Clinical heterogeneity and prognostic factors of anti-synthetase syndrome: a multi-centered retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS) patients have heterogeneous clinical manifestations with different initial presentations, complications, and outcomes. This study aimed to assess the clinical characteristics and complications in patients with ASyS, and to identify factors that were associated with the survival of ASyS patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicentre longitudinal study. Patients fulfilling either the Connor's criteria or Solomon's criteria for ASyS were recruited. Electronic health records were reviewed until October 2022. Multivariate Cox-regression analysis was used to determine the independent prognostic factors. Auto-antibodies were checked by commercial immunoassays. RESULTS: A total of 205 patients (anti-Jo-1 49.3%, anti-PL-7 19.0%, anti-EJ 11.2%, anti-PL-12 10.2% and anti-OJ 3.4%) were included. The median follow-up time was 4 years. The time from symptoms onset to diagnosis was significantly longer for non-anti-Jo1 patients (median 5 vs 3 months). Common initial presentations included myositis (56.1%), arthritis (54.6%), and interstitial lung disease (ILD) (54.1%). Patients with anti-Jo-1 had significantly higher muscle enzyme levels and more arthritis. All patients with anti-EJ would develop ILD on follow-up and malignancy was noted in 28.6% of the anti-OJ positive patients. 15.6% of the patients died and pulmonary diseases (ILD or pneumonia) were the major causes. Age at diagnosis, malignancy and rapidly progressive-ILD were independently associated with mortality, while joint manifestation was a protective factor. CONCLUSION: In view of the heterogeneity of clinical presentation of ASyS, high index of suspicion and early checking of specific autoantibodies might help prompt diagnosis of ASyS and detection of related complications.

EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus enteral stent placement for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

BACKGROUND: EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a novel procedure for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO); however, data comparing EUS-GE to enteral stent placement are limited. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes between EUS-GE and enteral stent placement in the palliation of malignant GOO. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database on patients who underwent EUS-GE or enteral stent placement for palliation of malignant GOO from 2014 to 2017 was conducted. Primary outcome was the rate of stent failure requiring repeat intervention. Secondary outcomes included technical and clinical success, time to repeat intervention, length of hospital stay, and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 100 consecutive patients (mean age 65.9 ± 11.9 years, 44.0% female) were identified, of which 78 underwent enteral stent placement, and 22 underwent EUS-GE. Rate of stent failure requiring repeat intervention was higher in the enteral stent group than the EUS-GE group (32.0% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.021). Technical success was achieved in 100% in both groups. Higher initial clinical success was attained in the EUS-GE group than the enteral stent group (95.8% vs. 76.3%, p = 0.042). Mean length of hospital stay following stent placement was similar between groups (p = 0.821). The enteral stent group trended towards increased adverse events (40.2% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.098). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed decreased stent function in the enteral stent group (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Compared to enteral stent placement, EUS-GE has a higher rate of initial clinical success and lower rate of stent failure requiring repeat intervention. EUS-GE may be offered for selected patients with malignant GOO in centers with extensive experience.

A brief psychoeducational intervention improves memory contentment in breast cancer survivors with cognitive concerns: results of a single-arm prospective study.

PURPOSE: One in three breast cancer survivors experiences persistent cognitive changes that can negatively impact daily functioning and quality of life. In our cancer center, the largest tertiary cancer center in Canada, patients with self-reported cancer-related cognitive dysfunction (CRCD) are offered psychoeducation intended to reduce distress about CRCD symptoms and improve everyday cognitive performance, but evidence regarding this intervention's impact is lacking. Here, we assess whether a 1-hour (h), individual psychoeducational intervention designed to promote self-management of CRCD symptoms can improve attitudes and coping with memory-related difficulties in women with breast cancer. METHODS: Breast cancer survivors with self-reported CRCD (N = 100) were assessed immediately before, immediately after, and 6 weeks following the intervention. Participants' memory contentment, knowledge of CRCD, symptom distress, and self-efficacy to cope with symptoms were measured. RESULTS: Participants showed improvements in memory contentment immediately after the intervention (Cohen's d effect size and 95% CI = 0.87 [0.58, 1.16]) and 6 weeks later (d = 0.77 [0.48, 1.05]). Significant improvements in secondary study outcomes, including knowledge of CRCD (d = 1.32 [1.01, 1.63]), symptom distress (d = - 0.82 [- 1.11, - 0.53]), and self-efficacy to cope with cognitive symptoms (d = 1.45 [1.14, 1.76]), were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: A single, 1-hour psychoeducational intervention can achieve lasting and improved adjustment to memory symptoms in breast cancer survivors with self-reported CRCD. Further investigation using a randomized controlled study design is warranted. Comparisons with previously reported psychoeducational interventions for CRCD are made, and next steps for this research are discussed.

