN to 0.7-3.0 kN. Shear forces accounted for a mean of 11 ± 6% and 12 ± 4% of axial forces at the two ends. In the third group of tests with increased torso mass, repeatability tests showed that the mean difference in the axial force between the two tests at the same velocity across the entire range of inputs was <2% at both ends. At the inferior end, the axial and shear forces ranged from 5.7-28.7 kN to 0.6-3.4 kN. Shear forces accounted for a mean of 11 ± 8% and 9 ± 3% of axial forces across all tests at the inferior and superior ends. Other data including plots of axial and shear forces at the superior and inferior ends across tested velocities of the spine are given in the paper. CONCLUSIONS: The Hybrid III lumbar spine when subjected to vertical impact simulating underbody blast levels showed that the impact is transmitted via the axial loading mechanism. This finding paralleled the results of axial force predominance over shear forces and axial loading injuries to human spines. Axial forces increased with increasing velocity suggesting the possibility of developing injury assessment risk curves, i.e., the manikin spine does not saturate, and its response is not a step function. It is possible to associate probability values for different force magnitudes. A similar conclusion was found to be true for both magnitudes of added effective torso mass at the superior end of the manikin spinal column. Additional matched-pair tests are needed to develop injury criteria for the Hybrid III male and female lumbar spines.

Do expandable cage size and number of cages matter in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1? A comparative biomechanical analysis using finite element modeling.

OBJECTIVE: Expandable transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cages were designed to address the limitations of static cages. Bilateral cage insertion can potentially enhance stability, fusion rates, and segmental lordosis. However, the benefits of unilateral versus bilateral expandable cages with varying sizes in TLIF remain unclear. This study used a validated finite element spine model to compare the biomechanical properties of L5-S1 TLIF by using differently sized expandable cages inserted unilaterally or bilaterally. METHODS: A finite element model of X-PAC expandable lumbar cages was created and used at the L5-S1 level. This model had cage dimensions of 9 mm in height, 15° in lordosis, and varying widths and lengths. Various placements (unilateral vs bilateral) and sizes were examined under pure moment loading to evaluate range of motion, adjacent-segment motion, and endplate stress. RESULTS: Stability at the L5-S1 level decreased when smaller cages were used in both the unilateral and bilateral cage models. In the unilateral model, cage 1 (the smallest cage) resulted in 47.9% more motion at the L5-S1 level compared to cage 5 (the largest cage) in flexion, as well as 64.8% more motion in extension. Similarly, in the bilateral TLIF model, bilateral cage 1 led to 49.4% more motion at the L5-S1 level in flexion and 73.4% more motion in extension compared to bilateral cage 5. Unilateral insertion of cage 5 provided superior stability in flexion and surpassed cages 1-3 in extension when compared to cages inserted either unilaterally or bilaterally. Reduced motion at L5-S1 correlated with increased adjacent-segment motion at L4-5. Bilateral TLIF resulted in greater adjacent-segment motion compared to unilateral TLIF with the same-size cages. Inferior endplates experienced higher stress during flexion and extension than superior endplates, with this difference being more pronounced in the bilateral model. In bilateral cage placement, stress differences ranged from 46.3% to 60.0%, while they ranged from 1.1% to 9.6% in unilateral cages. Qualitative analysis revealed increased focal stress in unilateral cages versus bilateral cages. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' study shows that using a large unilateral TLIF cage may offer better stability than the bilateral insertion of smaller cages. While large bilateral cages increase adjacent-segment motion, they also provide a uniform stress distribution on the endplates. These findings deepen our understanding of the biomechanics of the available expandable TLIF cages.

Effect of sagittal alignment on spinal cord biomechanics in the stenotic cervical spine during neck flexion and extension.

