Five-Year Clinical Trial of the Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP) Study: Phase 4 Report.

PURPOSE: To evaluate (1) the long-term efficacy of low-concentration atropine over 5 years, (2) the proportion of children requiring re-treatment and associated factors, and (3) the efficacy of pro re nata (PRN) re-treatment using 0.05% atropine from years 3 to 5. DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked extended trial. PARTICIPANTS: Children 4 to 12 years of age originally from the Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP) study. METHODS: Children 4 to 12 years of age originally from the LAMP study were followed up for 5 years. During the third year, children in each group originally receiving 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine were randomized to continued treatment and treatment cessation. During years 4 and 5, all continued treatment subgroups were switched to 0.05% atropine for continued treatment, whereas all treatment cessation subgroups followed a PRN re-treatment protocol to resume 0.05% atropine for children with myopic progressions of 0.5 diopter (D) or more over 1 year. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare the changes in spherical equivalent (SE) progression and axial length (AL) elongation among groups. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: (1) Changes in SE and AL in different groups over 5 years, (2) the proportion of children who needed re-treatment, and (3) changes in SE and AL in the continued treatment and PRN re-treatment groups from years 3 to 5. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy (82.8%) of 326 children (82.5%) from the third year completed 5 years of follow-up. Over 5 years, the cumulative mean SE progressions were -1.34 ± 1.40 D, -1.97 ± 1.03 D, and -2.34 ± 1.71 D for the continued treatment groups with initial 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine, respectively (P = 0.02). Similar trends were observed in AL elongation (P = 0.01). Among the PRN re-treatment group, 87.9% of children (94/107) needed re-treatment. The proportion of re-treatment across all studied concentrations was similar (P = 0.76). The SE progressions for continued treatment and PRN re-treatment groups from years 3 to 5 were -0.97 ± 0.82 D and -1.00 ± 0.74 D (P = 0.55) and the AL elongations were 0.51 ± 0.34 mm and 0.49 ± 0.32 mm (P = 0.84), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Over 5 years, the continued 0.05% atropine treatment demonstrated good efficacy for myopia control. Most children needed to restart treatment after atropine cessation at year 3. Restarted treatment with 0.05% atropine achieved similar efficacy as continued treatment. Children should be considered for re-treatment if myopia progresses after treatment cessation. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

In-vivo confocal microscopy predicts cytomegalovirus as the cause of chronic or recurrent anterior uveitis among Chinese.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare endothelial features by in-vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in Chinese eyes with chronic or recurrent anterior uveitis (AU) with and without cytomegalovirus (CMV). METHODS: A double-masked, cross-sectional case-control study at a tertiary eye clinic. RESULTS: Thirty eyes of 30 subjects were analyzed. Fifteen eyes (50%) were CMV positive, while fifteen eyes were negative for herpes simplex virus, varicella zoster virus and CMV. Absence of pseudoguttata was the strongest, independent risk factor for CMV (OR 34.53, 95% CI: 1.84-648.02, p = 0.018), followed by severe iris depigmentation (OR 31.45, 1.02-965.81, p = 0.048) and low corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) (OR 14.79, 1.14-191.30, p = 0.039) on univariable regression. All three remained statistically significant after adjustment. The combination of absence of pseudoguttata and low ECD on IVCM achieved a similar predictive value as iris depigmentation examination. CONCLUSION: Absence of pseudoguttata on IVCM was an independent predictor of positive CMV detection after adjusting for iris depigmentation and corneal endothelial cell density. The addition of this feature to severe iris depigmentation and low corneal ECD can increase the positive predictive value of detecting CMV. IVCM was a useful non-invasive tool to predict CMV in patients with chronic or recurrent AU.