Investigating student perceptions at an interprofessional student-run free clinic serving marginalised populations.

Many health profession schools have student-run free clinics (SRFCs), but their educational relevance has not been well studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the learning experiences and skills developed among interprofessional healthcare students at an SRFC serving marginalised populations, in order to provide data for ongoing programme improvement and recommendations for other SRFCs based on lessons learned. Under 1:1 supervision with a preceptor, interprofessional students completed three clinical shifts at an SRFC and attended a reflection session. A total of 101 out of 105 participants answered semi-structured pre- and post-programme surveys (response rate: 96%). Descriptive statistics and descriptive thematic analyses were used for quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. Numerous skills derived from learning objectives common to many healthcare professions were addressed while participating at the SRFC. Valued programme elements included working with and learning about inner city populations in an interprofessional care model. Interprofessional SRFCs encourage student learning about resources for inner city populations and interprofessional collaboration while providing an opportunity to develop skills related to the formal curriculum. This may provide a workable strategy to address an interprofessional education gap in the healthcare professional curriculum.

Information Needs of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgical Oncology Patients.

A marked knowledge gap exists concerning the information needs of hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgical oncology patients. We investigated the comprehensive information needs of this patient population, including the type and amount of information desired, as well as the preferred method of receiving information. A questionnaire was administered to patients being treated surgically for cancers of the liver, pancreas, gallbladder, or bile ducts at Toronto General Hospital, part of the University Health Network, in Toronto, Canada. The questionnaire examined patients' information needs across six domains of information: medical, practical, physical, emotional, social, and spiritual. Among 36 respondents, the importance of information and amount of information desired differed significantly by domain (both p < 0.001). This group of patients rated information in the medical and physical domains as most important, though they also desired specific items of information from the emotional, practical, and social domains. Patients' overwhelming preference was to receive information via a one-on-one consultation with a healthcare provider. It is important for healthcare providers working with HPB surgical oncology patients to be comprehensive when providing information related to patients' cancer diagnosis, prognosis, associated symptoms, and side effects of treatment. Certain emotional, practical, and social issues (e.g., fears of cancer recurrence, drug coverage options, relationship changes) should be addressed as well. Face-to-face interactions should be the primary mode of delivering information to patients. Our findings are being used to guide the training of healthcare providers and the development of educational resources specific to HPB surgical oncology patients.

Investigating Patient and Physician Delays in the Diagnosis of Head and Neck Cancers: a Canadian Perspective.

Diagnostic delays for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients are common. Patients often disregard symptoms for long periods before seeking help, and some family physicians may not be alert to the warning symptoms and signs of HNCs. This study evaluated the factors associated with length of delays in the diagnosis of HNCs in a Canadian population. This was a mixed-method study consisting of patient interviews and surveys in an academic health center. A questionnaire requesting demographic and disease information was completed by HNC patients followed by a 30 min semi-structured interview in a private setting. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, anonymized, and descriptively coded for emergent themes. Twenty-eight head and neck cancer patients participated in the study. More patients experienced physician delay (71 %) than patient delay (36 %). The median physician delay and patient delay were 108 and 31 days, respectively. Two main themes regarding these delays were (1) physician lack of knowledge and (2) lack of patient awareness. Results indicate that physician delay needs to be focused on compared to patient delay, as it is more common and has longer delays. More comprehensive training in head and neck clinical examination skills during undergraduate and residency training is recommended to reduce physician delay. Patient delay could be targeted by public education programs via both physicians and dentists.