Spinal cord stress and strain contribute to degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), while cervical kyphosis is known to negatively impact surgical outcomes. In DCM, the relationship between spinal cord biomechanics, sagittal alignment, and cord compression is not well understood. Quantifying this relationship can guide surgical strategies. A previously validated three-dimensional finite element model of the human cervical spine with spinal cord was used. Three models of cervical alignment were created: lordosis (C2-C7 Cobb angle: 20°), straight (0°), and kyphosis (- 9°). C5-C6 spinal stenosis was simulated with ventral disk protrusions, reducing spinal canal diameters to 10 mm, 8 mm, and 6 mm. Spinal cord pre-stress and pre-strain due to alignment and compression were quantified. Cervical flexion and extension were simulated with a pure moment load of 2 Nm. The Von Mises stress and maximum principal strain of the whole spinal cord were calculated during neck motion and the relationship between spinal cord biomechanics, alignment, and compression was analyzed using linear regression analysis. Spinal cord pre-stress and pre-strain were greatest with kyphosis (7.53 kPa, 5.4%). Progressive kyphosis and stenosis were associated with an increase in spinal cord stress (R2 = 0.99) and strain (R2 = 0.99). Cervical kyphosis was associated with greater spinal cord stress and strain during neck flexion-extension and the magnitude of difference increased with increasing stenosis. Cervical kyphosis increases baseline spinal cord stress and strain. Incorporating sagittal alignment with compression to calculate spinal cord biomechanics is necessary to accurately quantify spinal stress and strain during neck flexion and extension.

Behind Armor Blunt Trauma: Liver Injuries Using a Live Animal Model.

INTRODUCTION: While the 44-mm clay penetration criterion was developed in the 1970s for soft body armor applications, and the researchers acknowledged the need to conduct additional tests, the same behind the armor blunt trauma displacement limit is used for both soft and hard body armor evaluations and design considerations. Because the human thoraco-abdominal contents are heterogeneous, have different skeletal coverage, and have different functional requirements, the same level of penetration limit does not imply the same level of protection. It is important to determine the regional responses of different thoraco-abdominal organs to better describe human tolerance and improve the current behind armor blunt trauma standard. The purpose of this study was to report on the methods, procedures, and data collected from swine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Live swine tests were conducted after obtaining approvals from the local institution and the Army Care and Use Review Office of the U.S. Department of Defense. Trachea tubes and an intravenous line were introduced before administering anesthesia. Pressure transducers were inserted into the lungs and aorta. An indenter simulating the backface deformation profiles produced by body armor from military-relevant ballistics to human cadavers was used to deliver impact loading to the liver region. A triaxial accelerometer was included in the indenter design. The animals were monitored for 6 hours, necropsies were performed, and injuries were identified. Biomechanical data of the energy, velocity, deflection, viscous criterion, force, and impulse variables were obtained for each test. RESULTS: Peak accelerations, velocities, deflections, forces, impulse, and energies ranged from 897 to 5,808 g, 21 to 59 m/s, 1.96 to 8.87 cm, 2.3 to 13.1 kN, 1.1 to 7.1 Ns, and 58 to 387 J, respectively. The peak viscous criterion ranged from 0.8 to 5.8 m/s. All animals survived the 6-hour survival period. Three animals responded with liver lacerations while the remaining 4 did not have any injuries. CONCLUSION: The experimental design based on parallel tests with whole body human cadavers and cadaver swine was found to be successful in delivering controlled impacts to the liver region of live swine and reproducing liver injuries. Previously used biomechanical measures as potential candidates for injury criteria development were obtained. Using this proven model, tests with additional samples are needed to develop injury risk curves for liver impacts and obtain regional (liver) injury criteria.