COMPARING FUNCTIONAL AND VASCULAR LAYER OUTCOMES OF LASER PHOTOCOAGULATION VERSUS SUBTHRESHOLD MICROPULSE LASER FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: An OCT-Angiography Study.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of conventional laser and subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) in treating diabetic macular edema in terms of functional outcomes and changes in quantitative metrics for the retinal capillary and choriocapillary vascular layers. METHODS: Fifty-two eyes from 52 patients with treatment-naive, clinically significant macular edema were randomly assigned to the conventional laser group or SML group in a 1:1 ratio. Best-corrected visual acuity, central macular thickness (CMT), and optical coherence tomography angiography scans were measured at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. RESULTS: The SML group showed rapid visual recovery, improving from baseline of 0.320 ± 0.31 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (20/42 Snellen) to 0.270 ± 0.22 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (20/37 Snellen) at 1 month ( P = 0.038) and had significant improvements in CMT at 6-month post-treatment (353.88-301.00 µ m, P = 0.005). Statistically significant changes were detected across all optical coherence tomography angiography metrics, including vessel density, vessel length density, vessel diameter index, and fractal dimension, at 6 months for both groups in the deep capillary plexus and choriocapillary plexus. CONCLUSION: Subthreshold micropulse laser resulted in early visual recovery and sustained macular thickness improvement in the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Microvascular perfusion parameters, including vessel density, vessel length density, and fractal dimension, improved in the deep capillary plexus and choriocapillary plexus for both treatment groups at 6 months post-treatment.

Effect of Low-Concentration Atropine Eyedrops vs Placebo on Myopia Incidence in Children: The LAMP2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Early onset of myopia is associated with high myopia later in life, and myopia is irreversible once developed. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of low-concentration atropine eyedrops at 0.05% and 0.01% concentration for delaying the onset of myopia. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked trial conducted at the Chinese University of Hong Kong Eye Centre enrolled 474 nonmyopic children aged 4 through 9 years with cycloplegic spherical equivalent between +1.00 D to 0.00 D and astigmatism less than -1.00 D. The first recruited participant started treatment on July 11, 2017, and the last participant was enrolled on June 4, 2020; the date of the final follow-up session was June 4, 2022. Interventions: Participants were assigned at random to the 0.05% atropine (n = 160), 0.01% atropine (n = 159), and placebo (n = 155) groups and had eyedrops applied once nightly in both eyes over 2 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the 2-year cumulative incidence rate of myopia (cycloplegic spherical equivalent of at least -0.50 D in either eye) and the percentage of participants with fast myopic shift (spherical equivalent myopic shift of at least 1.00 D). Results: Of the 474 randomized patients (mean age, 6.8 years; 50% female), 353 (74.5%) completed the trial. The 2-year cumulative incidence of myopia in the 0.05% atropine, 0.01% atropine, and placebo groups were 28.4% (33/116), 45.9% (56/122), and 53.0% (61/115), respectively, and the percentages of participants with fast myopic shift at 2 years were 25.0%, 45.1%, and 53.9%. Compared with the placebo group, the 0.05% atropine group had significantly lower 2-year cumulative myopia incidence (difference, 24.6% [95% CI, 12.0%-36.4%]) and percentage of patients with fast myopic shift (difference, 28.9% [95% CI, 16.5%-40.5%]). Compared with the 0.01% atropine group, the 0.05% atropine group had significantly lower 2-year cumulative myopia incidence (difference, 17.5% [95% CI, 5.2%-29.2%]) and percentage of patients with fast myopic shift (difference, 20.1% [95% CI, 8.0%-31.6%]). The 0.01% atropine and placebo groups were not significantly different in 2-year cumulative myopia incidence or percentage of patients with fast myopic shift. Photophobia was the most common adverse event and was reported by 12.9% of participants in the 0.05% atropine group, 18.9% in the 0.01% atropine group, and 12.2% in the placebo group in the second year. Conclusions and Relevance: Among children aged 4 to 9 years without myopia, nightly use of 0.05% atropine eyedrops compared with placebo resulted in a significantly lower incidence of myopia and lower percentage of participants with fast myopic shift at 2 years. There was no significant difference between 0.01% atropine and placebo. Further research is needed to replicate the findings, to understand whether this represents a delay or prevention of myopia, and to assess longer-term safety. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR-IPR-15006883.