Leading Nursing Into the Future: Development of a Strategic Nursing Platform on a System Level.

Leading and orchestrating the mission-essential work of 47 diverse hospitals toward a common vision with a supporting strategy is a challenge for any health care system. Trinity Health embraced this challenge while reorganizing the pivotal role of nursing in designing the future of health care delivery. This article outlines the roadmap utilized to create a common nursing platform to drive strategy aligned to future viability, strength, and growth across a system.

Investigating coping strategies and social support among Canadian melanoma patients: A survey approach.

Complex support needs are involved in coping with a diagnosis of melanoma. The purpose of this study was to determine the perceived social support levels and utilization of adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies by Canadian melanoma patients. The impact of social support level on coping strategy utilization was also examined. Social support and coping strategies were assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS) and the 28-item Brief COPE, respectively. Perceived levels of emotional/informational support were significantly lower than affectionate support and positive social interaction. Acceptance, active coping, and use of emotional support were the most frequently utilized coping strategies. Patients with higher perceived levels of social support had significantly higher adaptive coping scores than patients with lower levels of social support. Health care professionals have an important role in promoting awareness of and access to emotional and informational support resources in order to improve perceived social support levels.

Primary Care Perspectives on Education Scholarship: A Qualitative Synthesis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A significant portion of medical education takes place in primary care settings with family medicine clinician teachers that have variable backgrounds in teaching. Ernest Boyer's concept of education scholarship calls on faculty to systematically study and innovate their teaching practices. This meta-ethnographic review synthesizes the literature on primary care clinician teachers' perspectives and experiences of integrating education scholarship in practice. METHODS: We conducted an electronic database search in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, ERIC, and Web of Science for primary research articles published between January 2000 and August 2021. In the included articles, researchers studied primary care physicians' and/or residents' perspectives of clinical teaching and reported qualitative results (eg, interviews, focus groups). Of the 1,454 articles found in the search, we included 33 in the final synthesis. We used line-by-line descriptive coding of the qualitative data to develop analytical themes. RESULTS: Four main themes emerged from our synthesis: (1) perceptions of clinical teaching (lack of confidence, presumed teaching competency, lack of formal recognition); (2) clinical teaching strategies (learner-centered teaching, ad hoc teaching, role modeling, mentorship); (3) benefits of clinical teaching (shared learning experience, networking, personal interest, career satisfaction); and (4) challenges of clinical teaching (inadequate time, compensation, conflicting responsibilities). CONCLUSIONS: Clinician teachers identified several common factors regarding their scholarly roles but had difficulty describing them in relation to education scholarship. Institutional support, resources, and awareness are needed to assist family medicine clinician teachers to further implement Boyer's concept of education scholarship in practice-specifically, to study, evaluate, and innovate current clinical teaching strategies.

Gaming the System? A Qualitative Exploration of Physician Assistant Learner Perceptions of Virtual Patient Education.

INTRODUCTION: Virtual patients (VPs) are increasingly used in health professions education. How learners engage with VPs and the relationship between engagement and authenticity is not well understood. We explored learners' perceptions of VP education to gain an understanding of the characteristics promoting meaningful engagement in learning, including perceived authenticity. METHODS: Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, we conducted interviews and focus groups with 11 students from 2 Canadian Physician Assistant programs, where VP learning was implemented to supplement clinical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. We explored trainee perspectives on the use of VPs as an educational modality. Data were iteratively collected and descriptively analyzed thematically using a constant comparison approach until theoretical sufficiency was reached. RESULTS: We identified 3 groups of factors influencing these students' VP learning experiences: (1) technical factors related to the VP platform influenced the perceived authenticity of the patient interactions; (2) individual factors of learners' attitudes influenced their engagement and motivation; and (3) contextual factors related to the learning environment influenced the acceptability and perceived value of the learning experience. Overall, the psychological authenticity of the learning platform and students' motivation for self-directed learning were perceived as most important for students' learning experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing VP learning as a supplement to clinical education should be done with consideration of factors that enhance the psychological authenticity of the learning platform, promote learner engagement and accountability, and encourage acceptability of the learning modality through curricular placement and messaging.