Analysis of Injury Metrics From Experimental Cardiac Injuries From Behind Armor Blunt Trauma Using Live Swine Tests: A Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: Warfighters are issued hard body armor designed to defeat ballistic projectiles. The resulting backface deformation can injure different thoracoabdominal organs. Developed over decades ago, the behind armor blunt impact criterion of maximum 44 mm depth in clay continues to be used independent of armor type or impact location on the thoracoabdominal region covered by the armor. Because thoracoabdominal components have different energy absorption capabilities, their mode of failures and mechanical properties are different. These considerations underscore the lack of effectiveness of using the single standard to cover all thoracoabdominal components to represent the same level of injury risk. The objective of this pilot study is to conduct cardiac impact tests with a live animal model and analyze biomechanical injury candidate metrics for behind armor blunt trauma applications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Live swine tests were conducted after obtaining approvals from the U.S. DoD. Trachea tubes. An intravenous line were introduced into the swine before administering anesthesia. Pressure transducers were inserted into lungs and aorta. An indenter simulating backface deformation profiles produced by body armor from military-relevant ballistics to human cadavers delivered impact to the heart region. The approved test protocol included 6-hour monitoring and necropsies. Indenter accelerometer signals were processed to compute the velocity and deflection, and their peak magnitudes were obtained. The deflection-time signal was normalized with respect to chest depth along the impact axis. The peak magnitude of the viscous criterion, kinetic energy, force, momentum and stiffness were obtained. RESULTS: Out of the 8 specimens, 2 were sham controls. The mean total body mass and soft tissue thickness at the impact site were 81.1 ± 4.1 kg and 3.8 ± 1.1 cm. The peak velocities ranged from 30 to 59 m/s, normalized deflections ranged from 15 to 21%, and energies ranged from 105 to 407 J. The range in momentum and stiffness were 7.0 to 13.9 kg-m/s and 22.3 to 79.9 N/m. The maximum forces and impulse data ranged from 2.9 to 11.7 kN and 1.9 to 5.8 N-s. The peak viscous criterion ranged from 2.0 to 5.3 m/s. One animal did not sustain any injuries, 2 had cardiac injuries, and others had lung and skeletal injuries. CONCLUSIONS: The present study applied blunt impact loads to the live swine cardiac region and determined potential candidate injury metrics for characterization. The sample size of 6 swine produced injuries ranging from none to pure skeletal to pure organ trauma. The viscous criterion metric associated with the response of the animal demonstrated a differing pattern than other variables with increasing velocity. These findings demonstrate that our live animal experimental design can be effectively used with testing additional samples to develop behind armor blunt injury criteria for cardiac trauma in the form of risk curves. Injury criteria obtained for cardiac trauma can be used to enhance the effectiveness of the body armor, reduce morbidity and mortality, and improve warfighter readiness in combat operations.

Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Bilateral Expandable Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages: A Finite Element Analysis Study.

BACKGROUND: Expandable transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cages could offer an alternative to anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Bilateral cage insertion enhances endplate coverage, potentially improving stability and fusion rates and maximizing segmental lordosis. This study aims to compare the biomechanical properties of bilateral expandable TLIF cages to ALIF cages using finite element modeling. METHODS: We used a validated 3-dimensional finite element model of the lumbar spine. ALIF and TLIF cages were created based on available product data. Our focus was on analyzing spinal motion in the sagittal plane, evaluating forces transmitted through the vertebrae, and comparing an ALIF model with various TLIF cage models. RESULTS: The largest TLIF cage model exhibited a 407.9% increase in flexion motion and a 42.1% decrease in extension motion compared with the ALIF cage. The second largest TLIF cages resulted in more flexion motion and less extension motion compared with ALIF, while smaller cages were inferior to ALIF. ALIF cages were associated with increased adjacent segment motion compared with TLIF cages, primarily in extension. Endplate stress analysis revealed higher stress in the ALIF cage model with a more uniform stress distribution. CONCLUSION: ALIF cages excel in stabilizing L5 to S1 during flexion, while largest TLIF cages offer superior stability in extension. Large bilateral TLIF cages may provide biomechanical stability comparable to ALIF, especially in extension and could potentially reduce the risk of adjacent segment disease with lower adjacent segment motion.

Using Finite Element Models to Assess Spinal Cord Biomechanics after Cervical Laminoplasty for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

Cervical laminoplasty is an established motion-preserving procedure for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). However, patients with pre-existing cervical kyphosis often experience inferior outcomes compared to those with straight or lordotic spines. Limited dorsal spinal cord shift in kyphotic spines post-decompression and increased spinal cord tension may contribute to poor neurological recovery and spinal cord injury. This study aims to quantify the biomechanical impact of cervical sagittal alignment on spinal cord stress and strain post-laminoplasty using a validated 3D finite element model of the C2-T1 spine. Three models were created based on the C2-C7 Cobb angle: lordosis (20 degrees), straight (0 degrees), and kyphosis (-9 degrees). Open-door laminoplasty was simulated at C4, C5, and C6 levels, followed by physiological neck flexion and extension. The results showed that spinal cord stress and strain were highest in kyphotic curvature compared to straight and lordotic curvatures across all cervical segments, despite similar segmental ROM. In flexion, kyphotic spines exhibited 103.3% higher stress and 128.9% higher strain than lordotic spines and 16.7% higher stress and 26.8% higher strain than straight spines. In extension, kyphotic spines showed 135.4% higher stress and 241.7% higher strain than lordotic spines and 21.5% higher stress and 43.2% higher strain than straight spines. The study shows that cervical kyphosis leads to increased spinal cord stress and strain post-laminoplasty, underscoring the need to address sagittal alignment in addition to decompression for optimal patient outcomes.