Intraocular inflammation following COVID-19 vaccination: the clinical presentations.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to describe the cases of intraocular inflammation following COVID-19 vaccination (Comirnaty mRNA vaccine and CoronaVac vaccine) in Hong Kong. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series. RESULTS: This series includes 16 eyes among 10 female patients, with a mean age of 49.4 ± 17.4 years. Eight patients (80%) received the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccination. Anterior uveitis was the most common presentation of postvaccination uveitis (50%) observed in our series, followed by intermediate uveitis (30%) and posterior uveitis (20%), respectively. A case of retinal vasculitis in the form of frosted branch angiitis, previously only reported following COVID-19 infection, was observed following COVID-19 vaccination. The median time from vaccination to uveitis onset was 15.2 days (range: 0-6 weeks). Inflammation in 11 out 16 eyes (68.75%) was completely resolved with topical steroids. CONCLUSION: Anterior uveitis was the predominant presentations of uveitis flare-ups following COVID-19 in our case series, followed by intermediate uveitis. Aligning with the current global literature concerning this issue, most of the uveitis attacks presented as anterior uveitis and were completely resolved with topical steroids. Consequently, the risk of uveitis flare-ups should not deter the public from receiving COVID-19 vaccines.

Three-Year Clinical Trial of Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP) Study: Continued Versus Washout: Phase 3 Report.

PURPOSE: (1) To compare the efficacy of continued and stopping treatment for 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine during the third year. (2) To evaluate the efficacy of continued treatment over 3 years. (3) To investigate the rebound phenomenon and its determinants after cessation of treatment. DESIGN: A randomized, double-masked extended trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 350 of 438 children aged 4 to 12 years originally recruited into the Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP) study. METHODS: At the beginning of the third year, children in each group were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to continued treatment and washout subgroups. Cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) refraction and axial length (AL) were measured at 4-month intervals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in SE and AL between groups. RESULTS: A total of 326 children completed 3 years of follow-up. During the third year, SE progression and AL elongation were faster in the washout subgroups than in the continued treatment groups across all concentrations: -0.68 ± 0.49 diopters (D) versus -0.28 ± 0.42 D (P < 0.001) and 0.33 ± 0.17 mm versus 0.17 ± 0.14 mm (P < 0.001) for the 0.05%; -0.57 ± 0.38 D versus -0.35 ± 0.37 D (P = 0.004) and 0.29 ± 0.14 mm versus 0.20 ± 0.15 mm (P = 0.001) for the 0.025%; -0.56 ± 0.40 D versus -0.38 ± 0.49 D (P = 0.04) and 0.29 ± 0.15 mm versus 0.24 ± 0.18 mm (P = 0.13) for the 0.01%. Over the 3-year period, SE progressions were -0.73 ± 1.04 D, -1.31 ± 0.92 D, and -1.60 ± 1.32 D (P = 0.001) for the 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% groups in the continued treatment subgroups, respectively, and -1.15 ± 1.13 D, -1.47 ± 0.77 D, and -1.81 ± 1.10 D (P = 0.03), respectively, in the washout subgroup. The respective AL elongations were 0.50 ± 0.40 mm, 0.74 ± 0.41 mm, and 0.89 ± 0.53 mm (P < 0.001) for the continued treatment subgroups and 0.70 ± 0.47 mm, 0.82 ± 0.37 mm, and 0.98 ± 0.48 mm (P = 0.04) for the washout subgroup. The rebound SE progressions during washout were concentration dependent, but their differences were clinically small (P = 0.15). Older age and lower concentration were associated with smaller rebound effects in both SE progression (P < 0.001) and AL elongation (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: During the third year, continued atropine treatment achieved a better effect across all concentrations compared with the washout regimen. 0.05% atropine remained the optimal concentration over 3 years in Chinese children. The differences in rebound effects were clinically small across all 3 studied atropine concentrations. Stopping treatment at an older age and lower concentration are associated with a smaller rebound.