Residency spiral concussion curriculum design.

BACKGROUND: Resident-focused concussion curricula that measure learner behaviours are currently unavailable. We sought to fill this gap by developing and iteratively implementing a Spiral Integrated Concussion Curriculum (SICC). APPROACH: Programme elements of the concussion curriculum include academic half-days (AHDs) and three half-day clinics for first- and second-year family medicine residents. Our SICC utilises social cognitive learning principles, the constructivism paradigm and utilisation-focused evaluation. EVALUATION: A mixed-method evaluation with a pre-/post-test design and interviews was utilised. Surveys and knowledge tests were used to measure knowledge and confidence pre-AHD and 6 months post-AHD. Interviews at 6 months explored programme perception and behaviour change. Of the 141 programme attendees, 114 (80%) participated in the pre-intervention knowledge test and 33 completed the pre- and post-AHD test. Immediate pre-/post-testing demonstrated statistically significant improvement in knowledge (p = 0.042). At 6 months post-AHD, residents in Cycle 1 (n = 5) had a knowledge decrease of 3.33% (p > 0.05). Residents in Cycle 2 (n = 7) had a knowledge increase of 11.6% (p > 0.05). Both cycles of residents had an increase in confidence (Cycle 1: 65.0% [p = 0.025]; Cycle 2: 62.8% [p = 0.0014]). Residents (5 out of 6) reported positive behavioural changes at 6 months. Valued programme elements included concussion diagnosis and management, the self-study guide resource and the organised structure. IMPLICATIONS: The SICC enriched these residents' learning and fostered sustained knowledge improvement and behavioural change at 6 months post-intervention. This approach may provide a workable design for future competency-based curriculum development.

Generation of anti-Notch antibodies and their application in blocking Notch signalling in neural stem cells.

Notch signalling occurs via direct cell-cell interactions and plays an important role in linking the fates of neighbouring cells. There are four different mammalian Notch receptors that can be activated by five cell surface ligands. The ability to inhibit specific Notch receptors would help identify the roles of individual family members and potentially provide a means to study and control cell differentiation. Anti-Notch antibodies in the form of single chain Fvs were generated from an antibody phage display library by selection on either the ligand binding domain or the negative regulatory region (NRR) of Notch1 and Notch2. Six antibodies targeting the NRR of Notch1 and four antibodies recognising the NRR of Notch2 were found to prevent receptor activation in cell-based luciferase reporter assays. These antibodies were potent, highly specific inhibitors of individual Notch receptors and interfered with endogenous signalling in stem cell systems of both human and mouse origin. Antibody-mediated inhibition of Notch efficiently down-regulated transcription of the immediate Notch target gene hairy and enhancer of split 5 (Hes5) in both mouse and human neural stem cells and revealed a redundant regulation of Hes5 in these cells as complete down-regulation was seen only after simultaneous blocking of Notch1 and Notch2. In addition, these antibodies promoted differentiation of neural stem cells towards a neuronal fate. In contrast to the widely used small molecule γ-secretase inhibitors, which block all 4 Notch receptors (and a multitude of other signalling pathways), antibodies allow blockade of individual Notch family members in a highly specific way. Specific inhibition will allow examination of the effect of individual Notch receptors in complex differentiation schemes regulated by the co-ordinated action of multiple signalling pathways.