Matched-pair hybrid test paradigm for behind armor blunt trauma using an experimental animal model.

Background: The current behind armor blunt trauma (BABT) injury criterion uses a single penetration limit of 44 mm in Roma Plastilina clay and is not specific to thoracoabdominal regions. However, different regions in the human body have different injury tolerances. This manuscript presents a matched-pair hybrid test paradigm with different experimental models and candidate metrics to develop regional human injury criteria. Methods: Live and cadaver swine were used as matched pair experimental models. An impactor simulating backface deformation profiles produced by body armor from military-relevant ballistics was used to deliver BABT loading to liver and lung regions in cadaver and live swine. Impact loading was characterized using peak accelerations and energy. For live swine, physiological parameters were monitored for 6 hours, animals were euthanized, and a detailed necropsy was done to identify injuries to skeletal structures, organs and soft tissues. A similar process was used to identify injuries to the cadaver swine for targeted thoracoabdominal regions. Results: Two cadavers and one live swine were subjected to BABT impacts to the liver. One cadaver and one live swine were subjected to BABT impacts to the left lung. Injuries to both regions were similar at similar energies between the cadaver and live models. Conclusions: Swine is an established animal for thoracoabdominal impact studies in automotive standards, although at lower insult levels. Similarities in BABT responses between cadaver and live swine allow for extending testing protocols to human cadavers and for the development of scaling relationships between animal and human cadavers, acting as a hybrid protocol between species and live and cadaver models. Injury tolerances and injury risk curves from live animals can be converted to human tolerances via structural scaling using these outcomes. The present experimental paradigm can be used to develop region-based BABT injury criteria, which are not currently available.

Investigating the Impact of Blunt Force Trauma: A Probabilistic Study of Behind Armor Blunt Trauma Risk.

Evaluating Behind Armor Blunt Trauma (BABT) is a critical step in preventing non-penetrating injuries in military personnel, which can result from the transfer of kinetic energy from projectiles impacting body armor. While the current NIJ Standard-0101.06 standard focuses on preventing excessive armor backface deformation, this standard does not account for the variability in impact location, thorax organ and tissue material properties, and injury thresholds in order to assess potential injury. To address this gap, Finite Element (FE) human body models (HBMs) have been employed to investigate variability in BABT impact conditions by recreating specific cases from survivor databases and generating injury risk curves. However, these deterministic analyses predominantly use models representing the 50th percentile male and do not investigate the uncertainty and variability inherent within the system, thus limiting the generalizability of investigating injury risk over a diverse military population. The DoD-funded I-PREDICT Future Naval Capability (FNC) introduces a probabilistic HBM, which considers uncertainty and variability in tissue material and failure properties, anthropometry, and external loading conditions. This study utilizes the I-PREDICT HBM for BABT simulations for three thoracic impact locations-liver, heart, and lower abdomen. A probabilistic analysis of tissue-level strains resulting from a BABT event is used to determine the probability of achieving a Military Combat Incapacitation Scale (MCIS) for organ-level injuries and the New Injury Severity Score (NISS) is employed for whole-body injury risk evaluations. Organ-level MCIS metrics show that impact at the heart can cause severe injuries to the heart and spleen, whereas impact to the liver can cause rib fractures and major lacerations in the liver. Impact at the lower abdomen can cause lacerations in the spleen. Simulation results indicate that, under current protection standards, the whole-body risk of injury varies between 6 and 98% based on impact location, with the impact at the heart being the most severe, followed by impact at the liver and the lower abdomen. These results suggest that the current body armor protection standards might result in severe injuries in specific locations, but no injuries in others.