Ocular surface disturbance in patients after acute COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the ocular surface disturbances in COVID-19 patients discharged from the hospital. METHODS: One hundred and seventy-nine eyes of 109 healthy participants and 456 eyes of 228 post-COVID-19 patients received comprehensive eye examinations; the latter were interviewed with questionnaires on ocular symptoms before and after COVID-19 diagnosis. Associations of ocular surface manifestations with virological and ophthalmic parameters were evaluated by multivariable mixed linear or logistic regression models. RESULTS: Mean interval between COVID-19 diagnosis and ophthalmic evaluation was 52.23 ± 16.12 days. The severity of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) based on clinical staging was higher in post-COVID-19 than healthy eyes (1.14 ± 0.67 vs. 0.92 ± 0.68, p = 0.002) and so was ocular surface staining score (0.60 ± 0.69 vs. 0.49 ± 0.68, p = 0.044). Patients requiring supplementary oxygen during hospitalisation had shorter tear break-up time (ß -1.63, 95% CI -2.61 to -0.65). Cycle threshold (Ct) value from upper respiratory samples (inversely correlated with viral load) at diagnosis had an OR = 0.91 (95% CI 0.84-0.98) with new ocular surface symptoms 4 weeks after diagnosis. The presence of ocular surface symptoms 1 week prior to COVID-19 diagnosis showed an OR of 20.89 (95% CI 6.35-68.66) of persistent or new ocular symptoms 4 weeks afterward. CONCLUSIONS: MGD and ocular surface staining are more common and severe in post-COVID-19 patients. Patients with higher viral loads have greater risks of ocular surface symptoms. Patients requiring supplementary oxygen are more likely to show tear film instability. Ocular surface evaluation should be considered 1-3 months following hospital discharge for any COVID-19 patient.

Age Effect on Treatment Responses to 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% Atropine: Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of age at treatment and other factors on treatment response to atropine in the Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP) Study. DESIGN: Secondary analysis from a randomized trial. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred fifty children aged 4 to 12 years who originally were assigned to receive 0.05%, 0.025%, or 0.01% atropine or placebo once daily, and who completed 2 years of the LAMP Study, were included. In the second year, the placebo group was switched to the 0.05% atropine group. METHODS: Potential predictive factors for change in spherical equivalent (SE) and axial length (AL) over 2 years were evaluated by generalized estimating equations in each treatment group. Evaluated factors included age at treatment, gender, baseline refraction, parental myopia, time outdoors, diopter hours of near work, and treatment compliance. Estimated mean values and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of change in SE and AL over 2 years also were generated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors associated with SE change and AL change over 2 years were the primary outcome measures. Associated factors during the first year were secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: In 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine groups, younger age was the only factor associated with SE progression (coefficient of 0.14, 0.15, and 0.20, respectively) and AL elongation (coefficient of -0.10, -0.11, and -0.12, respectively) over 2 years; the younger the age, the poorer the response. At each year of age from 4 to 12 years across the treatment groups, higher-concentration atropine showed a better treatment response, following a concentration-dependent effect (Ptrend <0.05 for each age group). In addition, the mean SE progression in 6-year-old children receiving 0.05% atropine (-0.90 diopter [D]; 95% CI, -0.99 to -0.82) was similar to that of 8-year-old children receiving 0.025% atropine (-0.89 D; 95% CI, -0.94 to -0.83) and 10-year-old children receiving 0.01% atropine (-0.92 D; 95% CI, -0.99 to -0.85). All concentrations were well tolerated in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Younger age is associated with poor treatment response to low-concentration atropine at 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01%. Among concentrations studied, younger children required the highest 0.05% concentration to achieve similar reduction in myopic progression as older children receiving lower concentrations.

Transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking using iontophoresis versus the Dresden protocol in progressive keratoconus: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Standard epithelium-off collagen cross-linking using Dresden protocol (S-CXL) is the standard of care for progressive keratoconus. Despite its efficacy, epithelial debridement is associated with pain, delayed visual rehabilitation, stromal oedema and haze. Minimising these complications while achieving a comparable efficacy remains an unmet need. METHODS: Comparative studies between transepithelial iontophoresis-assisted CXL (I-CXL) and S-CXL reporting the outcomes of visual, refractive, topographic, aberrometry, demarcation line, endothelial cell density, confocal microscopy or complications were identified from databases. Assessments of publication bias, meta-analyses, sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and meta-regressions were performed. RESULTS: In this meta-analysis, 586 eyes from three randomised controlled trials and seven comparative studies were analysed. No differences were found in the change in uncorrected/corrected distance visual acuities, mean/maximum keratometry, central corneal thickness, higher order aberration, spherical aberration, coma, subbasal nerve/anterior stromal keratocyte density and demarcation line depth in both CXL protocols (P ≥ .052). However, I-CXL resulted in less thinning at the minimum pachymetry (standardised mean difference 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.06-0.44). More importantly, there was a significant reduction in complications following I-CXL (odds ratio 0.30; 95% CI 0.12-0.75). Meta-regression analyses on demarcation line depth and complication suggested that I-CXL was more effective than S-CXL when baseline maximum keratometry was >55.2 D and the risk of complication was independent of other baseline covariates. CONCLUSION: I-CXL has a more favourable safety profile, as evidenced by the available literature, with less thinning at the minimum pachymetry and reduced risk of complications while achieving comparable effects on visual, refractive, topographic, aberrometry, and morphological outcomes as S-CXL.

The clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of ocular tuberculosis: a 5-year experience in an endemic area.

PURPOSE: To report the clinical presentations of ocular tuberculosis infection (OTB) and the treatment regimen and outcome in an endemic area. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of patients with presumed OTB treated in a tertiary teaching hospital in Hong Kong in 2014-2019. RESULTS: Among the nineteen patients recruited, the most common clinical presentation of OTB was retinal vasculitis (42.1%), followed by scleritis, intermediate uveitis, and choroidal tuberculoma (15.8% respectively). 94.7% and 94.4% of the subjects were treated with ATT and steroid, respectively, and 31.6% were put on systemic immunosuppressant prior to the initiation of ATT. Apart from those suffering from intermediate uveitis, most demonstrated good clinical response within 8 weeks of ATT initiation. CONCLUSION: Ocular involvement of TB has been increasingly recognized, especially in endemic regions like Hong Kong. High index of suspicion is recommended for OTB in typical clinical phenotypes or recurrent/resistant ocular inflammation unresponsive to conventional therapy. TB retinal vasculitis was the most common presentation of OTB in this study and OTB generally requires treatment with either regional or systemic steroid together with ATT.

The association between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and retinal nerve fiber/ganglion cell layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Retinal nerve fiber/ganglion cell layer (RNFL/GCL) thickness measured using optical coherence tomography has been proposed as an ocular biomarker for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but findings varied in different studies. This study aims to determine the association between RNFL/GCL thickness and ADHD in children by systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We performed a literature search in Embase, PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, and PsycINFO for relevant articles published up to February 29, 2020. All studies with original data comparing RNFL/GCL thickness in ADHD and healthy children were included. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to assess bias risk and quality of evidence. Pooled estimates of the differences in thickness of RNFL or GCL between ADHD and healthy subjects were generated using meta-analysis with a random-effect model due to significant inter-study heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was also performed. RESULTS: We identified four eligible studies involving a total of 164 ADHD and 150 control subjects. Meta-analysis revealed that ADHD in children was associated with a reduction in global RNFL thickness (SMD, - 0.23; 95% CI - 0.46, - 0.01; p = 0.04). The global GCL thickness was examined in two studies with 89 ADHD and 75 control subjects, but the pooled difference in global GCL thickness between ADHD children and controls was not statistically significant (SMD, - 0.34; 95% CI - 1.25, 0.58; p = 0.47). CONCLUSION: Existing evidence suggests a possible association between ADHD and RNFL thinning in children. In view of the limited number of reports, further studies in large cohorts should be warranted.

Differential Effects on Ocular Biometrics by 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% Atropine: Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in ocular biometrics in groups receiving 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine compared with placebo over 1 year based on the Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP) study. DESIGN: Double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred eighty-three children aged 4 to 12 years who were assigned randomly to receive 0.05%, 0.025%, 0.01% atropine, or placebo once daily in both eyes and completed the first year of the LAMP study. METHODS: Cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE), axial length (AL), corneal curvature (K), and anterior chamber depth (ACD) were measured by IOLMaster. Corneal astigmatism and lens power were calculated. The ocular biometric parameter changes were compared among groups. Contributions to SE progression from ocular parameters were determined and compared among groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in ocular biometrics and their associations with the changes in SE. RESULTS: Over 1 year, changes in AL were 0.20 ± 0.25 mm, 0.29 ± 0.20 mm, 0.36 ± 0.29 mm, and 0.41 ± 0.22 mm in the 0.05% atropine, 0.025% atropine, 0.01% atropine, and placebo groups, respectively (P < 0.001), with a concentration-dependent response. Corneal power remained stable, and its changes were similar across all atropine concentrations: -0.02 ± 0.14 diopter (D), -0.01 ± 0.14 D, -0.01 ± 0.12 D, and 0.01 ± 0.14 D in the 0.05% atropine, 0.025% atropine, 0.01% atropine, and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.10). Lens power decreased over time in each concentration, but its changes also were similar across all concentrations: -0.31 ± 0.43 D, -0.38 ± 0.47 D, -0.40 ± 0.43 D, and -0.41 ± 0.43 D in the 0.05% atropine, 0.025% atropine, 0.01% atropine, and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.24). Changes in ACD remained similar across all concentrations (P = 0.41). The contributions to SE progression from the ocular biometric changes after adjusting for age and gender in each concentration were similar across all groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Low-concentrations of atropine (0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01%) have no clinical effect on corneal or lens power. Antimyopic effects of low-concentration atropine act mainly on reducing AL elongation, and therefore could reduce the risk of subsequent myopia complications.