Investigating the experiences of medical students quarantined due to COVID-19 exposure.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted medical education systems worldwide. Between March 2020 and December 2021, 111 MD students at the University of Toronto completed two-week quarantines due to hospital or community exposures and experienced disrupted clinical instruction. We explored the experiences, barriers, and supports of these quarantined medical students to identify program development opportunities and improve student supports. Methods: We used a qualitative descriptive approach to explore experiences of clerkship students quarantined due to COVID-19 exposure. Methods included an online survey with open-ended questions and an audio-recorded interview. We analysed the demographic survey responses using descriptive statistics. Subsequently, we conducted descriptive thematic analysis of the narrative survey responses and transcribed interview recordings. Results: Concerns reported in surveys (n = 23, response rate 20.7%) and interviews (n = 5) included themes of illness uncertainty, racial tensions, confidentiality of COVID-19 status, unclear academic expectations, and financial burden. Supports included friends, family, and MD program administration. Recommendations related to communication, administration, equity considerations, supports, confidentiality/privacy, and academics. Conclusion: Supporting student wellbeing and learning is at the core of medical training. Enhanced understanding of health profession trainee needs during COVID can improve institutional supportive responses to students routinely and during times of crisis.

Contexte: La pandémie de la COVID-19 a eu des répercussions importantes sur les systèmes d'éducation médicale dans le monde entier. Entre mars 2020 et décembre 2021, 111 étudiants en médecine de l'Université de Toronto ont été contraints à l'auto-isolement pour une période de deux semaines après une exposition au virus à l'hôpital ou dans la collectivité, voyant du même coup leur apprentissage clinique perturbé. Nous avons exploré les expériences, les obstacles et les types de soutien que ces étudiants ont eus alors qu'ils étaient en quarantaine pour en tirer des leçons afin d'améliorer notre programme et de mieux soutenir nos étudiants. Méthodes: Nous avons utilisé une approche qualitative descriptive pour explorer le vécu des étudiants à l'externat mis en quarantaine en raison d'une exposition à la COVID-19. Les méthodes comprenaient une enquête en ligne avec des questions ouvertes et une interview enregistrée. Nous avons analysé les données démographiques à l'aide de méthodes statistiques descriptives. Par la suite, nous avons effectué une analyse thématique descriptive des réponses narratives à l'enquête en ligne et des transcriptions des entretiens. Résultats: Les préoccupations signalées dans les réponses à l'enquête en ligne (n=23, taux de réponse de 20,7 %) et les entretiens (n=5) touchaient à l'incertitude face à la maladie, aux tensions raciales, à la confidentialité du fait d'avoir été infecté , au manque de clarté quant aux attentes académiques, et au fardeau financier. Les sources de soutien citées comprenaient les amis, la famille et l'administration du programme d'études. Les recommandations concernaient la communication, l'administration, les considérations d'équité, le soutien, la confidentialité et les études. Conclusion: Le soutien au bien-être et à l'apprentissage des étudiants est au cœur de la formation médicale. Une meilleure compréhension des besoins des stagiaires des professions de la santé à l'occasion d'une infection par la COVID-19 peut améliorer le soutien institutionnel qui leur est offert en temps normal et en temps de crise.

The Companion Curriculum: medical students' perceptions of the integration of humanities within medical education.

Background: The contributions of arts and humanities to medical education are known in the medical education community, but medical schools' offerings vary. The Companion Curriculum (CC) is a student-curated set of optional humanities content for medical students at the University of Toronto. This study evaluates integration of the CC to identify key enabling conditions for medical humanities engagement. Methods: A mixed-methods evaluation gauged usage and perceptions of integration of the CC among medical students using an online survey and focus groups. Narrative data underwent thematic analysis, supported by summary statistics of quantitative data. Results: Half of survey respondents were aware of the CC (n = 67/130; 52%), and, once prompted with a description, 14% had discussed it in their tutorial groups. Of students using the CC, 80% reported learning something new regarding their roles as communicators and health advocates. Themes were the perceived value of the humanities, internal student barriers, institutional neglect of the humanities, and student critiques and recommendations. Conclusion: Despite participants' interest in medical humanities, our CC remains underused. To improve humanities' visibility in the MD curriculum, our results indicate that greater institutional support, including faculty development and early curricular integration, is required. Further study should explore reasons for gaps between interest and participation.