Two-Year Clinical Trial of the Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP) Study: Phase 2 Report.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine eye drops over 2 years to determine which is the optimal concentration for longer-term myopia control. DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked trial extended from the Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP) Study. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred eighty-three of 438 children (87%) aged 4 to 12 years with myopia of at least -1.0 diopter (D) originally randomized to receive atropine 0.05%, 0.025%, 0.01%, or placebo once daily in both eyes in the LAMP phase 1 study were continued in this extended trial (phase 2). METHODS: Children in the placebo group (phase 1) were switched to receive 0.05% atropine from the beginning of the second-year follow-up, whereas those in the 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine groups continued with the same regimen. Cycloplegic refraction, axial length (AL), accommodation amplitude, photopic and mesopic pupil diameter, and best-corrected visual acuity were measured at 4-month intervals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in spherical equivalent (SE) and AL and their differences between groups. RESULTS: Over the 2-year period, the mean SE progression was 0.55±0.86 D, 0.85±0.73 D, and 1.12±0.85 D in the 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine groups, respectively (P = 0.015, P < 0.001, and P = 0.02, respectively, for pairwise comparisons), with mean AL changes over 2 years of 0.39±0.35 mm, 0.50±0.33 mm, and 0.59±0.38 mm (P = 0.04, P < 0.001, and P = 0.10, respectively). Compared with the first year, the second-year efficacy of 0.05% and 0.025% atropine remained similar (P >0.1), but improved mildly in the 0.01% atropine group (P = 0.04). For the phase 1 placebo group, the myopia progression was reduced significantly after switching to 0.05% atropine (SE change, 0.18 D in second year vs. 0.82 D in first year [P < 0.001]; AL elongated 0.15 mm in second year vs. 0.43 mm in first year [P < 0.001]). Accommodation loss and change in pupil size in all concentrations remained similar to the first-year results and were well tolerated. Visual acuity and vision-related quality of life remained unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: Over 2 years, the efficacy of 0.05% atropine observed was double that observed with 0.01% atropine, and it remained the optimal concentration among the studied atropine concentrations in slowing myopia progression.

Association of the CAV1-CAV2 locus with normal-tension glaucoma in Chinese and Japanese.

BACKGROUND: The CAV1-CAV2 locus has been associated with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and intraocular pressure. However, its association with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) was inconclusive. Therefore, we evaluated this association in Chinese and Japanese. METHODS: Two single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs, rs4236601 and rs1052990) from previous genome-wide association studies of POAG were genotyped in a total of 2220 study subjects: a Hong Kong Chinese cohort of 537 NTG patients and 490 controls, a Shantou Chinese cohort of 102 NTG and 731 controls and an Osaka Japanese cohort of 153 NTG and 207 controls. Subgroup analysis by gender was conducted. Outcomes from different cohorts were combined using meta-analysis. RESULTS: SNP rs4236601 was significantly associated with NTG in the two Chinese cohorts (Pmeta = .0019, OR = 4.55, I2 = 0). In contrast, rs4236601 was monomorphic in the Osaka cohort. The association of rs1052990 was insignificant in a meta-analysis combining Chinese and Japanese cohorts (Pmeta = .81, OR = 1.05; I2 = 64%), and the OR tended towards opposite directions between Chinese (OR = 1.26) and Japanese (OR = 0.69). Gender-specific effects of the SNPs were not statistically significant in the logistic regression or Breslow-day tests of ORs (P > .05), although rs4236601 was significant in males (P = .0068; OR = 10.30) but not in females (P = .14; OR = 2.65) in the meta-analysis of Chinese subjects. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we confirmed the association of rs4236601 at the CAV1-CAV2 locus with NTG in Chinese. SNP rs4236601 is monomorphic, and rs1052990 tends towards a different direction in the Japanese cohort. Further studies are warranted to verify the ethnic difference and gender-specific effects of this locus.