Contexte: L'apport des arts et des sciences humaines à la formation médicale est bien connu du milieu de l'enseignement médical, mais l'offre des programmes à cet égard varie d'une faculté à l'autre. Le Companion curriculum (CC) est un recueil de contenu facultatif en sciences humaines, préparé par des étudiants et destiné aux étudiants en médecine de l'Université de Toronto. En évaluant l'intégration du CC au programme de formation, cette étude vise à dégager les principales conditions propices à un engagement en faveur des humanités médicales. Méthodes: Une évaluation à méthodes mixtes, à l'aide d'un sondage en ligne et de groupes de discussion, a permis de mesurer l'utilisation du CC par les étudiants en médecine et leur perception quant à l'intégration de cet outil. Les données narratives ont fait l'objet d'une analyse thématique, étayée par des statistiques sommaires de données quantitatives. Résultats: La moitié des répondants au sondage connaissaient le CC (n=67/130 ; 52%) et, une fois qu'on le leur a décrit, 14 % en avaient discuté dans leurs groupes de tutorat. Parmi les étudiants qui l'avaient utilisé, 80 % ont déclaré avoir appris quelque chose de nouveau concernant leurs rôles de communicateur et de promoteur de la santé. Les thèmes abordés étaient la valeur perçue des sciences humaines, les réserves des étudiants, le manque d'intérêt envers les sciences humaines au sein des établissements d'enseignement médical, ainsi que les critiques et les recommandations formulées par les étudiants. Conclusion: Malgré l'intérêt des participants pour les humanités médicales, notre CC demeure sous-utilisé. Nos résultats indiquent que le renforcement de la visibilité des sciences humaines dans le programme d'études médicales nécessite plus de soutien de la part des établissements, y compris par une formation des enseignants et par l'intégration des sciences humaines tôt dans le cursus du programme. Une étude plus approfondie permettrait d'explorer les raisons de l'écart entre l'intérêt et la participation.

Educating future physicians for francophone official language minority communities in Canada: a case study.

Background: Over one million Francophone Canadians live in official language minority communities (OLMC) outside of Québec. Availability and accessibility of linguistically appropriate care to these OLMCs is lacking, resulting in poorer quality of care. To help address this health equity gap, the FrancoDoc program was created in 2015 to identify Francophone/Francophile medical students enrolled at medical faculties that use English as their primary language of instruction and equip them with skills to increase their medical French abilities. Little is known, however, about the affordances and limitations of this educational endeavour. Methods: Our qualitative instrumental single case study explored participants' experiences with FrancoDoc, while also examining factors shaping the delivery of linguistically appropriate healthcare services to OLMCs. We conducted semi-structured interviews with medical students from across Canada and thematically analyzed these using a reflexive, inductive approach. Results: Four main themes were derived from 12 interviews: factors facilitating French language learning; barriers to French language learning; contextual factors shaping linguistically appropriate healthcare provision; and recommendations to improve healthcare education to better prepare learners to provide care to OLMCs. Conclusions: Medical student participants are highly motivated to engage in educational activities linked to FrancoDoc. Their efforts are nonetheless frequently impeded by barriers such as time constraints, irregular event programming, lack of regular clinical learning opportunities, and lukewarm support from faculties of medicine. If medical faculties are to realize their obligations to the OLMCs that they serve, recognition of language as a specific social determinant of health and more robust institutional supports for initiatives like FrancoDoc are paramount.

Contexte: Plus d'un million de Canadiens francophones vivent dans des communautés de langue officielle en situation minoritaire (CLOSM) hors Québec. L'accessibilité de soins linguistiquement appropriés aux CLOSM est limitée. Par conséquent, la qualité des services qui leur sont offerts en souffre. Le programme FrancoDoc a été créé en 2015 pour aider à combler cette lacune sur le plan de l'équité en matière de santé. Il vise à offrir aux étudiants en médecine francophones ou francophiles dont l'anglais est la principale langue d'enseignement les moyens d'améliorer leurs compétences en français médical. Cependant, on sait peu de choses sur les possibilités et les limites de cette initiative éducative. Méthodes: Notre étude qualitative instrumentale de cas unique a exploré les expériences des participants au programme FrancoDoc, tout en examinant les facteurs qui influencent la prestation de services de santé linguistiquement appropriés aux CLOSM. Nous avons mené des entrevues semi-structurées avec des étudiants en médecine de tout le Canada et nous en avons analysé le contenu thématiquement en utilisant une approche réflexive et inductive. Résultats: Quatre thèmes principaux ont été dégagés des 12 entrevues réalisées : les facteurs facilitant l'apprentissage du français; les obstacles à l'apprentissage du français; les facteurs contextuels influençant la prestation de soins de santé linguistiquement appropriés; et les recommandations visant à améliorer l'enseignement en soins de santé de manière à préparer les apprenants à servir les CLOSM. Conclusions: Bien que très motivés par le programme FrancoDoc, les étudiants participants se heurtent à des obstacles comme les contraintes de temps, la programmation irrégulière des activités, le manque d'occasions d'apprentissage clinique régulier et la réticence des facultés de médecine. Or, pour remplir leurs obligations envers les CLOSM qu'elles servent, il est essentiel que les facultés de médecine reconnaissent la langue comme un déterminant social spécifique de la santé et qu'elles offrent un soutien solide aux initiatives comme le programme FrancoDoc.