Outcomes and complications in scleral-fixated intraocular lens implantations.

PURPOSE: This study compares outcomes and complications of scleral-fixated intraocular lens implantation between 2 levels of surgeons. METHODS: A retrospective case series of patients undergoing scleral-fixated intraocular lens implantation at Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, between May 2012 and April 2017 were reviewed. Data collected included age, gender, affected eye, preoperative and postoperative visual acuities, refractive target and outcome, surgeon profile, operative details including method of scleral fixation, intraoperative and postoperative complications and length of follow-up. RESULTS: Ninety eyes of 90 patients were included for analyses. The mean LogMAR visual acuities were 1.17 ± 0.70 at postoperative week 1, 0.81 ± 0.56 at 1 month, 0.66 ± 0.55 at 3 months, 0.56 ± 0.59 at 6 months, and 0.51 ± 0.60 at 1 year, respectively. After adjusting for age at operation, operative time, axial length, subspecialty of the surgeon and preoperative LogMAR, surgeon seniority was not significantly associated with final visual outcomes. There was no statistically significant difference between the mean improvement in visual acuities between eyes operated by consultants and fellows under direct supervision of a senior surgeon. CONCLUSION: Scleral-fixated intraocular lens implantation is safe and effective in improving visual acuity in aphakic adults without capsular support. Under good supervision, fellows were able to produce comparable results compared with experienced specialists.

Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP) Study: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial of 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% Atropine Eye Drops in Myopia Control.

PURPOSE: Low-concentration atropine is an emerging therapy for myopia progression, but its efficacy and optimal concentration remain uncertain. Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-concentration atropine eye drops at 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% compared with placebo over a 1-year period. DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 438 children aged 4 to 12 years with myopia of at least -1.0 diopter (D) and astigmatism of -2.5 D or less. METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine eye drops, or placebo eye drop, respectively, once nightly to both eyes for 1 year. Cycloplegic refraction, axial length (AL), accommodation amplitude, pupil diameter, and best-corrected visual acuity were measured at baseline, 2 weeks, 4 months, 8 months, and 12 months. Visual Function Questionnaire was administered at the 1-year visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in spherical equivalent (SE) and AL were measured, and their differences among groups were compared using generalized estimating equation. RESULTS: After 1 year, the mean SE change was -0.27±0.61 D, -0.46±0.45 D, -0.59±0.61 D, and -0.81±0.53 D in the 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine groups, and placebo groups, respectively (P < 0.001), with a respective mean increase in AL of 0.20±0.25 mm, 0.29±0.20 mm, 0.36±0.29 mm, and 0.41±0.22 mm (P < 0.001). The accommodation amplitude was reduced by 1.98±2.82 D, 1.61±2.61 D, 0.26±3.04 D, and 0.32±2.91 D, respectively (P < 0.001). The pupil sizes under photopic and mesopic conditions were increased respectively by 1.03±1.02 mm and 0.58±0.63 mm in the 0.05% atropine group, 0.76±0.90 mm and 0.43±0.61 mm in the 0.025% atropine group, 0.49±0.80 mm and 0.23±0.46 mm in the 0.01% atropine group, and 0.13±1.07 mm and 0.02±0.55 mm in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Visual acuity and vision-related quality of life were not affected in each group. CONCLUSIONS: The 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine eye drops reduced myopia progression along a concentration-dependent response. All concentrations were well tolerated without an adverse effect on vision-related quality of life. Of the 3 concentrations used, 0.05% atropine was most effective in controlling SE progression and AL elongation over a period of 1 year.