Teaching spirituality to Canadian medical students: students' perceptions of a spiritual history taking clinical skills session.

Spirituality involves one's sense of purpose, connection with others, and ability to find meaning in life. We implemented a three-year pilot of a spiritual history taking (SHT) clinical skills session. In small groups, medical students discussed and practiced SHT with clinical scenarios and the FICA framework and received preceptor and peer feedback. Post-session focus groups and interviews demonstrated student perceptions of improved comfort, knowledge, and awareness of discussing spirituality with patients. This innovation may support improved clinical skills teaching across other health professions institutions to better prepare students to recognize patients' spiritual needs and provide more holistic, culturally competent care.

La spiritualité touche au sentiment d'avoir une raison d'être, à la relation à l'autre et à la capacité de trouver un sens à la vie1. Nous avons mis en place, comme projet pilote de trois ans, une séance visant l'acquisition de compétences cliniques portant sur l'anamnèse spirituelle (AS). En petits groupes, les étudiants discutaient de l'anamnèse spirituelle et la mettaient en pratique au moyen de scénarios cliniques et du questionnaire d'anamnèse spirituelle FICA2, puis recevaient des commentaires de la part de leur précepteur et de leurs pairs. Les groupes de discussion et les entretiens après les séances ont montré que les étudiants se sentaient mieux informés, plus à l'aise et plus conscients de la nécessité de parler de spiritualité avec les patients. Cette innovation peut contribuer à améliorer l'enseignement des compétences cliniques dans d'autres professions de la santé pour mieux préparer les étudiants à reconnaître les besoins spirituels des patients et à fournir des soins plus holistiques et culturellement adaptés.

Exploring the Barriers and Facilitators Experienced by Palliative Health Care Providers Working with Patients Experiencing Homelessness during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: Patients experiencing homelessness not only have higher rates of medical complexity, comorbidity, and mortality, but also face barriers to accessing palliative care services. In structurally vulnerable populations with palliative care needs, these barriers are compounded, creating significant challenges for both patients and providers that have important health equity implications. Objective: The aim is to explore the experiences of palliative care providers working with patients experiencing homelessness during the COVID-19 pandemic and understand the barriers they faced in providing care, as well as facilitators that aided in the success of their teams. Methods: Seven health care providers from two Canadian palliative outreach teams involved in delivering palliative care services to patients experiencing homelessness during the COVID-19 pandemic participated in audio-recorded and transcribed videoconferencing interviews. Analysis was completed using generic descriptive thematic analysis. Results: Five key themes were identified: (1) factors negatively impacting patient health, (2) use of technology, (3) care provider emotions, (4) care provider education and advocacy, and (5) outreach team factors. Conclusion: Identified barriers during the pandemic included worsening of existing patient vulnerabilities, as well as challenges incorporating technology into care. Providers faced increased emotional burden, with a rise in workload, stress, fear, and grief. However, several facilitators allowed teams to provide high-quality care to this vulnerable population, including team support, interprofessional collaboration, and advocacy and education initiatives. The outreach model also proved to be a highly flexible, resilient, and adaptable model for providing care during the COVID-19 pandemic.