Identification and characterization of a novel promoter variant in placental growth factor for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: Intronic variants in the placental growth factor (PGF) gene have been associated with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). This study is to discover and characterize rare variants in the PGF gene for neovascular AMD. METHODS: The promoter region, coding sequences and splicing regions of the PGF gene were sequenced in a Hong Kong southern Chinese cohort of 235 neovascular AMD patients and 435 controls. A detected 18 base-pair deletion variant in the promoter region of PGF was analyzed in a Shantou southern Chinese cohort of 189 neovascular AMD patients and 846 controls. The transcription activity of this disease-associated promoter variant was determined in human ARPE-19 cells by promoter-luciferase analysis. RESULTS: A novel 18-base-pair deletion mutation in the promoter region of PGF was identified in 3 (1.28%) patients and 1 (0.23%) control subject (OR = 5.61; 95% CI 0.58-54.26) in the Hong Kong cohort, and in 2 (1.06%) patients and 2 (0.24%) controls (OR = 4.51; 95% CI: 0.63-32.25) in the Shantou cohort. In the combined southern Chinese sample, this deletion had a significant association with neovascular AMD (P = 0.026; OR = 5.08, 95% CI: 1.21-21.36). The 18-base-pair deletion was predicted to alter the transcription factor binding sites in the PGF promoter, and higher luciferase expression was detected in ARPE-19 cells transfected with the deletion variant plasmid than those transfected with wild type plasmid (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a rare, functional promoter variant in the PGF gene that increases PGF transcription activity and confers a 5-fold risk to neovascular AMD.

Association of the SIX6 locus with primary open angle glaucoma in southern Chinese and Japanese.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the association profiles of the SIX6 locus with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in southern Chinese and Japanese. In this study, we tested single marker and haplotype-based associations of 11 tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) covering the SIX6 locus with POAG in a Hong Kong Chinese cohort (N = 1402). A novel SNP (i.e., rs12436579) and two SNPs (i.e., rs33912345 and rs10483727) from previous genome-wide association studies were further tested in a Chinese cohort from Shantou (N = 888) and a Japanese cohort from Osaka (N = 463). Results from the three cohorts were meta-analysed using a random-effect model. We found rs12436579, which has not been previously reported, was associated with POAG in Hong Kong and Shantou Chinese (Pcombined = 4.3 × 10-5, OR = 0.72, I2 = 0). Additionally, we replicated the association of one known SNP, rs33912345 (Pcombined = 0.0061, OR = 0.69, I2 = 45%), with POAG in the Chinese cohorts but not in the Japanese cohort (P > 0.6). Another known SNP, rs10483727, was nominally associated with POAG in the two Chinese cohorts (Pcombined = 0.017, OR = 0.70, I2 = 53%). All these three SNPs were significantly associated with POAG when the three cohorts were combined in meta-analysis (Pcombined<0.005). Furthermore, two haplotypes, C-C (Pcombined = 1.13 × 10-5, OR = 1.41, I2 = 0) and A-A (Pcombined = 0.045, OR = 0.68, I2 = 70%), defined by rs33912345-rs12436579 were associated with POAG in Chinese but not in Japanese. In conclusion, this study confirmed the association between two GWAS SNPs in SIX6 (rs33912345 and rs10483727) and POAG. Also, a SNP, rs12436579, not associated with POAG before, was found to be associated with POAG in Chinese. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the role of this novel SNP in POAG.

Fifteen-year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing 0.02% mitomycin C, limbal conjunctival autograft, and combined mitomycin C with limbal conjunctival autograft in recurrent pterygium surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term outcomes of recurrent pterygium surgery between three different techniques. METHODS: We performed a 15-year follow-up study of a randomized controlled study on surgical management of recurrent pterygium. Group 1 received limbal conjunctival autograft (LCAU); group 2 received intraoperative mitomycin C (MMC) 0.02% for 5 min; and group 3 received combined LCAU + MMC 0.02% for 5 min. Consecutive patients enrolled in the original study (from April 2001 to March 2003) were invited back for a detailed clinical examination to document the long-term outcomes. The main outcome measures included the recurrence rate, residual conjunctival bed status, and complications from any of the surgical methods. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were recruited in the original study. Eight patients had passed away and 12 patients were uncontactable or not responded. One patient who had bilateral operations refused to return for follow-up and one eye had insufficient data for analysis. Finally, 40 eyes of 40 patients were included for analyses. One eye developed a recurrence over 15 years and none required a tertiary pterygium operation. The patient received LCAU for a temporal recurrent pterygium developed a 2.2-mm recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: All three techniques yielded favorable outcomes for patients with recurrent pterygium. The use of LCAU was associated with better cosmetic outcome.